The Impact of Prior Season Vaccination on Subsequent Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness to Prevent Influenza-related Hospitalizations Over 4 Influenza Seasons in Canada

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated the possibility of negative associations between prior influenza vaccines and subsequent influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE), depending on season and strain. We investigated this association over 4 consecutive influenza seasons (2011-2012 through 2014-2015) in Canada.

METHODS

Using a matched test-negative design, laboratory-confirmed influenza cases and matched test-negative controls admitted to hospitals were enrolled. Patients were stratified into 4 groups according to influenza vaccine history (not vaccinated current and prior season [referent], vaccinated prior season only, vaccinated current season only, and vaccinated both current and prior season). Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate VE; prior vaccine impact was assessed each season for overall effect and effect stratified by age (<65 years, ≥65 years) and type/subtype (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, influenza B).

RESULTS

Overall, mainly nonsignificant associations were observed. Trends of nonsignificant decreased VE among patients repeatedly vaccinated in both prior and current season relative to the current season only were observed in the A/H3N2-dominant seasons of 2012-2013 and 2014-2015. Conversely, in 2011-2012, during which B viruses circulated, and in 2013-2014, when A/H1N1 circulated, being vaccinated in both seasons tended to result in a high VE in the current season against the dominant circulating subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior vaccine impact on subsequent VE among Canadian inpatients was mainly nonsignificant. Even in circumstances where we observed a trend of negative impact, being repeatedly vaccinated was still more effective than not receiving the current season's vaccine. These findings favor continuation of annual influenza vaccination recommendations, particularly in older adults.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01517191.

Validation of the Seegene RV15 multiplex PCR for the detection of influenza A subtypes and influenza B lineages during national influenza surveillance in hospitalized adults

Background. The Serious Outcomes Surveillance Network of the Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN SOS) has been performing active influenza surveillance since 2009 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01517191). Influenza A and B viruses are identified and characterized using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and multiplex testing has been performed on a subset of patients to identify other respiratory virus aetiologies. Since both methods can identify influenza A and B, a direct comparison was performed.Methods. Validated real-time RT-PCRs from the World Health Organization (WHO) to identify influenza A and B viruses, characterize influenza A viruses into the H1N1 or H3N2 subtypes and describe influenza B viruses belonging to the Yamagata or Victoria lineages. In a subset of patients, the Seeplex RV15 One-Step ACE Detection assay (RV15) kit was also used for the detection of other respiratory viruses.Results. In total, 1111 nasopharyngeal swabs were tested by RV15 and real-time RT-PCRs for influenza A and B identification and characterization. For influenza A, RV15 showed 98.0 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity and 99.7 % accuracy. The performance characteristics of RV15 were similar for influenza A subtypes H1N1 and H3N2. For influenza B, RV15 had 99.2 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity and 99.8 % accuracy, with similar assay performance being shown for both the Yamagata and Victoria lineages.Conclusions. Overall, the detection of circulating subtypes of influenza A and lineages of influenza B by RV15 was similar to detection by real-time RT-PCR. Multiplex testing with RV15 allows for a more comprehensive respiratory virus surveillance in hospitalized adults, without significantly compromising the reliability of influenza A or B virus detection.

Clinical and microbiological follow-up of an outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype Ib

Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, a food-borne pathogen, causes infection that commonly presents as gastroenteritis and mesenteric lymphadenitis. Post-infectious complications include erythema nodosum, reactive arthritis and, less commonly, uveitis and nephritis. Six serotypes of Y. pseudotuberculosis have been identified, and post-infectious complications have been identified following infection with some, but not all, serotypes. The first recognized outbreak of Y. pseudotuberculosis serotype lb occurred in British Columbia in November 1998. We documented the incidence of post-infectious complications and the effect of antibiotic use on the clinical course. Four months after the outbreak, a standardized questionnaire asking about symptoms and antibiotic use was administered by telephone to laboratory-confirmed cases. Stool samples were collected to examine for chronic carriage of Y. pseudotuberculosis and 59 of 74 eligible cases participated. The most common post-infectious symptoms were rash (8/59) and joint pain (7/59). Microbiological analysis, at follow-up, revealed 0/36 stools positive for Y. pseudotuberculosis. Seventy-eight percent of cases had taken antibiotics during their acute illness. There was no significant difference in the frequency of post-infectious symptoms between cases who had or had not taken antibiotics. The post-infectious pathogenicity of Y. pseudotuberculosis serotype lb is lower than that documented for other serotypes. Antibiotic use did not significantly alter the reported clinical course of illness.

Immunoblot patterns of Giardia duodenalis isolates from different hosts and geographical locations

Eighteen isolates of Giardia duodenalis from animal and human sources were studied for protein differences by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and for antigenic differences by immunoblot analysis. The polyacrylamide gels showed that whilst the isolates were for the most part homogeneous in their protein banding patterns, some isolates did show some differences. The immunoblot analysis yielded many bands, including prominent bands of 32 and 66 kilodaltons. Five of the six isolates that showed differences in protein banding pattern also showed differences in antigenic reactivity. Our findings suggest that differences can be seen with the use of immunoblotting and that this technique is a tool that may be useful for isolate differentiation when used in conjunction with other techniques.