A controlled clinical trial comparing potent progestins, LNG-IUS and dienogest, for the treatment of women with adenomyosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of two progestins, levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG), for adenomyosis.

METHODS

This study enrolled 157 women with adenomyosis, randomized to either LNG-IUS (n = 76) or DNG (n = 81) groups as a controlled clinical trial for 72 months. Participants were classified by three different localizations of adenomyosis: diffuse, focal, and extrinsic. VAS (Visual analog scale) score, days, and amount of uterine bleeding were assessed. Uterine volume or bone mineral density (BMD) were measured by three-dimensional ultrasonography or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

LNG-IUS and DNG comparably reduced pain scores in patients with adenomyosis. With regard to pain control, DNG offered greater efficacy than LNG-IUS in 3 months of treatment. In all types of adenomyosis, the days of bleeding after 12 months with DNG were significantly decreased compared to those with LNG-IUS. The decrease of whole uterine body was transient in any subtypes. A comparable decrease in BMD due to age-related changes in both groups was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

LNG-IUS and DNG could be useful for long-term management of adenomyosis. In terms of durations of uterine bleeding, DNG was superior to LNG-IUS for 6 years.

Re-evaluation of Urinary Trypsin Inhibitor on Pregnancy Course in Patients with Threatened Preterm Delivery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background

We evaluated the necessity of urinary trypsin inhibitor for patients with threatened premature labor.

Methods

We enrolled 146 women with singleton pregnancies who were treated for threatened premature labor as inpatients. The uterine cervical length of each patient was ≤ 25 mm at 22-35 weeks of gestation on transvaginal ultrasonography. The patients were divided into two groups: the urinary trypsin inhibitor group (91 patients treated with urinary trypsin inhibitor daily) or non-urinary trypsin inhibitor group (55 patients not treated with urinary trypsin inhibitor). The childbirth outcomes were retrospectively assessed.

Results

The median cervical length measured on the day of admission was almost similar between the urinary trypsin inhibitor and non-urinary trypsin inhibitor groups. Depending on the symptoms of uterine contractions, we determined whether ritodrine hydrochloride and/or magnesium sulfate would be appropriate for treatment. The median gestational week at birth was 38 weeks in the urinary trypsin inhibitor group, and no obvious differences were observed when compared with the non-urinary trypsin inhibitor group. With regard to birth weight, no significant difference was found between the two groups (urinary trypsin inhibitor group, 2776 g; non-urinary trypsin inhibitor group, 2800 g).

Conclusion

Our data showed no significant beneficial effects of urinary trypsin inhibitor in the maternal course and delivery outcomes.