The Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI) is a valid and reliable measure to assess psychological readiness before returning to sport following peroneal tendon pathology surgery

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to validate a scale that could help surgeons evaluate patients' psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) after peroneal tendon pathology surgery.

METHODS

The Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI) scale, which had previously been validated in ankle ligament reconstruction patients, was adapted to evaluate the psychological preparedness for RTS in athletic patients who underwent peroneal tendinopathy surgery. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Foot Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM) scores were employed as patient-related outcome measurement (PROM) instruments.

RESULTS

This study included 57 patients. There was a strong correlation between ALR-RSI and both FAOS and FAAM (r = -0.68 and 0.74, respectively). ALR-RSI was considerably higher in patients who returned to sports than in those who did not. The mean score was 72.9 ± 19.0 in patients who returned to the same preinjury level, 48.5 ± 24.0 in those who returned to a lower level and 53.6 ± 31.1 in patients who changed their athletic activity (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, ALR-RSI showed at least a similar discrimination ability when compared to FAOS and FAAM. The test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95. The Cronbach's α statistic used to measure the internal consistency was high (0.95). A Youden index of 0.65 was observed for a cut-off score of 68 points.

CONCLUSION

ALR-RSI is a valid instrument for assessing psychological readiness to RTS in an athletic population following peroneal tendon surgery. When compared to the most commonly used PROMs, it was strongly correlated and demonstrated at least similar discrimination capacity. This could assist surgeons in identifying athletes who will have poor postoperative results and advising them on their capability to RTS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Validation of the Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sports after Injury (ALR-RSI) Score as a Tool to Assess Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport in an Active Population After Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Cross-sectional Study

Ankle injuries account for 15% to 25% of all sports injuries resulting in significant pain and loss of function. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to validate a scale to help surgeons quantify the psychological readiness to Return To Sport (RTS) in patients undergoing ankle fracture surgery. ALR-RSI was used to assess the psychological readiness for RTS in athletic patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation between January 2020 and January 2021. Participants filled out ALR-RSI and 2 Patient-Related Outcome Measurement (PROM) tools: Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS). A total of 93 patients were included. There was a strong correlation between ALR-RSI and both OMAS and SEFAS, with Pearson coefficients of r = 0.58 and 0.53, respectively. ALR-RSI was significantly higher in the RTS group than in those who no longer practiced their main preinjury sport. Moreover, the discriminant validity of ALR-RSI (AUC = 0.81) was better than that of the SEFAS and OMAS (AUC = 0.64 and 0.65, respectively, p = .001). The intra-class correlation coefficient ρ of 0.94 showed excellent reproducibility. At an optimal cutoff value of 76.7, ALR-RSI had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 75% with a Youden index of 0.56. In conclusion, ALR-RSI was a valid and reproducible tool to evaluate the psychological readiness for RTS in an active population after an ankle fracture. This score could help surgeons identify athletes who may have unfavorable postoperative outcomes and provide support on the ability to RTS.

Women's beliefs about "natural" hormones and natural hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess women's beliefs about natural hormones, including what they believe the term "natural" means, and their beliefs about the risks, side effects, and efficacy of natural hormone replacement compared to standard hormone replacement.

DESIGN

Eighty-two women completed a 20-item survey available at a local compounding pharmacy. Respondents were white (100%), middle-aged (mean age, 47.22 years), and college educated (95.1%); 32.9% were perimenopausal, and 50.0% were postmenopausal; 58.5% were currently using hormone replacement therapy and, of those, 77.1% were using human bio-identical hormones.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of the respondents ( n = 74) reported that they had heard about natural hormones. Of those, most believed natural meant plant-derived (44.6%) and/or not synthesized or made without chemicals (50.0%). Most reported hearing about natural hormones from a healthcare provider (66.2%) and/or magazines and books (55.4%). When compared with standard hormone replacement, most respondents endorsed the beliefs that natural hormones have fewer or no risks (71.4%), have fewer or no side effects (69.0%), and are equally or more effective for managing menopause symptoms (61.8%). In addition, many endorsed the beliefs that natural hormone replacement is equally or more effective than standard hormone replacement for protection against osteoporosis (47.1%) and heart disease (40.0%), although many endorsed "don't know" for bone (45.7%) and heart (54.3%) protection.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women responding to a survey in a compounding pharmacy, most believed that, compared with standard hormones, natural hormones are safer, cause fewer side effects, and are equally or more effective for symptom management. Many believed natural hormone replacement is equally or more effective for long-term bone and heart protection. Educating women on the nature, risks, and benefits of natural hormone therapy is recommended.