[Safety of mesh with fluoropolymer coating during intra-abdominal placement in large animals: results of the pilot study]

OBJECTIVE

When performing laparoscopic intraperitoneal hernioplasty (IPOM), endoprostheses made of fluoropolymers are often used. However, there is no data in the literature on the intra-abdominal use of inexpensive polyester prostheses with a fluoropolymer coating compared to composite implants. Thus, the aim of the pilot study was a preliminary assessment of the safety profile of FTOREX mesh endoprostheses during intra-abdominal placement in large animals.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

6 endoprostheses were installed laparoscopically intraperitoneally in each of the 3 pigs: 1) FTOREX; 2) FTOREX with a layer of carboxymethylcellulose; 3) REPEREN-16-2; 4) SYMBOTEX; 5) VENTRALIGHT ST; 6) decellularized pork peritoneum. Fixation was performed with a herniator, transfascial sutures were not used. Relaparoscopy was performed after 45 days, and withdrawal from the experiment was performed after 90 days. Performance characteristics, signs of deformation and retraction, parameters of spike formation were evaluated.

RESULTS

All the animals survived, no complications were observed. There were no clinical manifestations or behavioral reactions indicating the presence of adhesions. The most convenient to use were the SYMBOTEX and FTOREX implants (5.0 points each). By the end of the experiment, deformation and retraction were noted in both variants of the FTOREX implants and the REPEREN prosthesis. These changes were completely absent only when using the SYMBOTEX endoprosthesis. According to the number of implants with adhesions, by the end of the observation, both variants of FTOREX prostheses occupied an intermediate position between the Reference (the worst indicator) and VENTRALIGHT ST (the best indicator). However, both FTOREX endoprostheses showed the best performance among all implants in the integral assessment of adhesions, as well as in terms of parameters such as the area and appearance of adhesions, and in terms of the strength of the joints, they were second only to the VENTRALIGHT ST endoprosthesis (0.67 vs. 0.5 points). During the study, there was no reliable dependence of deformation, retraction and adhesion formation indicators on the type of implant.

CONCLUSION

The results of the pilot study showed that all the implants used did not cause any clinically significant adverse reactions or complications. FTOREX endoprostheses with their intraperitoneal installation have anti-adhesive properties that are not inferior to VENTRALIGHT ST or SYMBOTEX composite implants. However, having less rigidity, they are more often deformed and subjected to retraction.

[Histological changes in intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with synthetic and biological meshes. Results of the chronic experiment]

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to analyze histological changes in the site of the meshes FTOREX, FTOREX coated with carboxymethylcellulose, Ventralight ST, Symbotex, REPEREN-16-2 and decellularized porcine peritoneum on the parietal peritoneum of the pig.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

At laparoscopy, 6 different meshes were placed intraperitoneally in each of the 3 pigs. After 90 days, the animals were taken out of the experiment. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin, quantitative morphometry and counting the number of vessels and cells in the interstitium in the areas of the mesh and peritoneum were performed. An immunohistochemical study with an antibody to pancytokeratins assessed the state of the initial peritoneum and neoperitoneum.

RESULTS

According to morphological characteristics, the meshes were divided into 3 groups: 1) with fluoropolymer coating FTOREX, 2) Ventralight ST and Symbotex, 3) REPEREN and decellularized peritoneum. In group 1, the surface area of the mesh threads was optimal in terms of the arrangement and arrangement of the threads relative to each other. This contributed to the formation of a relatively dense fibrous framework and a place to preserve the underlying peritoneum involved in the formation of the neoperitoneum. Despite the smallest surface area of the threads, in group 3, the greatest fibroblastic reaction was noted. Inflammatory changes were the least pronounced in group 1. They were the greatest in group 3, where there was a pronounced leukocyte reaction, combined with the processes of metaplasia, the development of fibrinoid necrosis, and the progression of the secondary inflammatory process. In group 1, the optimal ratio of newly formed vessels was noted, in group 2 - veins prevailed over arteries, in group 3 - the number of vessels was minimal. Immunohistochemical study showed that in group 1, mesothelial cells covered almost the entire surface of the implant, and there were also areas of preserved basic peritoneum. In group 2, mesothelium also covered most of the surface of the meshes, but the underlying peritoneum was absent. In group 3, on the contrary, a significant number of extended areas not covered with mesothelium were revealed.

CONCLUSION

The conducted morphological and morphometric study showed that the most balanced ratio of the components of the newly formed fibrous tissue and blood vessels is observed when using implants with a fluoropolymer coating FTOREX. At the same time, the remaining basic peritoneum actively participated in the formation of the neoperitoneum. The Ventralight ST and Symbotex meshes also contributed to the formation of a full-fledged fibrous tissue and adequate vascular proliferation, however, they prevented the preservation of the underlying peritoneum, which practically excluded its participation in the formation of the neoperitoneum. The REPEREN mesh and decellularized porcine peritoneum led to the least balanced cell and vascular proliferation and the greatest fibroplastic reaction, which could further negatively affect the state of the formed scar.