AB1473 EFFICACY RESPONSES ACROSS DISEASE SEVERITY AND TREATMENT HISTORY SUBGROUPS OF PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE PLAQUE PSORIASIS TREATED WITH GUSELKUMAB: POOLED RESULTS FROM VOYAGE-1 AND VOYAGE-2 THROUGH 5 YEARS

Background

The VOYAGE-1 and VOYAGE-2 phase 3 studies evaluated efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS) in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Objectives

To assess the five-year efficacy of GUS by baseline disease characteristics and treatment history.

Methods

This study evaluated 1829 patients randomized to GUS, placebo (PBO)→GUS, and adalimumab (ADA) →GUS from the VOYAGE-1 and VOYAGE-2 trials. All patients received open-label GUS 100 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) during Week (W) 52 to W252 in VOYAGE-1 and during W76 to W252 in VOYAGE-2. The proportions of combined GUS patients (including PBO→GUS and ADA→GUS) achieving Investigator’s Global Assessment of cleared or minimal (IGA-0/1) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 response were evaluated from W100 to W252 by baseline PASI (<20/≥20) and IGA (<4/=4) scores, body surface area (BSA; <20%/≥20%), and prior psoriasis treatments. Analysis was performed using observed data after applying treatment failure rules.

Results

At W252, proportions of combined GUS patients achieving IGA 0/1 or PASI 90, respectively, were comparable or numerically greater for patients with baseline PASI < 20 (85.4%; 81.1%) vs PASI ≥ 20 (81.4%; 83.8%); IGA < 4 (85.1%; 82.7%) vs IGA = 4 (78.9%; 81.1%); BSA < 20% (85.1%; 82.7%) vs BSA ≥ 20% (82.6%; 82.0%); no prior phototherapy (83.3%; 84.0%) vs prior phototherapy (83.8%; 81.1%); no prior non-biologic systemic therapy (84.5%; 83.0%) vs prior non-biologic systemic therapy (83.2%; 82.0%); and no prior biologics (85.3%; 83.8%) vs prior biologics (76.7%; 76.3%). This trend was consistent at each timepoint evaluated from W100 to W252.

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrated that the high degree of efficacy of GUS treatment is durable through 5 years among broad subpopulations of patients with varying disease severity characteristics and previous psoriasis treatments.

References

None

Disclosure of Interests

Kenneth Gordon Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Dermira, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma, Joseph F. Merola Consultant of: AbbVie, Arena, Avotres, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, EMD Sorono, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and UCB pharma, Peter Foley Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, GSK, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Valeant, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Arcutis, Aslan, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celtaxsys, CSL, Cutanea, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, GSK, Hexima, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Reistone, Roche, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, and Valeant, Grant/research support from: grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; and travel grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma, Olivia Choi Shareholder of: may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Daphne Chan Shareholder of: may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Megan Miller Shareholder of: may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yin You Shareholder of: may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yaung-Kaung Shen Shareholder of: may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Ya-Wen Yang Shareholder of: may own stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Andrew Blauvelt Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Almirall, Arena, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Evommune, Forte, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Rapt, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Arena, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Evommune, Forte, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Rapt, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma

Five-year maintenance of clinical response and health-related quality of life improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: results from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic disease requiring long-term therapy.

OBJECTIVES

Physician- and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated through week 252 in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2.

METHODS

In total, 1829 patients were randomized at baseline to receive guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks, placebo or adalimumab. Patients receiving placebo crossed over to guselkumab at week 16. Patients receiving adalimumab crossed over to guselkumab at week 52 in VOYAGE 1, and randomized withdrawal and retreatment occurred at weeks 28-76 in VOYAGE 2; all patients then received open-label guselkumab through week 252. Efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) endpoints were analysed through week 252. Safety was monitored through week 264.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients in the guselkumab group who achieved clinical responses at week 252 in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2, respectively, were 84·1% and 82·0% [≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)]; 82·4% and 85·0% [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0 or 1]; 52·7% and 53·0% (100% improvement in PASI) and 54·7% and 55·5% (IGA 0). HRQoL endpoints were achieved as follows: 72·7% and 71·1% of patients (Dermatology Life Quality Index 0 or 1: no effect on patient's life); 42·4% and 42·0% [Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) symptom score = 0] and 33·0% and 31·0% (PSSD sign score = 0). As measured in VOYAGE 2 only, approximately 45% of patients achieved ≥ 5-point reduction in Short Form-36 physical and mental component scores, and 80% reported no anxiety or depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores < 8). Similar findings were reported for adalimumab crossovers. These effects were maintained from week 52 in VOYAGE 1 and week 100 in VOYAGE 2. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Guselkumab maintains high levels of clinical response and improvement in patient-reported outcomes through 5 years in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

AB0532 MAINTENANCE OF RESPONSE THROUGH 5 YEARS OF CONTINUOUS GUSELKUMAB TREATMENT: RESULTS FROM THE PHASE-3 VOYAGE 1 TRIAL

Background:

VOYAGE 1, a phase-3, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS; a fully human anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody) in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.1,2,3

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy and safety through 5 years of continuous GUS treatment.

Methods:

In VOYAGE 1, patients were randomized to GUS 100 mg at Weeks 0, 4, 12, then every 8 weeks (q8w); placebo at Weeks 0, 4, 12 followed by GUS 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20 then q8w; or adalimumab 80 mg at Week 0, 40 mg at Week 1, then 40 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) through Week 47. At Week 52, all patients continued open-label GUS through Week 252. Efficacy assessments included proportions of patients achieving ≥90% or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90, PASI 100), and Investigator’s Global Assessment scores of cleared/minimal or cleared (IGA 0/1, IGA 0). Three statistical methods were used to analyze efficacy: prespecified Treatment Failure Rules (TFR), Nonresponder Imputation (NRI), and As Observed (OBS). For TFR analyses, patients who discontinued study agent due to lack of efficacy, worsening of psoriasis, or use of a protocol-prohibited psoriasis treatment were considered nonresponders. For NRI analyses, patients with missing efficacy data (regardless of the reason) after application of TFR were counted as nonresponders. For OBS analyses, missing data were not imputed. Safety was assessed through Week 264.

Results:

Among a total of 494 patients randomized to GUS at Week 0 (N=329) and placebo patients who crossed over to GUS at Week 16 (N=165), 76.9% (380/494) continued study agent through Week 252. PASI 90 responses were well-maintained with up to 5 years of continuous GUS use. At Week 52, PASI 90 response rates were 79.7%, 75.5%, and 80.6% based on TFR, NRI, and OBS analyses, respectively; corresponding rates at Week 252 were 84.1%, 66.6%, and 86.6%. Likewise, PASI 100, IGA 0/1, and IGA 0 responses were maintained from Week 52 through Week 252 (Table 1). Efficacy was also maintained through Week 252 in patients randomized to GUS at Week 0 (N=329). Through the end of the study for all patients (GUS group and adalimumab→GUS crossover group; N=774), the proportion of patients reporting at least one adverse event (AE), serious AE, or discontinuation due to AEs were 87.7%, 16.4%, and 6.1%, respectively. Rates of AEs of interest through Week 264 were as follows: serious infections (2.8%), malignancies (nonmelanoma skin cancer [1.7%]; cancer other than nonmelanoma skin cancer [2.3%]), major adverse cardiovascular events (1.0%), and suicidal ideation and behavior (0.6%).

Conclusion:

High efficacy response rates were maintained (regardless of the method used to analyze data) and no new safety concerns were identified through 5 years of continuous GUS treatment in VOYAGE 1.

References:

[1]Blauvelt A et al. J Am Acad Derm 2017;76:405-417

[2]Griffiths CEM et al. J Drugs Dermatol 2018;17:826-832

[3]Griffiths CEM et al. J Dermatol Treat 2020;13:1-9

Table 1.

Proportion of Patients in the GUS Groupa Achieving Clinical Responses by Analysis Type at Week 52 and Week 252

Week 52Week 252TFR (N=468)(%)NRI (N=494)(%)OBS (N=463)(%)TFR (N=391)(%)NRI (N=494)(%)OBS (N=380)(%) PASI 90 77.9 75.5 80.6 84.1 66.686.6 PASI 100 49.7 46.6 49.7 52.741.7 54.2 IGA 0 84.6 80.2 85.582.4 65.2 84.7IGA 0 53.3 50.854.254.743.356.3

GUS, guselkumab; IGA, Investigator’s Global Assessment; NRI, nonresponder imputation method; OBS, As Observed method; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; TFR, treatment failure rules method

aIncludes patients randomized to GUS and placebo patients who crossed over to GUS at Week 16

Disclosure of Interests:

Christopher E.M. Griffiths Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sun Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sun Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sun Pharma, Kim Papp Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Baxalta, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, MedImmune, Merck-Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Stiefel, Sun Pharma, Takeda, UCB, and Valeant, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Baxalta, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, MedImmune, Merck-Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Stiefel, Sun Pharma, Takeda, UCB, and Valeant, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Baxalta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, Leo Pharma, MedImmune, Merck-Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Stiefel, Takeda, UCB, and Valeant, Michael Song Shareholder of: Johnson and Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Megan Miller Shareholder of: Johnson and Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yin You Shareholder of: Johnson and Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yaung-Kaung Shen Shareholder of: Johnson and Johnson, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Andrew Blauvelt Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Consultant of: AbbVie, Aclaris, Almirall, Arena, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly, FLX Bio, Forte, Galderma, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Ortho, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma.

Maintenance of Response Through up to 4 Years of Continuous Guselkumab Treatment of Psoriasis in the VOYAGE 2 Phase 3 Study

BACKGROUND

Guselkumab effectively treats moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

Results of continuous guselkumab treatment through 4 years from VOYAGE 2 are presented.

METHODS

At baseline, 992 patients were randomized to receive guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks, placebo, or adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks. Placebo-treated patients crossed over to guselkumab at week 16. Weeks 28-76 incorporated randomized withdrawal, and all patients received open-label guselkumab through to week 204. Efficacy was analyzed using pre-specified treatment failure rules (patients were considered nonresponders after discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, worsening of psoriasis, or use of a prohibited treatment). There was no missing data imputation after treatment failure rules. Safety was analyzed through 4 years.

RESULTS

The proportions of guselkumab-treated patients who achieved and maintained designated clinical responses at weeks 100 and 204, respectively, were as follows: at least a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index from baseline (PASI 75): 94.1% and 92.3%; PASI 90: 79.1% and 79.7%; PASI 100: 48.4% and 51.0%; Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1: 83.1% and 81.9%; IGA score of 0: 52.7% and 52.7%; Dermatology Life Quality Index score of 0/1: 70.2% and 69.1%; Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) symptom score of 0: 35.7% and 39.7%; PSSD sign score of 0: 22.0% and 27.2%; ≥ 5% improvement in Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component score: 48.8% and 45.0%; ≥ 5% improvement in SF-36 mental component score: 45.1% and 43.2%; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS)-anxiety score ≥ 8: 22.9% and 21.7%; and HADS-depression score ≥ 8: 16.6% and 21.0%. Similar findings were reported for the adalimumab → guselkumab group. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

High efficacy levels were maintained from week 100 through to week 204 with continuous guselkumab treatment, across multiple endpoints, in VOYAGE 2. Guselkumab was well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02207244.

Safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated through 100 weeks: a pooled analysis from the randomized VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies

BACKGROUND

Long-term evaluation is required to confirm the safety profile of newer biologic agents.

OBJECTIVES

To report on pooled safety data from the ongoing VOYAGE 1 (NCT02207231) and VOYAGE 2 (NCT02207244) trials through 100 weeks of follow-up.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to either guselkumab 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter; placebo at weeks 0, 4, 12 followed by guselkumab 100 mg at weeks 16 and 20 and every 8 weeks thereafter; or adalimumab 80 mg at week 0, 40 mg at week 1, and 40 mg every 2 weeks thereafter. Patients who received adalimumab crossed over to guselkumab at week 52 (VOYAGE 1) and at/after week 28 based on clinical response (VOYAGE 2). Open-label extensions, in which all patients received guselkumab, started at week 52 (VOYAGE 1) and week 76 (VOYAGE 2). Rates of adverse events (AEs) per 100 patient-years (PYs) are presented through 100 weeks of follow-up.

RESULTS

Through week 52, observed rates for guselkumab- and adalimumab-treated patients, respectively, were 262·45 per 100 PYs and 328·28 per 100 PYs for AEs, 6·20 per 100 PYs and 7·77 per 100 PYs for serious AEs (SAEs), 1·22 per 100 PYs and 1·79 per 100 PYs for serious infections (SIs), 0·28 per 100 PYs and 0·40 per 100 PYs for malignancies other than nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), 0·56 per 100 PYs and 0·40 per 100 PYs for NMSCs, and 0·47 per 100 PYs and 0·40 per 100 PYs for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Rates among patients treated with guselkumab through week 52 and week 100, respectively, were 262·45 per 100 PYs and 210·41 per 100 PYs for AEs, 6·20 and 6·29 per 100 PYs, for SAEs, 1·22 per 100 PYs and 1·06 per 100 PYs for SIs, 0·28 per 100 PYs and 0·38 per 100 PYs for malignancies, 0·56 per 100 PYs and 0·39 per 100 PYs for NMSCs, and 0·47 per 100 PYs and 0·38 per 100 PYs for MACEs. Among patients treated with adalimumab, rates of AEs, SAEs, SIs, malignancies, NMSCs, and MACEs showed some variability before and after crossover to guselkumab, although no new safety signals were noted after crossover.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile for guselkumab remains favourable through 100 weeks of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

AB0759 FOUR-YEAR EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GUSELKUMAB IN PSORIASIS PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: A POOLED ANALYSIS FROM VOYAGE 1 AND VOYAGE 2

Background:

Guselkumab (GUS), a fully human monoclonal antibody, selectively binds and blocks interleukin-23. VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 are two ongoing Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)/active comparator-controlled clinical trials of GUS in patients (pts) with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO).

Objectives:

This post-hoc analysis reports pooled results through 4 years among a subgroup of moderate-to-severe PsO pts with self-reported psoriatic arthritis (PsA) at baseline.

Methods:

1829 pts were randomized to GUS 100 mg at Weeks (Wks) 0, 4, and 12, then every 8 wks (q8wk); PBO at Wks 0, 4, and 12, GUS at Wks 16 and 20 then q8wk; or adalimumab (ADA) 80 mg at Wk 0, 40 mg at Wk 1, then 40 mg q2wk until Wk 47 (VOYAGE 1) or Wk 23 (VOYAGE 2). In VOYAGE 1, all pts received open-label GUS 100 mg q8wk during Wks 52-204. VOYAGE 2 incorporated a randomized withdrawal study design, followed by open-label GUS during Wks 76-204. Pooled subgroup analyses using the combined GUS group were conducted based on self-reported PsA status at baseline. Efficacy based on Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response was assessed using prespecified treatment failure rules (nonresponder status for all time points after discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, worsening of PsO, or use of a prohibited treatment).

Results:

For pooled VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 pts (N=1721), combined GUS and ADA to GUS response rates at Wks 100, 156, and 204 were: PASI 90 80.6%, 80.0%, and 80.4%; PASI 100 50.1%, 49.9%, and 52.2%; IGA 0/1 83.6%, 83.3%, and 81.7%; and IGA 0 54.3%, 52.9%, and 53.9, respectively. In the pooled subgroup analysis of pts with and without PsA, response rates were similar across the Wk 100, Wk 156, and Wk 204 evaluations (Table). Rates of adverse events through Wk 204 were comparable for pts with PsA vs those without PsA at baseline.

Conclusion:

Among GUS-treated pts with moderate-to-severe PsO with and without self-reported PsA at baseline, stable, durable, and high levels of skin responses, as well as comparable safety outcomes, through 4 years were observed.

Table.

Acknowledgments:

None

Disclosure of Interests:

Kristian Reich Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Jan Dutz Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Peter Foley Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Diamant Thaçi Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Ronald Vender Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Michael Song Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Megan Miller Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yin You Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Shu Li Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Yaung-Kaung Shen Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, April Armstrong Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Use of dose-exposure-response relationships in Phase 2 and Phase 3 guselkumab studies to optimize dose selection in psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Guselkumab is an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between dose-response and exposure-response of guselkumab in Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies to optimize dose selection.

METHODS

Serum guselkumab concentrations in Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies (VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2) were measured using a validated immunoassay. Efficacy assessments included Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI).

RESULTS

In Phase 2, a positive dose-response relationship was observed for PASI and PGA (5-mg through 100-mg dose regimens). Exposure-response analysis showed that patients with steady-state trough serum guselkumab concentrations ≥0.67 μg/mL achieved the highest levels of efficacy (PGA 0/1: 90.0%; PGA 0: 70.0%). The guselkumab 100-mg every 8-week (q8w) dose regimen, safe and well-tolerated in Phase 2, provided the highest serum guselkumab concentrations among all regimens studied and was selected for Phase 3. In Phase 3, 72.5% of patients achieved guselkumab concentrations ≥0.67 μg/mL at week 28, the level associated with the highest clinical responses in Phase 2, with patients achieving response rates of IGA 0/1: 91.2%, IGA 0: 55.3%, PASI 90: 83.8% and PASI 100: 49.1% at week 28.

CONCLUSION

The 100-mg guselkumab q8w dose regimen, based on the dose-exposure-response relationship from the Phase 2 study, produced the target serum concentration associated with high-level efficacy in the majority of patients in Phase 3. Phase 3 data further confirmed that guselkumab 100mg q8w is the optimum dosing regimen for treating patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Hypergravity-assisted chemical liquid deposition of nano-granular film on the inner surface of a quartz tube

Transparent tubes with functions of heating and temperature measurement are badly required in the visualization investigation of two-phase flows and flow-boiling heat transfer. In order to prepare such a tube, we introduced a cost-effective and energy-efficient procedure of hypergravity-assisted chemical liquid deposition (HACLD) to produce transparent and conductive silver (Ag) films on the inner surfaces of quartz tubes, typically 50 mm in length and 8 mm in inner diameter with a set-up that was designed and built for this purpose. Precursors of organometallic Ag precursor solutions were prepared by dissolving silver citrate and 1,2-diaminopropane in 2-methoxyethanol with required concentration for the chemical liquid deposition process. Semitransparent and conductive Ag films formed inside the required quartz tubes under specific heating process in hypergravity. One of the films was about 47 nm in thickness, 23 Ω per square sheet resistance, and 30% optical transmittance. This attempt may pave a way for the understanding of the film forming mechanism in hypergravity, and the development of a film preparation technology of HACLD.

Effects of sequential deletions of residues from the N- or C-terminus on the functions of epsilon subunit of the chloroplast ATP synthase

Ten truncated mutants of chloroplast ATP synthase epsilon subunit from spinach (Spinacia oleracea), which had sequentially lost 1-5 amino acid residues from the N-terminus and 6-10 residues from the C-terminus, were generated by PCR. These mutants were overexpressed in Escherichia coli, reconstituted with soluble and membrane-bound CF(1), and the ATPase activity and proton conductance of thylakoid membrane were examined. Deletions of as few as 3 amino acid residues from the N-terminus or 6 residues from the C-terminus of epsilon subunit significantly affected their ATPase-inhibitory activity in solution. Deletion of 5 residues from the N-terminus abolished its abilities to inhibit ATPase activity and to restore proton impermeability. Considering the consequence of interaction of epsilon and gamma subunit in the enzyme functions, the special interactions between the epsilon variants and the gamma subunit were detected in the yeast two-hybrid system and in vitro binding assay. In addition, the structures of these mutants were modeled through the SWISS-MODEL Protein Modeling Server. These results suggested that in chloroplast ATP synthase, both the N-terminus and C-terminus of the epsilon subunit show importance in regulation of the ATPase activity. Furthermore, the N-terminus of the epsilon subunit is more important for its interaction with gamma and some CF(o) subunits, and crucial for the blocking of proton leakage. Compared with the epsilon subunit from E. coli [Jounouchi, M., Takeyama, M., Noumi, T., Moriyama, Y., Maeda, M., and Futai, M. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 292, 87-94; Kuki, M., Noumi, T., Maeda, M., Amemura, A., and Futai, M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 4335-4340], the chloroplast epsilon subunit is more sensitive to N-terminal or C-terminal truncations.

Photoinactivation of photosystem II by cumulative exposure to short light pulses during the induction period of photosynthesis

Photoinactivation of Photosystem (PS) II in vivo was investigated by cumulative exposure of pea, rice and spinach leaves to light pulses of variable duration from 2 to 100 s, separated by dark intervals of 30 min. During each light pulse, photosynthetic induction occurred to an extent depending on the time of illumination, but steady-state photosynthesis had not been achieved. During photosynthetic induction, it is clearly demonstrated that reciprocity of irradiance and duration of illumination did not hold: hence the same cumulative photon exposure (mol m(-2)) does not necessarily give the same extent of photoinactivation of PS II. This contrasts with the situation of steady-state photosynthesis where the photoinactivation of PS II exhibited reciprocity of irradiance and duration of illumination (Park et al. (1995) Planta 196: 401-411). We suggest that, for reciprocity to hold between irradiance and duration of illumination, there must be a balance between photochemical (qP) and non-photochemical (NPQ) quenching at all irradiances. The index of susceptibility to light stress, which represents an intrinsic ability of PS II to balance photochemical and non-photochemical quenching, is defined by the quotient (1-qP)/NPQ. Although constant in steady-state photosynthesis under a wide range of irradiance (Park et al. (1995). Plant Cell Physiol 36: 1163-1169), this index of susceptibility for spinach leaves declined extremely rapidly during photosynthetic induction at a given irradiance, and, at a given cumulative photon exposure, was dependent on irradiance. During photosynthetic induction, only limited photoprotective strategies are developed: while the transthylakoid pH gradient conferred some degree of photoprotection, neither D1 protein turnover nor the xanthophyll cycle was operative. Thus, PS II is more easily photoinactivated during photosynthetic induction, a phenomenon that may have relevance for understorey leaves experiencing infrequent, short sunflecks.

Malate regulation of Mg(2+)-ATPase of chloroplast coupling factor 1

The regulatory effects of malate on chloroplast Mg(2+)-ATPase were investigated and the mechanism was discussed. Malate stimulated methanol-activated membrane-bound and isolated CF1 Mg(2+)-ATPase activity. The γ subunit of CF1 may be involved in malate regulation of the enzyme function. Modification of γ subunit at one site of the peptide by NEM may affect malate stimulation of ATPase while at another site may have no effect. The effect of malate on the Mg(2+)-ATPase was also controlled by the Mg(2+)/ATP ratio in the reaction medium. The enhancing effect of malate on Mg(2+)-ATPase activity depended on the presence of high concentrations of Mg(2+) in the reaction mixture. Kinetic study showed that malate raised the Vmax of catalysis without affecting the Km for Mg(2+) ATP. The experiments imply that the stimulation of Mg(2+)-ATPase by malate is probably correlated with the Pi binding site on the enzyme. The regulation of ATPase activity by malate in chloroplasts may be relevant to its function in vivo.