Effect of Surgical Team Communication on Adherence to Opioid Discharge Guidelines in Post-Operative Inpatients

OBJECTIVE

Current opioid prescribing guidelines state that post-operative inpatients who do not receive opioids in the 24 hours preceding discharge do not require an opioid prescription on discharge. This study was designed to assess providers' understanding of opioid discharge guidelines and explore drivers of adherence.

DESIGN

An electronic survey was released which assessed knowledge of opioid discharge guidelines and probed surgical team communication. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine differences between provider types. Spearman's correlation evaluated relationships between estimated and observed adherence to guidelines.

SETTING

Yale New-Haven Hospital, (tertiary, university-based) PARTICIPANTS: Surgical residents, advanced practice providers (APPs) and attendings who discharged inpatients with opioids between November 2017-August 2019 RESULTS: The response rate was 36% (90/253), including 36% (49/136) of residents, 23% (13/56) of APPs, and 46% (28/61) of attendings. Seventy eight percent of participants believed patients who met the guideline should "never" or "sometimes" receive opioids on discharge. There was a significant difference between attending preferences and what residents (H²₂ = 202.7, p = 0.0001) and APPs (H²₂ = 24.6, p = 0.003) believed were the attending's preferences. Eleven percent of attendings preferred their patients to "most of the time" or "always" receive opioids on discharge, while 45% of residents and 54% of APPs reported the same. Overall, 57% of attendings reported they "most of the time" or "always" communicated their discharge preferences while 12% of residents (H²₂ = -20.4, p = 0.0003) and 8% of APPs (H²₂ = -23.5, p = 0.003) reported the same. There was no correlation between all groups' estimated adherence to the guidelines and observed adherence (r_s = 0.135, p = 0.206).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that surgical residents, APPs, and attendings are aware of the guideline but breakdowns in communication between the attending and the surgical team may contribute to deviation from this guideline. Improving communication may lead to improved adherence to post-operative opioid discharge prescribing guidelines.

Residency Program Use of Social Media in the COVID-19 Era: An Applicant's Perspective

General surgery residency programs' use of social media has exploded since early spring 2020, as it became clear that the COVID-19 pandemic would prevent away rotations and in-person interviews. Faced with the prospect of ranking programs they cannot visit, applicants are becoming reliant on programs' use of social media to showcase program culture, now a key recruitment tool. However, proper etiquette for applicant engagement with programs' social media accounts is unclear. Who administers these accounts - residents, program directors, program coordinators, or marketing staff? The subjectivity of criteria for "potentially unprofessional" content may pose disproportionate risks to female applicants and applicants of color. From this applicant's perspective, programs' recent use of social media has been informative and humanizing. It is our hope that departments, programs, and residents continue to post on social media throughout the application cycle. However, we applicants would benefit from clear guidance and expectations as to how to engage with residency programs via social media.

Characterizing the social media footprint of general surgery residency programs

Background

The medical community has increasingly embraced social media for a variety of purposes, including trainee education, research dissemination, professional networking, and recruitment of trainees and faculty. Platform choice and usage patterns appear to vary by specialty and purpose, but few studies comprehensively assess programs’ social media presence. Prior studies assessed general surgery departments’ Twitter use but omitted additional social media platforms and residency-specific accounts.

Objective

This study sought to broadly characterize the social media footprint of U.S. general surgery residency programs.

Methods

Using a protocolized search of program websites, social media platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn), and internet search, cross-sectional data on social media usage in March 2020 were collected for programs, their affiliated departments, their program directors (PDs), and their assistant/associate PDs (APDs).

Results

318 general surgery residency programs, 313 PDs, and 296 APDs were identified. 47.2% of programs had surgery-specific accounts on ≥1 platform. 40.2% of PDs and APDs had ≥1 account on Twitter and/or LinkedIn. Program type was associated with social media adoption and Twitter utilization, with lower usage among university-affiliated and independent programs (p<0.01).

Conclusions

Most general surgery residencies, especially non-university-based programs, lacked any department or residency accounts across Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram by March 2020. These findings highlight opportunities for increased social media engagement and act as a pre-pandemic baseline for future investigations of how the shift to virtual trainee education, recruitment, conferences, and clinical care affect social media use.