Protocol for a scoping review to map health outcomes in individuals with inducible laryngeal obstruction

BACKGROUND

Inducible laryngeal obstruction causes narrowing of the laryngeal aperture in response to external triggers. Outcomes are measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction to monitor changes in health status over time.

METHODS

This study is a scoping review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. The review will be guided by the following research question: 'What health outcomes are measured in studies including people with inducible laryngeal obstruction?' The research question was validated using the Population-Concept-Context framework according to the methodology for Joanna Briggs Institution Scoping Reviews. Relevant peer-reviewed studies and grey literature conducted over the last 40 years will be identified from electronic databases including AMED, CINAHL, Embase, EMCARE, MEDLINE, OVID, PubMed and PsycINFO. The search strings 'inducible laryngeal obstruction', 'ILO', 'vocal cord dysfunction', 'VCD', 'paradoxical vocal fold motion', 'PVFM', 'outcome', 'measure', 'measurement instrument', 'assessment', 'scale', 'questionnaire' will be combined using Boolean logic. An independent reviewer will conduct title screening; two independent reviewers will conduct abstract and full article screening, followed by data extraction by two reviewers. Analyses will be conducted appropriate to the findings.

DISCUSSION

The review will document evidence of health outcomes measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction, identifying measurement characteristics and potential utility. Collating studies may identify gaps in coverage, the need for novel tools, and for standardisation for clinical and research purposes.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Inducible laryngeal obstruction causes narrowing of the laryngeal aperture in response to external triggers. Outcomes are measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction to monitor changes in health status over time. Currently, there are no standardised outcome measures for measuring the effects of interventions in inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO). What this paper adds to existing knowledge Assessment of health can be measured in a variety of ways. Physiological, radiological and biochemical measurements of impairment are more common historically but there are a lot of outcomes of other factors now including subjective measures of functional status and health-related quality of life, with data collected directly from patients. This study will allow us to scope the literature to see the health outcomes being measured in ILO to attempt to standardise and develop future health outcomes. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The review will document evidence of health outcomes measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction, identifying measurement characteristics and potential utility. Collating studies may identify gaps in coverage, the need for novel tools and for standardisation for clinical and research purposes.

Multidisciplinary management of inducible laryngeal obstruction and breathing pattern disorder

We provide an overview of the assessment and management of inducible laryngeal obstruction and breathing pattern disorder. We highlight the multidisciplinary team members involved and their essential roles within a complex breathlessness service. We discuss treatments initiated by physiotherapy and speech and language therapy, the importance of joint working, and discuss the high incidence of comorbidities and the association with other respiratory disorders.

Educational aims

Inducible laryngeal obstruction and breathing pattern disorder are common causes of breathlessness.Inducible laryngeal obstruction is an inappropriate, transient, reversible narrowing of the laryngeal area that causes breathlessness and laryngeal symptoms.Breathing pattern disorder is an alteration in the normal biomechanical patterns of breathing that results in intermittent or chronic symptoms, which may be respiratory and/or non-respiratory.People with inducible laryngeal obstruction or breathing pattern disorder often have other comorbidities that will also need addressing.Multidisciplinary assessment and treatment is essential for comprehensive workup and holistic care.Timely assessment and diagnosis can prevent unnecessary medication use and hospital admissions and facilitate effective management of the condition using reassurance, advice, education, breathing retraining and vocal exercises.

Physiotherapy, and speech and language therapy intervention for patients with refractory chronic cough: a multicentre randomised control trial

BACKGROUND

Physiotherapy, and speech and language therapy are emerging non-pharmacological treatments for refractory chronic cough. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a physiotherapy, and speech and language therapy intervention (PSALTI) to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to reduce cough frequency in patients with refractory chronic cough.

METHODS

In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, patients with refractory chronic cough were randomised to four weekly 1:1 sessions of either PSALTI consisting of education, laryngeal hygiene and hydration, cough suppression techniques, breathing exercises and psychoeducational counselling or control intervention consisting of healthy lifestyle advice. We assessed the change in HRQoL at week 4 with the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Secondary efficacy outcomes included 24-hour objective cough frequency (Leicester Cough Monitor) and cough reflex sensitivity. The primary analysis used an analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline measurements with the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered at UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN ID 10678).

FINDINGS

Between December 2011 and April 2014, we randomly assigned 75 participants who underwent baseline assessment (34 PSALTI and 41 controls). In the observed case analysis, HRQoL (LCQ) improved on average by 1.53 (95% CI 0.21 to 2.85) points more in PSALTI group than with control (p=0.024). Cough frequency decreased by 41% (95% CI 36% to 95%) in PSALTI group relative to control (p=0.030). The improvements within the PSALTI group were sustained up to 3 months. There was no significant difference between groups in the concentration of capsaicin causing five or more coughs.

INTERPRETATION

Greater improvements in HRQoL and cough frequency were observed with PSALTI intervention. Our findings support the use of PSALTI for patients with refractory chronic cough.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UKCRN ID 10678 and ISRCTN 73039760; Results.

Nocardiosis following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Nocardia species are ubiquitous environmental organisms that can cause a diverse spectrum of disease. Clinical manifestations range from localized skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening pulmonary, central nervous system, and/or disseminated infections. Patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at risk for nocardiosis, and further data in regard to characteristics of disease in this population are warranted.

METHODS

We performed retrospective chart review of patients post allogeneic HSCT at Moffitt Cancer Center in Florida diagnosed with nocardiosis from 2003 to 2013.

RESULTS

In a decade, 15 cases of nocardiosis were identified. The majority of patients were men (11/15). The median age was 55 years (range 25-65). The most common type of transplant was matched-related donor (n = 8), followed by matched-unrelated donor (n = 3), mismatched-unrelated donor (n = 3), and double umbilical cord (n = 1). Ten received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens. Twelve of 15 patients were on prednisone, 10 of which were on a total daily dose ≥20 mg. The median time from transplant to first positive culture was 10 months (range 1.5-93). Pulmonary nocardiosis was the most prevalent manifestation at 87%. Disseminated disease (2 or more sites of infection) was seen in 47%, whereas blood cultures were positive in 27% of the total cohort. The most common species was Nocardia nova (n = 4). At the time of diagnosis, 20% of the patients were receiving prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). Susceptibility data were available for 8 patients: all 8 samples were susceptible to TMP-SMX. Nocardiosis was treated with 2 or more active drugs in 93% of the patients. Overall mortality was 53%, with nocardiosis attributed as the cause in 62.5% (5/8). The absolute lymphocyte count at time of diagnoses was significantly lower in patients who ultimately experienced treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Infection with Nocardia species in allogeneic HSCT recipients appears to be a late complication of transplantation and most commonly involves the lung. Two-thirds of the cohort received a MAC regimen and the majority of the patients were receiving steroids at the time of diagnosis. Most patients were not receiving TMP-SMX for PJP prophylaxis at the time of nocardiosis diagnosis, and TMP-SMX may therefore have a protective effect.

Treatment of migraine attacks with subcutaneous sumatriptan: first placebo-controlled study. The Subcutaneous Sumatriptan International Study Group

The results of the very first large-scale placebo-controlled dose-response trial with the novel selective 5-hydroxytryptamine1-like (5HT1-like) receptor agonist sumatriptan are presented. We studied the efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneous injections of 1 mg, 2 mg and 3 mg of sumatriptan in alleviating migraine attacks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre clinical trial. Six-hundred and ninety patients were randomized and 685 received study medication. At 30 min, reduction of headache severity to mild or none (primary efficacy endpoint) was achieved in 22% (95% CI: 15-28%) of placebo-treated patients and in 39% (CI: 31-46%) of patients treated with 1 mg sumatriptan, 44% (CI: 36-51%) treated with 2 mg sumatriptan and 55% (CI: 48-63%) treated with 3 mg sumatriptan. Differences from placebo were 17% (CI: 8-27%) for 1 mg sumatriptan, 22% (CI: 13-32%) for 2 mg sumatriptan and 34% (CI: 24-44%) for 3 mg sumatriptan (p < 0.001 for all three comparisons). Other migraine symptoms were also more effectively treated by sumatriptan than by placebo. Subsequently, an open-label 3 mg dose subcutaneous sumatriptan was given to partial or non-responders. Thirty minutes after this open dose the response rate to sumatriptan had improved to between 70 and 80%. Adverse events after sumatriptan were minor and short-lived. We conclude that subcutaneous sumatriptan is well tolerated in doses up to 3 + 3 mg and may rapidly abort migraine attacks.