GS-9857 in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1-4 infection: a randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging phase 1 study

GS-9857, an inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) nonstructural protein (NS) 3/4A, demonstrates potent activity against HCV genotypes 1-6 and improved coverage against commonly encountered NS3 resistance-associated variants (RAVs). In this study, the safety, tolerability, antiviral activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of GS-9857 were evaluated in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1-4 infection. Patients with genotype 1-4 infection received placebo or once-daily GS-9857 at doses ranging from 50 to 300 mg for 3 days under fasting conditions. GS-9857 was well tolerated; all reported adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. Diarrhoea and headache were the most commonly reported AEs. Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities were observed in 17% of patients receiving GS-9857; there were no Grade 3 or 4 abnormalities in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase or alkaline phosphatase levels. GS-9857 demonstrated potent antiviral activity in patients with chronic HCV infection, achieving mean and median maximum reductions in HCV RNA of ≥3 log10 IU/mL following administration of a 100-mg dose in patients with HCV genotype 1a, 1b, 2, 3 or 4 infection. The antiviral activity of GS-9857 was unaffected by the presence of pretreatment NS3 RAVs. In patients with genotype 1-4 infection, GS-9857 exhibited linear PK and was associated with a median half-life of 29-42 h, supporting once-daily dosing. Thus, the tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile of GS-9857 support its further evaluation for treatment of patients with chronic HCV infection.

A phase 1, randomized, dose-ranging study of GS-5816, a once-daily NS5A inhibitor, in patients with genotype 1-4 hepatitis C virus

GS-5816 is an inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5A protein that has demonstrated pan-genotypic activity and a high barrier to resistance in HCV replicon assays. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, antiviral activity and pharmacokinetics of once-daily doses of GS-5816 in patients with genotype 1-4 HCV infection. Patients with genotype 1-4 HCV infection were randomized to 3 days of GS-5816 at doses ranging from 5 to 150 mg or placebo. Adverse events were recorded, and plasma samples obtained for analysis of pharmacokinetics, HCV RNA and NS5A sequencing studies. GS-5816 5-150 mg for 3 days was well tolerated and resulted in rapid declines in HCV RNA that were sustained over the dosing period. In patients treated with the 150 mg dose of GS-5816, the mean maximal HCV RNA declines were 4.0, 4.0, 4.4, 3.3 and 3.5 log10 IU/mL in patients with genotype 1a, 1b, 2, 3 and 4 HCV infection, respectively. Pretreatment NS5A resistance-associated polymorphisms were detected in 31% (22/70) of patients. Genotype 1 and 3 HCV-infected patients without pretreatment NS5A resistance-associated polymorphisms had greater declines in HCV RNA than patients with resistance-associated polymorphisms. Plasma pharmacokinetics were supportive of once-daily dosing. GS-5816 demonstrated pangenotypic antiviral activity in patients with genotype 1-4 HCV infection. It will be further evaluated in combination with other pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals to achieve the goal of developing a well-tolerated, highly effective treatment for all HCV genotypes.

An evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of treprostinil diolamine in subjects with hepatic impairment

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Treprostinil diolamine (oral treprostinil) is a prostacyclin analogue under evaluation for the treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of treprostinil following oral administration of a single sustained-release 1 mg dose in subjects with hepatic impairment.

METHODS

Four cohorts, including healthy volunteers, and subjects with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment were enrolled. Thirty subjects completed the study. Mean treprostinil clearance values (CL/F) decreased with the severity of hepatic impairment. The decrease in CL/F resulted in a marked increase in exposure levels of treprostinil. Relative to healthy subjects, mean area under the curve from time zero to 24 h after dosing interval (AUC0-24) values in subjects with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment increased by approximately 2·2-, 4·9- and 7·6-fold, respectively. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) exhibited in this study were similar to those seen with prostacyclin and its analogues and with AEs seen in other clinical studies with oral treprostinil (e.g. headache, diarrhoea and nausea). The overall incidence of all AEs and the specific events of headache and nausea increased with severity of hepatic impairment.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Based on these results, dosage adjustments should be performed in subjects with hepatic impairment.

Posaconazole Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability in Subjects With Varying Degrees of Chronic Renal Disease

Posaconazole is a triazole antifungal in development for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. The authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of posaconazole in healthy subjects and in those with mild (CL(CR) = 50-80 mL/min), moderate (CL(CR) = 20-49 mL/min), and severe chronic renal disease (CL(CR) <20 mL/min; receiving outpatient hemodialysis) (n = 6/group). Subjects received one 400-mg dose of posaconazole oral suspension with a standardized high-fat breakfast. For hemodialysis-dependent subjects, this dose was given on a nonhemodialysis day, and a second 400-mg dose was given 6 hours before hemodialysis. Blood samples were collected before dose and up to 120 hours postdose. For hemodialysis-dependent subjects following the second dose, additional samples (predialyzed and postdialyzed) were collected before, during, and after dialysis. There was no correlation between posaconazole pharmacokinetics and mild to moderate renal disease; the slopes of the linear regressions for creatinine clearance versus posaconazole AUC, C(max), CL/F, and t1/2 values were not significantly different from zero (P > .130). Mean CL/F values before and during hemodialysis were comparable. Furthermore, the difference in the predialyzed and postdialyzed posaconazole concentrations was only approximately 3%, supporting that posaconazole was not removed by hemodialysis. Protein binding was similar in all groups (approximately 98%) and was unaffected by hemodialysis. Posaconazole was generally well tolerated. One patient had elevated liver function test results that were not present at baseline and were thought to be possibly related to posaconazole. Results of this single-dose study indicate that dosage adjustments for patients with varying degrees of renal disease are not required.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic profiles of the new testosterone topical gel formulation, Testim, compared to AndroGel

A two-period, randomized, complete crossover study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of Testim (AA2500), a new 1% testosterone topical gel formulation, compared to AndroGel, an already available 1% testosterone topical gel. Twenty-nine hypogonadal subjects received a single dose (50 mg testosterone) of each formulation seven days apart. C(max) estimates for total testosterone, dihydrotestosterone and free testosterone were greater (30, 19 and 38%, respectively) following the application of Testim compared to AndroGel. Similarly, AUC(0-24) estimates for total testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and free testosterone were greater (30, 11 and 47%, respectively) following the application of Testim compared to AndroGel. Confidence intervals for C(max) and AUC(0-24) were not wholly contained within the bioequivalence limits for testosterone, therefore Testim trade mark and AndroGel are not bioequivalent with Testim providing higher serum levels and greater bioavailability than AndroGel.

Cardiovascular safety of sublingual apomorphine in patients on stable doses of oral antihypertensive agents and nitrates

Sublingual (SL) apomorphine (2 to 6 mg) has been shown to be effective for treatment of male erectile dysfunction. Many patients with erectile dysfunction are also being treated for systemic hypertension and/or cardiovascular disease. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, SL apomorphine 5 mg and placebo were administered on alternate days to 162 men who were on long-term therapy (> or =4 weeks) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, alpha(1) blockers, or short- or long-acting nitrates. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured before and after dosing; cardiac rhythm was recorded by 4-hour Holter monitoring. The only potentially clinically significant interactions between SL apomorphine and the antihypertensive agents or short-acting nitrates were greater orthostatic decreases in systolic blood pressure in the alpha-blocker and calcium channel blocker groups (-10 and -6 mm Hg vs placebo, respectively). Administration of SL apomorphine after dosing with long-acting nitrates resulted in significant decreases in blood pressure when patients were standing (mean systolic change, -5 to -9 mm Hg 30 to 60 minutes postdose, p <0.05; mean diastolic change, -3 to -4 mm Hg 50 to 60 minutes postdose, p <0.05). The most common adverse events with SL apomorphine were dizziness, nausea, and headache. Syncope occurred in 1 patient in the beta-blocker group; symptomatic hypotension occurred in 2 patients each in the short- and long-acting nitrate groups. Thus, in patients receiving common antihypertensive agents and short-acting nitrates, as well as in most patients receiving long-acting nitrates, SL apomorphine at higher than recommended doses produced no clinically significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure greater than changes seen with SL apomorphine alone.

A prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing telmisartan 80 mg with valsartan 80 mg in patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan 80 mg with valsartan 80 mg throughout a 24 h dosing interval.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, parallel group study. Treatment efficacy was compared using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), cuff sphygmomanometry and calculated responder rates. Tolerability was assessed by physical examination, laboratory parameters, 12-lead electrocardiogram, blood pressure and heart rate monitoring, and evaluation of adverse events.

SETTING

Thirty-five centres in the United States.

PATIENTS

Four hundred and twenty-six patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension entered the study. Ninety-two per cent (n=393) completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients underwent a four-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period before being randomly assigned to once-daily oral telmisartan 80 mg (n=214) or valsartan 80 mg (n=212) for an eight-week, open-label treatment period.

RESULTS

Treatment with telmisartan was associated with a significantly greater mean reduction from baseline in the last 6 h ABPM mean for diastolic blood pressure compared with the valsartan-treated group (-7.5+/-0.6 mmHg versus -5.2+/-0.6 mmHg, respectively, P<0.01). Secondary analyses showed significantly greater efficacy with telmisartan 80 mg than with valsartan 80 mg, including greater mean reductions from baseline of ABPM (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure) during the daytime (06:00 to 21:59) and morning (06:00 to11:59) hours, and larger decreases in trough cuff blood pressure (P<0.01). Both treatments showed placebo-like tolerability profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Telmisartan 80 mg once daily was superior to valsartan 80 mg once daily in reducing diastolic blood pressure during the last 6 h of the 24 h dosing interval. These results may be due to telmisartan's longer plasma half-life or to a higher potency compared with valsartan, such that a higher dose of valsartan may produce effects similar to those of 80 mg telmisartan. These data confirm the long duration of action of telmisartan with consistent and sustained control of blood pressure over 24 h and during the last 6 h of the dosing interval. Both treatments were well tolerated; the adverse event data confirmed the excellent tolerability profiles of telmisartan and valsartan that have been reported previously.

Influence of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin in normocholesterolemic adults

OBJECTIVE

The influence of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of cerivastatin was evaluated in this nonrandomized, non-blinded, 7-day, multiple-dose study.

METHODS

Thirty-five adults between the ages of 21 years and 75 years with normal renal function (CL(CR) >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, n = 9), or patients with either mild (CL(CR) 61 ml/min/1.73 m2 to < or =90 ml/min/1.73 m2, n = 9), moderate (CL(CR) 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 to < or =60 ml/ min/1.73 m2, n = 8), or severe (CL(CR) <30 ml/min/ 1.73 m2, but not on dialysis, n = 9) renal impairment were given cerivastatin 0.3 mg daily each evening for 7 days. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin, including the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)0-24, peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (tmax) and elimination half-life (t1/2), were determined on day 1 and day 7. The logarithm of the pharmacokinetic variables was analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Safety assessments included physical examination, fundoscopy, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), adverse events, and laboratory safety indices.

RESULTS

The day-1 AUC in patients with mild renal impairment was similar to that of patients with normal function (19.6 microg/h/l vs 19.2 microg/h/l, respectively). However, the AUC for cerivastatin patients with moderate or severe renal impairment was 40-60% higher (30.8 microg/h/l and 29.0 microg/h/l, respectively). Cmax values for patients with normal, mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment were 3.3, 3.4, 4.6, and 5.2 microg/l, respectively. This modest increase in plasma cerivastatin levels is nearly equivalent to a 0.4-mg daily dose, which has been recently approved in the United States. The mean t1/2 of cerivastatin was less than 4.5 h in all patients, indicating that renal dysfunction did not promote cerivastatin accumulation. This observation was confirmed by the finding that the cerivastatin plasma levels on day 1 and day 7 were similar in all patient groups. Furthermore, the mean AUC and Cmax values for both demethylated and hydroxylated cerivastatin were similar in the patients with the most severe renal dysfunction to the corresponding values in healthy subjects. Cerivastatin was well tolerated in all patients irrespective of renal function. Adverse events were observed in 37% of the subjects; nearly all were mild and generally of short duration, and most resolved without intervention. Incidence of adverse events was similar across all three renal groups and the control group. There were no clinically significant laboratory changes other than those consistent with renal disease.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that dosage adjustment of the daily 0.3-mg cerivastatin dose in patients with significant renal impairment is likely unnecessary.

Long-term safety and antihypertensive efficacy of irbesartan: pooled results of five open-label studies

An analysis of 5 multicenter, open-label studies was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of irbesartan in 1,006 patients with seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) 95-110 mm Hg. Irbesartan monotherapy was started at 75 mg and titrated to 300 mg at 2- to 4-week intervals to achieve normalized blood pressure (SeDBP <90 mm Hg). If normalized BP was not attained with irbesartan 300 mg alone, adjunctive medications could be added. At 12 months of therapy, the mean reduction in seated systolic blood pressure/SeDBP was 21.0/15.8 mm Hg, and 83% (684/821) of patients were normalized. Of those normalized, 64% were receiving irbesartan monotherapy and 86% were receiving irbesartan or irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide only. No evidence of tachyphylaxis to the antihypertensive effect of irbesartan was noted. Thus, long-term irbesartan therapy, with or without other antihypertensives, achieved and maintained normalized BP in the majority of patients and was well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin in patients with renal impairment

Sparfloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent with a broad spectrum of activity and long elimination half-life. Because its single-dose pharmacokinetics are altered by renal impairment, the present study was undertaken to determine the effects of moderate or severe renal insufficiency on the multidose pharmacokinetic characteristics of and tolerance to sparfloxacin. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of sparfloxacin were assessed in 32 subjects (15 men, 17 women) with (1) normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CLcr]> or = 250 mL/min per 1.73 m2) and a mean age of 52.6 years and mean weight of 70.4 kg; (2) moderate renal insufficiency (CLcr 30-49 mL/min per 1.73 m2) and a mean age of 54.4 years and mean weight of 67.8 kg; and (3) severe renal insufficiency (CLcr 10-29 mL/min per 1.73 m2) and a mean age of 50.8 years and mean weight of 73.1 kg. The first 2 groups received a 400-mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 200 mg once daily for 9 days; subjects with severe renal insufficiency received a 400-mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 200 mg every 48 hours on days 3, 5, 7, and 9. The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin and its glucuronide metabolite were determined after the last dose. All subjects were monitored for changes in the corrected QT (QTc) interval and for adverse events. Renal insufficiency altered the steady-state pharmacokinetic variables of sparfloxacin and its glucuronide metabolite, reducing their renal clearances and increasing both maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Mean steady-state plasma sparfloxacin concentrations in subjects with severe renal insufficiency (48-hour dosing interval) were comparable to those in subjects with normal renal function (24-hour dosing interval). However, mean plasma sparfloxacin concentrations in patients with moderate renal insufficiency were 2 to 3 times greater than the corresponding concentrations in subjects with normal renal function receiving the same dosage regimen. The QTc interval was slightly increased in all groups (the greatest increases were 14, 14, and 6 milliseconds in the groups with normal renal function and moderately and severely impaired renal function, respectively, at 5.5 hours post-dose on day 9 or 10) but similar among subjects with normal renal function or with renal insufficiency. Sparfloxacin was well tolerated. Thus sparfloxacin clearance is reduced and plasma concentrations raised by moderate or severe renal insufficiency. These increases do not appear to augment drug effects on the QTc interval or enhance the risk for adverse events. These results suggest that alternate-day dosing (48-hour dosing interval) following a double loading dose on day 1 should be used in patients with severe renal insufficiency and may be appropriate for patients with moderate renal insufficiency.

Repaglinide versus glyburide: a one-year comparison trial

This prospective, 1-year, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study was designed to show that repaglinide was at least equivalent to glyburide in patients with type 2 diabetes. Five hundred and seventy-six patients with type 2 diabetes of at least 6 months' duration were randomized to receive monotherapy with repaglinide (n = 383) or glyburide (n = 193). During weeks 1-8, doses were gradually increased to achieve a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) range of 80-140 mg/dl. The final adjusted dose was maintained for 12 months. Repaglinide patients received a starting dose of 0.5 mg three times/day preprandially, adjusted as necessary to 1, 2 or 4 mg before breakfast, lunch and dinner. Glyburide patients received a starting dose of 2.5 mg before breakfast and placebo before lunch and dinner. Glyburide was increased as necessary to 5 or 10 mg before breakfast (placebo before lunch and dinner) or to 15 mg (10 mg before breakfast, placebo before lunch, and 5 mg before dinner). After study drug was stopped, patients were transferred to an appropriate therapy, as recommended by the investigator. Efficacy was assessed by changes from baseline in glycemic control parameters and in C-peptide, insulin, and lipid profiles. Repaglinide provided glycemic control that was at least as effective and potentially safer than that provided by glyburide. The glucose-lowering effect of repaglinide was most pronounced in pharmacotherapy-naive patients, who showed rapid and marked decreases in mean glycosylated hemoglobin levels from baseline (9.4%) to month 3 (7.6%) and month 12 (7.9%). Mean FPG levels also decreased overall in this group, from 222 mg/dl at baseline, to 175 mg/dl at month 3, to 188 mg/dl at month 12. At endpoint, morning C-peptide levels had increased significantly in glyburide-treated patients compared with those treated with repaglinide, but morning fasting insulin levels did not differ significantly between the two groups. Repaglinide efficacy was sustained over 1 year and was not influenced by age or sex. Overall safety and changes in lipid profile and body weight were similar with both agents, with no significant change after extended pharmacotherapy. Weight gain data for the subset of pharmacotherapy-naïve patients suggest that patients given repaglinide may gain less weight than those given glyburide. Repaglinide, at doses of 0.5-4.0 mg administered three times preprandially, was well tolerated and provided safe and consistently effectiveglycemic control during this 1-year study. Patients using repaglinide received the same therapeutic benefits as those using glyburide, and may have received additional benefits.

Effect of RenaGel, a non-absorbed, calcium- and aluminium-free phosphate binder, on serum phosphorus, calcium, and intact parathyroid hormone in end-stage renal disease patients

BACKGROUND

Control of dietary phosphate absorption in end-stage renal disease patients is essential to prevent the deleterious sequelae of phosphorus retention. Efficacy of currently available calcium- and aluminium-containing phosphate binders is constrained by the side-effects associated with the absorption of calcium and aluminium. The current study examined the efficacy of RenaGel, a calcium- and aluminium-free, polymeric phosphate binder, in end-stage renal disease patients.

METHODS

Administration of calcium- or aluminium-containing phosphate binders ceased during a 2-week washout period. RenaGel, at starting doses of one, two, or three 500-mg capsules three times per day with meals, was administered for 8 weeks. RenaGel dose was titrated up 1 capsule per meal at the end of each 2-week period if necessary to achieve phosphorus control. A second 2-week washout period followed the end of RenaGel treatment.

RESULTS

Mean serum phosphorus rose from a pre-washout level of 6.9 mg/dl (2.23 mmol/l) to 8.1 mg/dl (2.62 mmol/l) at the end of the initial 2-week washout. With RenaGel treatment, serum phosphorus declined and returned to pre-washout levels after 4 weeks. Serum phosphorus reached a nadir of 6.5 mg/dl (2.10 mmol/l) after 7 weeks of RenaGel treatment. Serum phosphorus rose to 8.2 mg/dl (2.65 mmol/l) 2 weeks after cessation of RenaGel treatment. As anticipated, calcium declined during the initial washout period when calcium-based phosphate binders were stopped for the majority of patients. The rise in serum phosphorus and decline in serum calcium during washout resulted in an increase in median intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels from 292 pg/ml to 395 pg/ml. iPTH fell to 283 pg/ml after 6 weeks of RenaGel treatment despite a persistently lower serum calcium. RenaGel treatment also reduced serum total and LDL cholesterol by 25 mg/dl (0.65 mmol/l) and 23 mg/dl (0.59 mmol/l) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RenaGel appears to be an effective phosphate binder free of calcium and aluminium. Phosphorus control with two to four RenaGel capsules per meal appears to result in comparable phosphorus lowering seen with calcium- or aluminium-based phosphate binders. RenaGel may offer an alternative for the control of phosphorus retention in end-stage renal disease patients.

An elective-titration study of the comparative effectiveness of two angiotensin II-receptor blockers, irbesartan and losartan. Irbesartan/Losartan Study Investigators

This multicenter, randomized, double-masked, elective-titration study was designed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of irbesartan and losartan, two angiotensin II subtype AT1-receptor blockers, in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 3-week, single-masked, placebo lead-in period, 432 patients with a mean seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) of 95 to 115 mm Hg were randomly allocated to receive either irbesartan 150 mg once daily (n = 213) or losartan 50 mg once daily (n = 219). At week 4, if SeDBP at trough (i.e., 24 +/- 3 hours after the previous dose) was > or = 90 mm Hg, the daily dose was doubled (to irbesartan 300 mg or losartan 100 mg). At week 8, if trough SeDBP was > or = 90 mm Hg, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg once daily was added to the regimen; consistent with the prescribing information for losartan, the dose of losartan was reduced to 50 mg once daily on the addition of hydrochlorothiazide. A total of 370 patients (178 irbesartan and 192 losartan) were evaluable for efficacy. The mean change in trough SeDBP at week 8, the primary efficacy end point, was significantly greater in patients receiving irbesartan monotherapy than in those receiving losartan monotherapy (-10.2 mm Hg vs -7.9 mm Hg, respectively). At week 12, reductions in trough SeDBP and seated systolic blood pressure were greater with irbesartan treatment than with losartan treatment (-13.8 mm Hg vs -10.8 mm Hg and -18.0 mm Hg vs -13.9 mm Hg, respectively), and a greater proportion of irbesartan patients responded to therapy (i.e., trough SeDBP < 90 mm Hg or reduction in trough SeDBP > or = 10 mm Hg) compared with losartan patients (78% vs 64%, respectively). Both regimens were well tolerated.

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of two long-acting calcium antagonists, mibefradil and amlodipine, in essential hypertension. Mibefradil Hypertension Study Group

In a previous forced-titration trial, mibefradil 100 mg QD was as effective as amlodipine 10 mg QD in reducing sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP), and it produced significantly less leg edema than did amlodipine 10 mg QD. The present multicenter, double-masked, randomized, parallel-design trial was performed to assess the reproducibility of these results using a flexible-titration design. Following a 4-week, single-masked, placebo run-in period, 296 patients with a trough SDBP of between 95 and 114 mm Hg (21 to 27 hours postdose) were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with mibefradil 50 mg (n = 146) or amlodipine 5 mg (n = 150). In patients whose trough SDBP was greater than 90 mm Hg after 4 or 8 weeks of double-masked therapy, the dosage was titrated upward to mibefradil 100 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for the remainder of the 12-week active treatment period. A greater proportion of amlodipine-treated patients (65%) than of mibefradil-treated patients (54%) required titration to the higher dose. Despite this difference, statistically equivalent reductions in trough SDBP were observed after 12 weeks of treatment with 50 to 100 mg of mibefradil QD (-11.7 +/- 6.4 mm Hg) and 5 to 10 mg of amlodipine QD (-11.9 +/- 6.9 mm Hg). SDBP was normalized to < or = 90 mm Hg at week 12 in 66% of patients treated with mibefradil and 65% of those receiving amlodipine. The tolerability profile of mibefradil was superior to that of amlodipine, with significantly fewer patients (P = 0.009) reporting leg edema after mibefradil treatment (7%) than after amlodipine treatment (17%). The results of this study confirm those of the previous trial. Once-daily treatment with mibefradil 50 to 100 mg for 12 weeks was as effective as 12 weeks of once-daily treatment with amlodipine 5 to 10 mg in reducing SDBP and was associated with a significantly lower incidence of leg edema.

Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Captopril Plus Hydrochlorothiazide versus Nifedipine Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System in Black Patients with Mild to Moderate Hypertension

The safety and efficacy of captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were compared to nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) in 145 randomly assigned black patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Following a 4-week placebo lead-in, patients received captopril plus HCTZ 25/15 mg or nifedipine GITS 30 mg for up to 12 weeks. Upward dose titration was permitted at weeks 3 and 6. Mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased 16.1 ± 13.5 mm Hg and 11.5 ± 7.4 mm Hg, respectively, with captopril plus HCTZ. Statistically similar decreases were observed with nifedipine GITS: systolic, 19.3 ± 12.2 mm Hg; diastolic, 13.8 ± 7.2 mm Hg. There were no clinically significant between-group differences in serum chemistries. Edema was reported in 20.3% of nifedipine GITS patients versus 1.4% of captopril plus HCTZ patients (p = 0.001). The two regimens were equally effective in controlling blood pressure in black patients; however, a higher incidence of edema occurred with nifedipine GITS compared to captopril plus HCTZ.

Lower dose diuretic therapy in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension

Indapamide (Lozol), an indoline antihypertensive drug with diuretic and vasodilating activities, was evaluated in 195 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (sitting DBP between 95 and 110 mmHg) in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group design trial. A four week single-blind placebo wash-out period was followed by an eight week double-blind period. Patients were randomised to indapamide 1.25 mg/day or to placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in sitting DBP from baseline to week 8. Ninety patients in the placebo group (93%) and 82 patients (84%) in the indapamide group completed the eight weeks of double-blind therapy. Indapamide produced a mean (SE) decrease in sitting DBP of 7.4 (0.63) mmHg (from 100.1 to 92.8 mmHg) compared with a decrease of 3.6 (0.75) mmHg (from 99.6 to 95.8 mmHg) produced by placebo (p < 0.0001). Indapamide and placebo also produced mean decreases in standing DBP of 6.8 (0.75) and 2.8 (0.77) mmHg, respectively (p = 0.0002), in sitting SBP of 11.1 (1.18) and 3.2 (1.35) mmHg, respectively (p = 0.0001) and in standing SBP of 11.4 (1.29) and 4.0 (1.43) mmHg, respectively (P = 0.0002). Reduction in BP of > or = 10 mmHg or to a DBP of < or = 90 mmHg was more frequent (P = 0.0005) among indapamide (46.6%) compared with placebo (23.7%) treated patients. During the eight week double-blind treatment period, incidence rates for all adverse experiences and for drug-related adverse experiences were similar between the two treatment groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Advanced digoxin toxicity in renal failure: treatment with charcoal hemoperfusion

Glycoside toxicity, a common and potentially fatal complication among patients taking digoxin, is treated basically by managing cardiac arrythmias until the patient can excrete enough drug to decrease the intoxication. Patients with renal failure, however, are particularly difficult to manage. We describe a case of advanced digoxin toxicity in an elderly man with severe renal failure, treated with a charcoal hemoperfusion device.

Chronic renal vein thrombosis

Twenty-eight patients with demonstrated chronic renal vein thrombosis were studied. In seven, only small venous channels were involved; in 21, both small and large veins were thrombosed. A constellation of findings occurred with such frequency in these patients that we believe it virtually diagnostic of renal venous obstruction. These findings include the nephrotic syndrome, great variability in proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate, pulmonary embolization, sterile pyuria, hematuria, hyperchloremic acidosis, decreased renal tubular threshold for glucose and increased fibrin degradation products. These findings are an indication for definitive angiographic and biopsy procedures. Prolonged anticoagulant therapy was generally very effective.