Portable and wearable electromyographic devices for the assessment of sleep bruxism and awake bruxism: A literature review

OBJECTIVE

The current state of portable/wearable electromyographic (EMG) devices for assessment of bruxism was reviewed.

METHODS

A search of full-text articles relevant to portable/wearable EMG devices capable of being used at home was performed. The data source used was MEDLINE via PubMed from January 1970 to July 2019.

RESULTS

There were nine kinds of wearable EMG devices capable of being used under unrestrained conditions. Ultra-miniaturized wearable EMG devices with a level of performance equivalent to that of conventional stationary EMG devices have been developed and are being used during sleep and in the daytime. The devices have a high level of diagnostic accuracy for sleep bruxism. A definite cut-off value for awake bruxism has not been established.

DISCUSSION

Assessment of sleep bruxism with a high level of accuracy can be performed using a portable/wearable EMG device. However, a definite cut-off value is required for assessment of awake bruxism.

Quantitative analyses of jaw-opening muscle activity during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles in sleep bruxism

Rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA), which is defined as three or more consecutive phasic bursts, accounts for a large part of sleep bruxism (SB). RMMA is thought to be characterized by co-contraction, a jaw muscle activity in which jaw-opening muscles contract during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles, which is different from that during mastication. However, there has been limited information about co-contraction. The aim of the present study was to clarify the amplitudes and patterns of jaw-opening muscle activity during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles in RMMA. Data from 14 healthy volunteers with bruxism, which was diagnosed by using polysomnographic recording with audio-video, were analysed. RMMA with electromyographic amplitudes of more than two times the baseline amplitude was selected. From the selected RMMA, burst groups consisting of five or more consecutive phasic bursts, including tonic bursts, were selected for analyses. Electromyographic activities during gum chewing were also recorded before sleeping. The minimum, maximum and average value of the amplitudes of jaw-opening muscle activity during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles were calculated. Jaw-opening muscle activity during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles in RMMA was closer to the baseline than that in gum chewing. The minimum, maximum and average values of amplitudes of jaw-opening muscle activity during the phase were significantly smaller than those of gum chewing. Contrary to our hypothesis prior to the study, the obtained results suggested that the pattern of electromyogram activity of jaw-opening and jaw-closing muscles in RMMA was not necessarily co-contraction.

Diagnostic validity of self-reported measures of sleep bruxism using an ambulatory single-channel EMG device

PURPOSE

Self-reported measures have been widely used to indicate the presence of possible and probable sleep bruxism (SB) in both research and clinical situations. However, few studies have attempted to assess the diagnostic validity of this approach. The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic validity of self-reported measures of SB using an ambulatory single-channel electromyographic (EMG) device.

METHODS

A total of 115 participants were enrolled and examined by standardized Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) including two questions related to SB: self-reported SB and morning-jaw symptoms. An ambulatory single-channel EMG device (GrindCare3™, Medotech A/S) was used for measuring jaw-muscle EMG activity during sleep for seven consecutive nights. Cut-off values for different measures of EMG activity (average, maximum and minimum) and the coefficient of variation (CV) were selected to divide participants into two groups, with higher or lower EMG activity or CV values. The sensitivity and specificity for each question and combination of them were calculated.

RESULTS

Self-reported SB had the highest sensitivity (compared with morning-jaw symptoms) for all measures of EMG activity and CV, although the values were low to modest (average: 76.0%, maximum: 76.9%, minimum: 77.3%, CV: 61.0%). The specificity was low for both the questions related to the different measures of EMG activity and CV (35.1-52.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that the diagnostic validity of self-reported measures of SB was low to modest using an ambulatory EMG device assessment as a reference. Using only self-reported measures for the assessment of SB may not have a high validity, which should be taken into consideration in the clinical evaluation of patients.

Craniofacial Pain and Jaw-muscle Activity during Sleep

This study compared the jaw-muscle electromyographic (EMG) activity during sleep in patients with craniofacial pain (n = 63) or no painful conditions (n = 52) and between patients with tension-type headache (TTH: n = 30) and healthy control individuals (n = 30). All participants used a portable single-channel EMG device (Medotech A/S) for four nights. There was no significant difference in EMG activity between craniofacial pain (24.5 ± 17.9 events/hr) and no painful conditions (19.7 ± 14.5), or between TTH (20.8 ± 15.0) and healthy control individuals (15.2 ± 11.6, p >.050). There were positive correlations between EMG activity and number of painful muscles (r = 0.188; p = 0.044), characteristic pain intensity (r = 0.187; p = 0.046), McGill Pain Questionnaire (r = 0.251; p = 0.008), and depression scores (r = 0.291; p = 0.002). Patients with painful conditions had significantly higher night-to-night variability compared with pain-free individuals (p < 0.050). This short-term observational study suggests that there are no major differences between patients with different craniofacial pain conditions and pain-free individuals in terms of jaw-muscle EMG activity recorded with a single-channel EMG device during sleep. However, some associations may exist between the level of EMG activity and various parameters of craniofacial pain. Longitudinal studies are warranted to further explore the relationship between sleep bruxism and craniofacial pain.

Site-to-site variation of muscle activity and sensitivity in the human anterior temporalis muscle: implications for contingent stimulation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate variation of electromyographic (EMG) activity and sensitivity between different sites of anterior temporalis (AT) muscle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen healthy subjects (eight men: 28.8 ± 5.2 year old and eight women: 29.1 ± 3.9) participated in one experimental session. EMG activity during masticatory muscle contraction was recorded from nine sites at the AT muscle in a 3 × 3 grid with 1 cm between. The subjects maintained steady 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) using visual feedback. The surface EMG electrode was moved sequentially between these nine test sites and the contractions were repeated. One site was tested four times to assess test-re-test variability. The sensory threshold to electrical stimulation and impedance was also measured at the same sites as the placement of EMG electrodes.

RESULTS

The 30% MVC force values did not differ between sites (p = 0.863) or within the same site (p = 0.995) due to the feedback. The EMG activity during 30% MVC was highest at the anterior-superior site (p < 0.05) with a marginal difference within the same site (p = 0.044). Impedance was higher at the posterior-superior, posterior-middle and posterior-inferior sites (p < 0.05). The sensory threshold was highest at the posterior-superior site (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings showed that electrodes close to the hairline have higher impedance and sensory thresholds and should be avoided. The anterior-superior site produces the highest EMG activity and lower sensory thresholds and can be recommended as the optimal site to place the electrode for contingent stimulation.