1
|
Vernieri F, Brunelli N, Guerzoni S, Iannone LF, Baraldi C, Rao R, Schiano di Cola F, Ornello R, Cevoli S, Lovati C, Albanese M, Perrotta A, Cetta I, Rossi SS, Taranta V, Filippi M, Geppetti P, Sacco S, Altamura C. Retreating migraine patients in the second year with monoclonal antibodies anti-CGRP pathway: the multicenter prospective cohort RE-DO study. J Neurol 2023; 270:5436-5448. [PMID: 37468621 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11872-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcome of migraine patients retreated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRPr) is not completely known. METHODS This multicentric prospective observational cohort study assessed monthly migraine days (MMDs), migraine acute medication intake (MAMI), and HIT-6 at baseline, after 90-112 days (Rev-1), after 84-90 days since Rev-1 (Rev-2) and 30 days after the last injection of anti-CGRP/CGRPr mAbs (Year-end), in the first and the second year after a discontinuation period. RESULTS We enrolled 226 patients (79.6% with chronic migraine; 55.3% on erenumab and 44.7% on galcanezumab or fremanezumab). MMDs, MAMI, and HIT-6-did not differ at the respective first and second-year evaluations in the entire cohort, and comparing anti-CGRP with anti-CGRPr Abs. MMDs (18.1 ± 7.8 vs. 3.4 ± 7.8), MAMI (26.7 ± 28.3 vs.17.7 ± 17.2), and HIT-6 scores (63.1 ± 5.9 vs. 67.1 ± 10.3) were lower in the second year than in the pre-treatment baseline (consistently, p < 0.0001). Second-year baseline MMDs were lower in patients on anti-CGRP mAbs (p = 0.001) and with lower pre-treatment baseline MMDs (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION Anti-CGRP/CGRPr mAbs are effective in the second as in the first year. The use of anti-CGRP or CGRPr mAbs influenced the second-year baseline MMDs, but their effectiveness did not differ during the two treatment years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Vernieri
- Unità Cefalee e Neurosonologia, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
- Neurologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Unità Cefalee e Neurosonologia, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology, Headache Center and Drug Abuse, Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Luigi Francesco Iannone
- Headache Center, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology, Headache Center and Drug Abuse, Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Renata Rao
- Headache Center, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department Continuity of Care and Fragility, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurological Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca Schiano di Cola
- Headache Center, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department Continuity of Care and Fragility, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Neurological Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Lovati
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Albanese
- Neurology Unit, Headache Center, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Cetta
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience; Neurology Unit and Neurophysiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Soeren Rossi
- Neurologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Taranta
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience; Neurology Unit and Neurophysiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Headache Center, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Claudia Altamura
- Unità Cefalee e Neurosonologia, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Neurologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taranta V, Saporito G, Ornello R, Splendiani A, Bruno F, Sucapane P, Masciocchi C, Marinangeli F, Cacchio A, Di Cesare E, Pistoia F. Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound thalamotomy for refractory neuropathic pain: a systematic review and critical appraisal of current knowledge. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2023; 16:17562864231180729. [PMID: 37363184 PMCID: PMC10286169 DOI: 10.1177/17562864231180729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) is an innovative therapeutical approach for medically refractory tremor. It is currently under investigation for other neurological diseases including refractory neuropathic pain (NP). Objective The objective of this systematic review is to analyze available evidence about the effectiveness and safety profile of MRgFUS in the treatment of refractory NP. Methods Eligible studies were identified by searching published studies in PubMed and Scopus databases from inception to December 2022 and by identifying ongoing studies registered on the clinicaltrials.gov website. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021277154). Results We found three published observational studies and nine ongoing studies. In published studies, the involved population ranged from 8 to 46 patients with overall 66 patients being included with NP or trigeminal neuralgia. The target lesion was in the posterior part of the central lateral nucleus of the thalamus, bilaterally. Outcomes were assessed at different times through the Visual Analog Scale, showing a variable degree of improvement. Adverse events were rare, mild, and transient (vertigo, paresthesias, and dysesthesias) with intracerebral bleeding being reported as major adverse event in one case only. Among ongoing studies, we found three prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover trials (RCTs) and six observational studies. Inclusion criteria are previous failure of more than three pharmacological treatments and NP duration longer than 6 months. The thalamus is the main proposed target and measured outcomes are accuracy of the procedure and pain relief, with a follow-up period ranging from 1 week to 1 year. Conclusion This systematic review suggests that, although high-quality studies are lacking, available evidence endorses the effectiveness and safety of MRgFUS in the management of NP. Ongoing RCTs will provide more robust data to understand benefits and risks of the procedure. Registration PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021277154).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Taranta
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Gennaro Saporito
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Alessandra Splendiani
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Masciocchi
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Franco Marinangeli
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life Sciences and Environment Life, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Angelo Cacchio
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life Sciences and Environment Life, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Ernesto Di Cesare
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Castaldo M, Waliszewska-Prosół M, Koutsokera M, Robotti M, Straburzyński M, Apostolakopoulou L, Capizzi M, Çibuku O, Ambat FDF, Frattale I, Gadzhieva Z, Gallo E, Gryglas-Dworak A, Halili G, Jusupova A, Koperskaya Y, Leheste AR, Manzo ML, Marcinnò A, Marino A, Mikulenka P, Ong BE, Polat B, Popovic Z, Rivera-Mancilla E, Roceanu AM, Rollo E, Romozzi M, Ruscitto C, Scotto di Clemente F, Strauss S, Taranta V, Terhart M, Tychenko I, Vigneri S, Misiak B, Martelletti P, Raggi A. Headache onset after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:41. [PMID: 35361131 PMCID: PMC8969402 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01400-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are used to reduce the risk of developing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite the significant benefits in terms of reduced risk of hospitalization and death, different adverse events may present after vaccination: among them, headache is one of the most common, but nowadays there is no summary presentation of its incidence and no description of its main features. Methods We searched PubMed and EMBASE covering the period between January 1st 2020 and August 6th, 2021, looking for record in English and with an abstract and using three main search terms (with specific variations): COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination; headache/adverse events. We selected manuscript including information on subjects developing headache after injection, and such information had to be derived from a structured form (i.e. no free reporting). Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Analyses were carried out by vaccine vs. placebo, by first vs. second dose, and by mRNA-based vs. “traditional” vaccines; finally, we addressed the impact of age and gender on post-vaccine headache onset. Results Out of 9338 records, 84 papers were included in the review, accounting for 1.57 million participants, 94% of whom received BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. Headache was generally the third most common AE: it was detected in 22% (95% CI 18–27%) of subjects after the first dose of vaccine and in 29% (95% CI 23–35%) after the second, with an extreme heterogeneity. Those receiving placebo reported headache in 10–12% of cases. No differences were detected across different vaccines or by mRNA-based vs. “traditional” ones. None of the studies reported information on headache features. A lower prevalence of headache after the first injection of BNT162b2 among older participants was shown. Conclusions Our results show that vaccines are associated to a two-fold risk of developing headache within 7 days from injection, and the lack of difference between vaccine types enable to hypothesize that headache is secondary to systemic immunological reaction than to a vaccine-type specific reaction. Some descriptions report onset within the first 24 h and that in around one-third of the cases, headache has migraine-like features with pulsating quality, phono and photophobia; in 40–60% of the cases aggravation with activity is observed. The majority of patients used some medication to treat headache, the one perceived as the most effective being acetylsalicylic acid. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01400-4.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sacco S, Benemei S, Cevoli S, Coppola G, Cortelli P, De Cesaris F, De Icco R, De Marco CM, Di Lorenzo C, Geppetti P, Manni A, Negro A, Ornello R, Pierangeli G, Pierelli F, Pellesi L, Pini LA, Pistoia F, Prudenzano MP, Russo A, Sances G, Taranta V, Tassorelli C, Tedeschi G, Trojano M, Martelletti P. Development and validation of the ID-EC - the ITALIAN version of the identify chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 2019; 20:15. [PMID: 30760199 PMCID: PMC6734365 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-019-0966-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Case-finding tools, such as the Identify Chronic Migraine (ID-CM) questionnaire, can improve detection of CM and alleviate its significant societal burden. We aimed to develop and validate the Italian version of the ID-CM (ID-EC) in paper and as a smart app version in a headache clinic-based setting. METHODS The study investigators translated and adapted to the Italian language the original ID-CM questionnaire (ID-EC) and further implemented it as a smart app. The ID-EC was tested in its paper and electronic version in consecutive patients referring to 9 Italian tertiary headache centers for their first in-person visit. The scoring algorithm of the ID-EC paper version was applied by the study investigators (case-finding) and by patients (self-diagnosis), while the smart app provided to patients automatically the diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy of the ID-EC was assessed by matching the questionnaire results with the interview-based diagnoses performed by the headache specialists during the visit according to the criteria of International Classification of Headache Disorders, III edition, beta version. RESULTS We enrolled 531 patients in the test of the paper version of ID-EC and 427 in the validation study of the smart app. According to the clinical diagnosis 209 patients had CM in the paper version study and 202 had CM in the smart app study. 79.5% of patients returned valid paper questionnaires, while 100% of patients returned valid and complete smart app questionnaires. The paper questionnaire had a 81.5% sensitivity and a 81.1% specificity for case-finding and a 30.7% sensitivity and 90.7% specificity for self-diagnosis, while the smart app had a 64.9% sensitivity and 90.2% specificity. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that the ID-EC, developed and validated in tertiary headache centers, is a valid case-finding tool for CM, with sensitivity and specificity values above 80% in paper form, while the ID-EC smart app is more useful to exclude CM diagnosis in case of a negative result. Further studies are warranted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the ID-EC in general practice and population-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Sacco
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, Section of Neurology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Silvia Benemei
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Institute of Neurological Science of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluca Coppola
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Pietro Cortelli
- IRCCS Institute of Neurological Science of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cesaris
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto De Icco
- Headache Science Center, IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Cristiano Maria De Marco
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Cherubino Di Lorenzo
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | - Pierangelo Geppetti
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessia Manni
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Negro
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, Section of Neurology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Giulia Pierangeli
- IRCCS Institute of Neurological Science of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Lanfranco Pellesi
- Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Policlinico Hospital, University of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Luigi Alberto Pini
- Headache and Drug Abuse Research Centre, Policlinico Hospital, University of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesca Pistoia
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, Section of Neurology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Prudenzano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Caserta, Italy
| | - Grazia Sances
- Headache Science Center, IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Valentina Taranta
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, Section of Neurology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Headache Science Center, IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- Headache Center, Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Caserta, Italy
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|