Early Clinical Impact of Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound Performed by General Practitioners and Nurses in Rwanda

Background: Diagnostic breast ultrasound (US) could be an important tool for early detection of breast cancer in low-resource settings, where efficient strategies to refine the likelihood of malignancy among palpable breast masses are needed. However, the feasibility and clinical role of diagnostic ultrasound in such settings has not been described. We trained 4 general practitioner doctors (GPs) and 5 nurses in diagnostic breast US at a rural district hospital in Rwanda that serves as a cancer referral facility. Aim: Assess management plans, biopsy rates and patient diagnoses after nurse- and GP-performed breast ultrasounds to determine the impact of diagnostic US on clinical care. Methods: We reviewed outcomes from trainees' ultrasounds during 21 months of in-person and electronic training and mentorship by Boston-based radiologists. Trainees' US assessments and management plans were recorded on structured clinical forms. Patient diagnoses and follow-up were extracted from medical records using a standardized data collection form. Among patients who received breast US, we examined a) clinicians' management plans; b) biopsy rate; c) cancer detection rate; c) rate of benign diagnoses; d) cancers diagnosed among patients who were sent home after initial evaluation. Results: Between January 1, 2016 and September 30, 2017, 307 patients with breast concerns had a diagnostic breast US and a documented trainee US assessment. Of these, following their initial US, 158 (51%) were recommended to receive a biopsy, 30 (10%) were recommended to have aspiration/drainage, 49 (16%) were recommended for clinical or US surveillance, 1 (0.3%) was referred to another facility, 65 (21%) were discharged, and 4 (all with no abnormalities on US) had missing recommendations. Of those recommended for biopsy at initial presentation, 151 (96%) had a biopsy at that time. 56 (37%) were diagnosed with breast cancer, 37 (25%) with fibroadenoma, 7 (5%) with lactating adenoma, and 50 (33%) with other benign diagnoses. Among those with breast masses on US (n=255), 149 (58%) received a biopsy and 55 (22%) were diagnosed with cancer. As of November 23, 2017, all patients ultimately diagnosed with cancer had had a biopsy at their initial visit, and no patients who had been discharged or recommended for clinical or radiographic surveillance had been subsequently diagnosed with cancer. Conclusion: Diagnostic breast US by GPs and nurses has been a useful tool in the evaluation of breast lesions, including palpable masses, at a rural cancer facility in Rwanda. Early findings suggest that it has allowed avoidance of biopsy for 42% of patients with breast masses noted on US. Clinical follow-up and evaluation are ongoing to assess longer-term patient outcomes, cancer detection rates among patients who are not initially biopsied, and rates of follow-up among patients recommended to have clinical or radiographic surveillance.

Impact of In-Person and Electronic Training by Breast Radiologists on Rwandan General Practitioners' and Nurses' Skills in Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound

Background: Ultrasound (US) is a key tool in evaluation of palpable breast masses and can help refine the likelihood of malignancy and the need for further diagnostic studies. US technology is available in many low-resource settings, but there are few specialized radiologists. We launched a diagnostic breast ultrasound training program for general practitioner doctors (GPs) and nurses at a rural Rwandan district hospital that serves as a cancer referral facility. Aim: Assess GPs' and nurses' skill in diagnostic breast ultrasound over 23 months of intensive in-person and online supervision and mentorship. Methods: 4 rotating breast radiologists from Brigham and Women's Hospital trained 5 nurses and 4 doctors in Rwanda over 9 weeks of in-person training and 21 months of weekly remote case consultations and mentorship using electronic review of images with emailed feedback. During in-person trainings, trainees and radiologists evaluated patients separately, while radiologists' electronic assessments were based on emailed images and assessments from trainees. Among breast lesions with documented radiologist and trainee assessments, we compared written trainee and radiologist assessments to calculate the sensitivity of trainee assessments, with radiologist assessments as the gold standard. We used paired t-tests to examine whether the sensitivity varied between the first 14 months (stage I) and the last 9 months (stage 2), after the final in-person training. Results: Of 323 breast and axillary lesions assessed by trainees and radiologists, 279 were breast lesions. Of these, 114 (41%) were evaluated by radiologists in-person, and 165 (59%) through electronic evaluation. 237 (85%) were determined to be breast masses by the radiologists, with 164 of these solid masses, 25 complex solid/cystic lesions, 15 definite or probable simple cysts, 31 normal intramammary lymph nodes, and 2 other masses. Sensitivity of trainees' assessments for identifying a solid mass was 90.2% (95% CI 85.9-94.9) overall. Among trainees who scanned ≥ 10 lesions each, mean sensitivity was 90.6% in stage I, and 94.0% in stage 2 ( P = 0.3). In cases where both radiologists and trainees perceived solid masses (n=148), trainees' assessments had a sensitivity of 81.4% (95% CI 72.3-90.5) overall for detecting masses suspicious for malignancy, or probably benign but needing further evaluation (versus benign with no further evaluation needed). Among trainees who scanned ≥ 10 lesions each, sensitivity was 79.1% during stage I and 96.2% during the stage 2 ( P = 0.03). Conclusion: Nurses and GPs in a rural sub-Saharan African facility built strong skills in diagnostic ultrasound over 23 months of combined in-person training and distance learning via electronic case reviews. The sensitivity of their assessments for identifying masses concerning for malignancy showed significant improvement after sustained mentorship. Assessment of impact on patient care and outcomes is ongoing.