[Treatment outcome of 100 patients with hepatoblastoma based on a new risk stratification]

Objective: To provide the risk stratification method of hepatoblastoma (HB) suitable for implementation in China and explore the new treatment method for high-risk HB patients. Methods: A total of 100 cases of children and adolescents under 18 years old with newly diagnosed HB in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital from September 2014 to September 2018 were included. According to the clinical stage, AFP level, pathological subtype and other factors, patients were stratified into four groups: extremely low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk. The patients at very low risk were treated with surgery only and followed-up. The patients at very low risk were treated with C5V(Cisplatin+ 5-Fluroracil+ Vincristine) regimen for 4 courses. The patients at intermediate risk were treated with C5VD(Cisplatin+ 5-Fluroracil+ Vincristine+ Doxorubicin)regimen before and after surgery for 6-8 courses. The patients at high risk were treated with C5VD and IIV (ifoshamide+ irinotecan+ vincristine) alternately before and after surgery for 8 courses. Results: One hundred patients were stratified into extremely low-risk, low-risk, medium-risk and high-risk groups for 2, 10, 51 and 37 cases, respectively. Eighty three cases had evaluable lesions before chemotherapy. Among them, 65 patients achieved partial remission, stable disease and progressive disease were observed in 10, and 8 cases, respectively, with a response rate of 78.3%. During a median follow-up of 20 months, 30 patients experienced tumor relapse or progression, and 27 of them died. The 2-years progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 69.2% and 72.0%, respectively. The 2-years PFS rates of patients with extremely low risk, low risk, medium risk and high risk were 100%, 88.9%, 75.3% and 43.2%, respectively. The 2-years OS rates were 100%, 100%, 81.0% and 44.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The novel HB risk classification is simple and feasible. With active comprehensive treatment, patients at extremely low-, low- and medium-risk have excellent outcomes. The survival rate of high-risk HB patients remains to be improved, and new treatment strategies need to be explored.

[A single-center retrospective analysis of 85 children and adolescents with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma]

Objective: To summarize the efficiency and long-term outcomes of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents with ABVD therapy and determined whether omitting radiotherapy for a low-risk patient enabled the achievement of complete response (CR) after chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 13 y (2004-2016) from patients aged ≤18 y with limited-stage HL admitted to the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Patients received treatment with ABVD chemotherapy alone or ABVD chemotherapy followed by low-dose involved field radiotherapy. Results: Total 85 subjects were eligible for study inclusion; the median age was 12 (3-18) y; 66 (77.6%) were men, 80 (94.1%) had stage-II disease, 56 (65.9%) were at low-risk, and the median follow-up duration was 72 (8-196) months; 12 relapsed, 2 had secondary neoplasm, and 2 died. The 5-year event free survival (EFS) was (85.6±3.8) %, and the overall survival (OS) was 100%. The 5-year EFS and OS was (89.1±4.2) % and 100%, respectively, for the low-risk cohort and (79.3±7.5) % and 100%, respectively for the intermediate-risk cohort. Among the 39 low-risk patients who achieved CR after chemotherapy, 15 received treatment with chemotherapy followed by LD-IFRT. In the exploratory subset analysis, the low-risk cohort who achieved CR after chemotherapy, the 5-year EFS for comparing ABVD alone with chemotherapy followed by LD-IFRT was (87.0±7.0) % versus 100% (P=0.506) , and the OS was 100% for both the groups. Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis showed excellent survival of limited-stage HL patients with ABVD therapy. For patients who achieving CR after chemotherapy with low-risk HL, received chemotherapy followed by LD-IFRT does not improve 5-year OS and EFS. The use of risk- and response-based stratification may facilitate the development of effective and less toxic protocols.

[Impact of intensified maintenance therapy on the prognosis of children and adolescents with advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma]

目的

探讨增加维持治疗强度对Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤（Lymphoblastic lymphoma, LBL）患者预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析接受BFM-NHL-90/-95方案治疗且未做纵隔和中枢预防性放疗的Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年LBL患者的治疗结果。研究分组：1998年至2005年收治的患者于维持治疗阶段，在口服巯基嘌呤和甲氨蝶呤的基础上，定期采用“足叶乙甙+阿糖胞苷”和大剂量甲氨蝶呤交替进行化疗，为强化维持治疗组；其余为非强化维持治疗组。

结果

187例LBL患者纳入研究，其中强化维持治疗组52例，非强化维持治疗组135例，两组患者的性别、年龄、免疫分型、临床分期、危险度分层、受累部位的差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）；中位随访48（0.5～221）个月，两组患者的5年无事件生存（EFS）率分别为（76.9±5.8）%和（77.9±4.3）%（χ²＝0.249，P＝0.617），5年总生存（OS）率分别为（78.8±5.7）%和（79.8±4.1）%（χ²＝0.353，P＝0.552），差异均无统计学意义；亚组分析结果显示，两组患者在不同临床分期（Ⅲ/Ⅳ期）、免疫分型（T/B-LBL）和危险分层（中/高危）中的EFS、OS率差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）。维持治疗期间，强化维持治疗组和非强化维持治疗组患者Ⅲ、Ⅳ级骨髓抑制发生率分别为55.8%和18.5%（χ²＝25.363，P<0.05）。

结论

提高维持治疗强度并未提高Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期儿童青少年LBL患者的长期生存且可增加骨髓抑制等治疗相关不良反应。

[Expression and significance of programmed cell death ligand-1 in neuroblastoma tissues]

Objective: To investigate the relationship between expression of programmed cell death ligand-1(PD-L1) in the tissue of neuroblastoma (NB) and patient's clinical characteristics and prognosis. Methods: Clinical data and surgical tissue paraffin blocks of 100 newly diagnosed NB children at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2000 and December 2015 were collected and the expression level of PD-L1 and its' relationship with pathological parameters and survival rate were analyzed retrospectively. The ratio between groups was compared by chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and COX regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Results: Among 100 cases, 71 were males and 29 females; there were 5 cases of stageⅠ, 4 cases of stageⅡ, 19 cases of stage Ⅲ, 65 cases of stage Ⅳ and 7 cases of stage Ⅳs. Ten out of 62 cases (16%) were N-MYC amplified; 15 cases were in low-risk group, 18 were in medium-risk group and 67 were in high-risk group. The positive rate of PD-L1 in NB tumor tissue was 57% (57/100), of which 55 were weakly positive, 1 was moderately positive and 1 was strongly positive. The positive rates of PD-L1 expression in tumor tissues without bone metastasis were higher than those with bone metastasis(66%(39/59)vs.44%(18/41), χ(2)=4.864, P=0.027), the positive rates of PD-L1 expression in tumor tissues pathologically diagnosed as neuroblastoma were higher than those pathologically diagnosed as ganglioneuroblastoma (61%(53/87) vs.31%(4/13), χ(2)=4.195, P=0.041), the positive rates of PD-L1 expression in tumor tissues originated from abdominal cavity were higher than those originated from other places (61% (51/83)vs.35%(6/17), χ(2)=3.937,P=0.047).The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) rates of patients with PD-L1 negative and positive were 40% and 33% (χ(2)=0.009, P=0.923), respectively. The 4-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with PD-L1 negative and positive were 62% and 58% (χ(2)=0.294, P=0.587). Among 33 non-high-risk patients, the 4-year EFS rates of patients with PD-L1 negative and positive were 89% and 78% (χ(2)=0.001, P=0.965), the 4-year OS rates of patients with PD-L1 negative and positive were 100% and 96% (χ(2)=0.500, P=0.480). Among 67 high-risk patients, the 4-year EFS rates of patients with PD-L1 negative and positive were 24% and 11% (χ(2)=1.154, P=0.282), the 4-year OS rates of patients with PD-L1 negative and positive were 48% and 41% (χ(2)=0.692, P=0.405). Multivariate analysis showed that N-MYC gene amplification was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS and EFS rates of NB patients (RR: 1.726,95%CI:1.209-2.466; RR:1.326,95%CI:1.014-1.736) and advanced clinical stage was an independent adverse prognostic factor for EFS rates of NB patients (RR: 26.498, 95%CI:3.518-199.614). Conclusions: The expression of PD-L1 in NB tumor tissues was correlated with the clinical characteristics of children. However, there were no significant differences in the prognosis of patients with or without PD-L1 expression.