Christina Lee WC, Tublin ME, Chapman BE. Registration of MR and CT images of the liver: comparison of voxel similarity and surface based registration algorithms.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2005;
78:101-114. [PMID:
15848266 DOI:
10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.12.006]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2004] [Revised: 12/10/2004] [Accepted: 12/30/2004] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of retrospective registration of MR and CT images of the liver. The open-source ITK Insight Software package developed by the National Library of Medicine (USA) contains a multi-resolution, voxel-similarity-based registration algorithm which we selected as our baseline registration method. For comparison we implemented a multi-scale surface fitting technique based on the head-and-hat algorithm. Registration accuracy was assessed using the mean displacement of automatically selected point landmarks. The ITK voxel-similarity-based registration algorithm performed better than the surface-based approach with mean misregistration in the range of 7.7-8.4 mm for CT-CT registration, 8.2 mm for MR-MR registration, and 14.0-18.9 mm for MR-CT registration compared to mean misregistration from the surface-based technique in the range of 9.6-11.1 mm for CT-CT registration, 9.2-12.4 mm for MR-MR registration, and 15.2-19.0 mm for MR-CT registration.
Collapse