Has the role of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction been fully determined? A case report

Background

The persistent challenge of high mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction-induced cardiogenic shock endures notwithstanding advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease over the past two decades. While recent studies present conflicting evidence on the efficacy of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), observational research supports the benefits of early VA ECMO initiation. However, the current lack of robust support from randomized clinical trials for VA ECMO use in this context highlights the ongoing uncertainty surrounding its effectiveness.

Case summary

A 52-year-old male with sudden, intense chest pain was diagnosed with cardiogenic shock due to non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction at a local hospital. Initial treatment included aspirin, clopidogrel, and noradrenaline. Upon transfer to our hospital, the patient's condition deteriorated, leading to acute respiratory distress and severe hypotension. Prior to emergent percutaneous coronary intervention, peripheral VA ECMO was initiated. Coronary angiography revealed left main coronary artery occlusion, and a successful intervention was performed. Post-intervention, the patient's haemodynamic parameters significantly improved, and after 7 days, ECMO was successfully discontinued. The patient was discharged in stable condition after 25 days, with favourable outcomes persisting at the 30-day mark. Continuous monitoring is planned during outpatient follow-up.

Discussion

The clinical case illustrates a successful treatment outcome achieved through teamwork by the heart team, supporting the efficacy of the VA ECMO pre-percutaneous coronary intervention approach. The careful selection of appropriate candidates and strategic initiation of VA ECMO may play a role in enhancing outcomes for individuals experiencing acute myocardial infarction complicated by challenging cardiogenic shock.

Significant prostate cancer risk after MRI-guided biopsy showing benign findings: Results from a cohort of 381 men

BACKGROUND

MRI-guided biopsy (MGB) contributes to the diagnosis of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa). However, there are no clear recommendations for the management of men after a negative MGB. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of csPCa after a first negative MGB.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2020, we selected men with a PI-RADS score ≥ 3 on MRI and a negative MGB (showing benign findings) performed for suspected prostate cancer. MGB (targeted and systematic biopsies) was performed using fully integrated mobile fusion imaging (KOELIS). The primary endpoint was the rate of csPCa (defined as an ISUP grade ≥ 2) diagnosed after a first negative MGB.

RESULTS

A total of 381 men with a negative MGB and a median age of 65 (IQR: 59-69, range: 46-85) years were included. During the median follow-up of 31 months, 124 men (32.5%) had a new MRI, and 76 (19.9%) were referred for a new MGB, which revealed csPCa in 16 (4.2%) of them. We found no statistical difference in the characteristics of men diagnosed with csPCa compared with men with no csPCa after the second MGB.

CONCLUSION

We observed a risk of significant prostate cancer in 4% of men two years after a negative MRI-guided biopsy. Performing a repeat MRI could improve the selection of men who will benefit from a repeat MRI-guided biopsy, but a clear protocol is needed to follow these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

What causes H5N1 avian influenza? Lay perceptions of H5N1 aetiology in South East and East Asia

BACKGROUND

Health education to reduce population poultry exposures has limited effect. Lay beliefs about H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) causes could provide insights helpful for improving public health interventions.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews of poultry farmers, retailers, market stall holders and consumers in Hong Kong (n = 20), Guangzhou (n = 25), Vietnam (n = 38) and Thailand (n = 40) were conducted using purposive sampling and analysed using ethnographic principles.

RESULTS

Each location produced three comparable themes: 'viruses': HPAI exemplified a periodic, natural, disease process therefore, deserving little concern. For some, science had 'discovered' something long known to farmers and lived with for generations. Others believe the virus to be new. Viral ecology was reasonably well understood among farmers, but less so by retailers and consumers; 'husbandry practices' included poor hygiene, overcrowding and industrial farming, modern commercial feed and veterinary drugs; 'vulnerability factors' included uncontrollable 'external' explanations involving the weather, seasonal changes, bird migrations and pollution.

CONCLUSIONS

Lay explanations were generally ecologically consistent. Nonetheless, beliefs that HPAI is a normal, recurrent process, external factors and roles of industrialized poultry rearing countered health worker claims of H5N1 seriousness for smallholders. These causal beliefs incorporate contemporary models of H5N1 ecology, but in a manner that contradicts public health efforts at control.