Laparoscopic Nerve-Preserving Colposacropexy for Surgical Management of Neovaginal Prolapse

BACKGROUND

Neovaginal prolapse occurs rarely, and a standard treatment has not yet been defined.

CASE

We report 2 cases of patients with vaginal agenesis with a symptomatic neovaginal prolapse; one occurring 25 years after self-dilation and another occurring 24 years after sigmoid vaginoplasty. At 48 and 18 months after surgical treatment with laparoscopic nerve-preserving colposacropexy using 2 types of mesh and 2 kinds of sutures to anchor the mesh at the neovaginal wall, both women are asymptomatic and highly satisfied with the result, without prolapse recurrence or mesh/suture erosion.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

For the surgical management of neovaginal prolapse after sigmoid vaginoplasty and vagina creation after self-dilation, we recommend the nerve-preserving sacrocolpopexy as a safe method to achieve durable functional outcomes and good anatomic vaginal level I and II support.

Typical and Atypical Associated Findings in a Group of 346 Patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser Syndrome

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is characterized by vaginal and uterine aplasia in a 46,XX individual. Multiple abnormalities may be associated with MRKH syndrome, and it appears to overlap other syndromes. The aim of this study was to describe the spectrum of associated malformations and syndromes as well as abnormal karyotypic findings in a large cohort of 346 patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The study is a retrospective analysis of 346 MRKH patients treated in the University Hospital in Tuebingen between 1998 and 2013.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The dataset was screened for typical associated malformations as well as atypical malformations and abnormal karyotypes. A complete review of the literature was included.

RESULTS

Among our cohort of 346 patients, we found that 53.2% had MRKH type 1, 41.3% had MRKH type 2, and 5.5% had MURCS syndrome. The group with associated malformations included 57.6% renal, 44.4% skeletal, and 30.8% other malformations. Additionally, we found 2 cases of absent radius syndrome, 3 cases of anal atresia, and 1 patient with oculodentodigital dysplasia, and other atypical malformations. Abnormal karyotypes were found in 5 cases, and 39 siblings and 11 parents had known malformations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the hypothesis that the syndrome has a multifactorial pathogenesis. With the high numbers of associated malformations reported in this study, patients with MRKH syndrome should be regarded as having a complex syndrome. Molecular-genetic analyses in larger numbers of children after surrogacy, twin pregnancies, and familial cases may make it possible to obtain further information about the etiology of the syndrome.

Hybrid aortic procedures for endoluminal arch replacement in thoracic aneurysms and type B dissections

The aim of this study was to report our clinical experience with and review current literature on endoluminal aortic hybrid techniques and to evaluate outcome in high-risk patients treated for complex aortic arch lesions combining conventional supra-aortic debranching bypasses with subsequent or staged thoracic endovascular grafting. Of 172 patients treated with thoracic endografts for different thoracic aortic pathologies within the last 8 years, the mid-aortic arch was involved in 25, i.e. at least the left common carotid artery had to be overstented and revascularized to provide a proper proximal landing zone. These debranching bypasses were performed as a simultaneous or a staged procedure. All patients were at high-risk and were excluded by cardiac surgeons as ineligible for conventional arch repair. After partial (n=16) or complete (n=9) supra-aortic transposition, 4 different commercially available endografts (80% TAG, WL Gore) were implanted transfemorally or via iliac conduit. Deployment success was 100% in 25 patients after simultaneous or staged supra-aortic transposition; in 32% an emergency procedure was performed due to contained rupture; in 36% more than 1 endograft system was implanted (2 in 20%, 3 in 8% und 4 in 8%). The overall perioperative thirty-day mortality was 5 of 25 (20%) due to interoperative proximal bare stent perforation (n=1), transfusion related acute lung injury (TRALI n=1), cardiac failure (n=1), embolic stroke (n=1) and pneumonia (n=1). The mean follow-up was 21 months. All endoleaks type I (n=3) were corrected with another endograft; the 2 endoleaks type II sealed spontaneously. The major adverse events were: prolonged ventilation in 5 (20%), temporary renal insufficiency with hemodialysis (n=2), bypass infection (n=1), without any complications (n=9). No cases of paraplegia were recorded. Hybrid aortic arch repair is technically challenging but feasible. This novel approach may be an alternative to standard open procedures in high-risk patients and emergency cases. However, the promising early results need to be confirmed by longer follow-up and larger series.