1
|
Wai Sze Lei C, Holt J, Flynn B, Barrett R, Budhani P, Kamalakannan M, Wasti R, Thiede L, Tagore J, Potts J, Larouche J, Marcher M, Liao X, O’Brien S, Kashyap A, Pignatelli J, Liu K, Tumang J, Corse E, Stanger B, Pure E, Rodriguez DiBlasi V. 902 Comprehensive multi-omics meta-analysis of pancreatic cancer mouse models and human PDAC data sets identifies unique cancer-associated fibroblast subsets. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is resistant to many available therapies including immunotherapy because of its highly complex tumor microenvironment (TME). PDAC TME consists of a significant proportion of stromal cells, such as endothelial cells, perivascular cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Recent work indicates how CAFs can orchestrate the crosstalk cancer and immune cells, and contribute to many aspects of tumor progression, including angiogenesis, senescence, and inflammation. Recent studies based on scRNA-seq have increased understanding of CAF heterogeneity in PDAC in both human and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) is of high interest. To understand the translatability of GEMMs in the setting of PDAC, we conducted a thorough scRNA-seq meta-analysis on CAFs across GEMMs and PDAC human samples. Hereafter, we characterized CAFs multi-dimensionally based on transcriptional, chromatin accessibility, and spatial profiles. Finally, we suggested certain transcription factors may be regulatory drivers of heterogeneous CAF phenotypes in both human and GEMMs.MethodsWe collected publicly available and internally generated scRNA-seq data of PDAC CAFs from human and mouse. After dataset alignment and label transfer, we conducted differential expression analysis across CAF subsets to characterize myofibroblasts (myCAFs) and other CAF subsets of interest. Bioinformatically, we further interrogated CAF heterogeneity in terms of regulatory potential of transcription factors, gene set enrichment, and functional state transition. Complemented by epigenomic assessment, we investigated chromatin accessibility and transcription factor binding availability on the single-cell level. Finally, to investigate the TME organization and spatial neighborhood of cell-to-cell interaction, we explored potential functional differences across location and transcriptional changes of CAF subsets by spatial transcriptomics.ResultsWe found that myofibroblasts (myCAFs) make up a substantial proportion of the CAF population, in both human and mouse TME. In a combination of transcriptional profiling, chromatin accessibility assessment, and spatial transcriptomics, we elucidated potential functional and phenotypic differences within myCAF population and compared to other CAF subsets in the TME. While myofibroblasts are traditionally described as matrix remodeling related, heterogeneity in myofibroblasts may suggest additional roles played by this specific subset. In addition, CAFs in human and mouse share similarities, in terms of transcriptional profiles and phenotypes. The use of GEMMs facilitates our understanding of CAF heterogenous behavior and phenotypes in the PDAC TME.ConclusionsHere, we presented a comprehensive overview of CAF heterogeneity in mouse PDAC models and human datasets. Our observations highlight molecular differences in CAFs, which facilitates our understanding on PDAC stromal microenvironment and translatability in GEMMs in imitating human TME.
Collapse
|
2
|
Rizzardi LF, Hickey PF, Rodriguez DiBlasi V, Tryggvadóttir R, Callahan CM, Idrizi A, Hansen KD, Feinberg AP. Neuronal brain-region-specific DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility are associated with neuropsychiatric trait heritability. Nat Neurosci 2019; 22:307-316. [PMID: 30643296 PMCID: PMC6348048 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-018-0297-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications confer stable transcriptional patterns in the brain and both normal and abnormal brain function involve specialized brain regions. We examined DNA methylation by whole genome bisulfite sequencing in neuronal and non-neuronal populations from four brain regions (anterior cingulate gyrus, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens) as well as chromatin accessibility in the latter two. We find pronounced differences in CpG and non-CpG differentially methylated regions (CG- and CH-DMRs) only in neuronal cells across regions. While neuronal CH-DMRs were highly associated with differential gene expression, CG-DMRs were consistent with chromatin accessibility and enriched for regulatory regions. These CG-DMRs comprise ~12 Mb of the genome that is highly enriched for genomic regions associated with heritability of neuropsychiatric traits including addictive behavior, schizophrenia, and neuroticism, suggesting a mechanistic link between pathology and differential neuron-specific epigenetic regulation in distinct brain regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay F Rizzardi
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter F Hickey
- Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Varenka Rodriguez DiBlasi
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rakel Tryggvadóttir
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Colin M Callahan
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Adrian Idrizi
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kasper D Hansen
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Andrew P Feinberg
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|