1
|
Gastine S, Morse JD, Leung MT, Wong ICK, Howard RF, Harrop E, Liossi C, Standing JF, Jassal SS, Hain RD, Skene S, Oulton K, Law SL, Quek WT, Anderson BJ. Diamorphine pharmacokinetics and conversion factor estimates for intranasal diamorphine in paediatric breakthrough pain:systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 13:e485-e493. [PMID: 35184039 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intranasal diamorphine is a potential treatment for breakthrough pain but few paediatric data are available to assist dose estimation. AIM To determine an intranasal diamorphine dose in children through an understanding of pharmacokinetics. DESIGN A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to seek diamorphine pharmacokinetic parameters in neonates, children and adults. Parenteral and enteral diamorphine bioavailability were reviewed with respect to formation of the major metabolite, morphine. Clinical data quantifying equianalgesic effects of diamorphine and morphine were reviewed. REVIEW SOURCES PubMed (1960-2020); EMBASE (1980-2020); IPA (1973-2020) and original human research studies that reported diacetylmorphine and metabolite after any dose or route of administration. RESULTS The systematic review identified 19 studies: 16 in adults and 1 in children and 2 neonatal reports. Details of study participants were extracted. Age ranged from premature neonates to 67 years and weight 1.4-88 kg. Intranasal diamorphine bioavailability was predicted as 50%. The equianalgesic intravenous conversion ratio of morphine:diamorphine was 2:1. There was heterogeneity between pharmacokinetic parameter estimates attributed to routes of administration, lack of size standardisation, methodology and pharmacokinetic analysis. Estimates of the pharmacokinetic parameters clearance and volume of distribution were reduced in neonates. There were insufficient paediatric data to characterise clearance or volume maturation of either diamorphine or its metabolites. CONCLUSIONS We estimate equianalgesic ratios of intravenous morphine:diamorphine 2:1, intravenous morphine:intranasal diamorphine 1:1 and oral morphine:intranasal diamorphine of 1:3. These ratios are based on adult literature, but are reasonable for deciding on an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg in children 4-13 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gastine
- Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - James D Morse
- Department of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Miriam Ty Leung
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ian Chi Kei Wong
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, UK
| | - Richard F Howard
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Christina Liossi
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Immunity and Inflammation, University College London, London, UK
| | - Satbir Singh Jassal
- Palliative Care, Rainbows Hospice for Children and Young Adults, Loughborough, UK
| | - Richard D Hain
- All-Wales Managed Clinical Network in Paediatric Palliative Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Simon Skene
- Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences, Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Kate Oulton
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Siew L Law
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, UK
| | - Wan T Quek
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, UK
| | - Brian J Anderson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
SUMMARY The management of pain in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is essential. Whilst the field of pain management has developed over the years, much of what is done in PPC is based on anecdotal evidence or adult studies. This review explores recent developments in pain management in PPC, in particular the WHO guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of persisting pain in children with medical illnesses. Key issues discussed include the definition, assessment, pharmacological and integrative management of pain, availability of medications, education and research. Whilst advances have been made, including publication of the guidelines, significant gaps exist in terms of the evidence base, education and access to essential medications and both interdisciplinary and international collaboration are required to meet these gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Downing
- International Children's Palliative Care Network & Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Lulu Mathews
- Department of Pediatrics, Calicut Medical College & Institute of Palliative Medicine, Calicut, India
| | - Hanneke Brits
- Department of Family Medicine, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Stefan J Friedrichsdorf
- University of Minnesota Medical School & Department of Pain Medicine, Palliative Care & Integrative Medicine, Children's Hospitals & Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|