Utility of Urine Cultures During Febrile Neutropenia Workup in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients Without Urinary Symptoms

The utility of obtaining screening urine cultures for febrile neutropenia (FN) during hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) is unknown. In 667 adult HCT patients with FN, only 40 (6%) were found with bacteriuria. Antibiotics were modified in 3 patients (0.4%) based on urine cultures and none developed urinary-associated infectious complications.

Correlation of Engraftment and Time from Melphalan Administration to Stem Cell Infusion

Single-agent, high-dose melphalan continues to be the most commonly used conditioning regimen for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. The timing of melphalan administration with respect to stem cell infusion has not been clearly defined. Many institutions require a minimum of 24 hours between melphalan administration and stem cell infusion; however, some institutions have adopted shorter intervals based on melphalan's short half-life. Some studies have suggested that shortening the interval between melphalan administration and stem cell infusion may contribute to delays in engraftment, but this correlation has not been clearly evaluated or defined. This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated the times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in patients who received stem cells at least 24 hours after melphalan (≥24 hours cohort) compared with those who received stem cells within 24 hours of melphalan (<24 hours cohort. The study included a total of 723 adult patients, 502 patients in the ≥24 hours cohort and 221 in the <24 hours cohort, treated at 3 transplantation centers between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2019. Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. The Fisher exact test was used to compare nominal categorical variables between the 2 cohorts, and the nonparametric van der Waerden test or Mood median test was used to compare ordinal or continuous variables. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days for both the ≥24 hours cohort (interquartile range [IQR], 11 to 12 days) and the <24 hours cohort (IQR, 11 to 13 days) (P = .07). The median time to platelet engraftment was 19 days for both the ≥24 hours cohort (IQR, 17 to 22 days) and <24 hours cohort (IQR, 17 to 20 days) (P = .25). The median time between melphalan administration and stem cell infusion in the <24 hours cohort was 18 hours, with a minimum time of 12 hours. The existing literature has not clearly defined the impact of the timing between melphalan administration and stem cell infusion on engraftment in autologous transplantation. The ability to safely shorten the interval between chemotherapy and transplantation could increase logistical flexibility and/or decrease the length of hospital stay. This large multicenter retrospective study did not identify a statistical or clinical impact on engraftment when melphalan was infused <24 hours or ≥24 hours before autologous stem cell infusion.

Plerixafor strategies for autologous hematopoietic cell transplant mobilization: A comparison of efficacy and cost

Addition of plerixafor (P) to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during peripheral blood mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) increases the number of patients meeting collection goals prior to autologous stem cell transplant (aSCT). However, use of P is not universal among transplant centers due to cost. This study aims to compare clinical and financial impacts of using an algorithm-based P mobilization strategy versus use in all patients. This was a single center, retrospective analysis of adult patients with myeloma or amyloidosis receiving aSCT who received apheresis of their HSC between 3/1/2017 and 3/1/2019. Patients prior to 3/1/2018 were classified as receiving P "per algorithm" and those after this date were classified as "up-front" P. For the per-algorithm group, P was given for a pre-apheresis CD34+ cell count of <20 cells/μL on mobilization day 5 and patients returned on day 6 for apheresis. Of the 129 patients included, 55 received P per-algorithm and 74 received up-front P. There was a reduction in median number of apheresis days (1.5 vs 1 day, p < 0.001) and an increase in median number of CD34+ cells collected (6.6 vs 8.5 × 10⁶ cells/kg, p < 0.001) with up-front P. Up-front P increased drug cost but reduced apheresis costs, which resulted in a net savings of $121 per patient in total mobilization costs. These findings suggest that use of up-front P for mobilization significantly reduces apheresis days and increases HSC collection yield without increasing overall cost per patient.

Evaluation of mobilization efficacy with an extended interval following plerixafor administration

Plerixafor is a hematopoietic stem cell mobilizing agent used in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to improve collection for autologous stem cell transplantation. Despite a recommendation for administration 11 h prior to apheresis per package labeling, logistical challenges lead many institutions to administer plerixafor at an extended interval. The purpose of this study was to determine if plerixafor effectively and efficiently mobilizes CD34+ cells when given at an extended interval prior to apheresis. This was a retrospective evaluation of adult patients who received plerixafor based on an algorithm reserving daily plerixafor only for patients with a pre-apheresis CD34+ count of < 20 cells/µL (pre-apheresis plerixafor) or with a low CD34+ yield after the first apheresis session (rescue plerixafor). The primary outcome was achievement of a disease-specific collection goal of ≥ 6 ×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg for multiple myeloma and ≥ 4 ×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg for lymphoma. The mean interval between plerixafor administration and apheresis was 17 h in this study. Despite this extended interval, 64% of patients met their disease-specific collection goal. A minimum collection goal of ≥ 2 ×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg was achieved by 95% of patients. Mobilization remained efficient with a median of two days to complete collection. Based on this data, plerixafor effectively and efficiently mobilizes CD34+ cells when given at an extended interval prior to apheresis.

Start using a checklist, PRONTO: Recommendation for a standard review process for chemotherapy orders

Chemotherapy order review by pharmacists requires careful attention to many details, and serious consequences can occur if errors are made. Other high-risk industries have long used checklists to improve accuracy and reduce the risk of errors. Despite the recent expansion of checklist use in other areas of medicine, there is currently no published evidence that checklists are being widely used by pharmacists in the evaluation of chemotherapy orders. This article explains a flexible checklist called PRONTO (Patient, Regimen, Organ Function, Numbers, Toxicity, Order Verification) that has been successfully used by pharmacists in variety of practice settings in two academic centers in North Carolina. Proposed benefits of using a checklist in order review include standardization of review for better communication between collaborating pharmacists, a training tool for new or cross-training pharmacists, and an educational tool for students.

Everolimus: a new mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To review clinical trials and main characteristics of everolimus, with focus on treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

DATA SOURCES

Pertinent data were identified primarily through a search of MEDLINE and PubMed (1966-November 2010) using the primary search terms everolimus, RAD001, renal cell carcinoma, and mTOR inhibitors.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of everolimus in patients with cancer were evaluated, including Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials. Preference was given to Phase 2 and 3 studies evaluating use of everolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Everolimus is an oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor approved for the management of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who progressed on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Actions of everolimus within the mTOR pathway result in decreased protein synthesis and cell cycle arrest, as well as decreased angiogenesis. A usual starting dose for patients with renal cell carcinoma is 10 mg daily. Everolimus undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism, primarily through the CYP3A4 isoenzyme, which predisposes it to drug interactions with inducers and inhibitors of this enzyme. Most commonly reported adverse events associated with everolimus include anemia, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, mucositis, fatigue, and rash. Approval of everolimus was based on the results of a Phase 3 trial that demonstrated an increase in median progression-free survival by 2.1 months in patients receiving everolimus therapy as compared to placebo. The drug was recently added to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as a treatment option for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have progressed on tyrosine kinase therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a review of the currently available literature, everolimus provides a safe and efficacious treatment option for patients with renal cell carcinoma who have progressed on treatment with sunitinib and/or sorafenib.