1
|
van Delft LCJ, Essers BAB, Nelemans PJ, Mosterd K, van Winden MEC, Romaen IFL, Retra SJJ, Arits AHMM, Steijlen PM, Lubeek SFK, Kelleners-Smeets NWJ. Effectiveness of a patient decision aid for patients with superficial basal cell carcinoma: A pre- and post-implementation study. Patient Educ Couns 2023; 115:107907. [PMID: 37487347 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluates whether using a patient decision aid (PDA) for patients with superficial basal-cell carcinoma (sBCC) results in a decreased decisional conflict level and increased knowledge. METHODS In a prospective multicentre study, patient groups were included before and after implementation of a PDA. Decisional conflict levels were compared directly after making the treatment decision, measured once as the mean score on the decisional conflict scale (DCS). Higher scores correspond with higher conflict levels (0-100). Secondary outcomes were knowledge on treatment options, recognizing a BCC, and risk factors for developing a BCC measured on an adapted version of a validated knowledge questionnaire for melanoma patients, and patient satisfaction with the PDA. RESULTS Data was available for 103 patients in the control-group and 109 in the PDA-group. The mean DCS score in the control-group was 22.78 (SD 14.76) compared to 22.34 (SD 14.54) in the PDA-group; the decrease was non-significant (p = 0.828). The average percentage correct answers on the knowledge questionnaire increased from 76.5% in the control-group to 80.5% in the PDA-group (p = 0.044). According to the majority of patients in the PDA-group (73.7%) the PDA had added value. CONCLUSION Using the PDA had no significant effect on decisional conflict levels, but increased overall knowledge on relevant issues concerning sBCC. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The PDA can be used as an informational tool by patients with sBCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke C J van Delft
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
| | - Brigitte A B Essers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Patty J Nelemans
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Klara Mosterd
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ine F L Romaen
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Sean J J Retra
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Aimee H M M Arits
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Dermatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Peter M Steijlen
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Satish F K Lubeek
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bogie RMM, Winkens B, Retra SJJ, le Clercq CMC, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJA, Chang LC, de Ridder R, Hoge C, Straathof JW, Goudkade D, Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S, Masclee AAM. Metachronous neoplasms in patients with laterally spreading tumours during surveillance. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9:378-387. [PMID: 33245025 PMCID: PMC8259420 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620965317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Laterally spreading tumours represent a major challenge for endoscopic detection and resection. Objective To examine synchronous and metachronous neoplasms in patients with laterally spreading tumours. Methods We prospectively collected colonoscopy and histopathology data from patients who underwent colonoscopy in our centre at up to 6 years' follow‐up. Post‐resection surveillance outcomes between laterally spreading tumours, flat colorectal neoplasms 10 mm or greater, and large polypoid colorectal neoplasms, polypoid colorectal neoplasms 10 mm or greater, were compared. Results Between 2008 and 2012, 8120 patients underwent colonoscopy for symptoms (84.6%), screening (6.7%) or surveillance (8.7%). At baseline, 151 patients had adenomatous laterally spreading tumours and 566 patients had adenomatous large polypoid colorectal neoplasms. Laterally spreading tumour patients had more synchronous colorectal neoplasms than large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients (mean 3.34 vs. 2.34, p < 0.001). Laterally spreading tumour patients significantly more often developed metachronous colorectal neoplasms (71.6% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.0498) and colorectal neoplasms with high grade dysplasia/submucosal invasion than large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients (36.4% vs. 15.8%, p < 0.001). After correction for age and gender, laterally spreading tumour patients were more likely than large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients to develop a colorectal neoplasm with high grade dysplasia or submucosal invasion (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.8–4.6). The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer was not significantly different in laterally spreading tumours compared to large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients. Conclusion Patients with laterally spreading tumours developed more metachronous colorectal neoplasms with high grade dysplasia/submucosal invasion than large polypoid colorectal neoplasm patients. Based on these findings endoscopic treatment and surveillance recommendations for patients with laterally spreading tumours should be optimised.
Summarize the established knowledge on this subject
Laterally spreading tumours (LSTs) are a heterogeneous group of large, predominantly benign flat neoplasms that can be endoscopically treated, requiring additional time and expertise LSTs consist of different endoscopic subtypes which are predictive of the risk of submucosal invasion (SMI) Patients with LSTs harbour more synchronous neoplasms than patients with large polypoid colorectal neoplasms (LP‐CRNs)
What are the significant and/or new findings of this study?
Patients with LSTs more frequently have metachronous neoplasms than patients with LP‐CRNs, justifying strict surveillance LSTs can be effectively managed by conventional endoscopic resections in most cases
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roel M M Bogie
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sean J J Retra
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Chantal M C le Clercq
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle W Bouwens
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline J A Rondagh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Li-Chun Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Rogier de Ridder
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Chantal Hoge
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem Straathof
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Danny Goudkade
- Department of Pathology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia Sanduleanu-Dascalescu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ad A M Masclee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|