Association of circadian timing of initial infusions of immune checkpoint inhibitors with survival in advanced melanoma

Aims: Chronomodulation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is not well understood. The authors evaluated the circadian timing of initial ICI infusions. Patients & methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced melanoma (n = 121) was conducted. Results: Exclusive afternoon timing of the first four infusions was associated with worse overall survival (5.5 vs 24.9 months; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (3.3 vs 7.6 months; p = 0.009) on Kaplan-Meier curves. In multivariable Cox analysis, the rate of overall survival was lower in patients who received all first four ICI infusions in the afternoon versus patients who received ≥1 of the first four infusions in the morning (hazard ratio: 2.4; p = 0.004). Conclusion: Deliberate morning scheduling for the first several ICI treatments may improve patient-centered outcomes.

Survivals following discontinuation of PD-1 inhibitor treatment in advanced melanoma patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival post-treatment discontinuation survival (OS PTD ) in advanced melanoma patients started on immunotherapy. This retrospective study included all unresectable advanced or metastatic melanoma patients who had permanent treatment discontinuation after receiving at least one cycle of palliative-intent programmed death-1 ± cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4 inhibitor treatment from 2014 to 2019. Indications of permanent treatment discontinuation included treatment completion, toxicity or progression. OS PTD was defined as a time of permanent treatment discontinuation to the time of death. Our study ( N  = 96) had 27, 12 and 57 patients who discontinued PD-1 inhibitor treatment due to treatment completion, toxicity and progression, respectively. Median treatment durations received for the treatment completion, toxicity and progression groups were 24, 6 and 3 months, respectively. As expected those patients who had disease progression on immunotherapy had very poor survival compared to those that completed treatment or stopped due to toxicity. A multivariable Cox model excluding the patients who progressed indicated no significant OS PTD differences between the toxicity and treatment completion group (HR, 0.894; 95% CI, 0.232-3.449; P  = 0.871) who received single or dual immunotherapy. Our real-world study highlighted similar, durable survival at PD-1 inhibitor discontinuation due to either toxicity or treatment completion, despite longer treatment duration received in the completion group than toxicity group. Patients with progression on PD-1 inhibitor treatment have very poor survival. Our findings must be interpreted with caution due to its retrospective nature and small sample size.

Expression of TCF3 target genes defines a subclass of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma characterized by up-regulation of MYC target genes and poor clinical outcome following R-CHOP therapy

TCF3 is a lymphopoietic transcription factor that acquires somatic driver mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Hypothesizing that expression patterns of TCF3-regulated genes can inform clinical management, we found that unsupervised clustering analysis with 15 TCF3-regulated genes and eight additional ones resolved local DLBCL cases into two main clusters, denoted Groups A and B, of which Group A manifested inferior overall survival (OS, p = 0.0005). We trained a machine learning model to classify samples into the Groups based on expression of the 23 transcripts in an independent validation cohort of 569 R-CHOP-treated DLBCL cases. Group A overlapped with the ABC cell-of-origin subgroup but its prognostic power was superior. GSEA analysis demonstrated asymmetric expression of 30 gene sets between the Groups, pointing to biological differences. We present, validate and make available a novel method to assign DLBCL cases into biologically-distinct groups with divergent OS following R-CHOP therapy.

Complete response and survival outcomes in patients with advanced cancer on immune checkpoint inhibitors

Aim: To evaluate overall survival in advanced cancer patients who achieved complete response (CR) with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic cancer who received at least one cycle of palliative-intent ICI. Best overall response was used to define response groups. Results: 21 (7%) of 322 patients achieved CR. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CR was independently associated with better overall survival compared with disease progression (hazard ratio: 0.012; 95% CI: 0.002-0.090) and stable disease (hazard ratio: 0.063; 95% CI: 0.009-0.464) as well as a nonsignificant trend toward better overall survival compared with partial response (hazard ratio: 0.169; 95% CI: 0.023-1.252) regardless of cancer type, ICI regimen or ICI line. Conclusion: Patients who achieved CR had longer survival compared with patients who did not achieve CR.

No association between BMI and immunotoxicity or clinical outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background: The impact of BMI on immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity and efficacy has not been clearly characterized. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective single-center study of patients with advanced unresectable/metastatic cancer initiated on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Results: Of the 409 patients included in the study, 115 (28%) had a BMI ≥30. There was no difference in the development of immune-related adverse events, treatment response or overall survival with respect to BMI <30 versus ≥30 for the whole study population or the melanoma subgroup. Conclusion: Patients with BMI in the obese range (≥30) were not at increased risk of immunotoxicity. Furthermore, BMI was not correlated with treatment response or overall survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Improved overall survival in dual compared to single immune checkpoint inhibitors in BRAF V600-negative advanced melanoma

Aim:

To evaluate the efficacy of dual versus single immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma patients.

Materials & methods:

A retrospective study of all advanced BRAF wild-type melanoma patients on palliative-intent ICI between 2015 and 2020 (n = 67).

Results:

Dual ICI had better overall survival (OS) when compared with single ICI in BRAF wild-type patients (hazard ratio: 0.204; 95% CI: 0.064–0.649; p = 0.007), but lost its statistical significance (median OSl not reached vs 20.9 months; p = 0.213; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.475; 95% CI: 0.164–1.380; p = 0.171) when only including patients treated after 2018 when dual ICI was funded in our province. Dual ICI were significantly associated with more frequent (p = 0.005) and severe (p = 0.026) immune-related adverse events, and required more immune-related adverse events-indicated systemic corticosteroid use (p < 0.001) compared with single ICI.

Conclusion:

While limited by small sample size and retrospective nature, dual ICI may have non statistically significant trend toward better OS efficacy when compared with single ICI in BRAF V600 wild-type advanced melanoma patients.

Real-World Evidence of Systemic Therapy Sequencing on Overall Survival for Patients with Metastatic BRAF-Mutated Cutaneous Melanoma

Aim: To evaluate optimal systemic therapy sequencing (first-line targeted therapy (1L-TT) vs. first-line immunotherapy (1L-IO)) in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. Methods: Nation-wide prospective data of patients with newly diagnosed BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma were retrieved from the Canadian Melanoma Research Network. Results: Our study included 79 and 107 patients in the 1L-IO and 1L-TT groups, respectively. There were more patients with ECOG 0−1 (91% vs. 72%, p = 0.023) in the 1L-IO group compared to the 1L-TT group. Multivariable Cox analysis suggested no OS differences between the two groups (HR 0.838, 95%CI 0.502−1.400, p = 0.500). However, patients who received 1L-TT then 2L-IO had the longest OS compared to 1L-IO without 2L therapy, 1L-IO then 2L-TT, and 1L-TT without 2L therapy (38.3 vs. 32.2 vs. 16.9 vs. 6.3 months, p < 0.001). For patients who received 2L therapy, those who received 2L-IO had a trend towards OS improvement compared with the 2L-TT group (21.7 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.053). Conclusions: Our nation-wide prospective study failed to establish any optimal systemic therapy sequencing in advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma patients. Nevertheless, we provided evidence that immunotherapy has durable efficacy in advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma patients, regardless of treatment line, and that Canadian medical oncologists were selecting the appropriate treatment sequences in a real-world setting, based on patients’ clinical and tumour characteristics.

Venous thromboembolism events in patients with advanced cancer on immune checkpoint inhibitors

Aim: To evaluate the correlation between venous thromboembolism events (VTEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 403 patients with advanced cancer on ICI-based regimens. Results: We report 8% VTE incidence post-ICI initiation over a median of 11.1 months of follow-up. Compared with single-agent ICI, dual-ICI was significantly correlated with higher incidence of VTE (odds ratio [OR]: 4.196, 95% CI: 1.527-11.529, p = 0.005), but chemotherapy-immuno-oncology combination was not (OR: 1.374, 95% CI: 0.285-6.632, p = 0.693). Subsequent systemic therapy post-ICI was also independently associated with higher VTE incidence (OR: 2.599, 95% CI: 1.169-5.777, p = 0.019). Conclusion: Our findings suggest potential underreporting of VTE incidence in ICI clinical trials. As dual-ICI is becoming more prevalent in cancer management, clinicians should maintain vigilance regarding VTE in patients with advanced cancer on ICI-based regimens.

Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Autoimmune Diseases

Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment outcomes in numerous cancers. However, clinical trials have largely excluded patients with autoimmune diseases (ADs) due to the risk of AD flares or predilection for developing organ-specific inflammation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with cancer and preexisting ADs. A retrospective, single-center study of patients with cancer initiated on immune checkpoint inhibitors between 2012 and 2019 was conducted. The primary outcome was the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with respect to the presence of AD at baseline. Associations were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, bivariate and multivariable analyses. Of the 417 patients included in this study, 63 patients (15%) had preexisting ADs. A total of 218 patients (53%) developed at least 1 irAE. There was no association between the presence of baseline AD on the development, grade, or number of irAEs; time to irAE or irAE recovery; systemic corticosteroid or additional immunosuppressant treatment for irAEs; permanent treatment discontinuation; or overall response rate. Two smaller cohorts were studied, melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, and there was no effect of baseline AD on overall survival on either cohort. However, a greater proportion of patients with baseline ADs had full recovery from their irAE (P=0.037). Furthermore, age below 65, baseline steroid use, and single-agent immunotherapy regimens were protective in terms of the development of irAEs. Our study suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors have similar safety and efficacy profiles in patients with preexisting ADs.

Safety and efficacy analysis of pembrolizumab dosing patterns in patients with advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer

AIM

To evaluate the impact of discrepancy between prescribed and recommended fixed 200 mg dose (P-F discrepancy) on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and treatment efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma and NSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 177 patients with advanced melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received at least one cycle of single-agent pembrolizumab. We defined P-F discrepancy as the differences between prescribed pembrolizumab dose and 200 mg recommended dose, expressed in percentages. Our primary outcome was immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and our secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The median P-F discrepancy was -21.5%, with the 25th and 75th percentile at -32% and -5.0% respectively. ROC curve analyses did not show any optimal cutoffs to prognosticate irAEs (AUC = 0.558 for all patients) or cancer mortality (AUC = 0.583 for melanoma; AUC = 0.539 for NSCLC) in either cancer type. Separate multivariable Cox analyses suggested no statistically significant association between P-F discrepancy and overall survival in patients with melanoma (HR 1.012, 95%CI 0.987-1.038, P = 0.362) or NSCLC (HR 0.998, 95%CI 0.978-1.019, P = 0.876).

CONCLUSION

There was no optimal pembrolizumab cut-off point to predict irAEs or treatment efficacy. We supported the use of weight-based pembrolizumab dosing, given the potential cost-saving and no differences in terms of irAEs or treatment efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma or NSCLC. Future studies on province- or national-level would be important to validate our findings.

Safety of Immunotherapy Rechallenge After Immune-related Adverse Events in Patients With Advanced Cancer

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the safety profile of continuing or rechallenging patients with advanced cancer who developed grade≥2 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on immunotherapy-based regimens. Our study had 25, 20, and 40 patients (N=85) in the Treatment Continuation (TCG), Non-Rechallenge (NRG), and Rechallenge Groups (RG), respectively. Subsequent irAEs recurrence were more common in RG than TCG and NRG (78% vs. 56% vs. 25%, P<0.001). The same subsequent irAEs recurrences occurred on 42% of RG, 4% of TCG, and 15% of NRG (P<0.001). On the RG, there was a nonstatistical trend of shortening interval time between time from treatment rechallenge to subsequent irAEs when compared with time from first treatment to initial grade≥2 irAEs (5.86 vs. 8.86 wk, P=0.114). Patients who had cardiac irAEs were not rechallenged. Several high-risk features were identified to prognosticate risk of irAEs recurrences upon treatment rechallenge, including age 65 years and above (P=0.007), programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors (P<0.001), grade 3 irAEs (P=0.003), pneumonitis type (P=0.048), any systemic corticosteroid use (P=0.001)/high-dose systemic corticosteroid use (P=0.007)/prolonged ≥4-week corticosteroid use (P=0.001) for irAEs management, and early development of irAEs (P=0.003). Our study concluded that it was relatively safe to continue or rechallenge patients with advanced cancers on immunotherapy-based regimens postdevelopment of certain grade≥2 irAEs, except for cardiac, neurological, or any grade 4 irAEs. Subsequent irAEs were common, no more severe, involved the same organ sites, and occurred more quickly than the original irAE. Close monitoring of all potential irAEs is required when rechallenging a patient on immunotherapy, especially for patients with high-risk features.

Emergency Department Utilization for Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis of Identification and Outcomes for Those Presenting for Immune-Related Adverse Events

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) are known complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Early identification and management leads to improved morbidity and mortality. This study seeks to address our center's experience with iRAEs in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with ICIs in 2018 and 2019 for any indication. All diagnoses of iRAEs were recorded. For all patients who presented to the ED following administration of an ICI, we assessed whether the presenting symptoms were eventually diagnosed as an iRAE. We assessed disposition, time to initiation of corticosteroids and outcomes in these patients.

RESULTS

351 evaluable patients were treated with an ICI, 129 patients (37%) had at least one presentation to the ED, 17 of whom presented with symptoms due to a new iRAE. New iRAE diagnoses were broad, occurred after median 2 cycles, majority irAEs were grade 3 or higher (70.6%), and two patients died due to toxicity. Twelve patients were admitted to the hospital during initial presentation or at follow-up, four required ICU care. All patients required immunosuppressive therapy, and only three were later re-challenged with an ICI. Of the patients who were admitted to the hospital, median time to first dose of corticosteroid was 30.5 h (range 1-269 h).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on ICI have a significant risk of requiring an ED visit. A notable proportion of iRAEs have their first presentation at the ED and often can present in a very nonspecific manner. A standardized approach in the ED at the time of presentation may lead to improved identification and management of these patients.

Prognosticating role of serum eosinophils on immunotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma

Aim: To evaluate serum eosinophilia (≥500 peripheral eosinophil counts/microliter) in prognosticating immunotherapy (IO) efficacy. Methodology: A retrospective study of 86 patients with advanced melanoma on PD-1 inhibitors. Results: Eosinophilia-on-IO was an independent prognosticating factor for median OS (HR :0.223; 95% CI: 0.088-0.567; p = 0.002). 'Late eosinophilia' (≥1 year from IO start date) group had better median OS (31.9 vs 24.1 vs 13.0 months; p = 0.002) when compared with 'early eosinophilia' (<1 year from IO start date) and 'no eosinophilia' groups, respectively. Conclusion: Eosinophilia-on-IO and its timing were associated with better IO efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma. Our findings provided insights on potential therapeutic benefit of inducing eosinophilia at certain interval time to obtain a longer durable immunotherapy response.

Serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in prognosticating immunotherapy efficacy

Aim: To examine neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in prognosticating immunotherapy efficacy. Methods: A retrospective study of 156 patients with metastatic melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer on PD-1 inhibitors. Results: Baseline NLR ≥5 was associated with worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.01-2.31; p = 0.043) but nonsignificant worse overall survival trend (HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.98-2.34; p = 0.064). PLR ≥200 was associated with worse overall survival (HR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.29-2.94; p = 0.002) and worse progression-free survival (HR: 1.894; 95% CI: 1.27-2.82; p = 0.002). NLR or PLR are prognosticating factors regardless of cancer types, with PLR having a stronger association with outcomes than NLR. Conclusion: High baseline NLR or PLR (alone and combined) were associated with worse immunotherapy efficacy regardless of cancer type, indicating their potential role as an agnostic marker for immunotherapy efficacy.

Association of Innovations in Radiotherapy and Systemic Treatments With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Melanoma Brain Metastasis From 2007 to 2016

IMPORTANCE

Treatments for melanoma brain metastasis changed between 2007 and 2016 with the advent of new radiotherapy techniques, targeted therapeutic agents, and immunotherapy. Changes in clinical outcomes over time have not been systematically investigated in large population-based studies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of innovations in radiotherapy techniques and systemic therapies with clinical outcomes among patients with melanoma brain metastasis.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based cohort study included all patients who received radiotherapy and/or surgery for the treatment of melanoma brain metastasis in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2016. Brain treatment patterns and clinical outcomes were described by period (2007-2009, 2010-2012, and 2013-2016). Provincial administrative records were used to obtain data on surgery, radiotherapy, and drugs. Follow-up data were censored on August 31, 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. Data were analyzed between November 8, 2017 and May 13, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival, whole-brain radiotherapy-free survival, and time to subsequent brain treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 1096 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.7 [14.0] years; 751 men [68.5%]) with melanoma brain metastasis received treatment in Ontario between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2016. Of those, 326 patients received treatment from 2007 to 2009 (period 1), 310 patients received treatment from 2010 to 2012 (period 2), and 460 patients received treatment from 2013 to 2016 (period 3). Patient age, other sociodemographic characteristics, and disease factors were similar between periods. Whole-brain radiotherapy was the first local brain-directed treatment used in 246 patients (75.5%; 95% CI, 70.8%-80.1%) in period 1, decreasing to 239 patients (52.0%; 95% CI, 47.4%-56.5%) in period 3. The use of partial-brain radiotherapy techniques as the first treatment increased from 11 patients (3.4%; 95% CI, 1.4%-5.3%) in period 1 to 98 patients (21.3%; 95% CI, 17.6%-25.0%) in period 3. After the first treatment for melanoma brain metastasis, the use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immunotherapy increased from less than 6 patients (<1.8%; 95% CI, <0.4% to <3.3%) in period 1 to 188 patients (40.9%; 95% CI, 36.4%-45.4%) in period 3. Overall survival was greater in period 3 (1-year survival, 21.8% [95% CI, 17.9%-25.9%] and 2-year survival, 13.8% [95% CI, 10.4%-17.8%]; Wilcoxon P = .001) compared with period 1 (1-year survival, 12.3% [95% CI, 9.0%-16.1%] and 2-year survival, 6.4% [95% CI, 4.1%-9.5%]), with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.56-0.77). The findings were unchanged after accounting for the variation in imaging practice between periods. Between period 1 and period 3, the use of whole-brain radiotherapy decreased (aHR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22-0.46), and the use of multiple brain-directed treatments increased (aHR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.48-3.14).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that innovations in systemic therapy and radiotherapy are associated with improvements in clinical outcomes among patients with melanoma brain metastasis, even in population-wide routine practice. Overall survival improved over time, and the use of whole-brain radiotherapy decreased. However, many patients continued to receive whole-brain radiotherapy in the last period (2013-2016) examined.

Objective quantification of BCL2 protein by multiplex immunofluorescence in routine biopsy samples of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma demonstrates associations with survival and BCL2 gene alterations

Up-regulation of BCL2 in cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can confer treatment resistance. Quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) histology allows objective quantification of protein-based biomarkers. We investigated the utility of QIF for evaluating BCL2 as a biomarker in DLBCL by quantifying BCL2 selectively in CD20-expressing lymphoma cells in biopsy samples from 116 cases of DLBCL in two cohorts one of which consisted of relapsed/refractory cases from a clinical trial. BCL2 protein by QIF correlated with BCL2 mRNA abundance and was associated with both translocation and copy number gain of the BCL2 gene. Elevated BCL2 protein expression by QIF, but not immunohistochemistry or mRNA quantification, was associated with inferior overall and relapse-free survival in the relapsed/refractory cohort. QIF is an effective means of quantifying BCL2 protein objectively in routine cancer biopsy specimens and shows promise for identifying relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients at risk of inferior outcomes after salvage therapy.

Predictors of immunotherapy-induced immune-related adverse events

Purpose

We aimed to elucidate predictive factors for the development of immune-related adverse events (iraes) in patients receiving immunotherapies for the management of advanced solid cancers.

Methods

This retrospective study involved all patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or inoperable melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, or renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario. The type and severity of iraes, as well as potential protective and exacerbating factors, were collected from patient charts.

Results

The study included 78 patients receiving ipilimumab (32%), nivolumab (33%), or pembrolizumab (35%). Melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma accounted for 70%, 22%, and 8% of the cancers in the study population. In 41 patients (53%) iraes developed, with multiple iraes developing in 12 patients (15%). In most patients (70%), the iraes were of severity grade 1 or 2. Female sex [adjusted odds ratio (or_adj): 0.094; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.021 to 0.415; p = 0.002] and corticosteroid use before immunotherapy (or_adj: 0.143; 95% ci: 0.036 to 0.562; p = 0.005) were found to be associated with a protective effect against iraes. In contrast, a history of autoimmune disease (or_adj: 9.55; 95% ci: 1.34 to 68.22; p = 0.025), use of ctla-4 inhibitors (or_adj: 6.25; 95% ci: 1.61 to 24.25; p = 0.008), and poor kidney function of grade 3 or greater (or_adj: 10.66; 95% ci: 2.41 to 47.12; p = 0.025) were associated with a higher risk of developing iraes. A Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test demonstrated that the logistic regression model was effective at predicting the development of iraes (chi-square: 1.596; df = 7; p = 0.979).

Conclusions

Our study highlights several factors that affect the development of iraes in patients receiving immunotherapy. Although future studies are needed to validate the resulting model, findings from the study can help to guide risk stratification, monitoring, and management of iraes in patients given immunotherapy for advanced cancer.

Population survival impact of new targeted and immune based therapies for metastatic or unresectable melanoma

IntroductionNew classes of drugs for metastatic or unresectable melanoma (MM) have shown improved survival in randomized trials (e.g., anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, BRAF/MEK inhibitors). We sought to describe uptake of these new drugs and their impact on population-based survival outcomes of MM. Objectives and ApproachWe sought to describe uptake of these new drugs and their impact on population-based survival outcomes of MM. This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study of all treated MM in Ontario 2007-2015. Administrative data sources from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) were utilized. Within ICES, cutaneous and non-cutaneous primaries were identified in the Ontario Cancer Registry. Administrative sources from Cancer Care Ontario, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, and Canadian Institute for Health Information identified patients treated with palliative systemic therapy, radiotherapy and metastatectomy. Temporal trends in utilization and survival were investigated. Survival by drug class was described. ResultsWe identified 2,793 MM patients. First treatment was systemic therapy (46%), radiotherapy (41%) or metastatectomy (14%). MM patient number increased from 270 in 2007 to 418 in 2015. Systemic treatment rose from 125 MM first treated in 2007 to 343 in 2015. New drug treatments increased from <6% of reported first-line regimens in 2007 to 82\% in 2015. 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 28% and 15% respectively for all MM in 2007-2009, rising to 46% and 35% for 2014-2015 (logrank p<0.001; adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.49,0.63)). Survival gains were largely in the subset treated primarily systemically, where new drugs were increasingly utilized (2-year OS 16% 2007-2009 vs. 44% 2014-2015 logrank p<0.001; AHR 0.46, 95% CI: (0.38,0.56)). Conclusion/ImplicationsUtilization of systemic therapy for MM has increased considerably in routine practice during 2007-2015; at least some of this increase relates to use of novel agents since 2011. In line with randomized trial findings, new drug adoption was associated with substantial increases in population-based MM survival.

The efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in a real-world older patient population

IMPORTANCE

Immunotherapy has emerged as an effective treatment option for the management of advanced cancers. The effects of these immune checkpoint inhibitors in the older patient population has not been adequately assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the impact of aging on CTLA-4 and PDL-1 inhibitors efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAE) in the context of real-world management of advanced solid cancers.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective study involved all non-study patients with histologically-confirmed metastatic or inoperable solid cancers receiving immunotherapy at Kingston Health Sciences Centre. We defined 'older patient' as age ≥ 75. All statistical analyses were conducted under SPSS IBM for Windows version 24.0.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Study outcomes included immunotherapy treatment response, survival, as well as number, type, and severity of irAEs.

RESULTS

Our study (N = 78) had 29 (37%) patients age <65, 26 (33%) patients age 65-74, and 23 (30%) patients age ≥75. Melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma accounted for 70%, 22%, and 8% of the study population, respectively. Distributions of ipilimumab (32%), nivolumab (33%), and pembrolizumab (35%) were similar in the study. The response rates were 28%, 27%, and 39% in the age <65, age 64-74, age ≥75 groups, respectively (P = 0.585). Kaplan-Meier curve showed a median survival of 28 months (12.28-43.9, 95% CI) and 17 months (0-36.9, 95% CI) in the age <65 and age 64-74 groups, respectively; the estimated survival probability did not reach 50% in the age ≥75 group (P = 0.319). There were no statistically significant differences found in terms of irAEs, multiple irAEs, severity of grade 3 or higher, types of irAEs, and irAEs resolution status when comparing between different age groups.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Our results suggest that patients age ≥75 are able to gain as much benefit from immunotherapy as younger patients, without excess toxicity. Our findings suggest that single agent immunotherapy is generally well-tolerated across different age groups with no significant difference in the type, frequency or severity of irAEs. Future studies evaluating aging and combination immunotherapy are warranted.

A Population-based Study of Survival Impact of New Targeted and Immune-based Therapies for Metastatic or Unresectable Melanoma

AIMS

New targeted drugs and immune therapies reported since 2010 for metastatic or unresectable melanoma (MM) have shown improved survival in randomised trials. We studied the uptake of these new drugs and their impact on population-based survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study of all patients treated for MM in Ontario 2007-2015. Provincial administrative sources covering the whole population identified palliative systemic therapy, radiotherapy and metastasis surgery. Temporal trends in utilisation and survival were investigated, as was survival of treatments predefined as 'new drugs' (BRAF or MEK inhibitors, anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies).

RESULTS

We identified 2793 treated MM patients. First treatment was systemic therapy (46%), radiotherapy (41%) and metastasis surgery (14%). Systemic treatment increased from 53% of patients (2007) to 75% (2015). New drug treatments increased from <6% of known first-line regimens in 2007 to 82% in 2015. One and 2 year overall survival was 28% and 15%, respectively, for all MM 2007-2009, rising to 46% and 35% for 2014-2015 (adjusted hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.63, P < 0.0001). Survival gains were observed primarily among those cases initially treated with systemic therapy, which became dominated by the use of new drugs over the study period (2 year overall survival 16% 2007-2009 versus 44% 2014-2015; adjusted hazard ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.56, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilisation of new targeted drugs and immune therapies for MM has increased considerably in routine practice 2007-2015. Consistent with the results of clinical trials, adoption was associated with substantial increases in survival of patients in the general population.

Brief Report: Increase in Melanoma Incidence in Ontario

Background:

Melanoma is a serious, potentially lethal disease. It is one of very few common cancers whose incidence is rising in North America.

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to examine trends in melanoma incidence in Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, over the past 20 years.

Methods:

Using data from the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR), this retrospective cohort examined all incident cases of melanoma in Ontario from 1990 to 2012. Generalized linear modeling was used to evaluate changes in melanoma incidence over time, adjusting for age and sex using direct standardization with the 1991 Canadian census population. Tests for trend for changes in the distribution of cases by age, sex, socioeconomic status, and rurality status were also calculated.

Results:

Our results show a statistically significant increasing incidence of melanoma in Ontario from 9.3 cases per 100 000 in 1990 to 18.0 cases per 100 000 in 2012 ( P for trend <.001, adjusted for age and sex). Incidence rates show stabilization from 2010 to 2012.

Conclusion:

Our study reveals a marked increase in melanoma incidence in Ontario, more than doubling over the past 20 years but with a stabilization more recently. Adequate availability of dermatology services may be important to ensure satisfactory care for the increased caseload and to ensure that cases may detected at an early stage with a good prognosis.

Mental health services use by melanoma patients receiving adjuvant interferon: association of pre-treatment mental health care with early discontinuation

Background

Although high-dose interferon (hd-ifn) is the sole approved adjuvant systemic treatment for melanoma in many jurisdictions, it is toxic. We sought to assess the population-level effects of hd-ifn toxicity, particularly neuropsychiatric toxicity, hypothesizing that such toxicity would have the greatest effect on mental health services use in advanced resected melanoma.

Methods

This retrospective population-based registry study considered all melanoma patients receiving adjuvant hd-ifn in Ontario during 2008-2012. Toxicity was investigated through health services use compatible with hd-ifn toxicity (for example, mental health physician billings). Using stage data reported from cancer centres about a subset of patients (stages iib-iiic), a propensity-matched analysis compared such service use in patients who did and did not receive hd-ifn. Associations between early hd-ifn discontinuation and health services use were examined.

Results

Of 718 melanoma patients who received hd-ifn, 12% were 65 years of age and older, and 83% had few or no comorbidities. One third of the patients experienced 1 or more toxicity-associated health care utilization events within 1 year of starting hd-ifn. Of 420 utilization events, 364 (87%) were mental health-related, with 54% being family practitioner visits, and 39% being psychiatrist visits. In the propensity-matched analysis, patients receiving hd-ifn were more likely than untreated matched controls to use a mental health service (p = 0.01), with 42% of the control group and 51% of the hd-ifn group using a mental health service in the period spanning the 12 months before to the 24 months after diagnosis. In the multivariable analysis, early drug discontinuation was more likely in the presence of pre-existing mental health issues (odds ratio: 2.0; 95% confidence limits: 1.1, 3.4).

Conclusions

Stage iib-iiic melanoma patients carry a substantial burden of mental health services use whether or not receiving hd-ifn, highlighting an important survivorship issue for these patients. High-dose interferon is associated with more use of mental health services, and pre-treatment use of mental health services is associated with treatment discontinuation. That association should be kept in mind when hd-ifn is being considered.

Abundant expression of BMI1 in follicular lymphoma is associated with reduced overall survival

Although generally indolent, follicular lymphoma (FL) sometimes pursues a more aggressive course leading to early death. B-cell-specific Mo-MLV insertion site-1 (BMI1) is a member of the polycomb group (PcG) proteins that confer stem cell properties through gene silencing. We used multi-channel immunofluorescence and automated image analysis to quantify BMI1 selectively in the nuclei of FL-derived B-cells in routine biopsy specimens. Applying this assay to 109 pretreatment FL biopsy samples demonstrates a significant association between abundant BMI1 and reduced overall survival (p = .001); the statistically significant association with mortality persists in a Cox proportional hazards model that includes Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score, histological grade, and the presence of a component of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the biopsy sample. Ascertaining BMI1 over-expression may be useful in identifying patients who might benefit from novel therapies directed at reversing the chromatin-modifying functions of BMI1.

[18 F]-FDG PET/CT in the staging and management of indolent lymphoma: A prospective multicenter PET registry study

BACKGROUND

To measure the clinical impact of pretreatment fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on the staging and management of apparent limited stage indolent lymphoma being considered for curative radiation therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective multicenter registry study that included 197 patients accrued between May 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015. Pre-PET/CT stage, determined by clinical and CT data, was documented. If pre-PET/CT stage was indeterminate, a stage was assigned to the patient by the referring oncologist according to best clinical judgment and treatment intent. After PET/CT, revised stage and planned management were recorded and compared with data on actual treatment received available through provincial databases (n = 155).

RESULTS

PET/CT resulted in the upstaging of 47 (23.9%) patients with presumed limited stage disease (stage I-II) to advanced stage disease (stage III-IV) (P < .0001). Ten (5.1%) patients were downstaged by PET/CT, 4 of whom migrated from advanced to limited stage disease. Twenty-eight (14.2%) patients with a specific pre-PET/CT stage had equivocal PET/CT findings that required further evaluation to confirm disease extent. After PET/CT, 95 (61.3%) patients were planned to receive active treatment. Of the 59 patients planned for radiotherapy alone post-PET/CT, 34 (57.6%) received this treatment (P = .002), and nearly 80% of them (n = 27) had confirmed limited stage disease.

CONCLUSION

PET/CT has a significant impact on staging and management in patients with apparent limited stage indolent lymphoma who are being considered for curative radiotherapy. PET/CT should be routinely incorporated into the workup of these patients. Cancer 2017;123:2860-66. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Phase I Study of ONT-380, a HER2 Inhibitor, in Patients with HER2+-Advanced Solid Tumors, with an Expansion Cohort in HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

Purpose: ONT-380 (ARRY-380) is a potent and selective oral HER2 inhibitor. This Phase I study determined the MTD, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of ONT-380 in HER2-positive advanced solid tumors, with an expansion cohort of patients with HER2⁺ MBC.Experimental Design: ONT-380 was administered twice daily (BID) in continuous 28-day cycles. After a modified 3+3 dose-escalation design determined the MTD, the expansion cohort was enrolled. PK properties of ONT-380 and a metabolite were determined. Response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).Results: Fifty patients received ONT-380 (escalation = 33; expansion = 17); 43 patients had HER2⁺ MBC. Median prior anticancer regimens = 5. Dose-limiting toxicities of increased transaminases occurred at 800 mg BID, thus 600 mg BID was the MTD. Common AEs were usually Grade 1/2 in severity and included nausea (56%), diarrhea (52%), fatigue (50%), vomiting (40%) constipation, pain in extremity and cough (20% each). 5 patients (19%) treated at MTD had grade 3 AEs (increased transaminases, rash, night sweats, anemia, and hypokalemia). The half-life of ONT-380 was 5.38 hours and increases in exposure were approximately dose proportional. In evaluable HER2⁺ MBC (n = 22) treated at doses ≥ MTD, the response rate was 14% [all partial response (PR)] and the clinical benefit rate (PR + stable disease ≥ 24 weeks) was 27%.Conclusions: ONT-380 had a lower incidence and severity of diarrhea and rash than that typically associated with current dual HER2/EGFR inhibitors and showed notable antitumor activity in heavily pretreated HER2⁺ MBC patients, supporting its continued development. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3529-36. ©2017 AACR.

Effect of the addition of rituximab to salvage chemotherapy prior to autologous stem cell transplant in aggressive CD20+ lymphoma: a cohort comparison from the NCIC Clinical Trials Group Study LY.12<sup/>

The impact of the addition of rituximab to salvage chemotherapy prior to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was evaluated in a retrospective subgroup analysis of NCIC CTG LY.12. Among 414 patients who relapsed following R-CHOP, 96 received salvage chemotherapy alone [R - cohort]; and 318 received rituximab with chemotherapy [R + cohort] following a protocol amendment. The R-cohort had a higher proportion of patients with PS ≥2 and relapse <1 year after R-CHOP. The response rate (45.6% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.0003), CR/CRu (15.7% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.003) and transplantation rate (51.9% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.0004) was higher in the R + cohort. Event-free (27% vs. 22%, p = 0.0954) and overall survival at four years (43% vs. 31%; p = 0.045) were greater in the R + cohort when the patients with best response SD/PD to R-CHOP were excluded. Addition of rituximab to salvage therapy before ASCT appears to improve the response rate, transplantation rate, and overall survival in patients with CD20+ lymphoma who responded to R-CHOP.

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Obinutuzumab (GA101) With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed CD20+ Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the GAUSS Study

PURPOSE

Obinutuzumab (GA101), a novel glycoengineered type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated responses in single-arm studies of patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This is the first prospective, randomized study comparing safety and efficacy of obinutuzumab with rituximab in relapsed indolent lymphoma. The primary end point of this study was the overall response rate (ORR) in patients with follicular lymphoma after induction and safety in patients with indolent lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 175 patients with relapsed CD20(+) indolent lymphoma requiring therapy and with previous response to a rituximab-containing regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) to four once-per-week infusions of either obinutuzumab (1,000 mg) or rituximab (375 mg/m(2)). Patients without evidence of disease progression after induction therapy received obinutuzumab or rituximab maintenance therapy every 2 months for up to 2 years.

RESULTS

Among patients with follicular lymphoma (n = 149), ORR seemed higher for obinutuzumab than rituximab (44.6% v 33.3%; P = .08). This observation was also demonstrated by a blinded independent review panel that measured a higher ORR for obinutuzumab (44.6% v 26.7%; P = .01). However, this difference did not translate into an improvement in progression-free survival. No new safety signals were observed for obinutuzumab, and the incidence of adverse events was balanced between arms, with the exception of infusion-related reactions and cough, which were higher in the obinutuzumab arm.

CONCLUSION

Obinutuzumab demonstrated a higher ORR without appreciable differences in safety compared with rituximab. However, the clinical benefit of obinutuzumab in this setting remains unclear and should be evaluated within phase III trials.

Gemcitabine/dexamethasone/cisplatin vs cytarabine/dexamethasone/cisplatin for relapsed or refractory aggressive-histology lymphoma: cost-utility analysis of NCIC CTG LY.12

BACKGROUND

The NCIC CTG LY.12 study showed that gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) were noninferior to dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive histology lymphoma prior to autologous stem cell transplantation. We conducted an economic evaluation from the perspective of the Canadian public healthcare system based on trial data.

METHODS

The primary outcome was an incremental cost utility analysis comparing costs and benefits associated with GDP vs DHAP. Resource utilization data were collected from 519 Canadian patients in the trial. Costs were presented in 2012 Canadian dollars and disaggregated to highlight the major cost drivers of care. Benefit was measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on utilities translated from prospectively collected quality-of-life data. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The mean overall costs of treatment per patient in the GDP and DHAP arms were $19 961 (95% confidence interval (CI) = $17 286 to $24 565) and $34 425 (95% CI = $31 901 to $39 520), respectively, with an incremental difference in direct medical costs of $14 464 per patient in favor of GDP (P < .001). The predominant cost driver for both treatment arms was related to hospitalizations. The mean discounted quality-adjusted overall survival with GDP was 0.161 QALYs and 0.152 QALYs for DHAP (difference = 0.01 QALYs, P = .146). In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, GDP was associated with both cost savings and improved quality-adjusted outcomes compared with DHAP in 92.6% of cost-pair simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

GDP was associated with both lower costs and similar quality-adjusted outcomes compared with DHAP in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. Considering both costs and outcomes, GDP was the dominant therapy.

Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin Versus Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed and Refractory Aggressive Lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12

Purpose

For patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma, we hypothesized that gemcitabine-based therapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is as effective as and less toxic than standard treatment.

Patients and Methods

We randomly assigned 619 patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma to treatment with gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) or to dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP). Patients with B-cell lymphoma also received rituximab. Responding patients proceeded to stem-cell collection and ASCT. Coprimary end points were response rate after two treatment cycles and transplantation rate. The noninferiority margin for the response rate to GDP relative to DHAP was set at 10%. Secondary end points included event-free and overall survival, treatment toxicity, and quality of life.

Results

For the intention-to-treat population, the response rate with GDP was 45.2%; with DHAP the response rate was 44.0% (95% CI for difference, −9.0% to 6.7%), meeting protocol-defined criteria for noninferiority of GDP (P = .005). Similar results were obtained in a per-protocol analysis. The transplantation rates were 52.1% with GDP and 49.3% with DHAP (P = .44). At a median follow-up of 53 months, no differences were detected in event-free survival (HR, 0.99; stratified log-rank P = .95) or overall survival (HR, 1.03; P = .78) between GDP and DHAP. Treatment with GDP was associated with less toxicity (P < .001) and need for hospitalization (P < .001), and preserved quality of life (P = .04).

Conclusion

For patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphoma, in comparison with DHAP, treatment with GDP is associated with a noninferior response rate, similar transplantation rate, event-free survival, and overall survival, less toxicity and hospitalization, and superior quality of life.

Inactivation of the CDKN2A tumor-suppressor gene by deletion or methylation is common at diagnosis in follicular lymphoma and associated with poor clinical outcome

PURPOSE

Follicular lymphoma, the most common indolent lymphoma, is clinically heterogeneous. CDKN2A encodes the tumor suppressors p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) and frequently suffers deleterious alterations in cancer. We investigated the hypothesis that deletion or hypermethylation of CDKN2A might identify follicular lymphoma cases with distinct clinical or pathologic features potentially amenable to tailored clinical management.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Deletion of CDKN2A was detected in pretreatment biopsy specimens using a single nucleotide polymorphism-based approach or endpoint PCR, and methylation of CpG elements in CDKN2A was quantified by methylation-specific PCR. Correlations between CDKN2A status and pathologic or clinical characteristics, including overall survival (OS), were investigated in 106 cases using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

Deletion of CDKN2A was detected in 9 of 111 samples (8%) and methylation was detectable in 22 of 113 (19%). CDKN2A was either deleted or methylated in 29 of 106 cases (27%) and this status was associated with inferior OS especially among patients treated with rituximab (P = 0.004). CDKN2A deletion or methylation was associated with more advanced age (P = 0.012) and normal hemoglobin (P = 0.05) but not with sex, FLIPI score, ECOG stage, LDH, performance status, number of involved nodal sites, B symptoms, histologic grade, the presence of a component of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, proliferation index, or other pathologic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that deletion or methylation of CDKN2A is relatively common in pretreatment follicular lymphoma biopsy specimens and defines a group of cases associated with reduced survival in the rituximab era presumably on the basis of more aggressive disease biology.

Abstract A050: ARRY-380, an oral HER2 inhibitor: Final phase 1 results and conclusions

Background: Overexpression of HER2 occurs in ~25% of breast cancers. Despite the treatment successes achieved to date, improved clinical outcomes remain needed, including prevention and treatment of CNS metastases. Small-molecule HER2 inhibitors may have the advantage of being able to treat CNS and systemic disease simultaneously, particularly if used in combination with antibody-based therapy. However, currently available small molecules also target EGFR, with associated use limiting toxicities. Therefore, a specific small-molecule inhibitor of HER2 is needed. ARRY-380 is an oral, potent, reversible, ATP competitive, small molecule inhibitor of HER2. In cell-based assays, ARRY-380 was ~500-fold selective for HER2 versus EGFR. In multiple preclinical models, ARRY-380 demonstrated significant single agent and combination activity. In models of CNS disease, ARRY-380 was highly active as a single agent and demonstrated superior activity compared to lapatinib or neratinib. Thus, ARRY-380 was evaluated in a first in human clinical study.

Methods: A Phase 1 clinical study of ARRY-380 was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors that are believed to express HER2, with both dose-escalation (25 to 800 mg BID) and MTD expansion components. ARRY-380 was administered BID in 28 day cycles. Safety was assessed by AEs, clinical laboratory test results, physical examinations, vital signs and ECGs. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST every 2 cycles. Serial PK assessments were conducted in Cycle 1 on Days 1 and 3 and at steady state on Day 15.

Results: A total of 50 patients were enrolled (33 dose-escalation and 17 expansion). These results focus on the 31 patients treated at doses ≥ MTD: 27 at the MTD of 600/650 mg BID and 4 at 800 mg BID. All 31 patients had HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that had progressed on a prior trastuzumab containing regimen and 94% had received prior lapatinib, many who progressed on treatment. Dose limiting toxicity consisting of reversible Grade (G) 3 AST (n=1) and AST/ALT elevations (n=1) occurred in 2 of 4 patients treated at 800 mg BID, with an onset that occurred within 1 week, resolved within 2 weeks, and patients resumed treatment at a lower dose.

Overall, ARRY-380 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile at the MTD. The most common treatment-related AEs were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, liver enzyme elevations and rash, and were primarily G1 with a low incidence of G2 (gastrointestinal events [n=2], fatigue [n=3], liver enzyme elevations [n=2]) or G3 (rash [n=1], liver enzyme elevations [n=1]) events. There were no treatment-related cardiac events, serious AEs or G4 AEs.

ARRY-380 Cmax and AUC increased with increasing dose, with a Tmax of 2 hours and a t1/2 of 5 hours. Twenty-two HER2+ MBC patients with measurable disease were treated with ARRY-380 at doses ≥ 600 mg BID. In this heavily pretreated population, there was a clinical benefit rate (PR [n=3] plus SD for at least 6 months [n=3]) of 27%. Notably, 2 patients with PRs on ARRY-380 had confirmed progressions while on prior lapatinib- and trastuzumab-containing regimens.

Conclusions: ARRY-380 has demonstrated an acceptable safety and PK profile at the MTD. As predicted for a HER2-selective agent that does not inhibit EGFR, there was a very low incidence of Grade 2/3 rash and diarrhea. ARRY-380 has shown promising signs of antitumor activity in a heavily pretreated HER2+ MBC population. These safety and preliminary efficacy data support the continued clinical development of ARRY-380 at the recommended dose of 600 mg BID.

Citation Format: Virginia F. Borges, Steven K.L Chia, Susan D'Aloisio, Gina Fernetich, Bessie Sajan, Tessa McSpadden, Renae Chavira, Emma Barrett, Kari Guthrie, Jennifer Garrus, Tara Baetz, Stacy Moulder. ARRY-380, an oral HER2 inhibitor: Final phase 1 results and conclusions. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Breast Cancer Research: Genetics, Biology, and Clinical Applications; Oct 3-6, 2013; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2013;11(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A050.

MicroRNA signature obtained from the comparison of aggressive with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas: potential prognostic value in mantle-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) has a variable natural history but is incurable with current therapies. MicroRNAs (miRs) are useful in prognostic assessment of cancer. We determined an miR signature defining aggressiveness in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) and assessed whether this signature aids in MCL prognosis.

METHODS

We assessed miR expression in a training set of 43 NHL cases. The miR signature was validated in 44 additional cases and examined on a training set of 119 MCL cases from four institutions in Canada. miRs significantly associated with overall survival were examined in an independent cohort of 114 MCL cases to determine association with patient outcome. miR expression was combined with current clinical prognostic factors to develop an enhanced prognostic model in patients with MCL.

RESULTS

Fourteen miRs were differentially expressed between aggressive and indolent NHL; 11 of 14 were validated in an independent set of NHL (excluding MCL). miR-127-3p and miR-615-3p were significantly associated with overall survival in the MCL training set. Their expression was validated in an independent MCL patient set. In comparison with Ki-67, expression of these miRs was more significantly associated with overall survival among patients with MCL. miR-127-3p was combined with Ki-67 to create a new prognostic model for MCL. A similar model was created with miR-615-3p and Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores.

CONCLUSION

Eleven miRs are differentially expressed between aggressive and indolent NHL. Two novel miRs were associated with overall survival in MCL and were combined with clinical prognostic models to generate novel prognostic data for patients with MCL.

Abundant expression of interleukin-21 receptor in follicular lymphoma cells is associated with more aggressive disease

Recombinant interleukin-21 (IL-21) has potential utility in cancer therapy. Stimulation with IL-21 can induce apoptosis in follicular lymphoma (FL) cells, and existing studies have suggested that IL-21 signaling may function in tumor suppression. In order to elucidate the relationship between IL-21 receptor (IL-21R) expression and clinical and pathological features in FL, IL-21R was quantified in 114 pretreatment biopsy samples using either conventional immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence microscopy and automated quantitative analysis (AQUA). Reduced expression of IL-21R was associated with favorable overall survival (p = 0.048). AQUA analysis showed an association with the presence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the biopsy sample (p = 0.03), and expression of IL-21R was up-regulated upon transformation of FL to DLBCL in two cases. Our results based on the largest survey to date raise the possibility that IL-21 signaling in FL cells, rather than being tumor suppressive, supports tumor progression and that therapeutic benefit could be realized by blocking IL-21R instead of stimulating it.

Abstract A143: ARRY-380, a selective HER2 inhibitor: From drug design to clinical evaluation

In recent years, there has been discussion on the relative benefits of drugs that are kinase selective and those targeting multiple kinases, both in terms of clinical activity and safety. While the value of selectivity may be target dependent, there is now evidence that HER2 can be effectively targeted with a selective small molecule. Designing a selective HER2 inhibitor is challenging, as the ATP-binding pockets of EGFR and HER2 differ by only 2 amino acids and only 1 of these is involved with inhibitor binding (Cys775 vs. Ser783). While obtaining this selectivity was difficult, the goal of developing a drug that would inhibit HER2 without EGFR-related side effects was deemed advantageous, especially since it appears that inhibition of EGFR does not improve the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (Arteaga, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14(19):6277–83).

ARRY-380 is an orally active, potent, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2. The compound is a reversible, ATP-competitive inhibitor with nanomolar potency in enzymatic and cellular assays. In cell-based assays, ARRY-380 is ∼500-fold selective for HER2 versus EGFR and is equipotent against truncated p95-HER2. ARRY-380 is currently undergoing evaluation in a first-inhuman Phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy in pts with advanced solid tumors that express the HER2 target.

In the dose-escalation phase, pts with HER2+ MBC or other documented HER2+ cancers were treated with ARRY-380 as a single oral dose on Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1 followed by twice daily (BID) dosing, beginning on C1 D3, in 28-day dosing cycles. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory test results, physical examinations, vital signs and ECGs. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles.

As of August 31, 2011, 50 pts (43 with MBC) have received ARRY-380. In the completed dose-escalation phase, 33 pts were enrolled and treated at doses ranging from 25 mg to 800 mg BID; of these, 26 had HER2+ MBC and all were previously treated with trastuzumab and 81% with lapatinib. The MTD was determined to be 600 mg BID. Of 19 evaluable pts with HER2+ MBC receiving doses ≥ 200 mg BID, 6 (32%) had a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) ≥ 6 months; 10 pts had regression of tumor lesions, of these, 1 pt (5%) had a PR and 9 pts (47%) had SD. Treatment-related AEs included Grade 2 events of increased ALT/AST (5), constipation (1), fatigue (3), hyperbilirubinemia (1) and nausea (1) and Grade 3 AEs of increased ALT/AST (3), night sweats (1) and rash (1). No Grade 4 treatment-related AEs have been reported, nor has any treatment-related AE led to study drug discontinuation. An expansion cohort to confirm safety and further examine activity of ARRY-380 at the MTD in pts with HER2+ MBC is ongoing; enrollment is complete (N = 17) and data analysis is continuing. In conclusion, in the small number of pts treated to date, ARRY-380 is associated with few EGFR-related side effects. In heavily pre-treated MBC pts, ARRY-380 is exhibiting preliminary signs of efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. Thus, continued clinical development of ARRY-380 is warranted to further evaluate if a selective, small-molecule HER2 inhibitor may be an alternative treatment option to a multi-kinase inhibitor in pts with HER2+ cancers.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A143.

A Phase 1 Study To Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of ARRY-380 – An Oral Inhibitor of HER2

Background: ARRY-380 is a potent, orally active small molecule that selectively inhibits HER2 signaling in vitro and in vivo and significantly inhibits tumor growth in a variety of HER2-dependent tumor xenograft models. Based on its preclinical activity, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, a Phase 1 study was initiated to evaluate the safety, tolerability and PK profile of ARRY-380 as a single agent in patients with solid tumors and to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).Methods: Patients with HER2 positive breast cancer or other tumor types for which published evidence of HER2 expression exists were treated with ARRY-380 as a single oral dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, followed by continuous twice-daily (BID) oral dosing starting on Cycle 1 Day 3. ARRY-380 was escalated in cohorts of 3 to 4 patients, using standard dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) criteria during Cycle 1 to determine dose escalation. Serial PK assessments were made during Cycle 1 on Days 1, 2, 3 and at steady-state on Day 15.Preliminary Results: As of June 1, 2009, 15 patients have been treated in 5 dosing cohorts at doses of 25 to 300 mg BID. Patients had a median age of 61 years (range, 37-77 years) and ECOG PS of 0 to 2. Cancer types included HER2+ breast cancer (8), colorectal (6) and salivary gland (1). No DLTs have been observed and drug-related adverse events have included Grade 1 nausea, rash and fatigue and Grade 2 fatigue in 2 patients at the 200 mg BID dose level. Preliminary PK analyses indicate a trend for increasing Cmax and AUC with increasing dose, a median Tmax of 2 hours and a mean t1/2 of 4.6 hours across all cohorts. Two patients with HER2+ breast cancer have had stable disease for ≥ 4 months with no significant toxicity. One of these two patients had a notable reduction in liver metastases (28%) after 2 cycles of ARRY-380 and is currently on study.Conclusions: ARRY-380 has demonstrated an acceptable safety and PK profile and preliminary signs of clinical benefit. Dose escalation continues to determine the MTD.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 5111.

Primary cardiac diffuse large B cell lymphoma presenting with superior vena cava syndrome

Primary cardiac lymphomas are rare extranodal lymphomas that should be distinguished from secondary cardiac involvement by disseminated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cardiac lymphomas often mimic other cardiac neoplasms, including myxomas and angiosarcomas, and often require multimodality cardiac imaging, in combination with endomyocardial biopsy, excisional biopsy or pericardial fluid cytology, to establish a definitive diagnosis. A 60-year-old immunocompetent man who presented with superior vena cava syndrome secondary to a right atrial, primary cardiac diffuse large B cell lymphoma (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) is described in the present article. The patient had no clinical evidence of disseminated lymphoma and was successfully treated with prompt surgical excision of his atrial mass, followed by anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The patient required multi-modality cardiac imaging to accurately identify and plan surgical excision of his cardiac lymphoma. The therapeutic management and clinical and radio-logical features of primary cardiac lymphoma are reviewed.

Predicting outcome in follicular lymphoma by using interactive gene pairs

PURPOSE

Follicular lymphoma is a common lymphoma of adults. Although its course is often indolent, a substantial proportion of patients have a poor prognosis, often due to rapid progression or transformation to a more aggressive lymphoma. Currently available clinical prognostic scores, such as the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index, are not able to optimally predict transformation or poor outcome.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Gene expression profiling was done on primary lymphoma biopsy samples.

RESULTS

Using a statistically conservative approach, predictive interaction analysis, we have identified pairs of interacting genes that predict poor outcome, measured as death within 5 years of diagnosis. The best gene pair performs >1,000-fold better than any single gene or the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index in our data set. Many gene pairs achieve outcome prediction accuracies exceeding 85% in extensive cross-validation and noise sensitivity computational analyses. Many genes repeatedly appear in top-ranking pairs, suggesting that they reproducibly provide predictive capability.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence reported here may provide the basis for an expression-based, multi-gene test for predicting poor follicular lymphoma outcomes.

Primary cardiac lymphoma: molecular cytogenetic characterization of a rare entity

BACKGROUND

The majority of cardiac atrial neoplasms represent benign myxomas. Rarely, malignant cardiac neoplasms are encountered and can include primary cardiac neoplasms, as well as secondary tumors involving the heart. As many cardiac neoplasms lack pathognomonic clinical features, histopathologic diagnosis is crucial for classification and appropriate treatment of these neoplasms. Molecular investigation is critical to begin to catalogue genomic changes that correlate with these malignancies.

METHODS

A 60-year-old man presented with superior vena cava syndrome, and computed tomographic scan revealed an infiltrative mass of the right atrium that nearly filled the atrial chamber and partially occluded superior vena cava flow. Urgent surgical resection revealed a soft mass with the appearance of "fish flesh." Histologic, immunochistochemical, cytogenetic, and detailed molecular investigations were carried out.

RESULTS

Histologic examination revealed complete replacement of the atrial wall by diffuse sheets of pleomorphic lymphoid cells with occasional smaller plasmacytoid cells. The predominant lymphoid population was immunoreactive for CD45, CD20, CD79a, BCL-2, BCL-6, Ki-67, CD10, p53, and light chain restricted for IgM lambda. A diagnosis of primary cardiac diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with plasmacytoid differentiation was established and was supported by cytogenetic studies demonstrating the presence of a t(14;18)(q32;q21) translocation in addition to other chromosomal abnormalities. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed no evidence of a C-MYC translocation.

CONCLUSION

In this single case, comparative genomic hybridization analysis using both bacterial artificial chromosome and oligonucleotide arrays correlated well with cytogenetic findings and allows for the cataloguing of more subtle genomic events.

A phase 1 study of the selective cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor P276–00 in patients with advanced refractory neoplasms

14117

Background: In human cancers, genetic and epigenetic events result in over-expression of cyclins or absence or diminished levels of Cdk inhibitors, providing tumor cells with selective growth advantage. This has prompted the development of pharmacological Cdk inhibitors that could potentially produce anti-tumor effect. P276–00 is a selective Cdk4-D1 and Cdk1-B inhibitor. This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumour activity of P276–00 given intravenously to patients with advanced refractory solid tumours. Methods: P276–00 was administered in escalating doses to cohorts of eligible patients (pts), starting with a dose of 9 mg/m2 as a 30 minute iv infusion day 1 to 5, and day 8 to 12, q 3 weekly. To date 22 pts have been entered on the study (cohort 1 - 4 pts at 9 mg/m2, cohort 2 - 4 pts at 12.6 mg/m2, cohort 3 - 6 pts at 17.6 mg/m2, cohort 4 - 8 pts at 24.6 mg/m2) with PS 0–2, and mean age of 56 years. Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on cycle 1 days 1 and 5. Skin biopsies were obtained immediately prior to starting study treatment and on day 21 of cycle 2 and will be analyzed for Ki67, cleaved caspase 3, phospho-Rb, cyclin D1 and cdk4, and microarray. Results: To date dose limiting toxicity has occurred in one pt. Grade 3 fatigue occurred in 1 pt at 17.6 mg/m2. The most common drug-related adverse events, which were all grade 1 or 2, were fatigue, nausea, hypotension, sweating, and dry mouth. No Grade 3 biochemical toxicities have been reported so far. There have been no responses noted to date. 4 pts have stable disease after 2 cycles. Pharmacokinetic results: The Cmax, t1/2, and AUC0–8 on day 1 were as follows: 9 mg/m2- 315 ng/mL, 6.6 hr, 883 ng.h/mL; 12.6 mg/m2- 402 ng/mL, 5.5 hr, 848 ng.h/mL; 17.6 mg/m2- 589 ng/mL, 5.3 hr, 1289 ng.h/mL; 24.6 mg/m2- 621 ng/mL, 5.6 hr, 1286 ng.h/mL. Conclusions: P276–00 is well tolerated, but grade 3 fatigue has been noted in 1 pt at 17.6 mg/m2 dose level. We have observed confirmed stable disease in one patient. PK results indicate that at 9 mg/m2,12.6 mg/m2, 17.6 mg/m2 and 24.6 mg/m2 we are able to cross the cdk4 enzyme IC50 approximately 10, 13, 19 and 20 times and cross the anti-proliferative IC50 1.1, 1.4, 2.1 and 2.2 times respectively. Accrual continues at the 34.4 mg/m2 dose level.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I study of oral LY293111 given daily in combination with irinotecan in patients with solid tumours

BACKGROUND

LY293111 is an oral agent known to be a leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor antagonist and a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor resulting in selective inhibition of the lipoxygenase pathway. Lipoxygenases metabolize arachidonic acid and have been involved in cancer cell proliferation and survival. In addition, LY293111 has been found to be a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) agonist. Antineoplastic activity of LY293111 has been identified in preclinical models both alone and in combination with chemotherapy agents including irinotecan. The NCIC Clinical Trials Group studied LY293111 in combination with irinotecan to determine the recommended dose of the combination and to describe its tolerability and pharmacokinetic interaction. In addition the anti-tumour activity of LY293111 in combination with irinotecan was documented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with advanced solid tumours were treated on seven dose levels with the combination of irinotecan and LY293111. Irinotecan was administered intravenously every 21-days as a single dose. LY293111 was administered twice daily continuously by mouth.

RESULTS

Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 diarrhea was seen in two patients with doses of irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) IV every 21-days in combination with LY293111 300 mg BID. Subsequently the dose of irinotecan was decreased to 250 mg/m(2) IV every 21-days with escalating doses of LY293111. A DLT of grade 3 abdominal pain was seen at dose 600 mg BID of LY293111 with irinotecan 250 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetics (PK) indicated that the administration of LY293111 did not have an effect on the PK of irinotecan or its metabolite SN-38. No responses were seen; seven patients had stable disease of a median duration of 4.4 months (range 2.8-13 months).

CONCLUSION

The recommended phase II dose of LY293111 is 600 mg orally BID in combination with irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) IV every 21-days. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were common but could be well managed.

Ten year retrospective analysis of BOP (bleomycin, vincristine, predinisone)—A novel non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen for treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

17560

Background: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) represents the most common hematological malignancy in North America. Patients with advanced NHL, particularly those with pancytopenia, often do not tolerate the myelosuppressive side effects of chemotherapy. BOP (Bleomycin 10 mg/m2 IV D1, Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) D1 and Prednisone 100 mg PO on D1,3,5,) q weekly ± Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV D1 has been used as a non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced NHL at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario (CCSEO). Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients with NHL who have been treated with ≥1 cycle of BOP ± R at the CCSEO in the last 10 years. Primary endpoints included an assessment of patient demographics, clinical setting, clinical response, survival and toxicity. Results: Eighty-two patients were treated with BOP ± R (71 BOP, 11 R-BOP). The patient population was 59% male and 80% stage ≥3. The most common histology was Diffuse Large B cell Lymphoma (22%) and Follicular Lymphoma (19.5%). Eighty percent of patients had an IPI score ≥2. The median number of chemotherapy treatments prior to BOP was 2. Overall, the response rate (CR + PR) was 46.3% with a mean duration of response of 4.6 months. Median survival was 3.8 years. BOP was used successfully as a salvage regimen prior to stem cell transplant in three patients and as a first line treatment prior to myelosuppressive treatment in 19 patients. The regimen was generally well tolerated with no hematologic toxicity or infectious complication. Four patients experienced mild pulmonary toxicity. There were no deaths attributable to drug toxicity. Response rates and toxicities in the R-BOP population were not significantly different from those of BOP. Conclusions: Patients with advanced poor prognosis NHL have a favorable response rate associated with minimal toxicity to the non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen BOP ± R.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of perifosine in previously untreated patients with metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE

To assess the response rate and toxicity of the alkylphosphocholine analogue, perifosine, in patients with metastatic or recurrent malignant melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had histologically proven, unidimensionally measurable disease which was incurable by standard therapy. Prior adjuvant immunotherapy was allowed but patients had not received prior chemotherapy. Perisfosine was given orally as a loading dose of 900 mg on day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of 150 mg po on days 2-21 in a 28 day cycle. The loading dose was 300 mg on day 1 of all subsequent cycles. Tumour response was assessed every 2 cycles.

RESULTS

18 patients were accrued over 7 mos. No objective responses occurred in the 14 evaluable patients. Three patients (21%) achieved stable disease after 2 cycles and 11 had progression. Seventeen patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities included: diarrhea (12%), arthralgia (12%), nausea (6%), headache (6%), and fatigue (6%). No grade 3 or 4 hematological or biochemical toxicity were observed. Seventy-seven percent of patients received >or=90% of planned cycle 1 dose intensity and 58% received >or=90% of planned dose for cycle 2+. Four patients required dose reductions; treatment was delayed in 5 patients; and 5 patients missed doses because of toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Perifosine can be safely administered when given as an initial loading dose followed by daily maintenance therapy over 28 days. Gastrointestinal toxicity is common but generally of low grade. Hematological toxicity is minimal. No objective responses were observed. No further development of single-agent perifosine is recommended in malignant melanoma.

SarCNU in recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the activity and toxicity of SarCNU, an oral chloroethylnitrosourea in patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer who have progressed after first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer following first-line chemotherapy were treated with SarCNU 860 mg/m2 orally day 1, 5 and 9 every 6 weeks. The patient's median age was 64 and the ECOG performance status was 0 in six, 1 in eleven and 2 in one patients. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 16 were evaluable for response.

RESULTS

There were no objective responses (0%). One patient had stable disease and 15 had progressive disease at their first follow-up assessment. Median survival was 7.36 months (3.75-7.49 95% C.I.). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most severe toxicities (grade 3-4 in six and nine patients respectively). Pulmonary toxicity was also seen in five patients who had a drop of DLCO grade from baseline and two patients who had a fall in FVC from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

SarCNU is inactive in recurrent or metastatic colorectal patients who have progressed after first-line chemotherapy.