Real-life treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis with moxifloxacin or macrolides: a comparative post-marketing surveillance study in general practice

OBJECTIVE

To compare the real-life treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECBs) using moxifloxacin tablets or one of the oral macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin in terms of symptom relief, time until improvement and cure, overall efficacy and tolerability.

METHODS

This prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study included out-patients with AECB whose last exacerbation was treated with a macrolide. The current AECB was treated either with moxifloxacin or with one of the macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin. Data were obtained on the patient's characteristics, disease and treatment history, the course of the current AECB including time to improvement and cure, and the final assessments of efficacy and tolerability. All adverse events were recorded in patients treated with moxifloxacin; for patients receiving macrolides, only drug-related adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

464 physicians treated 904 patients with moxifloxacin and 846 patients with one of the macrolides. Age, sex and body mass index were well matched between the two treatment groups. However, more moxifloxacin than macrolide patients presented with a generally bad condition (62.8% vs 48.6%). About 42% of patients in both groups had had chronic bronchitis for 1-5 years, and about 27% for 5-10 years. The mean number of AECBs in the previous 12 months was 2.7 and 2.6, respectively. Moxifloxacin was administered to most patients for 5 (43.8%) or 7 days (42.4%). Patients in the macrolide group were treated in most cases with clarithromycin 500 mg for 4-7 days, roxithromycin 300 mg for 6-7 days or azithromycin 500 mg for 3 days. Physicians assessed overall efficacy and tolerability as 'very good' or 'good' in 96.1% and 98.1%, respectively, of moxifloxacin-treated patients and in 67.5% and 91.7%, respectively, of macrolide-treated patients. The mean duration until improvement and cure of AECB was 3.2 days (+/- SD 1.5) and 6.2 days (+/- 2.6) in moxifloxacin-treated patients compared with 4.5 days (+/- 1.8) and 7.5 days (+/- 3.0) in macrolide-treated patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study conducted under real-life treatment conditions in patients with AECBs who were previously treated with a macrolide showed faster symptom relief and higher recovery rates with moxifloxacin compared with macrolides. The two treatment groups had comparably good safety and tolerability profiles.

HIV infection does not influence clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with bacterial community-acquired pneumonia: results from the CAPO international cohort study

In a case-control study, outcomes for 58 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) were compared with outcomes for 174 HIV-negative patients with CAP. No differences were found in the time to clinical stability, the length of hospitalization, and mortality. Clinical outcomes for hospitalized patients with CAP may not be influenced by HIV infection.

Gemifloxacin once daily for 7 days compared to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid thrice daily for 10 days for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia of suspected pneumococcal origin

CONTEXT

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common among adults and contributes considerably to morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of gemifloxacin to high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of CAP of suspected pneumococcal origin.

DESIGN

Randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group Phase III study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

From September 1998 to July 1999, 324 patients with CAP were randomized at 102 centers in France, Poland and the Republic of South Africa.

INTERVENTION

Patients were double-blind randomized to receive either oral gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 7 days or oral amoxicillin/clavulanate 1 g/125 mg three times daily for 10 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were clinical, bacteriological, and radiological responses at the end of therapy (day 12-14) and follow-up (day 24-30) visits.

RESULTS

In 228 PP patients, clinical resolution at follow-up was 88.7% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 87.6% for 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate [95% CI, -7.3, 9.5]. In 249 PP patients, clinical resolution at end of therapy was 95.3% for 7-day gemifloxacin vs. 90.1% for 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate [95% CI, -1.2, 11.7]. Bacteriologic response rates for the PP patients at end of therapy were 96.3% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 91.8% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group [95% CI, -4.7, 13.6]. Bacteriologic response rates at follow-up were 87.2% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 89.1% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group [95% CI, -15.0, 11.2]. Specifically gemifloxacin eradicated 95.7% of Streptococcus pneumoniae including penicillin and macrolide resistant strains. Radiological response rates for the PP patients at end of therapy were 89.1% for 7-day gemifloxacin and 87.6% for the amoxicillin/clavulanate group. The most frequently reported drug-related events were in the gemifloxacin group, diarrhea (6.0%) and rash (3.0%) and in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group, diarrhea (11.1%) and fungal infection, vaginitis and vomiting (each 2.0%). Overall there were statistically fewer withdrawals due to lack of therapeutic effect in the gemifloxacin group compared with the amoxicillin/clavulanate cohort, (95% CI, -8.8;0.6; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 7 days was found to be clinically, bacteriologically, and radiologically as effective as 10 days of amoxicillin/clavulanate 1 g/125 mg three times daily for the treatment of suspected pneumococcal CAP.

Antibiotic therapy of community respiratory tract infections: strategies for optimal outcomes and minimized resistance emergence

Widespread, increasing antibiotic resistance amongst the major respiratory pathogens has compromised traditional therapy of the major infective respiratory syndromes, including bacterial pneumonia and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Guidelines for antibiotic prescribing dating from the 1980s to 1990s, which attempted to address such problems, were commonly too prescriptive and difficult to apply, and took little account of end-user practice or locally prevalent resistance levels. Further confusion was caused by conflicting recommendations emanating from differing specialty groups. The evidence that such guidelines benefited either clinical outcomes or treatment costs has been disputed. They have probably had little effect on resistance emergence. We report the recommendations of an independent, multi-national, inter-disciplinary group, which met to identify principles underlying prescribing and guideline formulation in an age of increasing bacterial resistance. Unnecessary prescribing was recognized as the major factor in influencing resistance and costs. Antibiotic therapy must be limited to syndromes in which bacterial infection is the predominant cause and should attempt maximal reduction in bacterial load, with the ultimate aim of bacterial eradication. It should be appropriate in type and context of local resistance prevalence, and optimal in dosage for the pathogen(s) involved. Prescribing should be based on pharmacodynamic principles that predict efficacy, bacterial eradication and prevention of resistance emergence. Pharmacoeconomic analyses confirm that bacteriologically more effective antibiotics can reduce overall management costs, particularly with respect to consequential morbidity and hospital admission. Application of these principles should positively benefit therapeutic outcomes, resistance avoidance and management costs and will more accurately guide antibiotic choices by both individuals and formulary/guideline committees.

Gemifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 070 Clinical Study group

Six hundred patients were evaluated in this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin (320 mg once-daily for 5 days) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (500/125 mg three-times daily for 7 days) for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Of note, more than 90% of study participants had stage 2 disease at study entry. The two drugs were found to be equally effective, with clinical success rates of 93.6% for gemifloxacin and 93.2% on amoxicillin/clavulanate (95% CI -3.9 to 4.6). Bacteriological success rates favored gemifloxacin (90.9% compared with 79.5% for amoxicillin/clavulanate; 95% CI -3.3 to 26.0); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Gemifloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate were both well tolerated. In summary, gemifloxacin was found to be well tolerated and effective for the treatment of AECB, suggesting it is well suited for empirical treatment of this common respiratory condition in the current clinical environment.

Fluconazole therapy for chronic disseminated candidiasis in patients with leukemia and prior amphotericin B therapy

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of fluconazole against chronic disseminated candidiasis (hepatosplenic candidiasis) in patients with leukemia in whom amphotericin B treatment had failed.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of patients with chronic disseminated candidiasis treated with fluconazole on a compassionate investigational new drug protocol.

SETTING

Multi-institutional.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients received 100 to 400 mg of fluconazole per day for a median of 30 weeks. All had either failed to respond to treatment with more than 2 g of amphotericin B or had serious amphotericin B-related toxicities.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 16 evaluable patients (88%) responded. Responses were observed in seven of nine patients in whom adequate doses of amphotericin B had failed and in all seven patients who had amphotericin B-related toxicities. In 12 patients, cytotoxic chemotherapy was continued without flare of the infection. Fluconazole was well tolerated with rare side effects. Aspergillus superinfection developed in three patients and contributed to the death of two of them.

CONCLUSION

Fluconazole is a safe and effective agent with significant activity against chronic disseminated candidiasis.