1
|
Tan DSW, Felip E, de Castro G, Solomon BJ, Greystoke A, Cho BC, Cobo M, Kim TM, Ganguly S, Carcereny E, Paz-Ares L, Bennouna J, Garassino MC, Schenker M, Kim SW, Brase JC, Bury-Maynard D, Passos VQ, Deudon S, Dharan B, Song Y, Caparica R, Johnson BE. Canakinumab Versus Placebo in Combination With First-Line Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the CANOPY-1 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:192-204. [PMID: 38039427 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The addition of checkpoint inhibitors to first-line treatment has prolonged survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but prognosis remains poor, with new treatment options needed. Canakinumab, a human, monoclonal anti-interleukin (IL)-1β antibody, has potential to enhance the activity of PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy (CT) by inhibiting protumor inflammation. METHODS CANOPY-1 was a phase III, randomized, double-blind study comparing canakinumab (200 mg subcutaneously once every 3 weeks) versus placebo, both combined with pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks) and platinum-based doublet CT, as first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic NSCLC without EGFR or ALK mutations. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included overall response rate, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 643 patients were randomly assigned to canakinumab (n = 320) or placebo (n = 323). With a median study follow-up of 6.5 months, the median PFS was 6.8 months with canakinumab versus 6.8 months with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.09; P = .102). With a median study follow-up of 21.2 months, the median OS was 20.8 months with canakinumab versus 20.2 months with placebo (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.10; P = .123). No unexpected safety signals were observed for canakinumab combination. Infection rates were comparable between treatment and control arms. A higher frequency of neutropenia and ALT increase (grade ≤2) were reported in the treatment arm. Higher baseline C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels were associated with shorter PFS and OS. Patients treated with canakinumab had clinically meaningful delays in deterioration of lung cancer symptoms, including chest pain and coughing per LC13 and dyspnea per LC13 and C30. CONCLUSION The addition of canakinumab to first-line pembrolizumab and CT did not prolong PFS or OS in patients with NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S W Tan
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Enriqueta Felip
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Alastair Greystoke
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Byoung Chul Cho
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Manuel Cobo
- Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional University Hospital and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Tae Min Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Enric Carcereny
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jaafar Bennouna
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Marina Chiara Garassino
- Department of Medicine, Section Hematology Oncology, Thoracic Oncology program, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael Schenker
- Sf Nectarie Oncology Center Craiova and the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | - Sang-We Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuanbo Song
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tan D, Kim T, Solomon B, Tan W, Yu CJ, Geater S, De Castro G, Greystoke A, Felip E, Johnson B, Deudon S, Louveau AL, Passos V, Cho B. CANOPY-1: A phase III, placebo-controlled study of pembrolizumab (PEM) plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (Ctx) with/without canakinumab in untreated patients (pts) with stage IIIB/IIIC-IV NSCLC. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz437.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
3
|
Shaw AT, Kim TM, Crinò L, Gridelli C, Kiura K, Liu G, Novello S, Bearz A, Gautschi O, Mok T, Nishio M, Scagliotti G, Spigel DR, Deudon S, Zheng C, Pantano S, Urban P, Massacesi C, Viraswami-Appanna K, Felip E. Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:874-886. [PMID: 28602779 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30339-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 394] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ceritinib is a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, which has shown robust anti-tumour efficacy, along with intracranial activity, in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. In phase 1 and 2 studies, ceritinib has been shown to be highly active in both ALK inhibitor-naive and ALK inhibitor-pretreated patients who had progressed after chemotherapy (mostly multiple lines). In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of ceritinib versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer who had previously progressed following crizotinib and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. METHODS In this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged at least 18 years with ALK-rearranged stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (with at least one measurable lesion) who had received previous chemotherapy (one or two lines, including a platinum doublet) and crizotinib and had subsequent disease progression, from 99 centres across 20 countries. Other inclusion criteria were a WHO performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function and laboratory test results, a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks, and having recovered from previous anticancer treatment-related toxicities. We randomly allocated patients (1:1; with blocking [block size of four]; stratified by WHO performance status [0 vs 1-2] and presence or absence of brain metastases) to oral ceritinib 750 mg per day fasted (in 21 day treatment cycles) or chemotherapy (intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 [investigator choice], every 21 days). Patients who discontinued chemotherapy because of progressive disease could cross over to the ceritinib group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed by a masked independent review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population, assessed every 6 weeks until month 18 and every 9 weeks thereafter. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01828112, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients. FINDINGS Between June 28, 2013, and Nov 2, 2015, we randomly allocated 231 patients; 115 (50%) to ceritinib and 116 (50%) to chemotherapy (40 [34%] to pemetrexed, 73 [63%] to docetaxel, and three [3%] discontinued before receiving treatment). Median follow-up was 16·5 months (IQR 11·5-21·4). Ceritinib showed a significant improvement in median progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy (5·4 months [95% CI 4·1-6·9] for ceritinib vs 1·6 months [1·4-2·8] for chemotherapy; hazard ratio 0·49 [0·36-0·67]; p<0·0001). Serious adverse events were reported in 49 (43%) of 115 patients in the ceritinib group and 36 (32%) of 113 in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related serious adverse events were similar between groups (13 [11%] in the ceritinib group vs 12 [11%] in the chemotherapy group). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events in the ceritinib group were increased alanine aminotransferase concentration (24 [21%] of 115 vs two [2%] of 113 in the chemotherapy group), increased γ glutamyltransferase concentration (24 [21%] vs one [1%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase concentration (16 [14%] vs one [1%] in the chemotherapy group). Six (5%) of 115 patients in the ceritinib group discontinued because of adverse events compared with eight (7%) of 116 in the chemotherapy group. 15 (13%) of 115 patients in the ceritinib group and five (4%) of 113 in the chemotherapy group died during the treatment period (from the day of the first dose of study treatment to 30 days after the final dose). 13 (87%) of the 15 patients who died in the ceritinib group died because of disease progression and two (13%) died because of an adverse event (one [7%] cerebrovascular accident and one [7%] respiratory failure); neither of these deaths were considered by the investigator to be treatment related. The five (4%) deaths in the chemotherapy group were all due to disease progression. INTERPRETATION These findings show that patients derive significant clinical benefit from a more potent ALK inhibitor after failure of crizotinib, and establish ceritinib as a more efficacious treatment option compared with chemotherapy in this patient population. FUNDING Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice T Shaw
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Tae Min Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Lucio Crinò
- Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Meldola, Italy
| | - Cesare Gridelli
- SG Moscati Hospital, Città Ospedaliera, Contrada Amoretta, Avellino, Italy
| | | | - Geoffrey Liu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Alessandra Bearz
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy
| | | | - Tony Mok
- State Key Laboratory of South China, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China
| | - Makoto Nishio
- Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Enriqueta Felip
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mok T, Scagliotti G, Kim T, Crinò L, Liu G, Gridelli C, Novello S, Kiura K, Bearz A, Gautschi O, Felip E, Nishio M, Spigel D, Urban P, Deudon S, Zheng C, Shaw A. 444PD Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in ASCEND-5: A randomized, phase 3 study of ceritinib vs chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearranged (ALK+) NSCLC previously treated with CT and crizotinib (CRZ). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw594.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
5
|
Mok T, Scagliotti G, Kim T, Crino L, Liu G, Gridelli C, Novello S, Kiura K, Bearz A, Gautschi O, Felip E, Nishio M, Spigel D, Urban P, Deudon S, Zheng C, Shaw A. 444PD Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in ASCEND-5: A randomized, phase 3 study of ceritinib vs chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearranged (ALK +) NSCLC previously treated with CT and crizotinib (CRZ). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0923-7534(21)00602-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
6
|
Scagliotti G, Kim T, Crinò L, Liu G, Gridelli C, Novello S, Kiura K, Bearz A, Gautschi O, Felip E, Nishio M, Spigel D, Mok T, Urban P, Deudon S, Zheng C, Shaw A. Ceritinib vs chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with CT and crizotinib (CRZ): Results from the confirmatory phase 3 ASCEND-5 study. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw435.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|