Brain hypometabolism in non-demented microtubule-associated protein tau H1 carriers with Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) H1 homozygosity (H1/H1 haplotype) is a genetic risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's disease (PD). MAPT H1 homozygosity has been associated with conversion to PD; however, results are conflicting since some studies did not find a strong influence. Cortical hypometabolism is associated with cognitive impairment in PD. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the metabolic pattern in nondemented PD patients MAPT H1/H1 carriers in comparison with MAPT H1/H2 haplotype. In addition, we evaluated domain-specific cognitive differences according to MAPT haplotype.

METHODS

We compared a group of 26 H1/H1 and 20 H1/H2 carriers with late-onset PD. Participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological cognitive evaluation and a [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET-MR scan.

RESULTS

MAPT H1/H1 carriers showed worse performance in the digit span forward test of attention compared to MAPT H1/H2 carriers. In the [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET comparisons, MAPT H1/H1 displayed hypometabolism in the frontal cortex, parahippocampal, and cingulate gyrus, as well as in the caudate and globus pallidus.

CONCLUSION

PD patients MAPT H1/H1 carriers without dementia exhibit relative hypometabolism in several cortical areas as well as in the basal ganglia, and worse performance in attention than MAPT H1/H2 carriers. Longitudinal studies should assess if lower scores in attention and dysfunction in these areas are predictors of dementia in MAPT H1/H1 homozygotes.

Effects of storage conditions on the stability of blood-based markers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is considered the most common cause of dementia in older people. Recently, blood-based markers (BBM) Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and phospho Tau181 (p-Tau181) have demonstrated the potential to transform the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of AD. Our aim was to investigate the effect of different storage conditions on the quantification of these BBM and to evaluate the interchangeability of plasma and serum samples.

METHODS

Forty-two individuals with some degree of cognitive impairment were studied. Thirty further patients were retrospectively selected. Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and p-Tau181 were quantified using the LUMIPULSE-G600II automated platform. To assess interchangeability between conditions, correction factors for magnitudes that showed strong correlations were calculated, followed by classification consistency studies.

RESULTS

Storing samples at 4 °C for 8-9 days was associated with a decrease in Aβ fractions but not when stored for 1-2 days. Using the ratio partially attenuated the pre-analytical effects. For p-Tau181, samples stored at 4 °C presented lower concentrations, whereas frozen samples presented higher ones. Concerning classification consistency in comparisons that revealed strong correlations (p-Tau181), the percentage of total agreement was greater than 90 % in a large number of the tested cut-offs values.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide relevant information for the standardization of sample collection and storage in the analysis of AD BBM in an automated platform. This knowledge is crucial to ensure their introduction into clinical settings.

Importance of cerebrospinal fluid storage conditions for the Alzheimer's disease diagnostics on an automated platform

OBJECTIVES

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is considered the most common cause of dementia in older people. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, total Tau (t-Tau), and phospho Tau (p-Tau) are important biomarkers for the diagnosis, however, they are highly dependent on the pre-analytical conditions. Our aim was to investigate the potential influence of different storage conditions on the simultaneous quantification of these biomarkers in a fully-automated platform to accommodate easier pre-analytical conditions for laboratories.

METHODS

CSF samples were obtained from 11 consecutive patients. Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, p-Tau, and t-Tau were quantified using the LUMIPULSE G600II automated platform.

RESULTS

Temperature and storage days significantly influenced Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 with concentrations decreasing with days spent at 4 °C. The use of the Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio could partly compensate it. P-Tau and t-Tau were not affected by any of the tested storage conditions. For conditions involving storage at 4 °C, a correction factor of 1.081 can be applied. Diagnostic agreement was almost perfect in all conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Cutoffs calculated in samples stored at -80 °C can be safely used in samples stored at -20 °C for 15-16 days or up to two days at RT and subsequent freezing at -80 °C. For samples stored at 4 °C, cutoffs would require applying a correction factor, allowing to work with the certainty of reaching the same clinical diagnosis.