Human pegivirus identified in severe myelitis and optic neuritis in immunocompromised patients: A pathogenic role for a forgotten virus?

The role of Human pegivirus (HPgV) in patients with encephalitis has been recently questioned. We present cases of 4 patients with similar clinical, biological, and radiological characteristics, including a past history of transplantation with long-term immunosuppression and a progressive course of severe and predominantly myelitis, associated in 3 cases with optic neuropathy causing blindness. Extensive workup was negative but analysis of the CSF by use of pan-microorganism DNA- and RNA-based shotgun metagenomics was positive for HPgV. This case series further supports the hypothesis of HPgV CNS infection and highlights the utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing of CSF in immunocompromised patients.

Poor Antibody Response after Two Doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Transplant Recipients

A low anti-spike antibody response of 28.6% was observed 28 days after BNT162b2 vaccine second dose among 133 solid organ transplant recipients without previous coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). No serious adverse events were recorded. Four severe COVID-19 cases were reported between or after the 2 doses. Our data suggest to change the vaccine strategy.

Identification of trajectories of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: a nationwide comparison

Background

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major contributor of heart transplant recipient's mortality. However, little is known about CAV trajectories at a population level.

Purpose

We aimed to identify the different profiles of CAV trajectories.

Methods

Heart transplant recipients receiving care at 4 academic centers (2004 to 2016) were included. Patients underwent prospective, protocol-based monitoring consisting of repeated coronary angiographies together with systematic assessment of clinical, functional, histological and immunological parameters. The mainoutcome was the CAV trajectories, identified with unsupervised latent class mixed models.

Results

Overall, 1,301 patients were included (609 in France, 206 in Belgium and 486 in the US). The median follow-up post-transplant was 6.6 years (IQR=4.7) with 4,710 coronary angiographies analyzed (3.6±1.6 CAV assessments per patient). In the French development cohort, we identified 4 distinct profiles of CAV trajectories over 10 years that were characterized by i) Patients without CAV at baseline and non-progression (n=317, 52.1%), ii) patients without CAV at baseline and late onset CAV progression (n=52, 8.5%), iii) patients with mild baseline CAV and mild progression (n=151, 24.8%), iv) patients with mild baseline CAV and accelerated CAV progression (n=89, 14.6%, discrimination 0.92). The 4 CAV trajectories were independently validated in the external validation cohorts from Belgium (discrimination=0.92) and the US (discrimination=0.97).

Conclusion

In a large multicentric and highly phenotyped prospective cohort of heart transplant recipients, we identified and validated 4 distinct CAV trajectories corresponding to specific initial CAV grades and subsequent evolutions. Our results provide the basis for a trajectory-based assessment for risk stratification at early-stage post heart transplantation.

Figure 1. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy trajectories in France (n=609), in Belgium (n=206), in USA (n=486). Thick lines represent latent class trajectory; thin lines represent CAV individual patient trajectory.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Trajectories of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy After Heart Transplantation and association with mortality: a population-based study

Background

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major contributor of heart transplant recipient's mortality. However, the associations between CAV trajectories and mortality remains poorly described.

Purpose

We aimed to identify the different evolutive profiles of CAV and to determine the respective association with all-cause mortality.

Methods

Heart transplant recipients receiving care at 4 academic centers were included. Patients underwent prospective, protocol-based monitoring consisting of repeated coronary angiographies together with systematic assessment of clinical, functional, histological and immunological parameters. The mainoutcome was a prediction for CAV trajectories using unsupervised latent class mixed models. We then identified their association with all-cause mortality (NCT04117152).

Results

Overall, 1,301 patients were included (815 and 486 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively). The median follow-up post-transplant was 6.6 years (IQR=4.7) with 4,710 coronary angiographies analyzed (3.6±1.6 CAV assessments per patient). We identified 4 distinct profiles of CAV trajectories over 10 years that were characterized by i)Patients without CAV at baseline and non-progression (n=823, 63.3%), ii) patients without CAV at baseline and late onset CAV progression (n=79, 6.1%), iii) patients with mild baseline CAV and mild progression (n=261, 20.1), iv) patients with mild baseline CAV and accelerated CAV progression (n=138, 10.6%, discrimination 0.95). The 4 CAV trajectories showed gradient for all-cause mortality (p<0.001). Trajectories #3 and #4 were associated with higher mortality rates (10-year patient survival of 73.43% [95% CI 65.18–80.02] and 51.89% [95% CI 38.76–63.51], respectively) as compared with trajectories #1, and #2 that were characterized by 10-year patient survival of 80.01 [95% CI 76.38–84.82] and 83.49% [95% CI 71.34–90.80], respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusion

In a large multicentric and highly phenotyped prospective cohort of heart transplant recipients, we identified 4 robust CAV trajectories. These different profiles were associated with distinct prognosis. Our results provide the basis for a trajectory-based assessment of heart transplant patients for early patient risk stratification and patient monitoring.

Figure 1. Overall 10-year survival probability according to the CAV trajectory in the overall cohort (n=1,301). The left part represents the main profiles CAV grades identified with latent class mixed models. Thick lines represent latent class trajectory; thin lines represent CAV individual patient trajectory. The right part represent the Kaplan Meier curves of the different trajectories.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Determinants of trajectories of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: a population based study

Background

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major contributor of heart transplant recipient's mortality. Little is known about determinants of CAV trajectories at a population level.

Purpose

We aimed to identify the respective contribution of immune and non-immune factors in the different evolutive profiles of CAV.

Methods

Heart transplant recipients receiving care at 2 academic centers (2004 to 2016) were included. Patients underwent prospective, protocol-based monitoring consisting of repeated coronary angiographies together with systematic assessment of clinical, functional, histological and immunological parameters. The outcome was CAV trajectories, identified with unsupervised latent class mixed models. The independent, predictive factors of CAV trajectories were investigated with multinomial regressions (NCT04117152).

Results

Overall, 815 patients were included. The median follow-up post-transplant was 7.7 years (IQR=5.14) with 2,742 coronary angiographies analyzed. We identified 4 distinct profiles of CAV trajectories over 10 years that were characterized by i) Patients without CAV at baseline and non-progression (n=459, 56.3%), ii) patients without CAV at baseline and late onset CAV progression (n=62, 7.6%), iii) patients with mild baseline CAV and mild progression (n=188 23.1%), iv) patients with mild baseline CAV and accelerated CAV progression (n=106, 13.0%, discrimination 0.92). Six early independent predictors of CAV trajectories were identified: donor age (p<0.001), donor male gender (p<0.001), donor tobacco consumption (p=0.001), recipient post-transplant dyslipidemia (p=0.009), preexisting or de novo class II anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (p=0.004) and episode of acute cellular rejection ≥2R during the first year post transplantation (p=0.028).

Conclusion

In a large multicentric and highly phenotyped prospective cohort of heart transplant recipients, we identified 4 robust CAV trajectories and their respective immune and non-immune determinants. Our results provide the basis for a trajectory-based assessment of heart transplant patients for early patient risk stratification and patient monitoring.

Factors associated CAV trajectories in multivariate analyses in the derivation cohort. This table shows the association of clinical, immunological, functional and structural parameters associated with CAV trajectories in multivariate multinomial regression analysis. The trajectory of reference was trajectory #1, including patients with no CAV at baseline and stable CAV grade over time.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Determinants of sudden cardiac death after heart transplantation

Background

Heart transplant recipients are at high-risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, risk factors of SCD in heart recipients remained poorly described.

Objective

To assess the predictors of SCD beyond the first-year post-transplant.

Methods

We enrolled consecutive patients transplanted between 2004 and 2017 in two French referral centers. We excluded patients deceased during the first year. Patients underwent an evaluation at the day of transplantation and during the first year, comprising clinical, biological, histological, immunological (circulating anti-HLA DSA) and interventional (cardiac allograft vasculopathy assessment) parameters. Echocardiographies were routinely performed in all included patients according to a prespecified protocol. According to the last consensus, SCD was defined as an unexpected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without obvious non-cardiac cause, in the first hour after initiation of symptoms. Cox model analysis was used to determine the parameters associated with sudden death risk.

Results

A total of 913 patients were included. The median follow-up post-HT was 5.9 years (IQR=2.9–8.5). Among the 213 deaths after one year, 44 patients (21%) died from SCD. In this population, the incidence rate of SCD was 0,82 per 100 person-year (95% CI: 0,51–2,05). Among the 60 parameters tested in univariate analysis, we identified 2 independent factors of sudden death after 1 year post-HT: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤55% any time after transplantation ( HR 4.07, 95% CI 1.94–8.53, p<0.001) and the presence of circulating anti-HLA DSA at the time of transplantation (HR 2.79, 95% CI 1.37–5.68, p=0.005). The incidence rate of SCD was 2.17 per 100 person-year (95% CI: 1.42; 4.60) and 1.21 per 100 person-year (95% CI: 0.80; 2.58) in patients with FEVG<55% (n=73) and in patients with pre-formed DSA (n=260), respectively.

Conclusion

In a large multicentric and highly phenotyped cohort of heart transplant recipients, we identified two independent factors associated with SCD beyond the first year. This study provides fresh evidence of SCD assessment for improving risk stratification of HT recipients.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Incidence of sudden cardiac death after heart transplantation

Background

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major contributor to the rate of mortality after heart transplantation. However, little is known about the incidence of SCD in heart recipients.

Objective

To assess the incidence of SCD after heart transplantation.

Methods

We enrolled consecutive patients transplanted between 2004 and 2017 in two French referral centers. We defined 7 main groups of causes of deaths: SCD, cardiovascular (including Cardiac allograft vasculopathy), infection, primary graft dysfunction, graft failure (including late graft dysfunction, rejection), malignancy and others. Causes of deaths were independently adjudicated by two senior cardiologists based on the analysis of death certificates and medical records. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion until a consensus was made. SCD was defined as an unexpected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without obvious non-cardiac cause, in the first hour after initiation of symptoms.

Results

A total of 1,363 patients were included. The median follow-up post-transplant was 3.99 years (IQR=0.49–7.49). 450 patients (33%) deceased during the first year. The leading cumulative causes of death in the first year after transplantation were infection, primary graft failure, multiple organ failure during the period in intensiv car unit. Beyond the post-operativ high-risk period of the first year, the leading cumulative cause of death was SCD: among the 213 deaths that occurred beyond the first year, 44 patients (21%) died from SCD. In this period, the incidence rate of SCD reached 0,82 per 100 person-year (95% CI: 0.51–2.05).

Conclusion

In a large multicentric and highly phenotyped cohort of heart transplant recipients, the leading cumulative cause of death beyond the first-year post transplant was sudden cardiac death. Our results open discussion on management of heart recipient, such as the implementation of cardioverter-defibrillators.

Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of causes of death in heart transplant recipients beyond the first year (n=913).

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Acquired transdiaphragmatic hernia: an unusual cause of cardiac tamponade

Transdiaphragmatic peritoneopericardial hernia is a rare complication after peritoneopericardial window formation, coronary artery bypass grafting using the gastroepiploic artery, or subxiphoid epicardial pacemaker insertion. We describe two different clinical presentations of transdiaphragmatic peritoneopericardial hernia in patients who had undergone recent heart transplantation. One was an exceptional case of cardiac tamponade caused by small bowel strangulation through a diaphragmatic defect.

Late Failing Heart Allografts: Pathology of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy and Association With Antibody-Mediated Rejection

In heart transplantation, there is a lack of robust evidence of the specific causes of late allograft failure. We hypothesized that a substantial fraction of failing heart allografts may be associated with antibody-mediated injury and immune-mediated coronary arteriosclerosis. We included all patients undergoing a retransplantation for late terminal heart allograft failure in three referral centers. We performed an integrative strategy of heart allograft phenotyping by assessing the heart vascular tree including histopathology and immunohistochemistry together with circulating donor-specific antibodies. The main analysis included 40 explanted heart allografts patients and 402 endomyocardial biopsies performed before allograft loss. Overall, antibody-mediated rejection was observed in 19 (47.5%) failing heart allografts including 16 patients (40%) in whom unrecognized previous episodes of subclinical antibody-mediated rejection occurred 4.5 ± 3.5 years before allograft loss. Explanted allografts with evidence of antibody-mediated rejection demonstrated higher endothelitis and microvascular inflammation scores (0.89 ± 0.26 and 2.25 ± 0.28, respectively) compared with explanted allografts without antibody-mediated rejection (0.42 ± 0.11 and 0.36 ± 0.09, p = 0.046 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Antibody-mediated injury was observed in 62.1% of failing allografts with pure coronary arteriosclerosis and mixed (arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis) pattern, while it was not observed in patients with pure coronary atherosclerosis (p = 0.0076). We demonstrate that antibody-mediated rejection is operating in a substantial fraction of failing heart allografts and is associated with severe coronary arteriosclerosis. Unrecognized subclinical antibody-mediated rejection episodes may be observed years before allograft failure.

Adapted treatment of Epstein-Barr virus infection to prevent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after heart transplantation

Up to 35% of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases occur within 1 year of transplantation, and over 50% are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). EBV primary infection and reactivation are PTLD predictive factors, but there is no consensus for their treatment. We conducted a prospective single-center study on 299 consecutive heart-transplant patients treated with the same immunosuppressive regimen and monitored by repetitive EBV viral-load measurements and endomyocardial biopsies to detect graft rejection. Immunosuppression was tapered on EBV reactivation with EBV viral loads >10(5) copies/mL or primary infection. In the absence of response at 1 month or a viral load >10(6) copies/mL, patients received one rituximab infusion (375 mg/m(2) ). All patients responded to treatment without increased graft rejection. One primary infection case developed a possible PTLD, which completely responded to diminution of immunosuppression, and one patient, whose EBV load was unevaluable, died of respiratory complications secondary to PTLD. Compared with a historical cohort of 820 patients, PTLD incidence was decreased (p = 0.033) by a per-protocol analysis. This is the largest study on EBV primary infection/reactivation treatment, the first using rituximab following solid organ transplantation to prevent PTLD and the first to demonstrate an acceptable tolerability profile in this setting.

Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8) transmission and related morbidity in organ recipients

The aims of the study were to assess the risk of HHV8 transmission resulting from organ transplantation, and related morbidity in liver, heart and kidney transplant recipients. Donor and recipient serologies were screened between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2005 using HHV8 indirect immunofluorescence latent assay (latent IFA) and indirect immunofluorescent lytic assay (lytic IFA). Recipients negative for latent IFA with a donor positive for at least one test were sequentially monitored for HHV8 viremia and underwent serological tests over a period of 2 years. The results showed that among 2354 donors, HHV8 seroprevalence was 9.9% (lytic IFA) and 4.4% (latent IFA). A total of 454 organ recipients (281 renal, 116 liver and 57 heart) were monitored over a 2-year period. Seroconversion was observed in 12 patients (cumulative incidence 28%) whose donor had positive latent IFA and in 36 patients (cumulative incidence 29%) whose donors were positive only for lytic IFA, without differences across types of transplants. Positive HHV8 viremia was detected in only 4 out of 89 liver transplant recipients during follow-up and not in recipients of other types of transplant. Two liver transplant recipients and one kidney transplant recipient developed KS. In conclusion, although HHV8 transmission is a frequent event after organ transplantation, HHV8-related morbidity is rather rare but can be life threatening. Donor screening is advisable for monitoring HHV8 seronegative liver transplant recipients.