Elevated G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity in Irish breast cancer patients: a comparison with other studies

Previous studies have shown that a significant proportion of breast cancer patients exhibit elevated G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity in contrast to controls (approximately 40%). In this study, the G2 assay was applied to a small number of Irish breast cancer patients who were recorded as sporadic cases and they were compared with a control group to compare and contrast with the previous documented studies. Lymphocyte cultures were set up on whole blood samples and stimulated with phytohaemagglutinin. The cultures were irradiated 74 h later with 0.5 Gy gamma-radiation and cells were arrested in metaphase by treating the cultures with colcemid. The chromosomes were harvested and the aberrations scored per 100 metaphases to assign a G2 score. The assay was first carried out on four donor controls to estimate intra-individual variation and then ten controls for inter-individual variation to measure assay reproducibility. The G2 assay was then applied to 27 breast cancer patients. Good intrinsic assay reproducibility was observed in the coefficient of variation (CV) data in three out of four controls. Intra-individual variation was similar in three out of four of the donors (4.6 - 5.1%) with one donor showing a higher CV compared with the others (22.9%). Inter-individual variation was calculated at 30.5% for all controls. No significant difference was observed between intra- and inter-individual variation using the variance ratio F-test. A G2 radiosensitivity cut-off of 110 aberrations/100 metaphases was calculated from the controls, and from this 70.4% of breast cancer patients and 7.7% of controls were calculated as G2 radiosensitive. This proportion of G2-sensitive breast cancer patients is the highest recorded in studies to date. It is thought that the G2 radiosensitivity assay is a biomarker of breast cancer predisposition genes of low penetrance, suggesting the presence of these genes in the Irish breast cancer patients used in this study who were recorded as sporadic cases. A larger number of Irish patients would be required to consolidate these findings and be representative of the Irish breast cancer population.

Predictive testing for BRCA1 and 2 mutations: a male contribution

BACKGROUND

Management strategies for women carrying BRCA1 and 2 mutations are becoming clearer and predictive testing for a known family mutation is commonly undertaken. Implications for men are not as clear and they participate less frequently.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six men from 10 extended families underwent predictive testing. Their motivation, reaction and outcome were studied. Subjects had appropriate pre- and post-test counselling. Informed consent was obtained before predictive testing for known deleterious mutations. DNA analysis followed standard procedures.

RESULTS

Eighteen tested positive and eight negative. Four had adverse psychological reactions and three reneged on their commitments to impart results. The spouse of another man had an adverse psychological reaction to the disclosure of his positive result. Two, already suffering from prostate cancer, were phenocopies and paternal lineage transmission was unexpectedly determined in another. Risk was removed from 33 offspring and confirmed for 56.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex themes associated with genetic testing are confirmed and the spectrum extended. Men appear to understand the importance of participating in this process. Methods of avoiding adverse reactions merit further study along with other aspects of the process.

The pathology of familial breast cancer: histological features of cancers in families not attributable to mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2

Breast cancers arising in carriers of mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, differ histologically from each other and from breast cancers unselected for a family history. However, a substantial proportion of families with multiple cases of breast cancer is not attributable to these two genes (non-BRCA1/2 families). We have now characterized the pathology of 82 breast cancers from non-BRCA1/2 families. Breast cancers in non-BRCA1/2 families were of lower grade (P = 0.0018), showed fewer mitoses (P < 0.0001), less nuclear pleomorphism (P = 0.0014), less lymphocytic infiltrate (P < 0.0001), a lesser extent of the tumor with a continuous pushing margin (P = 0.004), a lesser extent of the tumor composed of solid sheets of cells (P = 0.0047), less necrosis (P = 0.002), and wereparison with BRCA2 tumors, non-BRCA1/2 tumors were lower grade (P = 0.017) and exhibited less pleomorphism (P = 0.01) and more tubule formation (P = 0.05). In comparison with control breast cancers unselected for a family history of the disease, non-BRCA1/2 tumors were of significantly lower grade (P = 0.001), showed less pleomorphism (P = 0.0002), and had a lower mitotic count (P = 0.003). The results indicate that non-BRCA1/2 breast cancers differ histologically from both BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancers and are overall of lower grade. They also suggest that non-BRCA1/2 breast cancers differ from nonfamilial breast cancers, but these differences may be attributable to various types of bias.

Localization to Xq27 of a susceptibility gene for testicular germ-cell tumours

Testicular germ-cell tumours (TGCT) affect 1 in 500 men and are the most common cancer in males aged 15-40 in Western European populations. The incidence of TGCT has risen dramatically over the last century. Known risk factors for TGCT include a history of undescended testis (UDT), testicular dysgenesis, infertility, previously diagnosed TGCT (ref. 7) and a family history of the disease. Brothers of men with TGCT have an 8-10-fold risk of developing TGCT (refs 8,9), whereas the relative risk to fathers and sons is fourfold (ref. 9). This familial relative risk is much higher than that for most other types of cancer. We have collected samples from 134 families with two or more cases of TGCT, 87 of which are affected sibpairs. A genome-wide linkage search yielded a heterogeneity lod (hlod) score of 2.01 on chromosome Xq27 using all families compatible with X inheritance. We obtained a hlod score of 4.7 from families with at least one bilateral case, corresponding to a genome-wide significance level of P=0.034. The proportion of families with UDT linked to this locus was 73% compared with 26% of families without UDT (P=0.03). Our results provide evidence for a TGCT susceptibility gene on chromosome Xq27 that may also predispose to UDT.

Men in breast cancer families: a preliminary qualitative study of awareness and experience

In inherited forms of breast cancer, attention in clinical genetics services has focused on women because they are most at risk of developing cancer. Men at risk of transmitting a predisposing gene mutation are less likely to have a genetic test than the women in these families. This preliminary study investigates the perspective of the brothers of women with familial breast cancer and is based on qualitative analysis of 22 semistructured interviews using an attenuated form of Grounded Theory. There is an awareness among these men (without having had genetic counselling) that the breast cancer in their families is inherited. Some of them harbour fear of developing cancer themselves and many are concerned that their daughters might develop breast cancer. Some appeared to use avoidance as a coping strategy. The men were very often excluded from family conversations about breast cancer. Implications for the provision of genetic counselling for these families are discussed.

Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

BACKGROUND

We have previously demonstrated that breast cancers associated with inherited BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations differ from each other in their histopathologic appearances and that each of these types differs from breast cancers in patients unselected for family history (i.e., sporadic cancers). We have now conducted a more detailed examination of cytologic and architectural features of these tumors.

METHODS

Specimens of tumor tissue (5-microm-thick sections) were examined independently by two pathologists, who were unaware of the case or control subject status, for the presence of cell mitosis, lymphocytic infiltration, continuous pushing margins, and solid sheets of cancer cells; cell nuclei, cell nucleoli, cell necrosis, and cell borders were also evaluated. The resulting data were combined with previously available information on tumor type and tumor grade and further evaluated by multifactorial analysis. All statistical tests are two-sided.

RESULTS

Cancers associated with BRCA1 mutations exhibited higher mitotic counts (P = .001), a greater proportion of the tumor with a continuous pushing margin (P<.0001), and more lymphocytic infiltration (P = .002) than sporadic (i.e., control) cancers. Cancers associated with BRCA2 mutations exhibited a higher score for tubule formation (fewer tubules) (P = .0002), a higher proportion of the tumor perimeter with a continuous pushing margin (P<.0001), and a lower mitotic count (P = .003) than control cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has identified key features of the histologic phenotypes of breast cancers in carriers of mutant BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. This information may improve the classification of breast cancers in individuals with a family history of the disease and may ultimately aid in the clinical management of patients.

Cancer risks in two large breast cancer families linked to BRCA2 on chromosome 13q12-13

The penetrance of the BRCA2 gene on chromosome 13q12-13 has been estimated in two large, systematically ascertained, linked families, by use of a maximum-likelihood method to incorporate both cancer-incidence data and 13q marker typings in the families. The cumulative risk of breast cancer in female gene carriers was estimated to be 59.8% by age 50 years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 25.9%-78.5%) and 79.5% by age 70 years (95% CI 28.9%-97.5%). The cumulative risk of breast cancer in male carriers was estimated to be 6.3% (95% CI 1.4%-25.6%) by age 70 years. There was no evidence of any risk difference between the two families. These results indicate that the lifetime breast cancer risk in BRCA2 carriers, for at least a subset of mutations, is comparable to that for BRCA1. A significant excess of ovarian cancer in gene carriers was observed (relative risk 17.69, based on three cases), but the absolute risk of ovarian cancer was less than that reported for BRCA1. Significant excesses of laryngeal cancer (relative risk 7.67, based on two possible carriers) and prostate cancer (relative risk 2.89, based on five possible carriers) were also observed. One case of ocular melanoma, as well as a second eye cancer of unspecified histology, occurred in obligate gene carriers.

Hereditary breast cancer

An overview is provided of the genetics of hereditary breast cancer, as well as the clinical aspects and the management of this disease. In September 1994 a new breast cancer gene, BRCA 2, was located and BRCA 1, discovered in 1990, was sequenced (Miki et al., 1994; Wooster et al., 1994). The implications of these discoveries are immense. Tests are now available to women who have a family history of breast cancer that can determine if they carry one of these defective genes. The genetic nurse specialist can play a huge role in counselling women who wish to have predictive testing and in advising them about screening and risk.

Consistent loss of the wild type allele in breast cancers from a family linked to the BRCA2 gene on chromosome 13q12-13

A small proportion of breast cancer is attributable to the inheritance of dominant, high penetrance susceptibility genes. One of these genes, BRCA2, has recently been localised by genetic linkage analysis to chromosome 13q12-13. This is a region known to exhibit loss of heterozygosity in 20-40% sporadic breast cancers. In this study, we have examined cancers from a family showing strong evidence of linkage to BRCA2. LOH was seen in seven out of eight informative cancers. In all cases the allele lost was the wild type allele that does not segregate with the disease in the family. The data suggest that both alleles of BRCA2 are inactivated in cancers, the pattern expected of a recessive oncogene or tumour suppressor gene.