Buried Dysplasia and Early Adenocarcinoma Arising in Barrett Esophagus After Porfimer-photodynamic Therapy

The restoration of squamous epithelium after photodynamic therapy (PDT) for Barrett esophagus (BE) and its related neoplasms has been noted. It may result in the development of buried neoplasms and/or BE underneath restored squamous epithelium which maintain their potential for malignant transformation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, endoscopic, and histologic characteristics and also response to further treatment of buried neoplastic epithelium developing after PDT. Fifty-two BE patients with high-grade dysplasia (n=19), intramucosal adenocarcinoma (n=28), and invasive adenocarcinoma (n=5) were treated with porfimer PDT. Buried neoplasms completely covered by squamous epithelium were seen in 1 patient before and in 13 patients after PDT. Their prevalence was 0.6% and 7.4% of pre and post-PDT biopsy levels positive for neoplasia (P=0.001). Buried neoplasms, representing the highest grade of residual neoplasm, were noted in a series of 11 post-PDT endoscopies (7.1% of 155 post-PDT endoscopies with neoplastic diagnoses) of 8 patients. Their occurrence after PDT was neither associated with the length of BE, the diffuseness of neoplasms nor the presence of buried lesions before treatment. There was no prevalent location for these lesions in relation to the original segment of BE, although the majority of both surface and buried neoplasms were found in the prior neoplastic sites. Patients with buried neoplasms responded to further treatment similarly to those with only surface neoplasms (8 of 13 vs. 17 of 24) (P=0.33). In conclusion, buried neoplasms are not uncommon after PDT. Thorough endoscopic surveillance with extensive biopsies, especially of the sites previously positive for neoplasia is important to avoid overlooking buried neoplasms that may progress.

Endoscopic mucosal resection: an improved diagnostic procedure for early gastroesophageal epithelial neoplasms

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), which is advocated for the treatment of early (superficial) gastroesophageal neoplasms, has also been alluded to represent a superior diagnostic and staging modality. We compared the diagnostic concordance of preceding biopsies with EMR specimens in 31 gastric and 10 esophageal EMRs consisting of 6 low-grade and 12 high-grade dysplasias, 21 intramucosal adenocarcinomas, and 2 submucosal invasive adenocarcinomas. Discrepancies were considered as either major or minor if the histologic grades differed by 2 or more, or by only 1, respectively. Discrepant and concordant cases were compared with regard to the size of lesion (maximum dimension and surface area), number of biopsy fragments, and extent of biopsy sampling (ratio between lesion size and number of biopsy fragments). These same variables were used to evaluate the differences seen between gastric and esophageal cases. Of the 41 cases, 16 (39%) had discrepant diagnoses, including 14 gastric and 2 esophageal neoplasms. A major discrepancy was seen in 2% of the cases (n = 1, gastric) and a minor discrepancy, in 15 cases. All but 2 of the discrepant cases were found to have a higher grade on EMR. The average number of biopsy fragments was 4.4 in both concordant and discrepant groups. The maximal dimension, surface area, and biopsy sampling ratios of the lesion were significantly greater in the discrepant cases than in the concordant cases. The esophageal cases trended toward having smaller size and a significantly extensive biopsy sampling. We conclude that EMR is superior to biopsy for diagnosing superficial gastroesophageal tumors. Discrepancies between the specimens occur in larger lesions (>10 mm) with less extensive biopsy sampling. EMR can substantially modify the diagnostic grade of a lesion and therefore facilitate optimal therapeutic decisions by avoiding undertreatment and overtreatment based on inaccurate grading and staging.

Histopathologic aspects of photodynamic therapy for dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus

The efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) is currently evaluated for the treatment of superficial neoplasms arising in Barrett's esophagus (BE). An accurate assessment of this technique requires the evaluation of biopsies before and after treatment. However, despite the importance of pathology, only a limited number of studies have systematically assessed the mucosal changes after PDT. To evaluate mucosal changes after PDT, and pathologic variables that may impact on the success of this therapy, we analyzed the pre- and post-PDT biopsies of a cohort of patients treated by this modality. Thirty-three patients (mean age, 71 years) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and/or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) arising in BE and followed up after PDT using Porfimer sodium form the basis of this study. In all patients, a review of all pre- and post-PDT biopsies was performed. The variables recorded included the histologic grade and architecture of neoplasms, the distribution of neoplasms, and squamous re-epithelialization. IMC and HGD coexisted in the pre-PDT biopsies of 18 patients (54.5%). IMC and HGD showed a prominent tubular proliferation in 14 patients and displayed a papillary pattern (at least partially) in 19 patients. In post-PDT, patches of specialized columnar epithelium were buried under squamous epithelium in 17 patients (51.5%), and foci of dysplasia/carcinoma covered by squamous epithelium were found in 9 patients (27.3%). HGD and/or IMC were eradicated in 17 patients (eradicated group) and persisted in 16 patients (persistent group). In the persistent group, grade and architecture were unchanged after PDT in 62.5% and 87.5% of patients, respectively. The persistent group was characterized by: 1) a more frequent papillary architecture (P < 0.05), and 2) a diffuse distribution of the neoplasms on pre-PDT biopsies (P = 0.05). Singularly, the persistent neoplastic lesions were observed in the distal esophagus (P < 0.05). A systematic histopathologic evaluation allowed us to draw attention to the fact that distally located and papillary-type neoplasia seem resistant to PDT. The higher than expected incidence of buried residual neoplastic epithelium should also be emphasized since it represents a risk for undetected growth of malignancy.