The burden of entheseal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative ultrasonograghic study

BACKGROUND

Imaging is crucial for identifying and diagnosis of the musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms, which are one of the most typical manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For the joints, tendons, and entheseal sites, ultrasonography has shown to be sensitive and accurate for the diagnosis of both inflammation and structural damage.

AIM

The goal of the current investigation is to determine the prevalence and the distribution of entheseal abnormalities in SLE patients, using musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) and to assess the relationship between entheseal sonographic changes and the SLE disease activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-eight subjects were studied (56 SLE patients, 56 psoriatic arthritis (PSA) patients, and 56 normal cases). To compare the frequency and the distribution of entheseal involvement, high-resolution MSUS was conducted to assess the entheseal sites of all patients in accordance with the Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index (MASEI).

RESULTS

Clinical enthesitis was detected in 39.3% of the SLE patients using the Leeds Enthesitis Index compared to 71% detected via US examination, indicating a high proportion of subclinical enthesitis in our SLE patients. The most frequently affected enthesis was the distal insertion of the patellar tendon at the tibial tuberosity which was detected in 41% of SLE patients. Enthesitis was significantly more frequent in PSA patients (100%) compared to SLE patients (71.4%) (p < 0.05) and more significantly frequent in SLE patients compared to the healthy controls (19.6%). There was a significant correlation between MASI and SLEDAI scores (r = 0.250*, p = 0.048) and the total protein in 24 h (r = 0.289*, p = 0.031). In addition, there was an inverse significant correlation between MASEI and serum albumin (r =  - 0.324*, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

In SLE patients, enthesitis is frequently clinical and ultrasound-verified. The most impacted enthesis is at the insertion of the quadriceps tendon. Enthesitis presence and the rise in the MASI score can serve as indicators of the severity of the SLE disease. Key Points • The most impacted entheseal site lies at the insertion of the quadriceps tendon. • The presence and the rise in MASEI score can serve as indicators of the severity of the SLE disease.

Significance of platelets to lymphocytes and platelets to haemoglobin ratios in patients with systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a progressive autoimmune connective tissue disease. Platelets to lymphocytes (PLR) and platelets to haemoglobin ratios (PHR) are emerging biomarkers used in the assessment of activity and severity of various autoimmune diseases. This study was designed to clarify the association of PLR and PHR with SSc disease activity and its different manifestations.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study involved sixty SSc patients. Demographic, clinical data and investigations were done.

RESULTS

PLR and PHR were correlated positively with ESR (r=0.351, p=0.003*), (r=0.620, p=0.000**), CRP (r=0.417, p=0.001*), (r=0.305, p=0.018**) and SSc activity index (r=0.292, p=0.024*), (r=0.359, p=0.005*). PLR and PHR were highly significantly related to digital ulcerations, musckeloskeletal, and pulmonary manifestations. Also, they had a significant relation to ground glass abnormalities on HRCT, mild restriction in pulmonary function tests and anti-scleroderma-70 antibodies. The cutoff value for PLR was 107.8 with high sensitivity 97.9% and specifity 92.3%, area under the curve (AUC=0.723, P 0.015) on receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). PHR AUC (0.799, P .001), cut value was 23.5 at 95.7% sensitivity and 84.6% specifity.

CONCLUSION

PLR and PHR were significantly related to digital ulcerations, musculoskeletal, and pulmonary manifestations and can be considered as predictive biomarkers for the assessment of SSc disease activity and severity.

Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale in rheumatoid arthritis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune inflammatory condition that causing disability and affection of patient's quality of life (QoL). Self-efficacy investigation helps us to detect the requirements of chronically affected patients and evaluation of self-care management programs. The aim of our study was to test validity and reliability of Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD-Arabic) in RA patients.

METHOD

This study included 248 RA patients, carried out at Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department. The SEMCD-Arabic Validity was assessed by correlating the SEMCD-Arabic scale with the validated Arabic version of the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire HAQ (MHAQ), the Arabic version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) scale, and the Arabic version of Short Form 36 version 2 for quality of life (SF QoL). Internal consistency, test-retest reliability was assessed.

RESULTS

Convergent validity was confirmed by a positive correlation between (physical, mental) component of SF QoL and SEMCD-Arabic (r = 0.918, r = 0.925) respectively, and negative correlation between MAF and SEMCD-Arabic (r =  - 0.657) and MHAQ with SEMCD-Arabic (r =  - 0.595). Discriminant validity confirmed by a significant negative correlation between visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, disease activity scale (DAS28), Morning stiffness, patient health, physician health, age, duration, and SEMCD-Arabic (r =  - 0.1-0.7) (P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was estimated which revealed a high interclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.87-0.997) indicating excellent agreement and internal consistency is acceptable as the Cronbach's alpha value (0.660 to 0.78).

CONCLUSION

The SEMCD-Arabic questionnaire can be used as a valid and reliable measure for assessment of patient's self-efficacy in RA. Key Points • The SEMCD-Arabic questionnaire has a statistically significant validity in correlation with different clinical manifestations MHAQ, SF QoL, and MAF. • The Arabic SEMCD is highly reliable with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.660 to 0.78.

Psychosocial and clinical impact of COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship to the quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study, Egypt

Background

Data have been pouring on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with chronic diseases. This study aimed to address the relationship between the perceived fears of COVID-19 virus (FCV), psychological status, and quality of life (QoL) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the pandemic. This study included 100 patients with RA and an equal number of control subjects, who were recruited from Zagazig University rheumatology outpatient clinics, Egypt. All subjects were interviewed using the fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S), Symptom Checklist-90 scale (SCL-90), and World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF). Patients were additionally assessed using the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ).

Results

There were significant differences between both groups in all QoL domains and most psychological dimensions. Most patients with RA experienced moderate-to-high disease activity and mild-to-moderate functional impairment (85% and 80%, respectively). FCV was correlated with the number of family members (P-value 0.020), and obsessive-compulsive (P-value 0.006), interpersonal sensitivity (P-value 0.035), hostility (P-value 0.017), phobia (P-value 0.010), and psychoticism (P-value 0.034) symptoms. Moderate-to-high disease activity was associated with reduced psychological QoL. Patients with moderate-to-severe functional impairment had worse QoL in all domains (except social). Prolonged illness duration was associated with worse social QoL.

Conclusions

QoL was adversely affected in patients with RA during the pandemic. There was a robust relationship between FCV and the emergence of psychological symptoms. RA-related clinical factors like illness duration, disease activity, and functional disability were associated with reduced QoL in those patients.