Madsen JK, Grande P, Saunamäki K, Thayssen P, Kasis E, Eriksen UH, Rasmussen K, Haunsø S, Nielsen TT, Haghfelt TH, Hansen PF, Hjelms E, Paulsen PK, Alstrup P, Arendrup HC, Niebuhr-Jørgensen U, Andersen LI. [DANAMI. A Danish study of invasive versus conservative treatment of patients with post-infarction ischemia who had received thrombolytic therapy].
Ugeskr Laeger 2000;
162:5924-8. [PMID:
11094553]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
To compare an invasive strategy employing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) with a medical strategy in patients who had received thrombolytic treatment for first acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and with signs of inducible ischaemia.
METHODS
In a prospective study 1008 patients were randomized, 503 to invasive treatment, of whom 266 (52.9%) had PTCA, and 147 (29.2%) CABG, 505 to conservative treatment, of whom eight (1.6%) were revascularized within two months.
RESULTS
After a median follow-up of 2.4 years the mortality in the invasive group was 3.6% vs. 4.4% (p = 0.45) in the conservative group, re-infarction incidence was 5.6% vs. 10.5% (p = 0.0038) and percentage of admissions with unstable angina was 17.9% vs. 29.5% (p < 0.00001).
DISCUSSION
We conclude that post-infarct patients with inducible ischaemia should be referred to coronary angiography and revascularised accordingly.
Collapse