1
|
Murdan S, Wei L, van Riet-Nales DA, Gurmu AE, Usifoh SF, Tăerel AE, Yıldız-Peköz A, Krajnović D, Azzopardi LM, Brock T, Fernandes AI, dos Santos ALS, Anto BP, Vallet T, Lee EE, Jeong KH, Akel M, Tam E, Volmer D, Douss T, Shukla S, Yamamura S, Lou X, van Riet BH, Usifoh CO, Duwiejua M, Ruiz F, Furnham A. Association between culture and the preference for, and perceptions of, 11 routes of medicine administration: A survey in 21 countries and regions. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm 2023; 12:100378. [PMID: 38094713 PMCID: PMC10716026 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Medicines can be taken by various routes of administration. These can impact the effects and perceptions of medicines. The literature about individuals' preferences for and perceptions of the different routes of administration is sparse, but indicates a potential influence of culture. Our aim was to determine: (i) any association between one's culture and one's preferred route of medicine administration and (ii) individual perceptions of pain, efficacy, speed of action and acceptability when medicines are swallowed or placed in the mouth, under the tongue, in the nose, eye, ear, lungs, rectum, vagina, on the skin, or areinjected. A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey of adults was conducted in 21 countries and regions of the world, namely, Tunisia, Ghana, Nigeria, Turkey, Ethiopia, Lebanon, Malta, Brazil, Great Britain, United States, India, Serbia, Romania, Portugal, France, Netherlands, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, mainland China and Estonia, using the Inglehart-Welzel cultural map to ensure coverage across all cultures. Participants scored the pain/discomfort, efficacy, speed of onset and acceptability of the different routes of medicine administration and stated their preferred route. Demographic information was collected. A total of 4435 participants took part in the survey. Overall, the oral route was the most preferred route, followed by injection, while the rectal route was the least preferred. While the oral route was the most preferred in all cultures, the percentage of participants selecting this route varied, from 98% in Protestant Europe to 50% in the African-Islamic culture. A multinomial logistic regression model revealed a number of predictors for the preferred route. Injections were favoured in the Baltic, South Asia, Latin America and African-Islamic cultures while dermal administration was favoured in Catholic Europe, Baltic and Latin America cultures. A marked association was found between culture and the preference for, and perceptions of the different routes by which medicines are taken. This applied to even the least favoured routes (vaginal and rectal). Only women were asked about the vaginal route, and our data shows that the vaginal route was slightly more popular than the rectal one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Li Wei
- UCL School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK
| | | | - Abyot Endale Gurmu
- Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Stella Folajole Usifoh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
| | - Adriana-Elena Tăerel
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ayca Yıldız-Peköz
- Dept. of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Istanbul University, Turkey
| | - Dušanka Krajnović
- Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Legislation, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Lilian M. Azzopardi
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Tina Brock
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, UCSF School of Pharmacy, UCSF Box 0622, 521 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco 94143, USA
| | - Ana I. Fernandes
- Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, 2829-511 Caparica, Almada, Portugal
| | | | - Berko Panyin Anto
- Dept of Clinical & Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical sciences, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Thibault Vallet
- ClinSearch, 110 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 92240 Malakoff, France
| | | | | | - Marwan Akel
- School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Lebanon
- Inspect-Lb (Institut National De Santé Publique, D'épidémiologie Clinique Et De Toxicologie-Liban), Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Eliza Tam
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Daisy Volmer
- Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
| | | | - Sharvari Shukla
- Symbiosis Statistical Institute, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India
| | - Shigeo Yamamura
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Josai International University, Togane, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Bauke H.G. van Riet
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute (at the time of participant recruitment in the Netherlands: MEB and VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cyril O. Usifoh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
| | - Mahama Duwiejua
- Dept of Clinical & Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical sciences, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Fabrice Ruiz
- ClinSearch, 110 Avenue Pierre Brossolette, 92240 Malakoff, France
| | - Adrian Furnham
- Dept Leadership and Orgnaisational Behaviour, Norwegian Business School, Norway
| |
Collapse
|