Parents' Opinion About a Routine Head-to-Toe Examination of Children as a Screening Instrument for Child Abuse and Neglect in Children Visiting the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION

To improve detection of child abuse and neglect (CAN), many emergency departments use screening methods. Apart from diagnostic accuracy, possible harms of screening methods are important to consider, especially because most children are not abused and do not benefit from screening. We performed a systematic literature review to assess parents' opinions about CAN screening, in which we could only include 7 studies, all reporting that the large majority of participating parents favor screening. Recently, a complete physical examination (called "top-toe" inspection [TTI], a fully undressed inspection of the child) was implemented as a CAN screening method at the emergency department of a teaching hospital in The Netherlands. This study describes parents' opinions about the TTI.

METHODS

We used a questionnaire to assess parents' opinions about the TTI of their children when visiting the emergency department. During the study period, 1000 questionnaires were distributed by mail.

RESULTS

In total, 372 questionnaires were returned (37%). A TTI was performed for 194 children (52%). The overall attitude of parents whose children underwent a TTI was positive; 77.3% of the respondents found the TTI acceptable, and 1.5% (N = 3) found it unacceptable. Seventy percent of the respondents agreed with the theorem that all children who visit the emergency department should have a TTI performed, and 7.3% (N = 14) disagreed.

DISCUSSION

Contrary to what is commonly believed, both in our systematic literature review and in our questionnaire study, the majority of participating parents agree with screening for CAN in general and with the TTI specifically. Sharing the results of this study with ED personnel and policy makers could take away prejudices about perceived disagreement of parents, thereby improving implementation of and adherence to CAN screening.

An interactive CD-ROM to inform patients about stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or a Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) are in need of information about their disease, treatment options and side effects. Patient education usually has to be given within limited time. Under these circumstances, patients may find it difficult to completely understand and to retain the information given.

METHODS

As a supplement to standard information methods we developed an interactive CD-ROM with information on SCT. This CD-ROM provides both medical information and more subjective patients' experiences. Part one provides information regarding the treatment course from diagnosis through to post-discharge care. The second part consists of interviews with former patients and describes their experiences. As the system is interactive, it can be utilised according to the patient's individual preferences. The CD-ROM comprises audio, video, animations, pictures, and text. Printing of certain sections is optional. The technical format of the CD-ROM makes it relatively simple to utilise the information and to make it suitable for other institutions or even other treatments. In this preliminary study the acceptability of the interactive CD-ROM by patients undergoing a SCT is described.

RESULTS

Patients' overall evaluations of the interactive CD-ROM were highly positive. For example, 90.2% (N=51) found it interesting, clear, useful and valued getting information by means of a CD-ROM. Most patients would recommend the interactive CD-ROM to other patients in the same situation.

CONCLUSION

The content of the CD-ROM on SCT as well as the computer-based interactive method are well accepted by patients.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Computer-based education may enhance patient education and thus the quality of patient care. We must now establish the program's effectiveness. Moreover, plans have been developed to disseminate the information on SCT over the Internet. Future development of comparable programs and their evaluation should be encouraged to promote the well-being of cancer patients.

Design and development of a decision aid to enhance shared decision making by patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

To design, develop, and evaluate an evidence-based decision aid (DA) for patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to inform them about the pros and cons of their treatment options (ie, surgery or watchful observation) and to help them make a shared decision.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team defined criteria for the desired DA as to design, medical content and functionality, particularly for elderly users. Development was according to the international standard (IPDAS). Fifteen patients with an AAA, who were either treated or not yet treated, evaluated the tool.

RESULTS

A DA was developed to offer information about the disease, the risks and benefits of surgical treatment and watchful observation, and the individual possibilities and threats based on the patient's aneurysm diameter and risk profile. The DA was improved and judged favorably by physicians and patients.

CONCLUSION

This evidence-based DA for AAA patients, developed according to IPDAS criteria, is likely to be a simple, user-friendly tool to offer patients evidence-based information about the pros and cons of treatment options for AAA, to improve patients' understanding of the disease and treatment options, and may support decision making based on individual values.

Exploring the black box of a decision aid: what information do patients select from an interactive Cd-Rom on treatment options in breast cancer?

OBJECTIVE

It is thought that patients fare better when they participate in treatment decision-making, and when they have more control over the amount and type of information they receive. To facilitate informed decision-making, interactive decision aids have been introduced in health care. This article describes how much, and which information patients select from an interactive decision aid on breast cancer. To explore whether the interactive system facilitates that different patients receive different information, associations between patients' characteristics and information selection are inspected.

METHODS

The interactive decision aid was provided to 106 patients after an initial discussion with their surgeon about their diagnosis and treatment options. Information regarding patients' age, completed education, treatment preference, psychological functioning, decision uncertainty and decision style was collected with a written, structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was completed before patients used the interactive decision aid. To create categories, a median-split procedure was employed on the scores of the continuous background variables. The information patients selected from the interactive decision aid were registered into logfiles. Associations between patients' background variables and information selection were investigated by means of univariate statistics.

RESULTS

Patients (n=97; 92%) used the interactive decision aid intensively. On average, patients spent almost 70min searching for information and selected 21 information topics. Overall, treatment related information was clearly more selected than other types of information. Age, education, and decision style factors were associated with information selection.

CONCLUSION

The interactive breast cancer decision aid was utilized intensively. The interactive system was found to facilitate that different patients received different amounts and types of information.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Interactive decision aids may improve information giving to patients, and as a result, the quality of care. To safeguard informed-choice, decision aids should be used in conjunction with other communication strategies. Decision aids should be available continuously and throughout the patients' disease journey. The Internet may help to achieve broad dissemination and enduring access.

Predictors of patients' choices for breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: a prospective study

A study was undertaken to describe the treatment preferences and choices of patients with breast cancer, and to identify predictors of undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy (MT). Consecutive patients with stage I/II breast cancer were eligible. Information about predictor variables, including socio-demographics, quality of life, patients' concerns, decision style, decisional conflict and perceived preference of the surgeon was collected at baseline, before decision making and surgery. Patients received standard information (n=88) or a decision aid (n=92) as a supplement to support decision making. A total of 180 patients participated in the study. In all, 72% decided to have BCT (n=123); 28% chose MT (n=49). Multivariate analysis showed that what patients perceived to be their surgeons' preference and the patients' concerns regarding breast loss and local tumour recurrence were the strongest predictors of treatment preference. Treatment preferences in itself were highly predictive of the treatment decision. The decision aid did not influence treatment choice. The results of this study demonstrate that patients' concerns and their perceptions of the treatment preferences of the physicians are important factors in patients' decision making. Adequate information and communication are essential to base treatment decisions on realistic concerns, and the treatment preferences of patients.

The decisional conflict scale: further validation in two samples of Dutch oncology patients

The importance of patient involvement in medical decision making is indisputable. Yet, decision making concerning medical treatment options is a difficult task for most patients. In order to study decision-making processes in health care, O'Connor developed the decisional conflict scale (DCS). The DCS assesses the level of 'decisional conflict' that patients experience while making health care decisions, and encompasses the following three subscales: (1) uncertainty about choosing among alternatives; (2) factors contributing to uncertainty; (3) perceived effectiveness of the decision. The aim of the present study is to investigate the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the DCS. A written version of the DCS was administered in two samples of Dutch cancer patients. One sample consisted of cancer patients faced with the decision whether or not to undergo palliative chemotherapy (N=29). The other sample included women with early stage breast cancer who had to choose between mastectomy or lumpectomy followed by radiation therapy (N=141). The response rates were 76% and 91%, respectively. The reliability coefficients of the three subscales were 0.52, 0.80, 0.84, and 0.74, 0.83, 0.83 in the two samples, respectively. Construct validity was partly supported. Criterion validity was substantiated. In evaluating the factorial validity, it was found that the original three-factor model had to be rejected (chi(2)(87)=293, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.137). A subsequent exploratory factor analysis suggested an alternative four-factor model. The psychometric properties of the DCS were partly confirmed in Dutch cancer patients. Improved 'wording' of certain items, e.g. to avoid double negatives, could further increase the factorial validity of the DCS. Then, this scale may be a valuable tool for studies that address the quality of medical decision making.

[Interactive cd-rom on the choice between breast-sparing treatment and mastectomy: positive responses from patients and surgeons]

OBJECTIVE

To assess how breast cancer patients and surgeons rate an interactive decision aid, using CD-ROM technology, developed to support a choice between breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy.

DESIGN

Questionnaire investigation.

METHOD

Written questionnaires were presented to patients as soon as they had finished using the CD-ROM. They responded on a 5-point scale. Surgeons (n = 14) were sent a written questionnaire to investigate their experiences of using the CD-ROM program.

RESULTS

The interactive CD-ROM was offered to 92 consecutive breast cancer patients. Responses were obtained from 86 (93%) of the patients. The remainder were inadvertently not given the questionnaire. All of the patients evaluated the program as positive. Most of the patients found the program to be 'interesting', 'clear', 'useful', 'encouraging', and 'reassuring'. A majority (n = 76) expressed the view that the amount of information received was 'just right'. The interactive, computer-based method was evaluated as 'agreeable' by 74 patients. Almost all of the patients (n = 82) recommended that the program be shown to other patients. All of the surgeons (n = 14) stated that their patients' evaluations of the program were positive. Moreover, most of the surgeons (n = 10) were of the opinion that the program 'considerably contributed' to the provision of information. With the exception of one surgeon (n = 13), they all held the view that the program can be offered to breast cancer patients facing a choice between breast-conservation or mastectomy on a standard basis.

CONCLUSION

Interactive decision-making support by means of a CD-ROM for patients with breast cancer, received positive evaluations from both the patients and surgeons.

Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of the Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM as a decision aid for breast cancer patients with a choice between breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy (MT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with stage I and II breast cancer were enrolled. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal, and pretest/posttest design was used. Follow-up was scheduled 3 and 9 months after discharge from the hospital. Control patients (n = 88) received standard care (oral information and brochures). The CDROM was provided to patients in the experimental condition (n = 92) as a supplement to standard procedures. Outcome variables were treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

No effect on treatment decision was found. CDROM patients expressed more general satisfaction with information at 3 and 9 months (95% confidence interval for the difference (d) between the means (d: 4.1 to 12.5 and 5.7 to 14.2 respectively). CDROM patients were also more satisfied with their treatment decision at 3 and at 9 months (d: 0.1 to 0.4; 0.2 to 0.5). Moreover, at 9 months, CDROM patients were more satisfied with breast cancer-specific information (d: 0.9 to 16.5), the decision-making process (d: 0.1 to 0.4), and communication (d: 0.2 to 11.0). At 3 and 9 months, a positive effect was found on general health (d: 0.2 to 14.5 and 0.3 to 15.0). Moreover, at 9 months, CDROM patients reported better physical functioning (d: 5.1 to 19.8), less pain (d: -17.9 to -4.5), and fewer arm symptoms (d: -14.1 to -0.5).

CONCLUSION

The Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM improved decision making in patients with early-stage breast cancer with a choice between BCT and MT, as evaluated in terms of patients' satisfaction and QoL.

Feasibility and effects of decision aids

Decision aids for patients have recently been introduced in health care. A literature review was conducted to address the following research questions: 1) which types of decision aids have been developed?; 2) to what extent are they feasible, and acceptable to patients and health care providers?; 3) do decision aids affect the decision-making process and patients' outcomes? Thirty non-controlled (e.g., one-group-only designs) and controlled studies (e.g., randomized experimental designs) were identified. Decision aids were found to be feasible and acceptable to patients and to increase the agreement between patients' values and decisions and patients' knowledge. The effects of decision aids on decisions and on patients' outcomes, including decision uncertainty, satisfaction, and health, have rarely been addressed. When studied, the beneficial effects of decision aids on these outcomes appear to be rather modest. Implications for future development of decision aids and the design of studies are discussed.

Focus group interviews with risk-taking gay men: appraisal of AIDS prevention activities, explanations for sexual risk-taking, and needs for support

Recently, several findings demonstrated an increase in high-risk sexual behaviour among gay men. This study conducted focus groups with gay men who engaged in risk-taking behaviour with casual partners. Three issues were addressed: appraisal of current AIDS prevention activities, explanations for sexual risk-taking, and needs for support. The results show that participants criticize current prevention efforts. The explanations for risk-taking behaviour contribute to a better understanding of the underlying processes related to sexual risk-taking. Participants' needs include unequivocal information on HIV and AIDS, more insight into the rationality behind safe sex directives, and more opportunities to discuss their difficulties regarding safe sex behaviour with peers.