Richter's transformation: Transforming the clinical landscape

Richter transformation (RT) represents an aggressive histological transformation from chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, most often to a large B cell lymphoma. It is characterised by chemo-resistance and subsequent short survival. Drug development has struggled over recent years in light of the aggressive kinetics of the disease, lack of pivotal registrational trials and relative rarity of the phenomenon. In this review we will highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of managing patients with RT as well as taking a look to the future therapeutic landscape. Highly active therapies developed across B cell malignancies are starting to impact this field, with T-cell activation therapies (CAR-T, bispecific antibodies), antibody-drug conjugates, and novel small molecule inhibitor combinations (e.g. BTKi-BCL2i) being actively studied. We will highlight the data supporting these developments and look to the studies to come to provide hope for patients suffering from this devastating disease.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients older than 65 years: analysis of 3 year Real World data of practice patterns and outcomes in England

BACKGROUND

We wished to examine treatment and outcome patterns in older diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, with a focus on the effect of route-to-diagnosis to outcome.

METHODS

Data were extracted from Public Health England's National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service between 2013 and 2015 included route-to-diagnosis, disease characteristics and survival for 9186 patients ≥65 years. Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy data identified front-line regimens, cycles and doses.

RESULTS

Route-to-diagnosis were emergency (34%), NHS urgent cancer pathway (rapid haemato-oncologist review <2 weeks), (29%) and standard GP referral (25%). The most common regimen was R-CHOP (n = 4392). 313 patients received R-miniCHOP (7% of R-CHOP). For all patients, 3-year overall survival (OS) for 65-79 years was 57% and for ≥80 years was 32%. Three-year OS for R-CHOP-treated patients diagnosed via emergency presentation was 54% (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.63, p < 0.01) and 75% (adjusted HR 0.81, p < 0.01) on the NHS urgent cancer pathway (reference HR:1.00: GP referrals). 3-year OS was 54% for both R-miniCHOP and R-CHOP in ≥80 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our comprehensive population analysis is the first to show that the NHS urgent cancer pathway is associated with a superior survival after adjusting for multiple confounders. Equivalent survival for R-CHOP and R-mini-CHOP was demonstrated in those ≥80 years.

Correction: Long-term clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with solitary plasmacytoma treated in the modern era

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219857.].

Impact of intended and relative dose intensity of R-CHOP in a large, consecutive cohort of elderly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with curative intent: no difference in cumulative incidence of relapse comparing patients by age

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in ageing populations places a significant burden on healthcare systems. Co-morbidity, frailty, and reduced organ and physiological reserve contribute to treatment-related complications. The optimal dose intensity of R-CHOP to optimize outcome across different ages with variable frailty and comorbidity burden is unclear.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

We examined the influence of intended (IDI) and relative (RDI) dose intensity of the combination of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, age and comorbidity on outcomes for DLBCL patients ≥70 years in a representative, consecutive cohort across eight UK centres (2009-2018). We determined predictors of survival using multivariable Cox regression, and predictors of recurrence before death using competing risks regression.

RESULTS

Porgression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly inferior in patients ≥80 vs. 70-79 years (P < 0.001). In contrast, 2-year cumulative relapse incidence, when accounting for non-relapse mortality as a competing risk, was no different between 70-79 vs. ≥80 years (P = 0.27) or comorbidity status (CIRS-G: 0-6 vs. >6) (P = 0.27). In 70-79 years, patients with an IDI ≥80% had a significantly improved PFS and OS (P < 0.001) compared to IDI < 80%. Conversely, in patients ≥80 years, there was no difference in PFS (P = 0.88) or OS (P = 0.75) according to IDI <80% vs. ≥80%. On multivariable analysis, when comparing by age, there was a significantly higher cumulative relapse rate for patients aged 70-79 years with an IDI <80% (vs. >80%) (P = 0.04) but not for patients ≥80 years comparing IDI (P = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

'R-mini-CHOP' provides adequate lymphoma-specific disease control and represents a reasonable treatment option in elderly patients ≥80 years aiming for cure.

Current treatment and future prospects for peripheral T-cell lymphoma

The management of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) remains a big challenge. PTCL exists as a collection of subentities, which are all rare. Each subtype described has its own unique pathogenesis, etiological associations and presentation. In general, PTCL is a relatively resistant disorder that exhibits extranodal features, B symptoms and paraneoplastic phenomena. This condition is prone to relapse, with a disappointing overall survival at 5 years of approximately 30%. This review will discuss the differences in the tumor biology of PTCL subentities, their associated targeted therapies, options for first-line treatment and the role of stem cell transplantation in first-line and relapsed settings. The authors then discuss new agents being used in early phase trials in relapsed/refractory disease and discuss the urgent need for collaborative randomized controlled trials in this resistant and biologically aggressive disease group.