1
|
Jonaitis L, Marković S, Farkas K, Gheorghe L, Krznarić Ž, Salupere R, Mokricka V, Spassova Z, Gatev D, Grosu I, Lijović A, Mitrović O, Saje M, Schafer E, Uršič V, Roblek T, Drobne D. Intravenous versus subcutaneous delivery of biotherapeutics in IBD: an expert's and patient's perspective. BMC Proc 2021; 15:25. [PMID: 34879868 PMCID: PMC8654488 DOI: 10.1186/s12919-021-00230-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Several biologic treatments are available in addition to intravenous also in subcutaneous form for treatment of chronic diseases. Benefits of the subcutaneous application of drugs include self-administration by the patient, shorter time of application process with less infusion related adverse events and consequently lower healthcare costs. With appropriate education and support patients are able to administer their treatments at home. This leads to improvement of quality of life, reduction of time needed to travel to the healthcare institution and consequently also reduces costs also for the patient. Over one million residents in the USA and 2.5 million in Europe are estimated to have inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with substantial costs for health care. These estimates do not factor in the ‘real’ price of IBD, which can impede career aspirations, instil social stigma and impair quality of life in patients. The Virtual Community Meeting, which offered an exchange of experience and opinions from healthcare professionals who are active in treating IBD, and patients with this chronic disease, revealed in-depth arguments and answers to some essential questions: which patients prefer subcutaneous over intravenous dosing; which patients continue to favour intravenous infusions; what are the limitations regarding both applications; what is the patient’s role in therapeutical decision-making and how does IBD affect the patient’s work, finances and quality of life? The aim of this article is to discuss the differences between subcutaneous and intravenous dosing from the health-economic, scientific, and personal perspectives. The meeting offered strong confirmation that most of the patients and healthcare professionals prefer subcutaneous over intravenous drug administration but emphasise the management of risks associated with treatment compliance. Patient education provided by the IBD team in this regard is mandatory. Quality of life of patients is poorer during active disease, but the findings that it can improve over time, including as a result of home- or self-administration of biologics, may be encouraging for individuals with this chronic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laimas Jonaitis
- Gastroenterology clinic, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu str. 2, LT-50009, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Srdjan Marković
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Medical Center Zvezdara, Dimitrija tucovica 161, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
| | - Klaudia Farkas
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Szeged, Kálvária sgt. 57, Szeged, 6725, Hungary
| | - Liana Gheorghe
- Center for Digestive Diseases and Liver Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Fundeni 258, 022328, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Željko Krznarić
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Riina Salupere
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tartu University Hospital, University of Tartu, Ludvig Puusepa 8, 50406, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Viktorija Mokricka
- Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, 13 Pilsoņu iela, Riga, LV, 1002, Latvia
| | - Zoya Spassova
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, University Hospital "St. Ivan Rilski", 1431, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Dimo Gatev
- BABKUK Bulgarian patient organization ( Bulgarian Crohn and Ulcerative Colitis Association), Nikolai Kopernik 28-30, 1000, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Isabella Grosu
- Romanian IBD Patient Association, Traian 3, 910040, Calarasi, Romania
| | - Anton Lijović
- Patient Organization HUCUK (Hrvatsko udruženje za Crohnovu bolest i ulcerozni colitis), Ulica Kralja Zvonimira 20, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Olga Mitrović
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Centar of Serbia, Koste Todorovica 26, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
| | - Mateja Saje
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Association (Društvo za kronično vnetno črevesno bolezen), Ljubljanska ulica 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Eszter Schafer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Military Hospital Budapest, Podmaniczky u. 111, Budapest, 1062, Hungary
| | - Viktor Uršič
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals d.o.o, Bleiweisova cesta 30, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tina Roblek
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals d.o.o, Bleiweisova cesta 30, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - David Drobne
- University medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. .,Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| |
Collapse
|