1
|
Sugavanam T, Crocker H, Violato M, Peters M. The financial impact on people with coeliac disease of withdrawing gluten-free food from prescriptions in England: findings from a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:146. [PMID: 38287389 PMCID: PMC10826048 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10600-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A lifelong gluten-free diet is the only treatment for coeliac disease. The cost and availability of gluten-free substitute food (GFSF) remain challenging. Some local areas in England have stopped gluten-free prescriptions for coeliac disease. The aim of this paper is to present the quantitative findings of the financial impact of prescription withdrawal on people with coeliac disease. METHODS A cross-sectional survey with adults in England who reported having been diagnosed with coeliac disease by a health professional. The postal survey was distributed by Coeliac UK to their members in 13 prescribing and 13 non-prescribing local areas that were matched for geographical location and level of deprivation. Additionally, an advertisement for the survey was placed on social media. The questionnaire contained items on the availability and use of prescriptions; the weekly amount spent on GFSF; amount of specific GFSF bought; affordability of GFSF; demographics and health-related variables. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics, analysis of variance and regression analysis. RESULTS Of the 1697 participants, 809 resided in areas that provided prescriptions and 888 in non-prescribing areas. Participants self-report of their prescription did not always match the local area prescription policy. There was no statistically significant difference between prescribing and non-prescribing areas in how easy or difficult participants found it to obtain GFSF (p = 0.644) and its availability in various locations. Participants in non-prescribing areas purchased most types of GFSF items in statistically significantly higher quantities and thereby spent an additional £11.32/month on GFSF items than participants in prescribing areas (p < 0.001). While taking into account the self-reported prescription status, the amount increased to £14.09/month (p < 0.001). Although affordability to buy GFSF did not differ based on local area prescription policy or self-reported prescription status, it was dependent on equivalised annual income. However, affordability did not influence spending on GFSF. Regression analysis indicated that males and households with additional members with coeliac disease spent more on GFSF. CONCLUSIONS The study has highlighted that gluten-free prescription withdrawal can have financial implications for people with coeliac disease. Any future changes to the prescription policy of GFSF should consider the impact on the population, especially lower income households.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism (OCDEM), University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
| | - Helen Crocker
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mara Violato
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michele Peters
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sannasi R, Dakshinamurthy A, Dommerholt J, Desai V, Kumar A, Sugavanam T. Diaphragm and core stabilization exercises in low back pain: A narrative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2023; 36:221-227. [PMID: 37949564 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Core stabilization is a vital concept in clinical rehabilitation (including low back pain rehabilitation) and competitive athletic training. The core comprises of a complex network of hip, trunk and neck muscles including the diaphragm. AIMS The paper aims to discuss the role of the diaphragm in core stability, summarize current evidence and put forth ideal core training strategies involving the diaphragm. METHOD Narrative review RESULTS: The diaphragm has a dual role of respiration and postural control. Evidence suggests that current core stability exercises for low back pain are superior than minimal or no treatment, however, no more beneficial than general exercises and/or manual therapy. There appears to be a higher focus on the transversus abdominis and multifidi muscles and minimal attention to the diaphragm. We propose that any form of core stabilization exercises for low back pain rehabilitation should consider the diaphragm. Core stabilization program could commence with facilitation of normal breathing patterns and progressive systematic restoration of the postural control role of the diaphragm muscle. CONCLUSION The role of the diaphragm is often overlooked in both research and practice. Attention to the diaphragm may improve the effectiveness of core stability exercise in low back pain rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajasekar Sannasi
- Institute of Physiotherapy, Srinivas University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
| | - Anandhi Dakshinamurthy
- SRM College of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, 603203, Kanchipuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - Jan Dommerholt
- Myopain Seminars, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA; Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| | - Vidhi Desai
- Institute of Physiotherapy, Srinivas University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
| | - Ajay Kumar
- Institute of Physiotherapy, Srinivas University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
| | - Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Health Services Research Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fordham B, Sugavanam T, Edwards K, Hemming K, Howick J, Copsey B, Lee H, Kaidesoja M, Kirtley S, Hopewell S, das Nair R, Howard R, Stallard P, Hamer-Hunt J, Cooper Z, Lamb SE. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-378. [PMID: 33629950 PMCID: PMC7957459 DOI: 10.3310/hta25090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive-behavioural therapy aims to increase quality of life by changing cognitive and behavioural factors that maintain problematic symptoms. A previous overview of cognitive-behavioural therapy systematic reviews suggested that cognitive-behavioural therapy was effective for many conditions. However, few of the included reviews synthesised randomised controlled trials. OBJECTIVES This project was undertaken to map the quality and gaps in the cognitive-behavioural therapy systematic review of randomised controlled trial evidence base. Panoramic meta-analyses were also conducted to identify any across-condition general effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy. DATA SOURCES The overview was designed with cognitive-behavioural therapy patients, clinicians and researchers. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and OpenGrey databases were searched from 1992 to January 2019. REVIEW METHODS Study inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) fulfil the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination criteria; (2) intervention reported as cognitive-behavioural therapy or including one cognitive and one behavioural element; (3) include a synthesis of cognitive-behavioural therapy trials; (4) include either health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety or pain outcome; and (5) available in English. Review quality was assessed with A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)-2. Reviews were quality assessed and data were extracted in duplicate by two independent researchers, and then mapped according to condition, population, context and quality. The effects from high-quality reviews were pooled within condition groups, using a random-effect panoramic meta-analysis. If the across-condition heterogeneity was I2 < 75%, we pooled across conditions. Subgroup analyses were conducted for age, delivery format, comparator type and length of follow-up, and a sensitivity analysis was performed for quality. RESULTS A total of 494 reviews were mapped, representing 68% (27/40) of the categories of the International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revision, Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. Most reviews (71%, 351/494) were of lower quality. Research on older adults, using cognitive-behavioural therapy preventatively, ethnic minorities and people living outside Europe, North America or Australasia was limited. Out of 494 reviews, 71 were included in the primary panoramic meta-analyses. A modest effect was found in favour of cognitive-behavioural therapy for health-related quality of life (standardised mean difference 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.41, prediction interval -0.05 to 0.50, I2 = 32%), anxiety (standardised mean difference 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.43, prediction interval -0.28 to 0.88, I2 = 62%) and pain (standardised mean difference 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.41, prediction interval -0.28 to 0.74, I2 = 64%) outcomes. All condition, subgroup and sensitivity effect estimates remained consistent with the general effect. A statistically significant interaction effect was evident between the active and non-active comparator groups for the health-related quality-of-life outcome. A general effect for depression outcomes was not produced as a result of considerable heterogeneity across reviews and conditions. LIMITATIONS Data extraction and analysis were conducted at the review level, rather than returning to the individual trial data. This meant that the risk of bias of the individual trials could not be accounted for, but only the quality of the systematic reviews that synthesised them. CONCLUSION Owing to the consistency and homogeneity of the highest-quality evidence, it is proposed that cognitive-behavioural therapy can produce a modest general, across-condition benefit in health-related quality-of-life, anxiety and pain outcomes. FUTURE WORK Future research should focus on how the modest effect sizes seen with cognitive-behavioural therapy can be increased, for example identifying alternative delivery formats to increase adherence and reduce dropout, and pursuing novel methods to assess intervention fidelity and quality. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017078690. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Fordham
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Katherine Edwards
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karla Hemming
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jeremy Howick
- Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bethan Copsey
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hopin Lee
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Milla Kaidesoja
- Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Shona Kirtley
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sally Hopewell
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Roshan das Nair
- Department of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Institute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Robert Howard
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Zafra Cooper
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fordham B, Sugavanam T, Edwards K, Stallard P, Howard R, das Nair R, Copsey B, Lee H, Howick J, Hemming K, Lamb SE. The evidence for cognitive behavioural therapy in any condition, population or context: a meta-review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2021; 51:21-29. [PMID: 33455594 PMCID: PMC7856415 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720005292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The majority of psychological treatment research is dedicated to investigating the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) across different conditions, population and contexts. We aimed to summarise the current systematic review evidence and evaluate the consistency of CBT's effect across different conditions. We included reviews of CBT randomised controlled trials in any: population, condition, format, context, with any type of comparator and published in English. We searched DARE, Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CDAS, and OpenGrey between 1992 and January 2019. Reviews were quality assessed, their data extracted and summarised. The effects upon health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were pooled, within-condition groups. If the across-condition heterogeneity was I2 < 75%, we pooled effects using a random-effect panoramic meta-analysis. We summarised 494 reviews (221 128 participants), representing 14/20 physical and 13/20 mental conditions (World Health Organisation's International Classification of Diseases). Most reviews were lower-quality (351/494), investigated face-to-face CBT (397/494), and in adults (378/494). Few reviews included trials conducted in Asia, South America or Africa (45/494). CBT produced a modest benefit across-conditions on HRQoL (standardised mean difference 0.23; 95% confidence intervals 0.14-0.33, I2 = 32%). The effect's associated prediction interval -0.05 to 0.50 suggested CBT will remain effective in conditions for which we do not currently have available evidence. While there remain some gaps in the completeness of the evidence base, we need to recognise the consistent evidence for the general benefit which CBT offers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Fordham
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS) University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Katherine Edwards
- Reviews and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Robert Howard
- Institute of Mental Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Roshan das Nair
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Hopin Lee
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS) University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeremy Howick
- Department of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karla Hemming
- Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah E. Lamb
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sugavanam T, Williamson E, Fordham B, Hansen Z, Richmond H, Hall A, Ali U, Copsey B, Lamb SE. Evaluation of the implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme using online training: a cohort implementation study. Physiotherapy 2020; 109:4-12. [PMID: 32795621 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 1) Evaluate implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme, a group cognitive behavioural approach for patients with low back pain (LBP) developed for a clinical trial, into the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom; 2) Compare patient outcomes with the BeST Trial results. DESIGN Two stage observational cohort implementation study. PARTICIPANTS Stage 1: NHS Clinicians enrolled in BeST online training. Stage 2: Patients with LBP attending NHS physiotherapy departments and enrolled in the BeST programme. INTERVENTION An online training and implementation programme. OUTCOMES Stage 1: LBP attitudes and beliefs, self-rated competence, intention and actual implementation were collected before, immediately, 4- and 12-months post-training. Stage 2: Patients rated pain, function, recovery and satisfaction before and up to one year after attending the BeST programme. RESULTS Stage 1: 1324 clinicians (157 NHS Trusts) enrolled in the training; 586 (44%) clinicians (101 NHS Trusts) completed training; 443/586 (76%) clinicians provided post-training data; 253/443 (57%) clinicians intended to implement the programme; 148/381 (39%) clinicians (54 NHS Trusts) provided follow-up data; 49/148 (33.1%) clinicians (27 NHS Trusts) implemented the programme. Attitudes and beliefs shifted towards a biopsychosocial model post-training. Stage 2: 923 patients were enrolled. Patients reported improvements in function (mean change: 1.55; 95%CI: 1.25, 1.86) and pain (-0.84; -1.1, -0.58) at follow-up. The majority rated themselves improved and satisfied with the programme. CONCLUSION Online training had good reach into NHS Trusts although, not everyone went onto implement the programme. Improvements in function that were consistent with the original trial were demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Esther Williamson
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Beth Fordham
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Zara Hansen
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Helen Richmond
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
| | - Amanda Hall
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
| | - Usama Ali
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Bethan Copsey
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Medical School, University of Exeter, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Keene DJ, Forde C, Sugavanam T, Williams MA, Lamb SE. Exercise for people with a fragility fracture of the pelvis or lower limb: a systematic review of interventions evaluated in clinical trials and reporting quality. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21:435. [PMID: 32622352 PMCID: PMC7335435 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03361-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To aid design of exercise trials for people with pelvic and lower limb fragility fractures a systematic review was conducted to identify what types of exercise interventions and mobility outcomes have been assessed, investigate intervention reporting quality, and evaluate risk of bias in published trials. METHODS Systematic searches of electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro) 1996-2019 were conducted to identify randomised controlled trials of exercise for pelvic or lower limb fragility fractures. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. One reviewer extracted data, a second verified. Two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias. Intervention reporting quality was based on TIDieR, assessed by one reviewer and verified by a second. Narrative synthesis was undertaken. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42017060905. RESULTS Searches identified 37 trials including 3564 participants, median sample size 81 (IQR 48-124), participants aged 81 years (IQR 79-82) and 76% (2536/3356) female. All trials focussed on people with hip fracture except one on ankle fracture. Exercise types focussed on resistance exercise in 14 trials, weight bearing exercise in 5 trials, 13 varied dose of sessions with health professionals, and 2 trials each focussed on treadmill gait training, timing of weight bearing or aerobic exercise. 30/37 (81%) of trials reported adequate sequence generation, 25/37 (68%) sufficient allocation concealment. 10/37 (27%) trials lacked outcome assessor blinding. Of 65 exercise interventions, reporting was clear for 33 (51%) in terms of when started, 61 (94%) for where delivered, 49 (75%) for who delivered, 47 (72%) for group or individual, 29 (45%) for duration, 46 (71%) for session frequency, 8 (12%) for full prescription details to enable the exercises to be reproduced, 32 (49%) clearly reported tailoring or modification, and 23 (35%) reported exercise adherence. Subjectively assessed mobility was assessed in 22/37 (59%) studies and 29/37 (78%) used an objective measure. CONCLUSIONS All trials focussed on hip fracture, apart from one ankle fracture trial. Research into pelvic and other lower limb fragility fractures is indicated. A range of exercise types were investigated but to date deficiencies in intervention reporting hamper reproducibility. Adoption of TIDieR and CERT guidelines should improve intervention reporting as use increases. Trials would be improved by consistent blinded outcome assessor use and with consensus on which mobility outcomes should be assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Keene
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Colin Forde
- Physiotherapy Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark A Williams
- Department of Sport, Health Sciences and Social Work, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fordham B, Sugavanam T, Hopewell S, Hemming K, Howick J, Kirtley S, das Nair R, Hamer-Hunt J, Lamb SE. Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e025761. [PMID: 30552285 PMCID: PMC6303684 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is a psychological therapy that has been used to improve patient well-being across multiple mental and physical health problems. Its effectiveness has been examined in thousands of randomised control trials that have been synthesised into hundreds of systematic reviews. The aim of this overview is to map, synthesise and assess the reliability of evidence generated from these systematic reviews of the effectiveness of CBT across all health conditions, patient groups and settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will run our search strategy, to identify systematic reviews of CBT, within the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Child Development and Adolescent Studies, and OpenGrey between January 1992 and 25 April 2018. Independent reviewers will sift, perform data extraction in duplicate and assess the quality of the reviews using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (V.2) tool. The outcomes of interest include: health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety, psychosis and physical/physiological outcomes prioritised in the individual reviews. The evidence will be mapped and synthesised where appropriate by health problem, patient subgroups, intervention type, context and outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required as this is an overview of published systematic reviews. We plan to publish results in peer-reviewed journals and present at international and national academic, clinical and patient conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017078690.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Fordham
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sally Hopewell
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karla Hemming
- Department of Public Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jeremy Howick
- Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Shona Kirtley
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Roshan das Nair
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Sarah E Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sugavanam T, Fosh B, Close J, Byng R, Horrell J, Lloyd H. Codesigning a Measure of Person-Centred Coordinated Care to Capture the Experience of the Patient: The Development of the P3CEQ. J Patient Exp 2018; 5:201-211. [PMID: 30214927 PMCID: PMC6134538 DOI: 10.1177/2374373517748642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centred coordinated care (P3C) is a priority for stakeholders (ie, patients, carers, professionals, policy makers). As a part of the development of an evaluation framework for P3C, we set out to identify patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) suitable for routine measurement and feedback during the development of services. METHODS A rapid review of the literature was undertaken to identity existing PREMs suitable for the probing person-centred and/or coordinated care. Of 74 measures identified, 7 met our inclusion criteria. We critically examined these against core domains and subdomains of P3C. Measures were then presented to stakeholders in codesign workshops to explore acceptability, utility, and their strengths/weaknesses. RESULTS The Long-Term Condition 6 questionnaire was preferred for its short length, utility, and tone. However, it lacked key questions in each core domain, and in response to requests from our codesign group, new questions were added to cover consideration as a whole person, coordination, care plans, carer involvement, and a single coordinator. Cognitive interviews, on-going codesign, and mapping to core P3C domains resulted in the refinement of the questionnaire to 11 items with 1 trigger question. The 11-item modified version was renamed the P3C Experiences Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS Due to a dearth of brief measures available to capture people's experience of P3C for routine practice, an existing measure was modified using an iterative process of adaption and validation through codesign workshops. Next steps include psychometric validation and modification for people with dementia and learning difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Rehabilitation Research in Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Fosh
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - James Close
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Byng
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Horrell
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Lloyd
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lloyd A, Bannigan K, Sugavanam T, Freeman J. Experiences of stroke survivors, their families and unpaid carers in goal setting within stroke rehabilitation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 16:1418-1453. [DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
10
|
Horrell J, Lloyd H, Sugavanam T, Close J, Byng R. Creating and facilitating change for Person-Centred Coordinated Care (P3C): The development of the Organisational Change Tool (P3C-OCT). Health Expect 2018; 21:448-456. [PMID: 29139220 PMCID: PMC5867330 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person Centred Coordinated Care (P3C) is a UK priority for patients, carers, professionals, commissioners and policy makers. Services are developing a range of approaches to deliver this care with a lack of tools to guide implementation. METHODOLOGY A scoping review and critical examination of current policy, key literature and NHS guidelines, together with stakeholder involvement led to the identification of domains, subdomains and component activities (processes and behaviours) required to deliver P3C. These were validated through codesign with stakeholders via a series of workshops and cognitive interviews. RESULTS Six core domains of P3C were identified as follows: (i) my goals, (ii) care planning, (iii) transitions, (iv) decision making (v), information and communication and (vi) organizational support activities. These were populated by 29 core subdomains (question items). A number of response codes (components) to each question provide examples of the processes and activities that can be actioned to achieve each core subdomain of P3C. CONCLUSION The P3C-OCT provides a coherent approach to monitoring progress and supporting practice development towards P3C. It can be used to generate a shared understanding of the core domains of P3C at a service delivery level, and support reorganization of care for those with complex needs. The tool can reliably detect change over time, as demonstrated in a sample of 40 UK general practices. It is currently being used in four UK evaluations of new models of care and being further developed as a training tool for the delivery of P3C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Horrell
- Plymouth UniversityPeninsula Schools of Medicine and DentistryNIHR CLAHRC, South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC)PlymouthUK
| | - Helen Lloyd
- Plymouth UniversityPeninsula Schools of Medicine and DentistryNIHR CLAHRC, South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC)PlymouthUK
| | - Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Nuffield Department of OrthopaedicsRheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS)University of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - James Close
- Plymouth UniversityPeninsula Schools of Medicine and DentistryNIHR CLAHRC, South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC)PlymouthUK
| | - Richard Byng
- Plymouth UniversityPeninsula Schools of Medicine and DentistryNIHR CLAHRC, South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC)PlymouthUK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lloyd H, Wheat H, Horrell J, Sugavanam T, Fosh B, Valderas JM, Close J. Patient-Reported Measures for Person-Centered Coordinated Care: A Comparative Domain Map and Web-Based Compendium for Supporting Policy Development and Implementation. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e54. [PMID: 29444767 PMCID: PMC5830608 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-reported measure (PRM) questionnaires were originally used in research to measure outcomes of intervention studies. They have now evolved into a diverse family of tools measuring a range of constructs including quality of life and experiences of care. Current health and social care policy increasingly advocates their use for embedding the patient voice into service redesign through new models of care such as person-centered coordinated care (P3C). If chosen carefully and used efficiently, these tools can help improve care delivery through a variety of novel ways, including system-level feedback for health care management and commissioning. Support and guidance on how to use these tools would be critical to achieve these goals. Objective The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based guidance and support for the use of P3C-PRMs in health and social care policy through identification of PRMs that can be used to enhance the development of P3C, mapping P3C-PRMs against an existing model of domains of P3C, and integration and organization of the information in a user-friendly Web-based database. Methods A pragmatic approach was used for the systematic identification of candidate P3C-PRMs, which aimed at balancing comprehensiveness and feasibility. This utilized a number of resources, including existing compendiums, peer-reviewed and gray literature (using a flexible search strategy), and stakeholder engagement (which included guidance for relevant clinical areas). A subset of those candidate measures (meeting prespecified eligibility criteria) was then mapped against a theoretical model of P3C, facilitating classification of the construct being measured and the subsequent generation of shortlists for generic P3C measures, specific aspects of P3C (eg, communication or decision making), and condition-specific measures (eg, diabetes, cancer) in priority areas, as highlighted by stakeholders. Results In total, 328 P3C-PRMs were identified, which were used to populate a freely available Web-based database. Of these, 63 P3C-PRMs met the eligibility criteria for shortlisting and were classified according to their measurement constructs and mapped against the theoretical P3C model. We identified tools with the best coverage of P3C, thereby providing evidence of their content validity as outcome measures for new models of care. Transitions and medications were 2 areas currently poorly covered by existing measures. All the information is currently available at a user-friendly web-based portal (p3c.org.uk), which includes all relevant information on each measure, such as the constructs targeted and links to relevant literature, in addition to shortlists according to relevant constructs. Conclusions A detailed compendium of P3C-PRMs has been developed using a pragmatic systematic approach supported by stakeholder engagement. Our user-friendly suite of tools is designed to act as a portal to the world of PRMs for P3C, and have utility for a broad audience, including (but not limited to) health care commissioners, managers, and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Lloyd
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Wheat
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Horrell
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Fosh
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - James Close
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tarrant M, Warmoth K, Code C, Dean S, Goodwin VA, Stein K, Sugavanam T. Creating psychological connections between intervention recipients: development and focus group evaluation of a group singing session for people with aphasia. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e009652. [PMID: 26908519 PMCID: PMC4769399 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study sought to identify key design features that could be used to create a new framework for group-based health interventions. We designed and tested the first session of a group intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia which was aimed at nurturing new psychological connections between group members. SETTING The intervention session, a participant focus group and interviews with intervention facilitators were held in a local community music centre in the South West of England. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of 10 community-dwelling people with poststroke aphasia participated in the session. Severity of aphasia was not considered for inclusion. INTERVENTION Participants took part in a 90-min group singing session which involved singing songs from a specially prepared song book. Musical accompaniment was provided by the facilitators. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Participants and group facilitators reported their experiences of participating in the session, with a focus on activities within the session related to the intervention aims. Researcher observations of the session were also made. RESULTS Two themes emerged from the analysis, concerning experiences of the session ('developing a sense of group belonging') and perceptions of its design and delivery ('creating the conditions for engagement'). Participants described an emerging sense of shared social identity as a member of the intervention group and identified fixed (eg, group size, session breaks) and flexible (eg, facilitator responsiveness) features of the session which contributed to this emergence. Facilitator interviews and researcher observations corroborated and expanded participant reports. CONCLUSIONS Engagement with health intervention content may be enhanced in group settings when intervention participants begin to establish positive and meaningful psychological connections with other group members. Understanding and actively nurturing these connections should be a core feature of a general framework for the design and delivery of group interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Tarrant
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (PenCLAHRC), South West Peninsula, UK
| | - Krystal Warmoth
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Code
- Department of Psychology, Centre for Clinical Neuropsychology Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Sarah Dean
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (PenCLAHRC), South West Peninsula, UK
| | - Victoria A Goodwin
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (PenCLAHRC), South West Peninsula, UK
| | - Ken Stein
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (PenCLAHRC), South West Peninsula, UK
| | - Thavapriya Sugavanam
- Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (PenCLAHRC), South West Peninsula, UK
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lloyd A, Bannigan K, Sugavanam T, Freeman J. The experiences of stroke survivors, their families and unpaid carers regarding goal setting within stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review protocol. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 14:77-88. [DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
14
|
Sugavanam T, Mead G, Bulley C, Donaghy M, van Wijck F. The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation – a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 35:177-90. [DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.690501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|