Maternal diaphragmatic hernia in pregnancy: A systematic review with a treatment algorithm

BACKGROUND

Diaphragmatic hernia (DH) is extremely rarely described during pregnancy. Due to the rarity, there is no diagnostic or treatment algorithm for DH in pregnancy.

AIM

To summarize and define the most appropriate diagnostic methods and therapeutic options for DH in pregnancy based on scarce literature.

METHODS

Literature search of English-, German-, Spanish-, and Italian-language articles were performed using PubMed (1946-2021), PubMed Central (1900-2021), and Google Scholar. The PRISMA protocol was followed. The search terms included: Maternal diaphragmatic hernia, congenital hernia, pregnancy, cardiovascular collapse, mediastinal shift, abdominal pain in pregnancy, hyperemesis, diaphragmatic rupture during labor, puerperium, hernie diaphragmatique maternelle, hernia diafragmática congenital. Additional studies were identified by reviewing reference lists of retrieved studies. Demographic, imaging, surgical, and obstetric data were obtained.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-eight cases were collected. The average maternal age increased across observed periods. The proportion of congenital hernias increased, while the other types appeared stationary. Most DHs were left-sided (83.8%). The median number of herniated organs declined across observed periods. A working diagnosis was correct in 50%. DH type did not correlate to maternal or neonatal outcomes. Laparoscopic access increased while thoracotomy varied across periods. Presentation of less than 3 days carried a significant risk of strangulation in pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

The clinical presentation of DH is easily confused with common chest conditions, delaying the diagnosis, and increasing maternal and fetal mortality. Symptomatic DH should be included in the differential diagnosis of pregnant women with abdominal pain associated with dyspnea and chest pain, especially when followed by collapse. Early diagnosis and immediate intervention lead to excellent maternal and fetal outcomes. A proposed algorithm helps manage pregnant women with maternal DH. Strangulated DH requires an emergent operation, while delivery should be based on obstetric indications.

State of the art, new treatment strategies, and emerging drugs for non-hormonal treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review of randomized control trials

Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to recap the data obtained from randomized controlled trials looking at new pharmacologic treatments for endometriosis published over the last decade with a focus on non-hormonal therapeutic options alleviating endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.Methods: We identified relevant original studies in the English language through a search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE (2012 to present) databases using the appropriate MeSH terms and applying the article type filter 'randomized controlled trials'. A total of 179 records were found during the electronic search. After a detailed evaluation and review of the manuscripts, seven primary articles met the inclusion criteria. A systematic review of the data was conducted.Results: This review included several, non-hormonal emerging drug therapies for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Based on our results, we divided well-founded studies into three subgroups: antiangiogenic agents, immunomodulators, and natural components. Randomized control trials showed promising results with dopamine agonists (cabergoline, quinagolide, and bromocriptine), and the immunomodulatory JNK inhibitor bentamapimod. Agents that have not been represented in randomized control trials or have failed to demonstrate efficacy include statins and TNF-α inhibitors.Conclusion: Although there are substantial improvements in non-hormonal therapy options, majority of the currently available treatment options are supressive rather than curative and do not present a final solution for patients. Future research priorities should be to identify novel target therapies and to evalute the effects of available drugs through different routes of administration.

Current status and challenges of drug development for hormonal treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review of randomized control trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the data obtained from randomized controlled trials looking at new pharmacologic treatments for endometriosis published over the last decade with a focus on hormonal therapeutic options for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (EAPP), excluding studies focusing on fertility.

METHODS

We identified relevant original studies in the English language through a search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE (2012 to present) databases using the appropriate MeSH terms and applying the article type filter 'randomized controlled trials'. A total of 219 records were found during the electronic search. After a detailed evaluation and review of the manuscripts, 11 primary articles met the inclusion criteria. A systematic review of the data was conducted.

RESULTS

This review included several emerging drug therapies for EAPP. Randomized control trials showed promising results with several oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (elagolix, relugolix, ASP1707, linzagolix). However, studies of other hormonal agents such as aromatase inhibitors and selective progesterone receptor modulators have not yielded significant or new advantages. Selective estrogen receptor modulators have not been represented in randomized control trials and have failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Although numerous novel agents are being investigated for the treatment of endometriosis, there is still no significant progress in the development of curative rather than suppressive drugs. Therefore, further efforts are needed to develop an effective and hopefully curative treatment for this chronic, costly, and overwhelming disease.