[Decision criteria and patient characteristics for patient-oriented treatment of field cancerization : Standardized algorithm for personalized treatment concepts]

Hintergrund

Aktinische Keratosen (AK) zeichnen sich durch einen chronischen Verlauf aus, und häufig ist ein ganzes Hautareal betroffen (Feldkanzerisierung). Die patientenindividuelle Abwägung therapiespezifischer Vor- und Nachteile einer feldgerichteten Therapie ist herausfordernd.

Fragestellung

Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war die Entwicklung und Evaluierung patientenorientierter Entscheidungskriterien, die sich für die pragmatische Einordnung einer AK-Feldtherapie im Behandlungsalltag bei Patienten mit besonderer Prädisposition zur Feldkanzerisierung eignen (Patiententyp 1 bis 3).

Material und Methoden

Die Entwicklung der Entscheidungskriterien und der Patiententypologie erfolgte im Rahmen eines nominalen bzw. strukturierten Multi-level-Gruppenprozesses. Anhand der patientenrelevanten Entscheidungskriterien, der verfügbaren Evidenz aus klinischen Studien und entlang der Patiententypologie wurde ein Bewertungsalgorithmus etabliert, und feldgerichtete AK-Therapieoptionen wurden systematisch evaluiert.

Ergebnisse

Als patientenrelevante Kriterien für die Therapieentscheidung wurden u. a. Effektivität, Sicherheit, Praktikabilität der Therapie, Adhärenz, Kosmetik, Patientenpräferenz und Komorbiditäten identifiziert und näher spezifiziert. In Bezug auf diese Entscheidungskriterien und Patiententypen, bei denen eine Feldtherapie vorrangig indiziert ist, erfüllte die photodynamische Therapie mit Tageslicht das therapiebezogene Anforderungsprofil in besonderem Maße.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Definition von patientenrelevanten und therapiebezogenen Entscheidungskriterien in der AK-Feldtherapie erlaubt eine strukturierte und gleichzeitig praxisorientierte Herangehensweise, um spezifische Therapieoptionen einzuordnen und individuelle Therapieentscheidungen herzuleiten.

Medical treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma

Considering the rising incidence, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (cSCC) has a high clinical relevance. In patients with localized cSCC, complete surgical resection is indicated. Radiotherapy should be performed in patients with non-resectable tumours or in patients who are not suitable for surgery. Systemic therapy is reserved for cSCC that are neither surgically nor radiotherapeutically curable due to their extensive local spread and/or local or distant metastasis. In the absence of prospective randomized phase 3 trials to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of chemotherapeutics, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors and anti-PD-1 antibodies, no final recommendation for systemic therapy can be given for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cSCC. Anti-PD-1 antibodies currently show promising results with response rates of up to 50% in both locally advanced and metastatic cSCC. Anti-PD-1 antibodies appear to achieve higher response rates compared with EGFR inhibitors, and the duration of response appears to be superior to both chemotherapy and EGFR inhibitors. Compared with chemotherapy, the side effect profile of anti-PD-1 antibodies appears to be favourable. Altogether, PD-1 inhibitors are expected to become the new standard of care for patients with locally advanced and metastatic cSCC. Currently, placebo-controlled clinical trials are investigating the adjuvant use of cemiplimab and pembrolizumab in patients undergoing resection and radiotherapy of high-risk cSCC. Patients not eligible for anti-PD-1 treatment, e.g. in organ transplant recipients, or in patients refractory to anti-PD-1 may be offered EGFR inhibitors and/or chemotherapies. Chemotherapies appear to be superior to EGFR inhibitors in terms of response rates, whereas EGFR inhibitors have a more favourable toxicity profile. EGFR inhibitors are therefore more suitable for multimorbid and/or frail elderly patients. By combining EGFR inhibitors with local therapy such as surgery or radiotherapy, response rates and duration of response may be improved.

Diagnostic accuracy of dermatofluoroscopy in cutaneous melanoma detection: results of a prospective multicentre clinical study in 476 pigmented lesions

BACKGROUND

Early detection is a key factor in improving survival from melanoma. Today, the clinical diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma is based mostly on visual inspection and dermoscopy. Preclinical studies in freshly excised or paraffin-embedded tissue have shown that the melanin fluorescence spectra after stepwise two-photon excitation, a process termed dermatofluoroscopy, differ between cutaneous melanoma and melanocytic naevi. However, confirmation from a larger prospective clinical study is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The primary end point of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of dermatofluoroscopy in melanoma detection. Secondary end points included the collection of data for improving the computer algorithm that classifies skin lesions based on melanin fluorescence and the assessment of safety aspects.

METHODS

This was a prospective, blinded, multicentre clinical study in patients with pigmented skin lesions (PSLs) indicated for excision either to rule out or to confirm cutaneous melanoma. All included lesions underwent dermoscopy and dermatofluoroscopy in vivo before lesions were excised and subjected to histopathological examination.

RESULTS

In total, 369 patients and 476 PSLs were included in the final analysis. In 101 of 476 lesions (21·2%) histopathology revealed melanoma. The observed sensitivity of dermatofluoroscopy was 89·1% (90 of 101 melanomas identified), with an observed specificity of 44·8%. The positive and negative predictive values were 30·3% and 93·9%, respectively. No adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatofluoroscopy is a safe and accurate diagnostic method to aid physicians in diagnosing cutaneous melanoma. Limitations arise from largely amelanotic or regressing lesions lacking sufficient melanin fluorescence.

Determinants of survival in patients with brain metastases from cutaneous melanoma

Background:

This retrospective study aimed to identify prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases from cutaneous melanoma.

Methods:

In all, 265 patients under regular screening according to valid national surveillance guidelines were included in the study. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to estimate and to compare overall survival. Cox modeling was used to identify independent determinants of the overall survival, which were used in explorative classification and regression tree analysis to define meaningful prognostic groups.

Results:

In total, 55.5% of our patients presented with two or less brain metastases, 82.6% had concurrent extracranial metastasis and 64% were asymptomatic and diagnosed during surveillance scans. In all, 36.7% were candidates for local treatment (neurosurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)). The median overall survival of the entire collective was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval: 4.3–5.7). Favourable independent prognostic factors were: normal pre-treatment level of serum lactate dehydrogenase (P<0.001), administered therapy (neurosurgery or SRS vs other, P=0.002), number of brain metastases (single vs multiple, P=0.032) and presence of bone metastasis (false vs true, P=0.044). Three prognostic groups with significantly different overall survival were identified. Candidates for local treatment (group I) had the longer median survival (9 months). Remaining patients could be further classified in two groups on the basis of serum lactate dehydrogenase.

Conclusion:

Applied treatment and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels were independent predictors of survival of patients with brain metastases from cutaneous melanoma. Patients receiving local therapy have overall survival comparable with general stage IV melanoma patients.

A phase II multicenter study on the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor MS-275, comparing two dosage schedules in metastatic melanoma

8044

Background: The acetylation of histones is a key component of gene regulation, which plays an important role in tumor initiation and progression. MS-275, an inhibitor of the benzamide series, is a synthetic orally available inhibitor of HDACs which showed anti-tumor activity in 3 phase 1 trials. Methods: A phase II, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study of oral MS-275 evaluated the efficacy and toxicity in patients with non-resectable metastatic melanoma. Patients should have received at least one, but not more than two previous systemic therapies (chemo- and/or immunotherapy) for stage IV melanoma. Patients were stratified to receive either 3 mg MS-275 biweekly (days 1+15 of a 4-week cycle) or 7 mg MS-275 weekly (days 1+8+15 of a 4-week cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Study endpoints were the assessment of tumor response and toxicity. Results: A total of 28 patients have been randomized equally to the two dosing groups. Patients were classified as belonging to AJCC stage IVa (n=0), IVb (n=9; 32%), and IVc (n=19; 68%). In general, MS-275 was very well tolerated. No treatment-related SAEs have been observed. Most frequently reported side effects were nausea (CTC Grade 1+2, 32%) hypophosphatemia (CTC Grade 1–3, 29%), and diarrhea (CTC Grade 1+2, 18%). Stable diseases lasting from 8 wks to more than 48 wks have been observed in 4 pts (29%) in the 3 mg and 3 pts (21%) in the 7 mg dose group. Stabilizations occurred in these metastatic localizations: skin, peripheral and visceral lymph nodes, lung and bone, respectively. However, objective tumor responses were not observed. Conclusions: The results suggest that MS-275 is well tolerated and shows long-lasting tumor stabilizations in patients with pre-treated metastatic melanoma. The failure of objective tumor responses in the single-agent treatment with MS-275 warrants further evaluation also in combinational settings.

[Table: see text]