OP0280 WEANING OF MAINTENANCE IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS (WIN-Lupus): A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Severe (proliferative) forms of LN are treated with an induction immunosuppressive therapy (IST), followed by a maintenance IST, to target remission and avoid relapses. The optimal duration of maintenance IST for proliferative LN is unknown.

Objectives

The WIN-Lupus trial tested whether IST discontinuation after 2-3 years in proliferative LN was non-inferior to IST continuation for 2 more years.

Methods

WIN-Lupus is an investigator-initiated academic randomized controlled trial, conducted in 28 French centers. Patients on maintenance IST with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for a minimum of 2 years and a maximum of 3 years, and who were taking Hydroxychloroquine, were randomized (1:1) between 2 groups: IST continuation and IST discontinuation. The primary endpoint was the relapse rate of proliferative LN at 24 months. Secondary endpoints were the rate of severe SLE flares, survival without renal relapse or severe flare, adverse events, kidney function, disease activity, corticosteroid exposure, patient-reported outcome and medico-economic impact.

Results

Between 2011 and 2016, 125 patients were screened and 96 were randomized in the trial: 48 in the IST continuation group, 48 in the IST discontinuation group. In the per-protocol population, a relapse of proliferative LN occurred in 5/40 (10.4%) patients with IST continuation, and in 12/44 (25%) patients with IST discontinuation (difference 14.8%, 95%CI [-1.9; 31.5]). Non-inferiority was not demonstrated for relapse rate. Time to renal relapse did not differ between groups (p=0.092). Severe SLE flares (renal or extra-renal) were less frequent in patients with IST continuation compared to IST discontinuation (5/40 vs 14/44 patients, p=0.035). IST discontinuation was associated with lower health-related costs. Adverse events did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

Non-inferiority of maintenance IST discontinuation after 2 to 3 years was not demonstrated for renal relapse. IST discontinuation was associated with a higher risk of severe SLE flare.

References

[1]Moroni G et al. When and how is it possible to stop therapy in patients with lupus nephritis? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021. CJN.04830421. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04830421.

[2]Fanouriakis A et al. 2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):713-723.

[3]Jourde-Chiche N et al. Proliferative lupus nephritis treatment: practice survey in nephrology and internal medicine in France. Nephrol Ther. 2014;10(3):170-6.

[4]Zen M et al. Immunosuppressive therapy withdrawal after remission achievement in patients with lupus nephritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;keab373. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab373.

[5]Malvar A et al. Kidney biopsy-based management of maintenance immunosuppression is safe and may ameliorate flare rate in lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 2020;97(1):156-162.

Acknowledgements

Groupe Coopératif sur le Lupus Rénal (GCLR)

Disclosure of Interests

Noemie JOURDE-CHICHE Speakers bureau: Vifor Pharma, Grant/research support from: Fresenius Medical Care: grant paid to my institution (AP-HM) for the CINEVAS study in ANCA-associated vasculitis, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau Grant/research support from: AP-HP received a research support from ROCHE for the OBILUP trial, Karine Baumstarck: None declared, LAURENCE BOUILLET Speakers bureau: GSK, novartis, biocryst, takeda, behring, Paid instructor for: takeda, novartis, Consultant of: GSK, novartis, biocryst, takeda, behring, blueprint, Grant/research support from: takeda, gsk, sanofi, biocryst, novartis, Stéphane Burtey: None declared, Valerie Caudwell: None declared, Laurent Chiche Speakers bureau: BMS, Paid instructor for: BMS, Lionel Couzi Speakers bureau: Astellas, Chiesi, Novartis, Sandoz, Ostuka, GSK, Biotest, Consultant of: Biotest, Hansa, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Astellas, Christophe DELIGNY: None declared, Bertrand Dussol Speakers bureau: Genzyme, Novonordisk, Grant/research support from: Shire, Stanislas Faguer Speakers bureau: Asahi, Vifor Pharma, Sanofi, Consultant of: Abyonyx Pharma, Pierre Gobert: None declared, Guillaume Gondran Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Consultant of: Genzyme, Antoine Huart Speakers bureau: Janssen, Paid instructor for: Pfizer, Aurélie Hummel: None declared, Emilie Kalbacher: None declared, Alexandre Karras Speakers bureau: Vifor, GSK, Astra-Zeneca, Roche, Paid instructor for: Vifor, Sanofi, Alexion, Consultant of: Novartis, GSK, Bohringer-Ingelheim, Marc Lambert Speakers bureau: CHUGAI-ROCHE, BAYER, PFIZER, LEOPHARMA, Paid instructor for: CHUGAI-ROCHE, Consultant of: CHUGAI-ROCHE, BAYER, PFIZER, LEOPHARMA, Grant/research support from: CHUGAI-ROCHE, Véronique LE GUERN: None declared, Sandrine Loubiere: None declared, Helene Maillard: None declared, Francois Maurier: None declared, Micheline Pha: None declared, Viviane Queyrel Paid instructor for: GSK, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Francoise Sarrot-Reynauld: None declared, David Verhelst: None declared, Eric Hachulla Speakers bureau: Johnson & Johnson, GSK, Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: Johnson & Johnson, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, GSK, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi-Genzyme, Grant/research support from: CSL Behring, GSK, Roche-Chugai and Johnson & Johnson, Zahir Amoura Speakers bureau: GSK, CSL Behring, Consultant of: GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK, Eric Daugas Speakers bureau: GSK, Amgen, Paid instructor for: GSK, Astra Zeneca, Consultant of: GSK, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Grant/research support from: ROCHE for the OBILUP trial (AP-HP)

Antiphospholipid antibodies in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: prevalence and clinical significance in a series of 74 patients

The aim of this study is to determine prevalence, clinical significance of antiphospholipidantibodies (aPL) including anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-b2GP1 and lupus anticoagulant (LA) in a cohort of 74 patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) according to revised European criteria. aPL were found in 25 (34%) patients; IgG in 23 (12 had low titres, six moderate titres and five high titres) and IgM in five (three and two had respectively moderate and high titres). Eight (11%) patients were found to have LA; anti-b2GP1 antibodies were detected only in three (4%) patients. Only two patients with LA, aPL and b2GP1 had recurrent venous thrombosis. One patient with moderate titres of aPL exhibited recurrent spontaneous foetal losses. Peripheral neuropathies without cryoglobulinemia were more frequent in the aPL group. Other systemic involvements of pSS were the same in both groups with or without aPL. Patients with aPL have more concurrentimmunological diseases such as thyroiditis and primary biliary cirrhosis and a higher prevalence of hypergammaglobulinemia (P < 0.05). Even if aPL prevalence reached 30% in pSS, titres were usually low, with a close correlation with hypergammaglobulinemia but not with antiphospholipid syndrome, which is related to positivity of both LA and aPL.

[Screening and management of cardiovascular risk factors in systemic lupus erythematosus: Recommendations for clinical practice based on the literature and expert opinion]

PURPOSE

To develop French recommendations about screening and management of cardiovascular risk factors in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Thirty-nine experts qualified in internal medicine, rheumatology and nephrology have selected recommendations from a list developed based on evidence from the literature. For each recommendation, the level of evidence and the level of agreement among the experts were specified.

RESULTS

Experts recommended an annual screening of cardiovascular risk factors in SLE. Statins should be prescribed for primary prevention in SLE patients based on the level of LDL-cholesterol and the number of cardiovascular risk factors, considering SLE as an additional risk factor. For secondary prevention, experts have agreed on an LDL-cholesterol target of <0.7 g/L. Hypertension should be managed according to the 2013 European guidelines, using renin-angiotensin system blockers as first line agents in case of renal involvement. Aspirin can be prescribed in patients with high cardiovascular risk or with antiphospholipid antibodies.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations about the screening and management of cardiovascular risk factors in SLE can be expected to improve clinical practice uniformity and, in the longer term, to optimize the management of SLE patients.

[Cost of systemic lupus erythematosus for adult patients with active and treated disease in France (LUCIE study)]

PURPOSE

To evaluate in France the annual direct medical cost of adult patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on medication and estimate the cost of a flare.

METHODS

A two-year, observational, retrospective, multicenter study, carried out between December 2010 and February 2011. Patients' characteristics, SLE disease activity and severity, rate of flares, healthcare consumption (medications, hospitalisations, etc.) were evaluated. Medical costs were assessed from the national Health Insurance perspective. Cost predictors were estimated using multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

Eight centres specialized in SLE management included 93 eligible patients (including 50.5% severe). The mean age was 39.9 (11.9) years and 93.5% were women. At baseline, the mean SLE duration was 9.8 (6.6) years. The mean scores of the SELENA-SLEDAI instrument and the SLICC/ACR index were higher in severe patients (9.8 vs 5.6, and 1.2 vs 0.4 respectively; P<0.001). Over the study period, 51% of patients received the combination containing at least corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. The mean annual direct medical cost of severe patients was €4660 versus €3560 for non-severe patients (non-significant difference). The cost of medications (61.8% of the annual cost) was higher in severe patients (€3214 vs €1856; P<0.05). Immunosuppressants and biologics represented 26.5% and 4.6% of the annual total cost respectively. Patients experienced on average 1.10 (0.59) flares/year, of which 0.50 were severe flare. The occurrence of a new severe flare incremented the annual cost of €1330 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Medications represented the major component of the annual direct medical cost. Severe flares increase significantly the cost of SLE care management.

[Euthyroid Graves' disease: a case report]

Euthyroid Graves' disease is defined as an ophtalmopathy without any clinical or biological signs of thyroid dysfunction. It highlights the apparent dissociation between orbitopathy and thyroid disease. Diagnosis is often too late while early treatment could really improve functional prognosis. We report a 57-year-old woman who presented with this entity and that illustrates both the diagnostic difficulty and disease course after intravenous corticosteroid therapy.