1
|
Galmiche S, Cortier T, Charmet T, Schaeffer L, Chény O, von Platen C, Lévy A, Martin S, Omar F, David C, Mailles A, Carrat F, Cauchemez S, Fontanet A. SARS-CoV-2 incubation period across variants of concern, individual factors, and circumstances of infection in France: a case series analysis from the ComCor study. Lancet Microbe 2023:S2666-5247(23)00005-8. [PMID: 37084751 PMCID: PMC10112864 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(23)00005-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incubation period of SARS-CoV-2 has been estimated for the known variants of concern. However, differences in study designs and settings make comparing variants difficult. We aimed to estimate the incubation period for each variant of concern compared with the historical strain within a unique and large study to identify individual factors and circumstances associated with its duration. METHODS In this case series analysis, we included participants (aged ≥18 years) of the ComCor case-control study in France who had a SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis between Oct 27, 2020, and Feb 4, 2022. Eligible participants were those who had the historical strain or a variant of concern during a single encounter with a known index case who was symptomatic and for whom the incubation period could be established, those who reported doing a reverse-transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) test, and those who were symptomatic by study completion. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, exposure information, circumstances of infection, and COVID-19 vaccination details were obtained via an online questionnaire, and variants were established through variant typing after RT-PCR testing or by matching the time that a positive test was reported with the predominance of a specific variant. We used multivariable linear regression to identify factors associated with the duration of the incubation period (defined as the number of days from contact with the index case to symptom onset). FINDINGS 20 413 participants were eligible for inclusion in this study. Mean incubation period varied across variants: 4·96 days (95% CI 4·90-5·02) for alpha (B.1.1.7), 5·18 days (4·93-5·43) for beta (B.1.351) and gamma (P.1), 4·43 days (4·36-4·49) for delta (B.1.617.2), and 3·61 days (3·55-3·68) for omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with 4·61 days (4·56-4·66) for the historical strain. Participants with omicron had a shorter incubation period than participants with the historical strain (-0·9 days, 95% CI -1·0 to -0·7). The incubation period increased with age (participants aged ≥70 years had an incubation period 0·4 days [0·2 to 0·6] longer than participants aged 18-29 years), in female participants (by 0·1 days, 0·0 to 0·2), and in those who wore a mask during contact with the index case (by 0·2 days, 0·1 to 0·4), and was reduced in those for whom the index case was symptomatic (-0·1 days, -0·2 to -0·1). These data were robust to sensitivity analyses correcting for an over-reporting of incubation periods of 7 days. INTERPRETATION SARS-CoV-2 incubation period is notably reduced in omicron cases compared with all other variants of concern, in young people, after transmission from a symptomatic index case, after transmission to a maskless secondary case, and (to a lesser extent) in men. These findings can inform future COVID-19 contact-tracing strategies and modelling. FUNDING Institut Pasteur, the French National Agency for AIDS Research-Emerging Infectious Diseases, Fondation de France, the INCEPTION project, and the Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Galmiche
- Emerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Ecole Doctorale Pierre Louis de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Cortier
- Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Ecole Doctorale Pierre Louis de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Tiffany Charmet
- Emerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Laura Schaeffer
- Emerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Olivia Chény
- Centre for Translational Research, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Cassandre von Platen
- Centre for Translational Research, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Anne Lévy
- Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Martin
- Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Fabrice Carrat
- The National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Simon Cauchemez
- Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Fontanet
- Emerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Unité Pasteur-Cnam Risques Infectieux et Émergents, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Viejo G, Cortier T, Peyrache A. Brain-state invariant thalamo-cortical coordination revealed by non-linear encoders. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1006041. [PMID: 29565979 PMCID: PMC5882158 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding how neurons cooperate to integrate sensory inputs and guide behavior is a fundamental problem in neuroscience. A large body of methods have been developed to study neuronal firing at the single cell and population levels, generally seeking interpretability as well as predictivity. However, these methods are usually confronted with the lack of ground-truth necessary to validate the approach. Here, using neuronal data from the head-direction (HD) system, we present evidence demonstrating how gradient boosted trees, a non-linear and supervised Machine Learning tool, can learn the relationship between behavioral parameters and neuronal responses with high accuracy by optimizing the information rate. Interestingly, and unlike other classes of Machine Learning methods, the intrinsic structure of the trees can be interpreted in relation to behavior (e.g. to recover the tuning curves) or to study how neurons cooperate with their peers in the network. We show how the method, unlike linear analysis, reveals that the coordination in thalamo-cortical circuits is qualitatively the same during wakefulness and sleep, indicating a brain-state independent feed-forward circuit. Machine Learning tools thus open new avenues for benchmarking model-based characterization of spike trains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Viejo
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Thomas Cortier
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
- École Normale Supérieure, 45 Rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Adrien Peyrache
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|