Assessment of Combined Nivolumab and Bevacizumab in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Importance

To date, single-agent programmed cell death 1 protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint blockade has shown limited activity in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Combination strategies of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition with antiangiogenic therapy have the potential for synergistic activity through modulation of the microenvironment and represent a potential therapeutic opportunity in this disease.

Objective

To evaluate the activity of combined nivolumab and bevacizumab in women with relapsed ovarian cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A single-arm, phase 2 study enrolled patients between February 8, 2017, and December 29, 2017, at 2 sites in the United States; the primary data analysis was completed July 27, 2018. Thirty-eight women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer were enrolled in this study. Participants had disease recurrence within 12 months of their last platinum-based therapy and had received between 1 and 3 lines of prior therapy.

Interventions

Participants received intravenous nivolumab and intravenous bevacizumab once every 2 weeks.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary end points included evaluation of the ORR by platinum sensitivity, assessment of progression-free survival, assessment of safety data, and investigation of the association of tumor PD-L1 with response to therapy.

Results

Of the 38 women enrolled, 18 had platinum-resistant and 20 had platinum-sensitive disease; mean (SD) age was 63.0 (9.1) years. Eleven patients experienced a confirmed response to nivolumab with bevacizumab (ORR, 28.9%; 95% exact binomial CI, 15.4%-45.9%), with 1 additional unconfirmed response. The ORR was 40.0% (19.1%-64.0%) in platinum-sensitive and 16.7% (95% CI 3.6%-41.4%) in platinum-resistant participants. Thirty-four participants (89.5%) experienced at least 1 treatment-related adverse event; 9 participants (23.7%) experienced a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event. Median progression-free survival was 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.3-14.7 months). In 36 histologic samples for which PD-L1 testing could be performed, 22 samples (61.1%) had a PD-L1 tumoral percentage less than 1, and 14 samples (38.9%) had a PD-L1 tumoral percentage of 1 or greater. Ten responses occurred in patients with PD-L1 tumor percentage less than 1, and 2 in patients with PD-L1 tumor percentages of 1 or greater.

Conclusions and Relevance

The nivolumab with bevacizumab combination appeared to show activity in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, with greater activity in the platinum-sensitive setting. Alternative combinational strategies may be necessary in the platinum-resistant setting.

A phase 2, two-stage study of avelumab and axitinib in patients with mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EC)

TPS5609

Background: Despite significant strides in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of EC, there remain few effective therapies for recurrent disease. Deeper insight into the roles of disordered tumor vasculature and HIF1α- and VEGF-mediated immunosuppressive effects on myeloid-derived suppressor cells, T-cells, and PD-L1 expression contributed to the development of new targeted regimens. Activity of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib was demonstrated in a phase 2 trial in MMR-P EC (NCT02501096). By inhibiting VEGF receptor (VEGFR) and PD-L1 signaling, immunologically “cold” tumors may become inflamed. However, there are concerns regarding the toxicity of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib and alternatives are sought. The combination of the anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab with axitinib, an inhibitor of VEGFR 1-3 and PDGFR with more potent IC50 inhibitory activity than lenvatinib, has also shown synergistic activity and is FDA approved as first line treatment for patients with renal cell cancer. We therefore hypothesized that this combination would be well tolerated and efficacious in recurrent MMR-P EC. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, phase 2, two-stage single cohort trial evaluating avelumab with axitinib in recurrent or persistent EC. Participants must have MMR-P EC of any histology and have received at least one chemotherapeutic regimen, with no upper limit on the number of prior lines received. Prior use of immune checkpoint (IC) inhibitors is excluded. Treatment consists of avelumab 800mg IV every 2 weeks and axitinib 5mg orally twice daily. Co-primary endpoints are progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and objective response rate by RECIST 1.1. Translational objectives include characterization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, infiltrating myeloid cells, expression of IC markers, and whole exome sequencing to evaluate mutations in genes related to DNA repair and immunologic response. This is a two-stage design in the method of Sill et al, with 16 participants anticipated in stage 1 and 19 participants in stage 2, for a total of 35 participants. Accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02912572.

Phase II Study of Avelumab in Patients With Mismatch Repair Deficient and Mismatch Repair Proficient Recurrent/Persistent Endometrial Cancer

PURPOSE

Despite the tissue-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab in mismatch repair deficient (MMRD) solid tumors, important unanswered questions remain about the role of immune checkpoint blockade in mismatch repair-proficient (MMRP) and -deficient endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

This phase II study evaluated the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab in two cohorts of patients with EC: (1) MMRD/POLE (polymerase ε) cohort, as defined by immunohistochemical (IHC) loss of expression of one or more mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and/or documented mutation in the exonuclease domain of POLE; and (2) MMRP cohort with normal IHC expression of all MMR proteins. Coprimary end points were objective response (OR) and progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6). Avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously was administered every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled. No patient with POLE-mutated tumor was enrolled in the MMRD cohort, and all MMRP tumors were not POLE-mutated. The MMRP cohort was closed at the first stage because of futility: Only one of 16 patients exhibited both OR and PFS6 responses. The MMRD cohort met the predefined primary end point of four ORs after accrual of only 17 patients; of 15 patients who initiated avelumab, four exhibited OR (one complete response, three partial responses; OR rate, 26.7%; 95% CI, 7.8% to 55.1%) and six (including all four ORs) PFS6 responses (PFS6, 40.0%; 95% CI, 16.3% to 66.7%), four of which are ongoing as of data cutoff date. Responses were observed in the absence of PD-L1 expression. IHC captured all cases of MMRD subsequently determined by polymerase chain reaction or genomically via targeted sequencing.

CONCLUSION

Avelumab exhibited promising activity in MMRD EC regardless of PD-L1 status. IHC for MMR assessment is a useful tool for patient selection. The activity of avelumab in MMRP/non-POLE-mutated ECs was low.

When Should Tumor Genomic Profiling Prompt Consideration of Germline Testing?

Somatic genomic testing is rapidly becoming an integral part of care for patients with metastatic cancer. Extrapolation of these results beyond personalized cancer therapy is a skill being demanded of practicing oncologists without prior specialty in genetics. Up to 12% of tumor genomic profiling reports will reveal a germline pathogenic variant. Recognition of these germline variants is essential not only for optimal care of the patient with cancer but also to initiate cascade genetic testing in at-risk family members who also may carry the familial mutation. This article provides a concise and methodical, evidence-based strategy to guide oncology providers about how to identify genes associated with an inherited predisposition for cancer, determine the pathogenicity of variants reported within those genes, and understand the likelihood that these variants are of germline origin in a particular patient with cancer. Case examples are provided to illustrate clinical scenarios and facilitate application of the proposed approach.

Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Do More Options Mean Greater Benefits?

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

A healthy 51-year-old woman presented with increasing abdominal and pelvic pain. Computed tomography imaging of the abdomen and pelvis showed an 11.6-cm pelvic mass, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, right hydronephrosis, and mesenteric tumor deposits ( Fig 1A ). A serum CA-125 was elevated at 1,149 U/mL. She underwent primary surgical cytoreduction including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, appendectomy, resection of pelvic tumor, omentectomy, and low anterior resection with colorectal anastomosis. Intraoperatively, she was noted to have bilateral ovarian masses, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenopathy, and a 4-cm omental tumor; in addition, both the uterus and rectosigmoid colon had adherent tumor deposits. All gross tumor was resected during the procedure. Final pathology confirmed high-grade serous carcinoma of ovarian origin ( Fig 1B ) that was determined to be stage IIIC as a result of upper abdominal involvement with greater than 2-cm tumor deposits, as well as retroperitoneal lymph node involvement. She underwent germline genetic testing, which did not identify a mutation in the BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D genes. She presented for adjuvant chemotherapy after an optimal (R0) resection.

Phase 2, two-group, two-stage study of avelumab in patients (pts) with microsatellite stable (MSS), microsatellite instable (MSI), and polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutated recurrent/persistent endometrial cancer (EC)

5502

Background: This non-randomized phase 2 study evaluated the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab in two cohorts of EC: i) MSI/ POLE cohort including ECs with immunohistochemical (IHC) loss of expression of at least one of the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and/or documented mutation in the exonuclease domain of POLE and ii) MSS cohort including ECs with normal IHC expression of all MMR proteins. Methods: Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, unlimited prior therapies, and any EC histology. Co-primary endpoints were confirmed objective response (OR) and progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6). Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV was given every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. In the 1st stage, 16 pts were enrolled in each cohort; if there were ≥2 ORs or ≥2 PFS6 responses, accrual would continue to the 2nd stage with enrollment of 19 additional pts. Overall, if there are ≥4 ORs or ≥8 PFS6 responses, avelumab would be considered worthy of further study in each cohort. Results: As of 12/2018, 33 pts were enrolled. The MSS cohort was closed at the 1st stage due to futility; of 16 pts in the MSS cohort, only 1 pt exhibited an OR and PFS6 response [ORR and PFS6 rate 6.25% (95% CI 0.16%-30.2%)]. Conversely, the MSI/POLE cohort reached the primary endpoint of 4 ORs after accrual of only 17 pts. Two pts in the MSI/POLE cohort did not initiate protocol therapy and were excluded from all analyses. Of 15 pts in the MSI/POLE cohort, 4 pts exhibited OR [1CR+3PRs, OR rate (ORR) 26.7% (95% CI 7.8%-55.1%)] and 6 pts (including the 4 pts with OR) exhibited PFS6 responses [PFS6 rate 40.0% (95% CI 16.3%-66.7%)], 4 ongoing and 3 approaching 2 yrs. Twenty-two pts (71%) reported treatment related toxicities, 6 patients (19%) G3 toxicities; there were no treatment-related G4 and G5 toxicities. In the MSI/POLE cohort, 5 of 6 PFS6 responses were observed in pts with ≥3 lines of prior therapy (p = 0.011) and in tumors who were PD-L1 negative by IHC. Further correlative work will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: In EC pts stratified by MSI/POLE status, MSI vs MSS status appears to be correlated with avelumab response even in PD-L1 negative tumors. Responses in the MSI/POLE cohort were more frequent in more heavily pretreated patients, a finding that warrants further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02912572.

Phase 2, two-group, two-stage, open-label study of avelumab in patients with microsatellite stable, microsatellite instable and POLE-mutated recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer

TPS5615

Background: The Cancer Genome Atlas project identified 2 groups of hypermutated endometrial cancers (ECs): an ultramutated group that harbored mutations in the exonuclease domain of polymerase e ( POLE), and a hypermutated group with microsatellite instability (MSI), the majority of which harbored MLH1 promoter methylation. We (Howitt, JAMA Onc 2015) and others have shown that POLE and MSI ECs are associated with higher number of predicted neoepitopes and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, which is counterbalanced by overexpression of PD-1/PD-L1, suggesting that they may be excellent candidates for PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Anti-PD-1 therapy has also demonstrated promising activity in mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancers and collectively in non-colorectal cancers (Le, NEJM 2015). Methods: This is an open-label, two-cohort, two-stage, phase 2 trial, of avelumab, a fully human IgG1 antibody directed against PD-L1, in two cohorts: i) a MSI/ POLE cohort including ECs with immunohistochemical (IHC) complete loss of expression of at least one of the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and/or documented mutation in the exonuclease domain of POLE and ii) a MSS cohort including ECs with normal IHC expression of all MMR proteins. Key eligibility criteria include measurable disease, no upper limit of prior therapies, and any EC histology. Co-primary objectives include objective response rate and rate of progression-free survival at 6 months. Avelumab is administered at 10 mg/kg as 1-hour IV infusion every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity; therapy may continue at the investigator’s discretion while awaiting radiologic confirmation of disease progression 4 weeks later. Maximum target enrollment is 70 patients (35 for each cohort). In the first stage, 16 patients will be enrolled in each cohort; if there are at least two objective responses or two patients progression-free at 6 months, accrual will continue to the second stage where 19 more patients will be enrolled for each cohort. Thus far, 16 patients have been enrolled, 13 on the MSS cohort and 3 on the MSI/ POLE cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT02912572.

Raising the safety bar: The hematology/oncology patient safety committee

144

Background: Enhancing patient safety can prevent unintended outcomes arising from defects in healthcare delivery systems. The Hematology/Oncology Patient Safety Committee (HOPSC) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) is a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers that meets monthly to review inpatient and outpatient adverse events, near misses, and medical errors that impact patient safety. Methods: Our aim was to quantify and qualify the cases that the HOPSC has reviewed from 2012-2013. In order to identify trends in event reporting, we reviewed the number of events reported to the HOPSC in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. We further subdivided events into two categories: medication-related and non-medication related. Additionally, we delineated which healthcare provider initiated the reporting of each event. Results: Over the two-year period, a total number of 1,061 events were reported to the HOPSC. Of these, 259 were medication-related events. Of the events reported, 40 were by a physician/NP and 1,021 were by a nurse. There was a discrepancy in the type of event reported (24.4% medication vs. 75.6% non-medication related) as well as in the type of reporter (3.8% physician/NP vs. 96.2% nurse). Of all the events reported, 8 were escalated to the Department of Medicine Peer Review Committee. Conclusions: Through review of healthcare provider event reports, the HOPSC has identified several types of adverse events and near misses in the Hematology/Oncology division at BIDMC. The events are mostly reported by inpatient nurses and are primarily medication-related. Given this skewed reporting pattern, we will investigate the reasons why reporting by physicians, especially in the outpatient setting, is limited. Our reported outline of the HOPSC operations may also guide oncology practices elsewhere in their own development of patient safety peer review committees. [Table: see text]

Abstract 2981: Association of a BRCAness profile with outcome and molecular aberrations involving homologous recombination in the TCGA ovarian cancer dataset

A subset of sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer (EOCs) may harbor a “BRCAness” phenotype characterized by improved outcome and enhanced responsiveness to platinum analogues and PARP inhibitors, similar to their BRCA1/2 mutated counterparts. This BRCAness phenotype may be due, in part, to defective homologous recombination (HR) related to various mechanisms, including BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation, somatic mutation of BRCA1/2 genes, or loss of function mutations in other HR pathway genes. We recently defined a gene expression profile of BRCAness that correlates with chemotherapy response and outcome in EOC. Here, we used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) EOC dataset to evaluate the association of the BRCAness profile with outcome, chemotherapy response and specific molecular aberrations that may underlie defective HR. We accessed data from 265 advanced stage high grade serous EOCs for which there was available gene expression, DNA copy number, promoter methylation and whole-exome DNA sequencing information. Patients were characterized as having a BRCAness phenotype (BL profile) or not (NBL profile) based on our BRCAness signature. BL patients were associated with improved median overall survival (OS) compared to NBL patients (59 vs 41 months respectively, log-rank p=0.008). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the BRCAness profile maintained an independent association with OS (HR=1.72, p=0.024). BL patients had a longer median platinum free interval compared to NBL patients (17 vs 11 months, p=0.024) and improved median disease free survival (18 vs 14 months, p=0.055). BRCAness profile was associated with molecular events affecting BRCA1/2 function such as BRCA1/2 mutations, BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation and EMSY amplification (47% in BL patients vs 27% in NBL patients, two-sided Fisher's exact p=0.007). Furthermore, BL patients had higher frequency of homozygous PTEN deletion compared to NBL patients but this did not reach statistical significance (12% vs 6% respectively, two-sided Fisher's exact p=0.14). Conversely, BRCAness profile was not associated with molecular events affecting the function of other Fanconi Anemia (FA) genes (FANCA/B/C/D2/E/F/G/I/J/L/M, PALB2) or DNA damage response genes involved in HR (ATM, ATR, CHEK1, CHEK2) although the overall incidence of these molecular events was very low (5% and 3% respectively). In conclusion, the BRCAness profile may identify patients with improved outcome, responsiveness to chemotherapy, and those who harbor certain molecular aberrations involving HR. Efforts to improve the predictive ability of the BRCAness profile using gene expression data from the TCGA dataset are underway.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2981. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2981

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal port placement for optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate complications of intraperitoneal ports placed laparoscopically as a separate procedure after initial debulking surgery for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

DESIGN

A retrospective case series (Canadian Task Force Classification III).

SETTING

Inpatient, academic teaching institution.

PATIENTS

Female patients of any age, at a single institution, undergoing laparoscopically-assisted intraperitoneal port placement after initial surgery for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer from January 2001 through December 2009.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopically assisted intra-peritoneal port placement.

MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-three ports were successfully placed, with no conversions to laparotomy. Only 2 patients were unable to receive intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and there was 1 major complication (enterotomy) related to port placement. There were 6 cases of port dysfunction (17%); however, in 3 cases the port was replaced and subsequently functioned well. There were 2 cases of port infection necessitating port removal. The majority (81.8%) of patients were able to complete all planned cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data from our institution, laparoscopic placement of an intraperitoneal port may be safely performed as a second procedure after initial surgery for stage III ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer and provides access for post-operative therapy.

Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian cancer

Resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy develops in the majority of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Platinum compounds form electrophilic intermediates that mediate DNA cross-linking and induce double-strand DNA breaks. Because the cellular response to electrophilic xenobiotics is partly mediated by Keap1-Nrf2 pathway, we evaluated the presence of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) mutations and NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway activation in EOC and correlated these with platinum resistance and clinical outcome. Nrf2 immunohistochemistry revealed nuclear localization (a surrogate of pathway activation) in over half of EOC patient specimens examined, with more common occurrence in the clear cell EOC subtype. Quantitative real-time PCR revealed that Nrf2 target genes were upregulated in tumors with nuclear positivity for Nrf2. Microarray analysis also showed upregulation of Nrf2 target genes in clear cell EOCs compared with other EOC subtypes. In addition, Keap1 sequence analysis revealed genetic mutations in 29% of clear cell samples and 8% of nonclear cell tumors. RNAi-mediated knockdown of Keap1 was associated with Nrf2 pathway activation and resistance to carboplatin in vitro. Importantly, patients with evidence of Nrf2 pathway activation had fewer complete clinical responses to platinum-based therapy, were enriched for platinum resistance, and had shorter median overall survival compared with those who did not show evidence of Nrf2 pathway activation. Our findings identify Keap1 mutations in EOC and they suggest a previously unrecognized role for the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway in mediating chemotherapeutic responses in this disease.

Gene expression profile of BRCAness that correlates with responsiveness to chemotherapy and with outcome in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To define a gene expression profile of BRCAness that correlates with chemotherapy response and outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

A publicly available microarray data set including 61 patients with EOC with either sporadic disease or BRCA(1/2) germline mutations was used for development of the BRCAness profile. Correlation with platinum responsiveness was assessed in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant tumor biopsy specimens from six patients with BRCA germline mutations. Association with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor responsiveness and with radiation-induced RAD51 foci formation (a surrogate of homologous recombination) was assessed in Capan-1 cell line clones. The BRCAness profile was validated in 70 patients enriched for sporadic disease to assess its association with outcome.

RESULTS

The BRCAness profile accurately predicted platinum responsiveness in eight out of 10 patient-derived tumor specimens, and between PARP-inhibitor sensitivity and resistance in four out of four Capan-1 clones. [corrected] When applied to the 70 patients with sporadic disease, patients with the BRCA-like (BL) profile had improved disease-free survival (34 months v 15 months; log-rank P = .013) and overall survival (72 months v 41 months; log-rank P = .006) compared with patients with a non-BRCA-like (NBL) profile, respectively. The BRCAness profile maintained independent prognostic value in multivariate analysis, which controlled for other known clinical prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The BRCAness profile correlates with responsiveness to platinum and PARP inhibitors and identifies a subset of sporadic patients with improved outcome. Additional evaluation of this profile as a predictive tool in patients with sporadic EOC is warranted.

Phase II Study of Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Bevacizumab With Maintenance Bevacizumab As First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Müllerian Tumors

Purpose

New strategies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor but is associated with GI perforations (GIPs) in patients with recurrent disease.

Patients and Methods

An open-label, phase II clinical trial was conducted in newly diagnosed patients with stage ≥ IC epithelial müllerian tumors. Patients received intravenous (IV) carboplatin (area under the curve = 5), paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 IV), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg IV) for six to eight cycles on day 1 every 21 days. Bevacizumab was omitted in the first cycle and continued as a single agent for 1 year.

Results

Sixty-two women participated in this study. Fifty-one patients (82%) were optimally surgically cytoreduced before treatment. The median age was 58 years (range, 18 to 77 years). Forty-five women (73%) had ovarian cancer, 10 (16%) had peritoneal cancer, four (6%) had fallopian tube cancers, and three (5%) had uterine papillary serous tumors. The majority of patients (90%) had stage III or IV disease. A median of 17 maintenance cycles (range, 0 to 25+ cycles) of bevacizumab (556 cycles) were administered with mild toxicity. Treatment was associated with two pulmonary embolisms and two GIPs, all occurring during the chemotherapy phase of treatment (364 total cycles). No grade 4 toxicities were seen during maintenance bevacizumab treatment. Radiographic responses were documented in 21 (75%) of 28 women with measurable disease (11 complete responses and 10 partial responses), with CA-125 responses in 76% of patients (11 complete responses, 21%; and 35 partial responses, 55%). The progression-free survival rate at 36 months was 58%.

Conclusion

The regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab with maintenance bevacizumab is feasible, safe, and worthy of future study in advanced ovarian cancer.

Cediranib, an oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor kinases, is an active drug in recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer

PURPOSE

Angiogenesis is important for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) growth, and blocking angiogenesis can lead to EOC regression. Cediranib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) -1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, and c-kit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a phase II study of cediranib for recurrent EOC or peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer; cediranib was administered as a daily oral dose, and the original dose was 45 mg daily. Because of toxicities observed in the first 11 patients, the dose was lowered to 30 mg. Eligibility included

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were enrolled; 46 were treated. Clinical benefit rate (defined as complete response [CR] or partial response [PR], stable disease [SD] > 16 weeks, or CA-125 nonprogression > 16 weeks), which was the primary end point, was 30%; eight patients (17%; 95% CI, 7.6% to 30.8%) had a PR, six patients (13%; 95% CI, 4.8% to 25.7%) had SD, and there were no CRs. Eleven patients (23%) were removed from study because of toxicities before two cycles. Grade 3 toxicities (> 20% of patients) included hypertension (46%), fatigue (24%), and diarrhea (13%). Grade 2 hypothyroidism occurred in 43% of patients. Grade 4 toxicities included CNS hemorrhage (n = 1), hypertriglyceridemia/hypercholesterolemia/elevated lipase (n = 1), and dehydration/elevated creatinine (n = 1). No bowel perforations or fistulas occurred. Median PFS was 5.2 months, and median OS has not been reached; median follow-up time is 10.7 months.

CONCLUSION

Cediranib has activity in recurrent EOC, tubal cancer, and peritoneal cancer with predictable toxicities observed with other TKIs.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Administration, Oral
• Adult
• Aged
• Disease-Free Survival
• Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
• Drug Administration Schedule
• Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/mortality
• Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/pathology
• Female
• Humans
• Maximum Tolerated Dose
• Middle Aged
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
• Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy
• Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/mortality
• Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology
• Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality
• Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
• Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Peritoneal Neoplasms/mortality
• Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology
• Prognosis
• Quinazolines/administration & dosage
• Quinazolines/adverse effects
• Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors
• Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/therapeutic use
• Risk Assessment
• Survival Analysis
• Treatment Outcome

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ursula A Matulonis Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, MA 02115, USA.
Suzanne Berlin
Percy Ivy
Karin Tyburski
Carolyn Krasner
Corrine Zarwan
Anna Berkenblit
Susana Campos
Neil Horowitz
Stephen A Cannistra
Hang Lee
Julie Lee
Maria Roche
Margaret Hill
Christin Whalen
Laura Sullivan
Chau Tran
Benjamin D Humphreys
Richard T Penson

Collapse

Carboplatin-induced gene expression changes in vitro are prognostic of survival in epithelial ovarian cancer

Background

We performed a time-course microarray experiment to define the transcriptional response to carboplatin in vitro, and to correlate this with clinical outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). RNA was isolated from carboplatin and control-treated 36M2 ovarian cancer cells at several time points, followed by oligonucleotide microarray hybridization. Carboplatin induced changes in gene expression were assessed at the single gene as well as at the pathway level. Clinical validation was performed in publicly available microarray datasets using disease free and overall survival endpoints.

Results

Time-course and pathway analyses identified 317 genes and 40 pathways (designated time-course and pathway signatures) deregulated following carboplatin exposure. Both types of signatures were validated in two separate platinum-treated ovarian and NSCLC cell lines using published microarray data. Expression of time-course and pathway signature genes distinguished between patients with unfavorable and favorable survival in two independent ovarian cancer datasets. Among the pathways most highly induced by carboplatin in vitro, the NRF2, NF-kB, and cytokine and inflammatory response pathways were also found to be upregulated prior to chemotherapy exposure in poor prognosis tumors.

Conclusion

Dynamic assessment of gene expression following carboplatin exposure in vitro can identify both genes and pathways that are correlated with clinical outcome. The functional relevance of this observation for better understanding the mechanisms of drug resistance in EOC will require further evaluation.

Gene-expression profiling in epithelial ovarian cancer

DNA-microarray technology has made it possible to simultaneously analyze the expression of thousands of genes in a small sample of tumor tissue. In epithelial ovarian cancer, gene-expression profiling has been used to provide prognostic information, to predict response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, and to discriminate between different histologic subtypes. Furthermore, DNA-microarray technology might permit identification of novel markers for early detection of disease and provide insights into the mechanisms of cancer growth and chemotherapy resistance. In this Review, we summarize the contributions of gene-expression profiling to the diagnosis and management of epithelial ovarian cancer and discuss ways in which this technique could become a useful tool in clinical management.

A feasibility study of low-dose, prolonged oral topotecan in patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal serous cancer who have attained a complete clinical response following platinum-based chemotherapy

To determine the tolerability of oral maintenance topotecan when administered to patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal serous cancers who have achieved a complete clinical response after first-line platinum-based therapy. Oral topotecan was given at a starting dose of 0.4 mg/m(2)/dose, twice a day (BID) for 21 consecutive days out of 28 days. The dose was subsequently increased to 0.5 mg/m(2)/dose, twice a day as tolerated. If the patient experienced toxicities during cycle 1 or subsequent cycles, doses were delayed and/or reduced. The lowest dose allowed on protocol was 0.3 mg/m(2)/dose twice daily. Thirteen patients were enrolled in the study, representing a total of fifty-nine cycles of oral topotecan. The starting dose of 0.4 mg/m(2) by mouth (PO) BID for 21 days was generally difficult for patients to tolerate, usually due to progressive anemia and fatigue, and a dose reduction to 0.3 mg/m(2) was necessary in 10/13 patients. A median of six cycles was administered, although 6 of 13 patients could not tolerate the planned 6 cycles due to toxicity. Hematologic toxicity was the most common side effect, although there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic side effect, occurring in 8 of 13 patients. Six patients were removed from the study prior to completing the planned six cycles of therapy, after receiving a median number of 2.5 cycles of treatment. This dose and schedule of oral topotecan does not appear to be feasible in this patient population.

Phase II study of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or peritoneal serous cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) or peritoneal serous carcinoma (PSC) who had experienced disease progression during, or within 3 months of discontinuing, topotecan or liposomal doxorubicin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

No more than three prior treatment regimens were allowed. Patients received single-agent bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. Response was assessed by computed tomography (CT) scan every 6 weeks using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).

RESULTS

Of 44 patients treated, 83.7% were primarily platinum resistant, 59.1% had received liposomal doxorubicin, 25% topotecan, 15.9% both agents, and 47.7% had received three prior chemotherapy regimens. A median of five (range, two to 16) bevacizumab doses were administered. Partial responses were observed in seven patients (15.9%). Median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.1 to 5.5 months), with a median survival duration of 10.7 months at study termination. Bevacizumab-associated grade 3 to 4 events included hypertension (9.1%), proteinuria (15.9%), bleeding (2.3%), and wound-healing complications (2.3%). The incidence of GI perforation (GIP; 11.4%) was higher than reported in bevacizumab trials of other tumor types. GIP occurred in 23.8% of patients receiving three prior chemotherapy regimens, compared with 0% of patients receiving two prior chemotherapy regimens (P < .01). A trend toward higher risk of GIP was observed for patients with bowel wall thickening or bowel obstruction on CT scan. Arterial thromboembolic events occurred in three patients (6.8%). Three deaths were related to bevacizumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab has single-agent activity in patients with platinum-resistant EOC or PSC. A higher than expected incidence of GIP was noted in these heavily pretreated patients.

IGF axis gene expression patterns are prognostic of survival in epithelial ovarian cancer

The IGF axis has documented growth-promoting effects in various malignancies, but its role in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has not been adequately examined. We studied the expression of the IGF axis genes in relation to outcome in EOC. Microarray expression profiles from 64 patients with advanced-stage EOC were used. Two multi-gene subsets were chosen, one upstream of the IGF receptor ('IGF family') and the other downstream of the IGF receptor ('IGF signaling pathway'), and analyzed in relation to survival. In addition, expression patterns of the two gene subsets were analyzed in relation to favorable and unfavorable prognosis categories identified in a previous study by whole-genome expression profiling. In a gene-by-gene analysis, IGF binding protein 4 and IGF-II receptor gene expression was inversely associated with survival. Using hierarchical clustering, the two multi-gene subsets separated the patient cohort into two groups with different median survival (IGF family: 33 vs 63 months, P=0.02 and IGF signaling pathway: 41 vs 63 months, P=0.05). Furthermore, the two multi-gene subsets were differentially expressed between the previously defined favorable and unfavorable prognosis tumors (Kolmogorov-Smirnov permutation: P=0.0005 and 0.003 for the IGF family and signaling pathway respectively), and individual genes (including IGF-I, IGF-I receptor, and several genes downstream of the receptor) were overexpressed in unfavorable prognosis tumors (permutation P<0.05). The expression patterns of several genes in the IGF axis are associated with survival in EOC, and expression changes of these genes may be underlying previously proposed microarray-derived clinical prognostic models. Future studies are needed to more precisely determine the diagnostic and potential therapeutic significance of these findings.

Unique Gene Expression Profile Based on Pathologic Response in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Purpose

We investigated whether tumor tissue obtained at diagnosis expresses a specific gene profile that is predictive of findings at second-look surgery in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Patients and Methods

Tumor tissue obtained at the time of diagnosis was profiled with oligonucleotide microarrays. Class prediction analysis was performed in a training set of 24 patients who had undergone a second-look procedure. The resultant predictive signature was then tested on an independent validation set comprised of 36 patients.

Results

A 93-gene signature referred to as the Chemotherapy Response Profile (CRP) was identified through its association with pathologic complete response. When applied to a separate validation set, the CRP distinguished between patients with unfavorable versus favorable overall survival (median 41 months v not yet reached, respectively, log-rank P = .007), with a median follow-up of 52 months. The signature maintained independent prognostic value in multivariate analysis, controlling for other known prognostic factors such as age, stage, grade, and debulking status. There was no genetic overlap between the CRP and our previously described Ovarian Cancer Prognostic Profile (OCPP), which demonstrated similar prognostic value. The combination of the CRP and OCPP yielded better prognostic discrimination then either profile alone. Genes present in the CRP include BAX, a proapoptotic protein previously associated with chemotherapy response in ovarian cancer.

Conclusion

Identification of a gene expression profile based on pathologic response in EOC provides independent prognostic information and offers potential insights into the mechanism of drug resistance. Efforts to identify a more tailored profile using selected genes from both the CRP and OCPP are underway.

Advances in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy in adult women. The most easily identifiable riskfactor is a strong family history of either ovarian or breast cancer; that may indicate the presence of an inherited germ-line mutation in either BRCA-1 or BRCA-2. Common symptoms, such as abdominal bloating and early satiety, indicate more advanced disease, involving the upper abdomen and present in approximately 70% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Physical examination often reveals the presence of a pelvic mass, which is best evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) for confirmation. Exploratory laparotomy is required for histologic confirmation, staging and tumor debulking and should be performed by a surgeon trained in these aspects of ovarian cancer management. Patients with early-stage disease, limited to the ovary or pelvis (stages I and II, respectively), have survival in the 80-95% range, whereas the survival of patients with disease involving the upper abdomen or beyond (stages III and IV, respectively) is 10-30%. Because of the propensity of EOC to spread beyond the confines of the ovary, the majority of patients will require postoperative chemotherapy in an attempt to eradicate residual disease. For selected patients with early-stage disease, confined to the ovary, such as those with well-differentiated, completely encapsulated tumors (e.g., stage IA, grade 1), no further treatment is necessary in view of excellent survival after surgery alone. For patients with higher-risk early-stage disease (e.g., those with pelvic extension, capsular rupture or involvement, positive washings, ascites or high-grade lesions) and for patients with advanced-stage disease (stages III and IV), postoperative combination chemotherapy with a taxane and platinum combination is the standard of care. Such treatment is capable of inducing responses in > 70% of patients with residual EOC and is also capable of prolonging both disease-free and overall survival. Unfortunately, despite an initial response to chemotherapy in the majority of patients, relapse is afrequent problem and is often detected by a rise in the serum tumor marker CA-125 in the absence of symptoms or signs of disease by physical examination or radiographic studies. In such cases, a hormonal maneuver is oftentimes considered in order to avoid the toxic effects of chemotherapy when the patient is asymptomatic and the goal of treatment is largely palliation, although eventually the development of clinical progression mandates the institution of second-line chemotherapy. If the treatment-free interval is > 6 months from the completion of first-line treatment, rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy is a reasonable first step. For those patients who develop resistance to second-line platinum or who have difficulty tolerating this agent, multiple other options are available for relapse management, including liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, gemcitabine and etoposide per os. Eventually the disease becomes resistant to multiple chemotherapy agents, and reorienting management toward supportive care and pain control is necessary. Ongoing efforts to identify more effective multiagent first-line regimens, to develop more effective strategies for early detection and to incorporate agents with novel mechanisms of action, such as antiangiogenesis compounds, hold promise.