Harmonisation of rat fetal skeletal terminology and classification. Report of the Third Workshop on the Terminology in Developmental Toxicology. Berlin, 14-16 September 2000

The initial efforts of the Federal Institute for Health Protection of Consumers and Veterinary Medicine (BgVV) and the Free University of Berlin to standardise terminology in the field of developmental toxicology began in 1995. Procedures were undertaken to harmonise the terminology used by the International Federation of Teratology Societies (IFTS) and the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). This article reflects these activities and is a report on the Third Workshop on the Terminology in Developmental Toxicology held in September 2000. This Workshop served as a forum to discuss the results of a survey on the classification of skeletal anomalies that had been previously sent to scientists active in the field. Although high agreement was reached among the evaluators for several terms, the use of a number of terms was rather variable. Therefore, the discussions at the workshop among the experts from research institutions, regulatory agencies, and industry were mainly focussed on those terms for which there was disagreement and/or uncertainties and the possible reasons. Pictures provided by the participants for the illustration of "grey zone" anomalies constituted the basis for detailed discussions. In many of the cases with lower agreement, decisions were facilitated by the provision of the corresponding picture. The main reasons for lower agreement were imprecise terms, insufficient knowledge on postnatal consequences, theoretical terms that are unlikely to occur in isolation, and the possibility of observing a range of severity that might be decisive for the classification of either a malformation or variation. The attendees concluded that "grey-zone" anomalies will never disappear completely and that for the assessment, the grade of severity and/or the frequency of the observation can be decisive for the terminology chosen. A Joint IPCS/IFTS Project was proposed to further consensus of terminology and classification and to link these anomalies to pictures at different skeletal sites. In order to support the harmonisation of regulatory decisions, it was proposed to establish a "Clearinghouse" System under the umbrella of the IPCS. The Clearinghouse could be contacted either by the regulatory authorities or by any company to clarify their queries, particularly with regard to registration or authorisation processes. Finally, it was recommended to also carry out a similar survey on "soft tissue anomalies" and "external findings." The results of this survey will be discussed at a Joint IPCS/IFTS Workshop in Berlin in 2002.

Registration requirements within the German Federal Health Office

Public health authorities responsible for consumer protection in connection with the use of chemical products are faced with several conflicting requirements. In addition to the primary requirements of protecting human health and assessing the balance between benefits and risks, the authorities are faced with the need to identify appropriate tests, to avoid unnecessary testing in experimental animals, to adapt existing test guidelines in the light of new technological and scientific developments and to make optimal use of the facilities and expertise available. Among the measures being taken by the German Federal Health Office to resolve these difficulties, particularly in connection with the testing of chemicals for skin and eye irritancy, are the evaluation of alternatives to animal tests, the encouragement of more effective screening and use of existing test results, promotion of the international exchange of test data, and support for proposed changes in the use of the Draize test.

Intercomparison Study on the Determination of Single Administration Toxicity in Rats

In 1977, the Commission of the European Communities initiated an intercomparison study to determine the single administration oral LD50 value in rats of each of 5 chemicals with the aims of comparing experimentation technologies, determining the degree of variation in the results and the various parameters used to establish the LD50 value, and establishing a common protocol for the determination of the LD50 value. Sixty-five laboratories in 8 countries took part in the first study. The significant variation in protocol may have led to the large interlaboratory variation observed in the results. Therefore, participating laboratories carried out a second study using a common protocol, preceded by a pilot study. A total of 100 laboratories in 13 countries participated. A majority of results of the second study are currently being analyzed, and the indications are that the interlaboratory variation has been significantly reduced.

Intercomparison study on the determination of single administration toxicity in rats

In 1977, the Commission of the European Communities initiated an intercomparison study to determine the single administration oral LD50 value in rats of each of 5 chemicals with the aims of comparing experimentation technologies, determining the degree of variation in the results and the various parameters used to establish the LD50 value, and establishing a common protocol for the determination of the LD50 value. Sixty-five laboratories in 8 countries took part in the first study. The significant variation in protocol may have led to the large interlaboratory variation observed in the results. Therefore, participating laboratories carried out a second study using a common protocol, preceded by a pilot study. A total of 100 laboratories in 13 countries participated. A majority of results of the second study are currently being analyzed, and the indications are that the interlaboratory variation has been significantly reduced.