Aortic root pseudoaneurysm: a case report and literature review

Pseudoaneurysms of the aortic root are rare. A case of prosthetic aortic valve infection progressing from a confined intramural abscess to a ruptured abscess communicating with the aorta and forming a large pseudoaneurysm is described. Additionally, data from all cases and case series, published between 2000 and 2021, was analyzed. A PUBMED search for the keywords "aortic root mycotic aneurysm," "aortic root abscess AND infective endocarditis," and "aortic root mycotic aneurysm AND infective endocarditis" yielded 152 publications (with 157 cases described): Aortic pseudoaneurysm is more common in males (80.9%, n = 127). Mean age is 51 years (4 months-84 years). The most common symptom is fever (68.5%, n = 102). Mean time until diagnosis is 27.2 days. Embolic complications are present in 17.8% (n = 28) at diagnosis. Most cases are due to valvular infections (n = 72 cases, 45.9%). Prior cardiac surgery is documented in 49.0% (n = 77). The mean time interval for developing aortic root abscess following heart surgery is 32.2 months. 22.3% (n = 35) are immunocompromised. Aetiological agents were Staphylococcus sp. (34.1%, n = 47) and Streptococcus sp. (23.2%, n = 32). Mean antimicrobial therapy lasts 58.5 days. Outcome with surgery is superior to medical treatment: overall inpatient mortality 18.5% (n = 27); with surgery 12.2% (n = 15 out of 123 patients), with only medical management 47.8% (n = 11 out of 23 patients). In conclusion, aortic root pseudoaneurysm occurs most commonly in middle-aged male patients. History of prior aortic procedures is commonly present. Correct diagnosis hinges on detailed history, transoesophageal echocardiography, and computed tomography (CT) aorta. Surgery is the preferred therapeutic option.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01580-x.

A Transesophageal Cardiovascular Intervention

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transesophageal pericardiocentesis was performed for a posteriorly located effusion not amenable to transthoracic drainage in a 58-year-old woman with a history of recurrent breast adenocarcinoma who presented with dyspnea. The patient had a pericardial effusion that resulted in cardiac tamponade. Transthoracic pericardiocentesis was unsuitable because of the posterior location of the effusion. Pericardiocentesis via the transesophageal route was performed. The pericardial sac was punctured with a 19-gauge needle, and 245 mL of pericardial fluid were aspirated, resulting in the resolution of the tamponade physiology. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided transesophageal drainage is a novel and promising therapeutic option for posteriorly located pericardial effusions.

ARNI Versus Perindopril for Remodeling in HFrEF. A Cohort Study

Introduction: Ventricular remodeling is a mal-adaptive process. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and sacubitril/valsartan have been shown to reverse remodeling in mostly uncontrolled observational studies. There is a lack of head-to-head studies. Methods: This cohort study compares the remodeling effects of angiotensin receptor blockers combined with a neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and perindopril in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients between January 2017 and December 2020. Inclusion criteria: (i) age > 18 years, (ii) recent diagnosis of de-novo HFrEF (EF < 40%), (iii) baseline echocardiography performed not more than 2 months prior to treatment onset, and (iv) follow-up echocardiography performed not earlier than 6 months and not later than 18 months posttreatment onset. No prior treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors was permitted in the ARNI group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) were analyzed. A two-way repeated measure ANOVA (for normally distributed) and generalized estimating equation test for nonnormally distributed interval dependent variables. Mean comparison between and within groups was performed using the Bonferroni test. Results: Following an average treatment period of 9 months, LVEF improved from 24.9% to 36.4% for ARNI and from 28.7% to 40.5% for perindopril, increments of 11.5% and 11.8% resp. (Bonferroni test [P ≤ .05]). LVEDV was reduced by 8.4 mL and 3.2 mL, and LVESV by 17.9 mL and 10.8 mL for ARNI and perindopril resp. Only the reduction of LVESV for ARNI was statistically significant (P = .007). Conclusion: Both ARNI and perindopril yielded a significant improvement in the LVEF within 9 months. The remodeling effect of ARNI seems stronger because of the greater improvements in left ventricular volumes.