Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for Large Brain Metastases: Dosimetric and Clinical Predictors of Local Progression and Radionecrosis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides high rates of local control for small brain metastases with low rates of radionecrosis (RN). Larger targets are associated with increased risk of both local progression (LP) and RN. In this analysis, we hypothesized that dosimetric and clinical parameters predict for risk of LP and RN in SRS targets larger than two centimeters.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with one or more targets with either an intact versus post-operative cavity larger than 2.0 cm treated with LINAC-based SRS between 2017 and 2022 at one institution. We assessed for association between patient, treatment, and disease variables with LP and RN. Variables assessed included tumor resection status, PDL1 positivity, target volume, maximum and minimum target dose, EQD2 and BED (a/b = 2 for necrosis and a/b = 10 for tumor control), as well as receipt of steroids, bevacizumab, or systemic therapy before or after SRS. Radionecrosis was determined by characteristic radiographic changes. Analyses were performed for the entire cohort and within subsets including by resection status and dose fractionation.

RESULTS

A total of 178 lesions in 143 patients were included. Targets with volume diameters measuring at least 2 cm were used. Median follow-up was 2.3 years. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 56% and 32%, respectively. Most lesions (n = 119) were resected and treated with SRS post-operatively. The most common dose and fractionation schemes used were 30 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 89) and 27 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 63). For the entire cohort, the cumulative incidence of LP 1 and 2 years was 26% and 34%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of radiographic radionecrosis at 1 and 2 years was 12% and 17%, respectively. There was no difference in LP or RN between 27 Gy in 3 fractions versus 30 Gy in 5 fractions (p>0.5 for both). Median planning target volume (PTV) size was 18.5 cc for the 27 Gy in 3 fraction group compared to 21.9 cc in the 30 Gy in 5 fraction group. Minimum or maximum dose within the target was not associated with increased risk of LP or RN. Among patients receiving 27 Gy in 3 fractions, patients treated with resection followed by SRS had lower risk of LP compared to those treated with SRS alone (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.64, p = 0.011). Among patients receiving 30 Gy in 5 fractions, patients who received corticosteroids prior to SRS had a lower risk of RN (HR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.66, p = 0.013). For the entire cohort as well as within all subgroups, PD-L1≥1% was associated with increased risk of RN (p<0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Selecting the optimal SRS dose fractionation and planning parameters to minimize both LP and RN remains a challenge for large targets. In this analysis, 27 Gy in 3 fractions appeared to provide equivalent LP and RN compared to 30 Gy in 5 fractions, and may be more convenient for patients. Patients with PD-L1≥1% with large brain targets treated with SRS may be at increased risk of RN; corticosteroid prophylaxis may be considered in this population.

Memantine for Pediatric Patients Receiving Cranial Irradiation: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

While memantine has become standard in certain adults receiving brain RT to decrease the cognitive impacts of RT, it is unknown whether pediatric patients can take and tolerate memantine or experience benefit. In this prospective single-arm feasibility study, we hypothesized pediatric patients receiving brain RT would tolerate memantine with good treatment adherence.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients aged 4-18 years with a primary CNS malignancy (excluding WHO Grade IV astrocytoma and glioblastoma) receiving intracranial RT were eligible. A 6-month course of memantine was given during and after RT. Dosing began once daily at 5 mg with up-titration in 5 mg increments over 4 weeks to a weight-based maximum (0.4 mg/kg to the closest 5 mg), not to exceed 10 mg BID. To reduce patient and clinical research associate (CRA) burden, medication adherence was tracked via the Medisafe Pill and Reminder application which study staff helped install on the patient or parent's smart phone. A paper pill diary was provided for those unable to use the app. The primary endpoint was to achieve 80% adherence rate to memantine in 80% of patients measured 1-month post-RT.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (14 male and 4 female, median age 11.5 years (range: 4-18)) were enrolled from 2020-2022. The study closed early after enrolling 18 of 20 planned patients to avoid competing with the phase III randomized Children's Oncology Group (COG) study AACL2031. One patient withdrew for cognition-altering substance-use, leaving 17 patients with data available for analysis. Histologies included germ cell tumor (n = 6), craniopharyngioma (n = 3), choroid plexus papilloma (n = 2), ependymoma (n = 2), glial/astrocytoma (n = 2), medulloblastoma (n = 1), and meningioma (n = 1). Thirteen had surgery, and 9 received chemotherapy. Eight received craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Median RT dose was 54 Gy (range 36-59.4) in 30 fractions (range: 20-33). At data freeze, all 17 had passed the 1-month post-RT time point. One patient discontinued memantine after a single dose due to nausea. Pill-reports were available for 14 of the remaining 16; two patients did not complete digital pill logs. For those with complete logs, all adherence rates were above 80%, with a median of 99.32% pill completion rate (range: 92.67-100). Seven (50%) took 100% of prescribed doses. Irrespective of adherence for the 2 unavailable for evaluation, the primary endpoint was still achieved. Grade 1 toxicities included headache (n = 6, 35%) and constipation (n = 1, 6%); there were no grade 2+ toxicities. At last follow-up, 15/16 have completed the full 6-month memantine course. Secondary endpoints including neurocognitive evaluations have not yet been met and will be the subject of future reports.

CONCLUSION

Memantine is a feasible and well-tolerated addition to multi-modality treatment for pediatric brain tumors. Secondary endpoints of this study and results of the ongoing COG study are awaited to define the value of memantine in this population.

Consolidative Radiotherapy for Residual PET-Avid Disease on Day +30 Post CAR T-Cell Therapy in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Up to30% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients achieve a partial response (PR) to anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy (CART) on day +30. Most PR patients relapse and only 30% achieve spontaneous complete response (CR) without additional therapies. This study is the first to report on the role of consolidative radiotherapy (cRT) for PR PET-avid disease on day +30 post-CART in NHL.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Aretrospective review across 3 institutions from 2018 to 2022 identified 60 patients with B-cell NHL who received CART and achieved PR (Deauville 4-5) with <5 PET-avid disease sites on day +30. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined from CART infusion to any disease progression. Overall survival (OS) was defined from CART infusion to death. Local relapse-free survival (LRFS), calculated based on the total number of PR sites, was defined from CART infusion to local relapse (LR) in the PR site identified on day +30. cRT was defined as comprehensive (compRT) - treated all PR PET-avid sites - or focal (focRT).

RESULTS

Followingday +30 PET scan, 45 PR patients were observed and 15 received cRT. Only one patient received consolidative systemic therapy and belonged to the cRT group. Prior to CART, bridging RT was given to 13 patients (9 in observation group and 4 in cRT group). There were no significant differences in the pre-CART and day +30 baseline characteristics, including the median size and SUVmax of the PR sites, between the two groups. However, the median number of PR sites on day +30 was higher in the cRT group (2 [range 1-3] vs 1 [range 1-3], p = 0.003). The median equivalent 2 Gy dose was 39.1 (Interquartile range 36.8-41) Gy, and the most common cRT regimen was 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions. The median follow-up was 21 months. Among the observed patients, 15 (33%) achieved spontaneous CR, and 27 (60%) experienced disease progression with all relapses involving the initial PR sites. Among patients who received cRT, 10 (67%) achieved CR, and 3 (20%) had disease progression with no relapses in the radiated PR sites. None of the 10 cRT patients achieving CR relapsed or required subsequent therapies. The 2-year PFS was 80% and 37% (p = 0.012) and the 2-year OS was 78% and 43% (p = 0.12) in the cRT and observation groups, respectively. Patients consolidated with compRT (n = 12) had superior 2-year PFS (92% vs 37%, p = 0.003) and 2-year OS (86% vs 43%, p = 0.048) compared to observed or focRT patients (n = 48). There were no grade 3+ RT-related toxicities. A total of 90 PR sites were identified; 64 were observed and 26 received cRT. Fourteen (22%) observed PR sites achieved spontaneous sustained CR and 42 (66%) experienced LR. Twenty-four (92%) PR sites consolidated with cRT achieved sustained CR and none experienced LR. The 2-year LRFS was 100% in the cRT sites and 31% in the observed sites (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

NHL patients who achieve PR by PET to CART are at high risk of local progression. cRT for residual PET-avid disease on day +30 post-CART appears to alter the pattern of relapse and improve LRFS and PFS.

Predictors of Local Control with Palliative Radiotherapy for Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is employed for patients with multiple myeloma to improve or prevent symptoms. However, the optimal dose fractionation is not well defined. The role of cytogenetics in informing RT warrants further study. We performed an institutional analysis of patients with multiple myeloma receiving palliative RT and assessed factors associated with local progression, with a focus on dose fractionation and cytogenetic abnormalities.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We queried a prospectively maintained, departmental database for consecutive patients who received palliative RT for multiple myeloma at our institution from 2015 to 2020. Double- and triple-hit were defined as the presence of two and three high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. RT dose fractionation data were extracted from the database. Follow-up imaging was used to evaluate for progression.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients with 362 treated lesions were included. Twenty-five patients (10.4%) with 39 lesions had double-hit cytogenetics, and 4 patients (1.7%) with 7 lesions were triple-hit. Patients had the following number of lesions treated with RT: 1 (156, 65.3%), 2 (53, 22.2%), 3 (17, 7.1%), or >3 (13, 5.4%). The most commonly targeted sites were spine (125, 34.5%), abdomen/pelvis (67, 18.5%), and lower extremity (53, 14.6%). Most lesions received doses of 20 Gy/5 fx (132, 36.5%), 8 Gy/1 fx (93, 25.7%), or 30 Gy/10 fx (48, 13.3%). RT equivalent dose in 2 Gray fractions (EQD2) was <2000 cGy for 126 lesions (34.8%) and ≥2000 cGy for 236 lesions (65.2%). At a median follow-up of 4.3 years, the risk of local progression on a per lesion basis at 1 and 4 years was 7.8% (95% CI: 5.5-11.1) and 13.4% (10.3-17.5), respectively. No cytogenetic abnormalities were correlated with local progression. Factors significant on univariate analysis included female sex [hazard ratio (HR): 1.94 (1.02-3.71), p = .045], LDH at diagnosis [HR per 10 units/liter: 1.04 (1.09-1.08), p = .016], and number of treated lesions [HR per lesion: 1.38 (1.02-1.89), p = .039]. These three covariates were included on multivariable analysis, and the only covariate to approach significance was number of treated lesions [HR for >3 versus 1: 2.43 (0.88-6.74), p = .059]. In the overall cohort, EQD2 did not impact risk of progression. Among those with >3 treated lesions, EQD2 ≥2000 cGy was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression [HR: 0.05 (0.01-0.23), p<.001]. Double- and triple-hit status were not correlated with progression. Median overall survival in all patients was 4.1 years versus 1.5 and 0.6 years in those with double- and triple-hit disease, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this large, institutional study of patients with multiple myeloma, palliative RT achieves durable long-term local control. Patients with high disease burden may be at increased risk of progression at treated sites. This group may benefit from an EQD ≥2000 cGy. Cytogenetics, including double- and triple-hit status, do not appear to influence RT response.

Electrocardiogram with Artificial Intelligence Assessment as a Predictor of Cardiac Events and Overall Survival in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (RT) has demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit in esophageal cancer and constitutes part of the standard of care trimodality therapy. Unfortunately, subsequent cardiac toxicity can reduce the benefit of treatment. Our group aimed to study whether data from electrocardiograms (ECGs) could predict clinical outcomes and cardiac events after RT for esophageal cancer, allowing for identification of and early intervention for patients at high risk for cardiac toxicity.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Included patients received at least 41.4 Gy of pre-operative or definitive photon or proton RT for esophageal cancer from 2015 through July 2022. All ECGs were assessed using a previously validated artificial intelligence assessment for atrial fibrillation (AF) and reduced ejection fraction (rEF) (Noseworthy et al. Lancet 2022). The model determined propensities for the development of multiple cardiac events, including AF and heart failure (HF). Medical records were reviewed for cardiac events and conditions prior to and after RT.

RESULTS

A cohort of 491 patients was assembled, with 301, 121, and 364 patients having an ECG prior to, during, and after RT, respectively. Of these, 84% had malignancy in the lower third of the esophagus and 48% underwent esophagectomy. At last follow-up relative to baseline assessment, patients had increased propensity for rEF (median 0.013, interquartile range (IQR): 0.001-0.038 vs. median 0.022, IQR: 0.011-0.074, p < 0.0001) and AF (median 0.16, IQR: 0.04-0.40 vs. median 0.048, IQR: 0.01-0.19, p < 0.0001). Increases in AF propensity were associated with reduced OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.10 per 0.1 increase, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.17, p = 0.0071). Baseline rEF propensity was predictive of future HF events (HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07-1.22, p < 0.001) for all patients or after excluding the 172 (35%) patients with baseline HF (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.19-1.76, p < 0.001). Among patients who did not have HF prior to radiotherapy, the development of HF was associated with reduced OS (HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.10-2.32, p = 0.014). Currently available cardiac dosimetric parameters, including heart mean/max doses, did not significantly correlate with cardiac outcomes. Patients who underwent esophagectomy had improved OS (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47-0.82, p = 0.0008) and were not more likely to develop cardiac toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can have significant impacts on a patient's propensity for cardiac events, which are associated with reduced OS. ECGs carry the potential to identify patients at greater risk for such events, and baseline ECGs with artificial intelligence assessment could select patients for increased surveillance or early intervention to further optimize the therapeutic ratio of RT.

The Role of Radiation Therapy in the Management of Gray Zone Lymphoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Gray zone lymphoma (GZL) is a relatively rare disease predominantly affecting young adults with purportedly poor outcomes with current treatment approaches. The role of radiation therapy (RT) in the management of GZL is not well established. This is the largest study to report on the outcomes of GZL patients treated with and without RT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective review of 30 patients with GZL treated across 3 institutions from 2009 to 2021 was performed. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined from initiation of frontline chemotherapy (CHT) to disease progression/relapse, initiation of salvage therapy, or death. Local control (LC) was defined from RT start date to in-field recurrence.

RESULTS

The median age was 32 (range: 18-86) years, and 16 (53%) patients had early stage (I-II) disease. Bulky mediastinal disease was present in 63% of patients, and the median tumor diameter was 10 (range: 1.5-18) cm. Patients received ABVD (20%), RCHOP (33%), or REPOCH (47%) as frontline CHT. Among 25 patients with interim PET/CT scan, there were 6 rapid early responders and 14 slow early responders (SER), with 2-year EFS of 33% and 24%, respectively (p = 0.13). After the completion of CHT, 15 (50%) patients achieved complete response (CR) and 10 (33%) achieved partial response (PR), with 2-year EFS of 46% and 10%, respectively (p = 0.004). RT was given to 9 patients in CR (n = 3) or in PR (n = 6). The median RT dose was 36 (30.6-48.6) Gy, at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction. Those receiving RT had bulkier disease at diagnosis (p = 0.049) and lower rates of CR following CHT (p = 0.03). After RT, 3/6 (50%) PR patients converted to CR. At a median follow-up of 4 years, the 2-year EFS was 26% for all patients, 33% for RT and 23% for noRT (p = 0.44). Among patients who did not receive upfront RT and experienced progression (n = 17), 16 (94%) relapsed in pre-existing sites. The 5-year OS was 80% for all patients, 88% for RT and 78% for no RT (p = 0.63). Patients who achieved PR to CHT and received RT had better 2-year EFS (17% vs 0%, p = 0.007) compared to patients who did not receive RT. Similarly, patients with SER who received RT had superior 2-year EFS (33% vs 13%, p = 0.038). Patients with bulky mediastinal disease had a 2-year EFS of 43% with RT and 11% without RT (p = 0.08). After 1st line treatment, 22 (73%) patients relapsed and 18 were successfully salvaged with a sustained CR. The most common salvage regimen involved high dose CHT followed by hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (n = 15). RT was given for 7 patients in the relapsed/refractory setting (consolidative peri-HCT n = 4; definitive salvage n = 3) and 5 (71%) achieved a sustained CR. Among the 16 patients who received RT in the upfront (n = 9) or salvage (n = 7) setting, 3 patients experienced in-field recurrence translating to 2-year LC of 79%.

CONCLUSION

GZL patients have high risk of relapse and maximal upfront combined modality therapy should be considered. RT provides good local control and improves EFS particularly for SER, PR, and bulky mediastinal disease.

Change in Blood Counts after Palliative Radiotherapy for Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Radiation therapy (RT) can provide effective palliation and prevent symptomatic local progression of multiple myeloma (MM). However, RT is sometimes avoided due to concerns for secondary impact to bone marrow, potentially decreasing blood cell counts and precluding ability to receive future systemic therapies. We reviewed a series of MM patients who received palliative RT to assess changes in blood counts from pre-RT to post-RT, hypothesizing that blood counts would not significantly decline after treatment with modern RT volumes and techniques.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We utilized a prospectively maintained departmental database and included patients who received palliative RT for MM from 2015 to 2020. Lab values immediately pre-RT (within one month of RT start date) and post-RT (within three months of RT completion) including hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelets were collected. Statistical differences from pre-RT to post-RT were assessed using t-tests. ANOVA was used to compare change in blood counts between common dose fractionation regimens (30 Gy in 10 Fractions, 20 Gy in 5, and 8 Gy in 1).

RESULTS

A total of 334 MM patients receiving 424 courses of RT were included in this analysis. The median age at start of first treatment was 67 (IQR: 60-76) years. One-hundred ninety-five (58%) were male. Median RT dose was 20 (IQR: 8-24.5) Gy delivered over a median 5 (IQR: 1-5) fractions. Between pre-RT and post-RT, there was no significant change in hemoglobin (+0.1 g/dL (IQR: -0.8, +0.5), p = .076), lymphocyte counts (-0.3*10^9 cells/L (IQR: -0.6, 0), p = .435), or neutrophil counts (-0.1*10^9 cells/L (IQR: -1.1, +0.9), p = .310). In contrast, platelet counts significantly decreased from pre-RT (median 165*10^9 cells/L, IQR: 112-210) to post-RT (median 146, IQR: 93-194) by a median of 17.5 *10^9 cells/L (IQR: -52.5, +14.0, p<0.0001). There were no differences in changes in hemoglobin, neutrophils, or platelets between the common dose fractionations. However, there was a significantly greater drop in lymphocytes after 30 Gy in 10 fractions (p = .039, mean lymphocyte count change (in 10^9 cells/L) for 30 Gy in 10: -0.87, 20 Gy in 5: -0.47, and 8 Gy in 1: -0.27).

CONCLUSION

In this large dataset of patients receiving modern palliative RT for MM, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, and neutrophils did not significantly decline from pre-RT to post-RT. In contrast, there was a statistically significant drop in platelet count by a median 17.5*10^9 cells/L from pre-RT to post-RT, which may or may not be clinically significant depending on clinical context. Patients receiving 30 Gy in 10 fractions had greater drops in lymphocytes than those receiving lower doses. Further analyses will be performed to determine clinical, dosimetric, and volumetric predictors of decline in blood counts after radiation.

Local Control after Low-Dose Radiation for Two Rare Forms of Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) are two rare subsets of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). National guidelines recommend 24-30 Gy for localized SLL. However, based on data for follicular and marginal zone lymphoma, lower dose RT (4 Gy) has been increasingly utilized. We reviewed our experience with SLL and LPL and hypothesized that low dose RT would provide excellent local control.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients at three tertiary cancer centers who had been treated with RT for SLL or LPL. Response to RT was classified using the World Health Organization response criteria and by examining available PET and CT imaging. Radiographic response was assessed at first imaging follow-up and clinical response was recorded if no imaging was performed. Time to best response was noted, and Kaplan Meier estimates and cumulative incidence tests were performed to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and local progression (LP), respectively.

RESULTS

From 2014-2022, 16 patients with 18 sites of SLL (n = 13) or LPL (n = 5) were treated with RT and available to review. Five sites of SLL represented diffuse large B-cell lymphoma transformation and were excluded from analysis. In total, eight sites of SLL (seven patients) and five sites of LPL (five patients) were treated with doses ranging from 4 to 30 Gy in 2 to 12 fractions (median 20 Gy). Four sites of disease received 4 Gy in 2 fractions, one of which (SLL) progressed approximately four months after RT. This site was successfully salvaged with 24 Gy in 12 fractions. There were no other LP. Toxicity overall was low: one patient experienced grade 2 mucositis after 25 Gy in 10 fractions to the maxillary sinus and palate and the remainder of patients experienced grade 1 or no toxicity. Of 10 symptomatic sites, seven (5/7 SLL and 2/3 LPL) attained at least partial relief after RT. A complete response (CR) was achieved in 14% of SLL disease sites and 60% of LPL sites. Partial response was achieved in 57% of SLL and 40% of LPL sites, and 29% of SLL sites were deemed to be stable. One patient with SLL died after their first RT treatment, but this was unrelated to RT. The median time to best response was 284 days (IQR 189-292 days) for SLL and 131 days (IQR 106-166 days) for LPL. 4 Gy in 2 fractions did not result in any CR, yet one patient from the LPL group exhibited a striking CR after 8 Gy in 2 fractions. PFS at one year was 51% for SLL and 100% for LPL - cumulative incidence of LP at two years was 15% and 0% respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients with two types of indolent NHL, one patient progressed locally after 4 Gy, while none progressed after higher doses. LPL sites achieved more complete responses than SLL sites, and RT was tolerated extremely well. These results indicate that similar to other indolent lymphomas, clinical judgment should be used when deciding between 4 Gy or higher doses of RT. For SLL in particular, higher doses of RT are more likely to provide durable local control and CR.

Spot Scanning Proton Therapy for Pregnant Patients with Brain and Head and Neck Tumors

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

When radiotherapy is medically necessary, x-ray based treatments (XRT) have traditionally been used to treat pregnant patients. Treatment planning and delivery techniques may be modified to minimize dose to the fetus but results in less optimal plans due to avoiding posterior beams or arcs. Monte Carlo calculations and published case studies suggest spot scanning proton therapy (PRT) reduces the equivalent dose to the fetus by a factor of 10 compared to XRT and does not require modified treatment planning techniques. However, due to concern for dose uncertainties and neutron scatter with PRT, few centers have adopted PRT over XRT for pregnant patients. The purpose of this work is to perform a retrospective study on the pregnant patients previously treated at our institution with XRT to measure the equivalent dose that would be delivered to the fetus with spot scanning PRT compared to XRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

PRT plans were made for seven pregnant patients, 4 brain tumors and 3 head and neck tumors, who had received XRT. Due to the finite range of protons, the fetal exposure is dominated by neutrons and not the primary beam. Thus, no beam arrangement modifications were required to minimize fetal dose for PRT plans. Fetal dose measurements were performed with the patient plans using a Rando phantom and Wendi-2 (Thermo Scientific) meter placed at the phantom's abdomen. The Wendi-2 measures ambient dose equivalent, which accounts for the biological effect of the neutron energies. Measurements were made at various distances from isocenter to the center of the detector. The total dose equivalent from PRT at several out of field distances was compared to that from XRT. Patient specific measurements were used to determine the total fetal dose from each modality, accounting for the changing position of the fetus each week of the mother's treatment. The imaging dose for standard of practice imaging, including verification CT scans and daily alignment imaging, was also evaluated using a similar setup with a Fluke 451 dose meter.

RESULTS

The average measured fetal equivalent dose for the brain plans was 0.4 mSv for PRT and 7 mSv for XRT. For the head and neck plans, it was 6 mSv for PRT and 90 mSv for XRT. The dose from PRT was consistently at least a factor of 10 less than the XRT plans. In addition, the PRT plans were preferred by the physicians when considering tumor coverage and other normal tissue sparing. Daily imaging added between 0.05 and 1.5 mSv to the total dose in the PRT treatments.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study showed that when treating brain or head and neck tumors in pregnant patients, the equivalent dose a fetus would receive with PRT is approximately a factor of 10 less than XRT without making any compromises in treatment planning. These results support changing the standard of practice to utilizing spot scanning PRT as the preferred method for treating pregnant patients with brain or head and neck tumors when available instead of XRT. We have brought this process to clinic at our center.

Integration of Telemedicine Consultations into a Tertiary Radiation Oncology Department: Predictors of Treatment Yield and Changes in Patient Population Compared to the Pre-Pandemic Era

Purpose/Objective(s)

The COVID-19 pandemic has proven telemedicine to be an efficient and safe method of healthcare delivery with the potential to increase accessibility for underrepresented groups. Given the anticipated permanence of telemedicine in radiation oncology practice, we aimed to understand the demographic and treatment characteristics of patients presenting for consultation via telemedicine, the predictors of patients opting to receive radiation therapy (RT) at our center, and the differences in patient and treatment characteristics compared to 2019, when consultations were exclusively in person.

Materials/Methods

We included all patients who had telemedicine consultations from March 2020 to February 2021. Treatment yield was calculated by dividing the number of patients who ultimately received RT by the total number of consults. New consultations seen in 2019 were reviewed and compared to the telemedicine cohort. Chi-square tests were used to identify differences.

Results

From 2020 to 2021, a total of 1,069 patients had telemedicine consultations (86% video, 14% phone). Most (64%) were male. Median age was 63 years. The most common disease sites included genitourinary (GU) (41%), breast (14%), and CNS (9%). Six-hundred forty-five (60%) had private insurance, while 424 (40%) had Medicare/Medicaid. Patients lived a median of 241 miles (IQR 96-481 miles) from the radiation oncology center. Forty-four percent of telemedicine patients ultimately received RT. These patients underwent photon RT (54%), proton RT (35%), brachytherapy (7%), stereotactic radiosurgery (3%), or intraoperative RT (1%). No differences were noted in age, sex, race/ethnicity, or insurance type between patients who did and did not receive RT. Patients who received RT lived closer to the center (median 287 vs. 189 miles, p<0.001). For patients within 100 miles of our center, 58% received RT, compared to only 32% of those who lived at least 500 miles away. Patients with gynecologic (76%) and hematologic (72%) malignancies were most likely to receive RT. Compared to 2019 when all 6,116 patients were seen in person, treatment yield was lower with telemedicine (67% vs. 44%, p<0.001). Telemedicine patients were more likely to be male (56% vs. 64%, P<0.001), white (93% vs. 95.0%, p=0.024), have private insurance (55% vs. 60%, p=0.0053), have a GU malignancy (24% vs. 41%, p<0.001), and live further from the center (median 241 vs. 139 miles, p<0.001).

Conclusion

Patients seen in telemedicine consultations lived further away and were less likely to receive RT at our tertiary care radiation oncology center. Telemedicine visits did not appear to improve healthcare access for underrepresented groups. Further analysis is warranted to identify gaps and opportunities in remote care.

Estrogen/progesterone receptor and HER2 discordance between primary tumor and brain metastases in breast cancer and its effect on treatment and survival

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer treatment is based on estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). At the time of metastasis, receptor status can be discordant from that at initial diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of discordance and its effect on survival and subsequent treatment in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM).

METHODS

A retrospective database of 316 patients who underwent craniotomy for BCBM between 2006 and 2017 was created. Discordance was considered present if the ER, PR, or HER2 status differed between the primary tumor and the BCBM.

RESULTS

The overall receptor discordance rate was 132/316 (42%), and the subtype discordance rate was 100/316 (32%). Hormone receptors (HR, either ER or PR) were gained in 40/160 (25%) patients with HR-negative primary tumors. HER2 was gained in 22/173 (13%) patients with HER2-negative primary tumors. Subsequent treatment was not adjusted for most patients who gained receptors-nonetheless, median survival (MS) improved but did not reach statistical significance (HR, 17-28 mo, P = 0.12; HER2, 15-19 mo, P = 0.39). MS for patients who lost receptors was worse (HR, 27-18 mo, P = 0.02; HER2, 30-18 mo, P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Receptor discordance between primary tumor and BCBM is common, adversely affects survival if receptors are lost, and represents a missed opportunity for use of effective treatments if receptors are gained. Receptor analysis of BCBM is indicated when clinically appropriate. Treatment should be adjusted accordingly.

KEY POINTS

1. Receptor discordance alters subtype in 32% of BCBM patients.2. The frequency of receptor gain for HR and HER2 was 25% and 13%, respectively.3. If receptors are lost, survival suffers. If receptors are gained, consider targeted treatment.

Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient

PURPOSE

Conventional wisdom has rendered patients with brain metastases ineligible for clinical trials for fear that poor survival could mask the benefit of otherwise promising treatments. Our group previously published the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). Updates with larger contemporary cohorts using molecular markers and newly identified prognostic factors have been published. The purposes of this work are to present all the updated indices in a single report to guide treatment choice, stratify research, and define an eligibility quotient to expand eligibility.

METHODS

A multi-institutional database of 6,984 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent multivariable analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival for each primary site. Significant factors were used to define the updated GPA. GPAs of 4.0 and 0.0 correlate with the best and worst prognoses, respectively.

RESULTS

Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis and new prognostic factors were identified. Those factors were incorporated into the updated GPA with robust separation (P < .01) between subgroups. Survival has improved, but varies widely by GPA for patients with non-small-cell lung, breast, melanoma, GI, and renal cancer with brain metastases from 7-47 months, 3-36 months, 5-34 months, 3-17 months, and 4-35 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Median survival varies widely and our ability to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases has improved. The updated GPA (available free at brainmetgpa.com) provides an accurate tool with which to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials. Instead of excluding patients with brain metastases, enrollment should be encouraged and those trials should be stratified by the GPA to ensure those trials make appropriate comparisons. Furthermore, we recommend the expansion of eligibility to allow for the enrollment of patients with previously treated brain metastases who have a 50% or greater probability of an additional year of survival (eligibility quotient > 0.50).

Beyond an Updated Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA): A Prognostic Index and Trends in Treatment and Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases From 1985 to Today

PURPOSE

Brain metastases are a common sequelae of breast cancer. Survival varies widely based on diagnosis-specific prognostic factors (PF). We previously published a prognostic index (Graded Prognostic Assessment [GPA]) for patients with breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM), based on cohort A (1985-2007, n = 642), then updated it, reporting the effect of tumor subtype in cohort B (1993-2010, n = 400). The purpose of this study is to update the Breast GPA with a larger contemporary cohort (C) and compare treatment and survival across the 3 cohorts.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multi-institutional (19), multinational (3), retrospective database of 2473 patients with breast cancer with newly diagnosed brain metastases (BCBM) diagnosed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2017, was created and compared with prior cohorts. Associations of PF and treatment with survival were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were compared with log-rank tests. PF were weighted and the Breast GPA was updated such that a GPA of 0 and 4.0 correlate with the worst and best prognoses, respectively.

RESULTS

Median survival (MS) for cohorts A, B, and C improved over time (from 11, to 14 to 16 months, respectively; P < .01), despite the subtype distribution becoming less favorable. PF significant for survival were tumor subtype, Karnofsky Performance Status, age, number of BCBMs, and extracranial metastases (all P < .01). MS for GPA 0 to 1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0, and 3.5-4.0 was 6, 13, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Between cohorts B and C, the proportion of human epidermal receptor 2 + subtype decreased from 31% to 18% (P < .01) and MS in this subtype increased from 18 to 25 months (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

MS has improved modestly but varies widely by diagnosis-specific PF. New PF are identified and incorporated into an updated Breast GPA (free online calculator available at brainmetgpa.com). The Breast GPA facilitates clinical decision-making and will be useful for stratification of future clinical trials. Furthermore, these data suggest human epidermal receptor 2-targeted therapies improve clinical outcomes in some patients with BCBM.

Tumor subtype and other prognostic factors in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: The updated graded prognostic assessment (Breast-GPA)

1079

Background: Brain metastases (BM) are a common and fatal complication of breast cancer but survival varies widely based on various prognostic factors (PF). Hence, patient counseling and therapeutic decisions should be individualized. We previously published a prognostic index (Breast GPA) based on cohort A (1985-2007, n = 642), updated it with tumor subtype in cohort B (1993-2010, n = 400) and are now updating it with a larger contemporary cohort (C). Methods: A multi-institutional (19) multi-national (3) retrospective database of 2473 breast cancer patients with BM diagnosed from 1/1/2006-12/31/2017 was created and compared to our prior cohorts. Demographic, clinical, molecular factors, tumor subtype and treatment were correlated with survival. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated and compared with log-rank tests. Results: The median survival (MS) for cohorts A, B and C improved over time [12, 14 and 16 mo, respectively ( < 0.01)] despite the subtype distribution becoming less favorable: Luminal B (ER/PR/HER2+) decreased from 26% to 21%; HER2 (HER2+/ER/PR-) decreased from 31% to 17%, Luminal A (ER/PR+/HER2-) increased from 20% to 31%; Basal (ER/PR/HER2-) was unchanged at 24%.MS by subtype improved from 21 to 27 mo in Luminal B, 18 to 25 mo in HER2, 10 to 14 mo in Luminal A and 6 to 9 mo in Basal tumors. The number of BM was 1 in 35%, ≤4 in 67% and > 10 in 18%. PF significant for survival were tumor subtype, age, KPS, number of BM and extracranial metastases (ECM) (all < 0.01). Surprisingly, Hispanic women (7%) showed improved survival (p < 0.01). BRCA1 was mutated in 57/533 (11%) and those patients showed a trend (0.16) toward improved survival. Treatment patterns have changed: the use of whole brain radiation therapy decreased from 71% to 67% to 47% in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. Conclusions: Despite the shift to less favorable tumor subtypes, MS has improvedbut varies widely by diagnosis-specific PF. Compared to prior cohorts, number of BM and ECM were identified as new PF. Ethnic, genetic and treatment differences between the eras are apparent. The updated Breast GPA, based on these data, and the correlation between BRCA1 and tumor subtype will be presented.

Novel electrochemical device for the detection of cholesterol or glucose

A thin-layer twin-electrode electrochemical cell in which the working and auxiliary electrodes are facing each other and which contains the appropriate enzyme and a mediator was used for the determination of cholesterol or glucose. A steady-state diffusion-controlled response was obtained for cholesterol whereas for glucose the response was limited by diffusion and kinetics. Simulation of the system showed that a steady-state response is obtained, in the absence of kinetic complications, after a time of 0.01 d2/Ds, where d is the distance between the two electrodes and D is the diffusion coefficient of the mediator. Linear plots of steady-state current versus concentration were obtained for cholesterol and glucose. The results were compared with those expected theoretically and a thin-layer capillary fill device is proposed.

The value of two-dimensional echocardiography and pulsed Doppler technique in facilitating percutaneous catheterization of the subclavian vein

We have found combined two-dimensional echocardiographic imaging and range-gated pulsed Doppler flow mapping to be very useful and accurate in identifying the location and course of the subclavian vein. It can be efficiently utilized to minimize the incidence of iatrogenic complications during percutaneous central venous catheterization. This is particularly relevant in patients who are predisposed to a high risk of complications from the procedure.