Functional characterization of 2 known ryanodine receptor mutations causing malignant hyperthermia

BACKGROUND

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a potentially lethal pharmacogenetic disorder. More than 300 variants in the ryanodine receptor 1 (RYR1) have been associated with MH; however, only 31 have been identified as causative. To confirm a mutation in RYR1 as being causative for MH, segregation of the potential mutation in at least 2 unrelated families with MH susceptibility must be demonstrated and functional assays must show abnormal calcium release compared with wild-type RYR1.

METHODS

We used "Hot-spot" DNA screening to identify mutations in RYR1 in 3 New Zealand families. B-lymphoblastoid cells were used to compare the amount of calcium released on stimulation with 4-chloro-m-cresol between wild-type RYR1 cells and cells carrying the new variants in RYR1.

RESULTS

We identified a known RYR1 mutation (R2355W) in 2 families and another more recently identified (V2354M) mutation in another family. Both mutations segregated with MH susceptibility in the respective families. Cell lines carrying a mutation in RYR1 showed increased sensitivity to 4-chloro-m-cresol.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that R2355W is confirmed as being an MH-causative mutation and suggest that V2354M is a RYR1 mutation likely to cause MH.

Safety of exposure of malignant hyperthermia non-susceptible patients and their relatives to anaesthetic triggering agents

As the reliability of malignant hyperthermia normal in vitro contracture test results has been questioned, this study set out to determine the reliability of malignant hyperthermia normal results in New Zealand. Three hundred and twenty-nine anaesthetics were administered to malignant hyperthermia normal patients, identified through the Palmerston North Hospital malignant hyperthermia database. Anaesthetic records were retrieved and scrutinised for a malignant hyperthermia reaction using the Malignant Hyperthermia Clinical Grading Scale. Patients were exposed to one or more of eight triggering agents and multiple anaesthetic agents were administered in 41% of cases. Six variables were analysed, and although a minority of variables were abnormal in a small number of patients, none of the findings supported a malignant hyperthermia reaction. While the analysis was limited by the adequacy of the anaesthesia records, it was supported by negative DNA analysis in 55% of patients. This study supports several previous studies in demonstrating that patients in New Zealand tested non-susceptible to malignant hyperthermia can safely be given triggering agents.