Genetic liability for gastrointestinal inflammation disorders and association with gastrointestinal symptoms in children with and without autism

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have a greater prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms than children without ASD. We tested whether polygenic scores for each of three GI disorders (ulcerative colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and Crohn's disease) were related to GI symptoms in children with and without ASD. Using genotyping data (564 ASD cases and 715 controls) and external genome-wide association study summary statistics, we computed GI polygenic scores for ulcerative colitis (UC-PGS), inflammatory bowel disease (IDB-PGS), and Crohn's disease (CD-PGS). Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for genetic ancestry, were used to estimate associations between each GI-PGS and (1) ASD case-control status, and (2) specific GI symptoms in neurotypical children and separately in ASD children. In children without ASD, polygenic scores for ulcerative colitis were significantly associated with experiencing any GI symptom (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.81, p = 0.03) and diarrhea specifically (aOR = 5.35, 95% CI = 1.77-26.20, p = 0.01). Among children without ASD, IBD-PGS, and Crohn's PGS were significantly associated with diarrhea (aOR = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.25-12.34, p = 0.02) and loose stools alternating with constipation (aOR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.13-6.55, p = 0.03), respectively. However, the three PGS were not associated with GI symptoms in the ASD case group. Furthermore, polygenic scores for ulcerative colitis significantly interacted with ASD status on presentation of any GI symptom within a European ancestry subset (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.19-0.88, p = 0.02). Genetic risk factors for some GI symptoms differ between children with and without ASD. Furthermore, our finding that increased genetic risks for GI inflammatory disorders are associated with GI symptoms in children without ASD informs future work on the early detection of GI disorders.

Association of Apolipoprotein B-Containing Lipoproteins and Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Individuals With and Without Atherosclerosis: Distinguishing Between Particle Concentration, Type, and Content

Importance

Lipid management typically focuses on levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and, to a lesser extent, triglycerides (TG). However, animal models and genetic studies suggest that the atherogenic particle subpopulations (LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein [VLDL]) are both important and that the number of particles is more predictive of cardiac events than their lipid content.

Objective

To determine whether common measures of cholesterol concentration, TG concentration, or their ratio are associated with cardiovascular risk beyond the number of apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort analysis included individuals from the population-based UK Biobank and from 2 large international clinical trials, FOURIER and IMPROVE-IT. The median (IQR) follow-up was 11.1 (10.4-11.8) years in UK Biobank and 2.5 (2.0-4.7) years in the clinical trials. Two populations were studied in this analysis: 389 529 individuals in the primary prevention group who were not taking lipid-lowering therapy and 40 430 patients with established atherosclerosis who were receiving statin treatment.

Exposures

ApoB, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-C, and TG.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary study outcome was incident myocardial infarction (MI).

Results

Of the 389 529 individuals in the primary prevention group, 224 097 (58%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 56.0 (49.5-62.5) years. Of the 40 430 patients with established atherosclerosis, 9647 (24%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 63 (56.2-69.0) years. In the primary prevention cohort, apoB, non-HDL-C, and TG each individually were associated with incident MI. However, when assessed together, only apoB was associated (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] per 1 SD, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.40; P < .001). Similarly, only apoB was associated with MI in the secondary prevention cohort. Adjusting for apoB, there was no association between the ratio of TG to LDL-C (a surrogate for the ratio of TG-rich lipoproteins to LDL) and risk of MI, implying that for a given concentration of apoB-containing lipoproteins, the relative proportions of particle subpopulations may no longer be a predictor of risk.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, risk of MI was best captured by the number of apoB-containing lipoproteins, independent from lipid content (cholesterol or TG) or type of lipoprotein (LDL or TG-rich). This suggests that apoB may be the primary driver of atherosclerosis and that lowering the concentration of all apoB-containing lipoproteins should be the focus of therapeutic strategies.