A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Induction of Labour with the Propess Vaginal System to the Prostin Vaginal Tablet in Premature Rupture of Membranes at Term

Aim: To compare the perinatal outcome and delivery intervals after the induction of labour with the Prostin vaginal tablet versus the Propess vaginal system in pregnant women with term-PROM. Design: One centre paralleled randomised controlled trial with a computer-generated table to allocate treatments. Setting: University Medical Centre in Slovenia. Participants: A total of 205 singleton healthy pregnant women with term-PROM. Intervention: Induction of labour with the Propess vaginal system (intervention group) versus Prostin tablets (control group). Main outcomes: The rate of failed inductions, complications in labour, time intervals between the PROM, induction, the beginning of the active phase, and delivery. Results: A total of 104 patients received Prostin, and 101 patients received Propess. Induction failure rates in the Prostin and the Propess groups were 8/104 (7.7%) and 5/101 (5.0%), respectively (p = 0.80). Delivery abnormalities were uncommon and comparable across the groups. The rates of caesarean sections in the Prostin and Propess groups were 4/96 (4.2%) and 6/96 (6.3%), respectively. The delivery intervals were comparable across the groups. Conclusions: In term-PROM pregnancies, the Propess vaginal system is a safe and effective option for inducing labour.

A case of previously undiagnosed acute intermittent porphyria in a 34-year-old primigravida with gestational diabetes mellitus

Porphyrias are very rare and easily overlooked diseases in pregnancy. Among these eight known metabolic disorders, acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is the most common and most severe type. An enzymatic alteration in the haem biosynthesis pathway causes liver overproduction of neurotoxic toxic metabolites, which cause attacks of acute neurovisceral symptoms, severe abdominal pain and/or skin lesions. Women with AIP can sometimes develop their first acute attack during pregnancy, and because the symptoms are unspecific, the diagnosis is difficult to obtain and often missed. However, prompt diagnosis of AIP during pregnancy is crucial as treatment can significantly improve the pregnancy outcome. The backbone of the therapy is food rich with carbohydrates, complemented by 20% glucose infusion and adequate pain control. We present a case of previously undiagnosed AIP in a 34-year primigravida, whose treatment was especially challenging due to co-existing gestational diabetes mellitus and problems with the central venous catheter.