Microsatellite Instability Is Insufficiently Used as a Biomarker for Lynch Syndrome Testing in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

The pan-cancer presence of microsatellite instability (MSI)-positive tumors demonstrates its clinical utility as an agnostic biomarker for identifying immunotherapy-eligible patients. Additionally, MSI is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS), the most prevalent cancer susceptibility syndrome among patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer. Therefore, MSI-high results should inform germline genetic testing for cancer-predisposing genes. However, in clinical practice, such analysis is frequently disregarded.

METHODS

A next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based technique was used for MSI analysis in 4,553 patients with various tumor types. Upon request, somatic BRAF gene analysis was conducted. In addition, hereditary testing of cancer-associated genes was performed in MSI-high cases using a capture-based NGS protocol. MLH1 promoter methylation analysis was conducted retrospectively in patients with colorectal and endometrial cancer to further investigate the origin of MSI at the tumor level.

RESULTS

The MSI positivity rate for the entire cohort was 5.27%. Endometrial, gastric, colorectal, urinary tract, and prostate cancers showed the highest proportion of MSI-high cases (15.69%, 8.54%, 7.40%, 4.55%, and 3.19%, respectively). A minority of 45 patients (22.73%) among the MSI-high cases underwent germline testing to determine whether the mismatch repair pathway deficiency was inherited. 24.44% of those who performed the genetic test carried a pathogenic variant in an LS-associated gene. Three MSI-high individuals had non-LS gene alterations, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and CDKN2A pathogenic variants, indicating the presence of non-LS-associated gene alterations among MSI-high patients.

CONCLUSION

Although MSI analysis is routinely performed in clinical practice, as many as 77% of MSI-high patients do not undergo LS genetic testing, despite international guidelines strongly recommending it. BRAF and MLH1 methylation analysis could shed light on the somatic origin of MSI in 42.50% of the MSI-high patients; however, MLH1 analysis is barely ever requested in clinical practice.

RediScore: Prospective validation of a pipeline for homologous recombination deficiency analysis

Tumors harboring homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) are considered optimal candidates for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP) inhibitor treatment. Such deficiency can be detected by analyzing breast cancer type (BRCA)1/2 gene mutations, as well as mutations in other genes of the homologous recombination pathway. The algorithmic measurement of the HRD effect by identifying genomic instability (GI) has been used as biomarker. As compared with the direct measurement of somatic gene alterations, this approach increases the number of patients who could benefit from PARP inhibitor treatment. In the present study, the performance of the Oncoscan CNV assay, accompanied by appropriate bioinformatic algorithms, was evaluated for its performance in GI calculation and was compared with that of a validated next-generation sequencing (NGS) test (myChoice HRD test). In addition, the clinical utility of the GI score (GIS) and BRCA1/2 tumor analysis were investigated in a cohort of 444 patients with ovarian cancer. For that reason, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays and appropriate bioinformatics algorithms were used to calculate GIS in 29 patients with ovarian cancer with known GIS status using a validated NGS test. Furthermore, BRCA1/2 analysis results were compared between the aforementioned assay and the amplicon-based Oncomine™ BRCA Research Assay. BRCA1/2 analysis was performed in 444 patients with ovarian cancer, while GIS was calculated in 175 BRCA1/2-negative cases. The bioinformatics algorithm developed for GIS calculation in combination with NGS BRCA1/2 analysis (RediScore), and the OncoscanR pipeline exhibited a high overall agreement with the validated test (93.1%). In addition, the Oncomine NGS assay had a 100% agreement with the validated test. The BRCA1/2 mutation frequency was 26.5% in the examined patients with ovarian cancer. GIS was positive in 40% of the BRCA1/2-negative cases. The RediScore bioinformatics algorithm developed for GIS calculation in combination with NGS BRCA1/2 analysis is a viable and effective approach for HRD calculation in patients with ovarian cancer, offering a positive prediction for PARP inhibitor responsiveness in 55% of the patients.

Revisiting the Implications of Positive Germline Testing Results Using Multi-gene Panels in Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

The use of multi-gene panels for germline testing in breast cancer enables the estimation of cancer risk and guides risk-reducing management options. The aim of this study was to present data that demonstrate the different levels of actionability for multi-gene panels used in genetic testing of breast cancer patients and their family members.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an analysis in our clinical database to identify breast cancer patients undergoing genetic testing. We reviewed positive results in respect of risk estimation and management, cascade family testing, secondary findings and information for treatment decision-making.

RESULTS

A total of 415 positive test reports were identified with 57.1%, 18.1%, 10.8% and 13.5% of individuals having pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in high, moderate, low and with insufficient evidence for breast cancer risk genes, respectively. Six point seven percent of individuals were double heterozygotes.

CONCLUSION

Germline findings in 92% of individuals are linked to evidence-based treatment information and risk estimates for predisposition to breast and/or other cancer types. The use of germline findings for treatment decision making expands the indication of genetic testing to include individuals that could benefit from targeted treatments.

Analysis of hereditary cancer syndromes by using a panel of genes: novel and multiple pathogenic mutations

Background

Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes are responsible for approximately 5–10% of all diagnosed cancer cases. In the past, single-gene analysis of specific high risk genes was used for the determination of the genetic cause of cancer heritability in certain families. The application of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology has facilitated multigene panel analysis and is widely used in clinical practice, for the identification of individuals with cancer predisposing gene variants. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent and nature of variants in genes implicated in hereditary cancer predisposition in individuals referred for testing in our laboratory.

Methods

In total, 1197 individuals from Greece, Romania and Turkey were referred to our laboratory for genetic testing in the past 4 years. The majority of referrals included individuals with personal of family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. The analysis of genes involved in hereditary cancer predisposition was performed using a NGS approach. Genomic DNA was enriched for targeted regions of 36 genes and sequencing was carried out using the Illumina NGS technology. The presence of large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) was investigated by computational analysis and Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA).

Results

A pathogenic variant was identified in 264 of 1197 individuals (22.1%) analyzed while a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was identified in 34.8% of cases. Clinically significant variants were identified in 29 of the 36 genes analyzed. Concerning the mutation distribution among individuals with positive findings, 43.6% were located in the BRCA1/2 genes whereas 21.6, 19.9, and 15.0% in other high, moderate and low risk genes respectively. Notably, 25 of the 264 positive individuals (9.5%) carried clinically significant variants in two different genes and 6.1% had a LGR.

Conclusions

In our cohort, analysis of all the genes in the panel allowed the identification of 4.3 and 8.1% additional pathogenic variants in other high or moderate/low risk genes, respectively, enabling personalized management decisions for these individuals and supporting the clinical significance of multigene panel analysis in hereditary cancer predisposition.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5756-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract P4-03-07: Analysis of hereditary cancer syndromes by using a panel of genes: Novel and multiple pathogenic mutations

BACKGOUND: Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes are believed to be responsible for approximately 5-10% of all diagnosed cancer cases. In the past, single genes analysis of certain high risk genes was used for the determination of the genetic cause of cancer heritability in certain families. The selection of genes was mainly based on the family history of the individuals analyzed and included only highly associated genes (e.g. the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes for families with breast cancer history. Nowadays though, the application of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology has facilitated multigene panel analysis and is widely used in clinical practice, for the identification of individuals with cancer predisposition gene mutations.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the extent and nature of mutations in 36 genes implicated in hereditary cancer predisposition in individuals referred for testing in our lab.

MATERIALS & METHODS: In total, 1197 individuals were referred for testing in our lab in the past four years from Greece, Romania and Turkey. The analysis of genes involved in hereditary cancer predisposition was performed using two NGS approaches. The first 451 individuals were analyzed using an amplicon based sequencing method (26 gene panel), while the following 746 individuals were analyzed using a capture based method (33 gene panel). Genomic DNA was enriched for targeted regions of 36 genes involved in hereditary predisposition to cancer included in both versions of the panel (APC, BMPR1A, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CDK4, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MEN1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RET, SMAD4, STK11, TP53, VHL, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2, NBN, RAD51C, RAD51D, BARD1, BLM, CHEK1, ABRAXAS1 (FAM175A), MRE11 (MRE11A), NF1, RAD50, RAD51B, XRCC2). Sequencing was carried out using the Illumina NGS technology. Reads were aligned to the reference sequence (GRCh37), and sequence changes were identified and interpreted in the context of a single clinically relevant transcript. The presence of large genomic rearrangements was investigated by computational analysis of NGS results and the use of MLPA for 13 genes. All clinically significant observations were confirmed by orthogonal technologies.

RESULTS: In total, a pathogenic mutation was identified in 259 of the 1197 individuals (21.6%) analyzed while a VUS was identified in 35.7% of the cases. Clinically significant mutations were identified in 29 of the genes analyzed. Concerning the mutation distribution among individuals with positive findings, 44.7% of them were located in BRCA1/2 genes whereas 20.9%, 19.9%, and 14.5% in high, moderate and low risk genes respectively. In addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes other highly mutated genes were CHEK2 (10.6%), PALB2 (7.1%), MUTYH (7.1%) and ATM (4.3%). Of note is that 25 of the 259 positive individuals (9.7%) carried clinically significant mutations in two different genes and 5.8% had a large genomic rearrangement (LGR).

CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the clinical significance of analysis of a panel of genes involved in hereditary cancer predisposition. In our cohort, analysis of this panel allowed for the identification of 8.3% additional pathogenic variants in moderate/low risk genes, enabling personalized management of these individuals.

Citation Format: Tsoulos N, Tsaousis GN, Papadopoulou E, Agiannitopoulos K, Pepe G, Kambouri S, Apessos A, Diamantopoulos N, Floros T, Iosifidou R, Katopodi O, Koumarianou A, Markopoulos C, Papazisis K, Venizelos V, Xanthakis I, Xepapadakis G, Banu E, Eniu DT, Negru S, Stanculeanu DL, Ungureanu A, Ozmen V, Tansan S, Tekinel M, Yalcin S, Nasioulas G. Analysis of hereditary cancer syndromes by using a panel of genes: Novel and multiple pathogenic mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-03-07.

Tumor molecular profiling of NSCLC patients using next generation sequencing

Non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer and a tumor with a broad spectrum of targeted therapies already available or in clinical trials. Thus, molecular characterization of the tumor using next generation sequencing (NGS) technology, has become a key tool for facilitating treatment decisions and the clinical management of NSCLC patients. The performance of a custom 23 gene multiplex amplification hot spot panel, based on Ion AmpliSeq™ technology, was evaluated for the analysis of tumor DNA extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Furthermore, the Ion AmpliSeq™ RNA Fusion Lung Cancer Research Panel was used for fusion RNA transcript analysis. The mutation spectrum of the tumors was determined in a cohort of 502 patients with NSCLC using the aforementioned targeted gene panels. The panel used for tumor DNA analysis in this study exhibited high rates (100%) of sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility at a mutation allelic frequency of 3%. At least one DNA mutation was detected in 374 patients (74.5%) and an RNA fusion was identified in 16 patients, (3.2%). In total, alterations in a cancer-driver gene were identified (including point mutations, gene rearrangements and MET amplifications) in 77.6% of the tumors tested. Among the NSCLC patients, 23% presented a mutation in a gene associated with approved or emerging targeted therapy. More specifically, 13.5% (68/502) presented a mutation in a gene with approved targeted therapy (EGFR, ALK, ROS1) and 9.4% (47/502) had an alteration in a gene related to emerging targeted therapies (ERBB2, BRAF, MET and RET). Furthermore, 51.6% of the patients had a mutation in a gene that could be related to an off label therapy or indicative for access to a clinical trial. Thus, the targeted NGS panel used in this study is a reliable approach for tumor molecular profiling and can be applied in personalized treatment decision making for NSCLC patients.

Molecular profiling of 502 patient cohort with NSCLC using a 27 somatic gene panel

e23193

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer and a tumor with broad spectrum of targeted therapies already available or in clinical trials. Thus, molecular characterization of the tumor using the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology, has become a key tool for NSCLC patients’ treatment decision and clinical management. Methods: The performance of a custom 23 gene multiplex amplification hot spot panel, based on Ion AmpliSeq Technology, was evaluated for the analysis of tumor DNA extracted from FFPE (Formalin Fixed Parraffin Embedded) tissue. Furthermore the Ion AmpliSeq™ RNA Fusion Lung Cancer Research Panel was used for fusion RNA transcript analysis. Tumors’ mutation spectrum was determined in a cohort of 502 patients with NSCLC using the aforementioned targeted gene panels. Results: The panel used for tumor DNA analysis in this study exhibit high rates (100%) of sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility at a mutation frequency of 3%. At least one DNA mutation was detected in 374 patients (74.5%) and an RNA fusion was identified in 16 patients, (3.2%). In total, alterations in a cancer driver gene were identified (including point mutations, gene rearrangements and MET amplifications) in 77.6% of the tumors tested. Among the NSCLC patients, 13.5% (68/502) presented a mutation in a gene with approved targeted therapy (EGFR, ALK ROS1) and 9.4% had an alteration in a gene related to emerging targeted therapies according the NCCN guidelines. These alterations include ERBB2, BRAF and MET mutations, MET amplification and RET rearrangements. The remaining 51.6% of the patients had a mutation in a gene that could be related to an off label therapy or give them access to a clinical trial. Conclusions: Thus the NGS panel validated is a reliable approach of clinical applicability for tumor molecular profile detection in NSCLC patients.

Phase 1/2 study of rilotumumab (AMG 102), a hepatocyte growth factor inhibitor, and erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Activation of the mesenchymal-epidermal transition factor (MET) tyrosine kinase and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), is implicated in resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. In this phase 1/2 trial, rilotumumab (an anti-HGF antibody) combined with erlotinib was evaluated in patients with metastatic, previously treated non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In phase 1, a dose de-escalation design was adopted with rilotumumab starting at 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks and oral erlotinib 150 mg daily. In phase 2, the disease control rate (DCR) (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) of the combination was evaluated using a Simon 2-stage design. The biomarkers examined included 10 plasma-circulating molecules associated with the EGFR and MET pathways.

RESULTS

Without indications for de-escalation, the recommended phase 2 dose was dose level 0. Overall, 45 response-evaluable patients were enrolled (13 with squamous carcinoma, 32 with adenocarcinoma; 2 had confirmed EGFR mutations, 33 had confirmed wild-type [WT] EGFR, and 7 had KRAS mutations). The DCR for all patients was 60% (90% confidence interval [CI], 47.1%-71.3%). Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (90% CI, 1.4-2.7 months), and median overall survival was 6.6 months (90% CI, 5.6-8.9 months). Among patients with WT EGFR, the DCR was 60.6% (90% CI, 46.3%-73.3%), median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (90% CI, 1.4-2.7 months), and median overall survival was 7.0 months (90% CI, 5.6-13.4 months). Elevated baseline levels of neuregulin 1 were associated with longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.87), whereas elevated amphiregulin levels were associated with more rapid progression (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.48-3.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined rilotumumab and erlotinib had an acceptable safety profile, and the DCR met the prespecified criteria for success. In the EGFR WT group, the DCR exceeded published reports for erlotinib alone. High circulating levels of neuregulin 1 may indicate sensitivity to this combination. Cancer 2017;123:2936-44. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Suppression of Lymphocyte Functions by Plasma Exosomes Correlates with Disease Activity in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

Purpose: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) often induce profound immunosuppression, which contributes to disease progression and interferes with immune-based therapies. Body fluids of patients with HNC are enriched in exosomes potentially engaged in negative regulation of antitumor immune responses. The presence and content of exosomes derived from plasma of patients with HNC are evaluated for the ability to induce immune dysfunction and influence disease activity.Experimental Design: Exosomes were isolated by size-exclusion chromatography from plasma of 38 patients with HNC and 14 healthy donors. Morphology, size, numbers, and protein and molecular contents of the recovered exosomes were determined. Coculture assays were performed to measure exosome-mediated effects on functions of normal human lymphocyte subsets and natural killer (NK) cells. The results were correlated with disease stage and activity.Results: The presence, quantity, and molecular content of isolated, plasma-derived exosomes discriminated patients with HNC with active disease (AD) from those with no evident disease (NED) after oncologic therapies. Exosomes of patients with AD were significantly more effective than exosomes of patients with NED in inducing apoptosis of CD8⁺ T cells, suppression of CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation, and upregulation of regulatory T-cell (Treg) suppressor functions (all at P < 0.05). Exosomes of patients with AD also downregulated NKG2D expression levels in NK cells.Conclusions: Exosomes in plasma of patients with HNC carry immunosuppressive molecules and interfere with functions of immune cells. Exosome-induced immune suppression correlates with disease activity in HNC, suggesting that plasma exosomes could be useful as biomarkers of HNC progression. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4843-54. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract 473: A tumor and immune related miRNA signature predicts progression-free survival of melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab

Background

Patients with regionally advanced melanoma were treated with neoadjuvant ipilimumab in a previously reported study (Tarhini et al, PLOS One 2014). MicroRNA (miRNA) expression profiles of tumors of treated patients were investigated for their therapeutic predictive value.

Methods

Patients were treated with ipilimumab (10 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks x2 doses) bracketing surgery. Tumor specimens were obtained at baseline and following ipilimumab at definitive surgery (week 6-8). MiRNA expression profiling was performed on the tumor biopsies of 30 patients using Affymetrix miRNA array (v.4). Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) was performed to test the association of each differentially expressed miRNA molecule with outcome. Targets of the selected miRNAs were obtained from miRTarBase (http://mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw). Functional annotation analysis of the list of miRNA target genes were performed using DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov). The FDR method was used to adjust for multiple testing in SAM and the functional analysis.

Results

An expression profile consisting of a 4-miRNA signature was associated with improved progression free survival. The signature consisted of miR-34c (previously reported to suppress cancer growth and invasion), miR-711 (reported as a prognostic marker in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and to target and suppress Heat Shock Protein 70 highly expressed in melanoma), miR-641 (activates MAPK by targeting NF1 and cooperates with its host gene AKT2 in human cancer) and miR-22 (reported to function as a tumour suppressor). Functional annotation analysis of target genes for the 4-miRNA signature was statistically significantly enriched for various cancer-related pathways including regulation of cell proliferation (GO:0042147), regulation of apoptosis (GO:0042981), MAPK signaling pathway (hsa04010) and positive regulation of T cell activation (GO:0050870).

Conclusions

MiRNA expression profiling identified a 4-miRNA signature that is significantly associated with PFS in advanced melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant ipilimumab. Preliminary results show that targets of these 4 miRNAs are biologically relevant and important. These findings warrant further investigation in relation to ipilimumab and other immunotherapeutics.

Citation Format: Ahmad Tarhini, Priyanka Vallabhaneni, Theofanis Floros, William A. LaFramboise, Panayiotis V. Benos, Lucas Santana dos Santos. A tumor and immune related miRNA signature predicts progression-free survival of melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 473.

Anticancer Cytokines: Biology and Clinical Effects of Interferon-α2, Interleukin (IL)-2, IL-15, IL-21, and IL-12

Efforts over nearly four decades have focused on ways to use cytokines to manipulate the host immune response towards cancer cell recognition and eradication. Significant advances were achieved with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-α (IFN-α), primarily in the treatment of patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. However, the utility of other cytokines showing promise in the preclinical setting has not been established largely because of toxicity, the complex functionality of each cytokine and the difficulty mimicking in preclinical models the human environment. Here, we review the basic biology and the clinical experiences with IFN-α, IL-2, IL-15, IL-21, and IL-12. We will also review ongoing clinical trials and discuss future directions including potential use of cytokines in combination with other effective immunotherapy approaches that have come of age in recent years.

Gastric metastases originating from breast cancer: report of 8 cases and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer metastasis to the stomach is rare. It is very important to distinguish a breast cancer metastasis to the stomach from a primary gastric cancer on the basis of clinical, endoscopic, radiological and histopathological features, in order to administer the appropriate treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight patients with breast cancer metastasis to the stomach were identified in our database between 1995 and 2008. The clinicopathological data and outcome from the medical records of these patients were then reviewed.

RESULTS

The median age at initial breast cancer diagnosis was 59.5 years (range 44-75 years), while the median interval between the primary breast cancer and the gastric involvement was 41 months (range 2-82 months). The primary breast cancer histological subtype was mostly lobular carcinoma. All the biopsy specimens were estrogen receptor (ER), cytokeratin (CK) 7 and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) positive and CK-20 negative, while two of them (25%) were HER-2-neu positive. All the patients received chemotherapy and two of them were also treated with hormonal treatment. Two patients underwent surgical intervention, while one patient who had gastric involvement as the only metastatic site will proceed to surgical resection of the stomach. All these three patients were alive after 9, 39 and 44 months of follow-up, respectively. The response rate to chemotherapy was 50% (1 complete response [CR], 3 partial responses [PR]), and the median survival was 11 months (range, 1-44+ months).

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer metastasis to the stomach can be differentiated from primary gastric cancer by comparing the biopsies from the gastric metastasis with the original histological slides from the primary breast tumor. Appropriate systemic treatment for metastatic breast carcinoma is the preferred treatment, whereas surgical intervention should be reserved for palliation or may be indicated in cases of solitary resectable gastrointestinal tract metastases.

Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate in metastatic androgen-resistant prostate cancer: a single institution experience

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of docetaxel, vinorelbine and oral estramustine in androgen-resistant prostate cancer (ARPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two eligible patients were treated with docetaxel at 30 mg/m2 (day 1 and 8), vinorelbine at 20 mg/m2 (day 1 and 8), and oral estramustine of 280 mg p.o. (daily on days 1 to 7) every 3 weeks for 12 cycles. Patients with osseous metastases received zoledronic acid of 4 mg every 3 weeks. Low molecular weight heparin was administered on a prophylaxis basis to all patients.

RESULTS

A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response > or = 50% from baseline was obtained in 29 (56%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42-70%) patients. Objective responses among the 25 patients with measurable disease were observed in 48% (95% CI, 27-69%), including 1 patient with complete response (CR) and 11 patients with partial response (PR). Patients with extraosseous only, skeletal only, and extraosseous and skeletal metastases showed different PSA responses (87% vs. 44% vs. 59%, respectively, p = 0.094). Furthermore, patients with soft tissue disease only showed insignificantly better PSA response than those with skeletal metastases (response rate: 87% vs. 50%, p = 0.064). The median progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.7-8.4 months) and the median overall survival was 18.2 months (95% CI, 15.5-20.8 months). The only parameters which were found to have an impact on survival were the extent of disease and the baseline levels of PSA. Toxicity was generally mild except for myelotoxicity. Neutropenia grade 3/4 was recorded in 33% of patients and 6% experienced febrile neutropenia. Anemia and thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 were not a problem. Three patients (6%) developed grade 3 sensory neuropathy and 2 patients (4%) developed grade 3 fatigue. Edema grade 3 occurred in 1 (2%) patient and thromboembolism grade 3 occurred in 2 (4%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of docetaxel, vinorelbine and oral estramustine is a well-tolerated regimen with high biochemical and objective response rates in patients with ARPC.