Assessing the Effectiveness of Stabilized Cysteamine 5% Cream Compared to Hydroquinone 4%/Ascorbic Acid 3% Combination Cream in Treating Acne-induced Post-inflammatory Hyperpigmentation: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Objective

Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) is a common sequela of acne vulgaris. Topical treatment with hydroquinone is the standard treatment, but may be associated with complications. Cysteamine is a relatively safe depigmenting agent with an observed depigmenting effect. We designed this study to assess the efficacy of a cysteamine 5% cream in treating acne-induced PIH.

Methods

Twenty-eight out of 32 participants finalized this investigator-blind, randomized, and controlled trial (registered in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials [IRCTID: IRCT20140212016557N5]). We randomized the patients to apply either cysteamine 5% or hydroquinone 4%/ascorbic acid 3% (HC) cream. Postacne hyperpigmentation index (PAHPI) and melanin index were the assessment measures after four months of treatment. We evaluated the quality of life by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire.

Results

Both cysteamine and HC cream significantly decreased the PAHPI score and melanin index of acne-induced PIH patients (p<0.05). The decrease in PAHPI score and melanin index were not significantly different in treatment groups after four months (p>0.05). Quality of life ameliorated significantly only with cysteamine treatment. However, no significant change in quality of life was observed between groups.

Limitations

Limitations of our study include the relatively small sample size and absence of follow-up.

Conclusion

Cysteamine cream is an effective treatment of post-acne PIH, with similar efficacy to the accepted treatment of PIH, i.e., hydroquinone cream.

Lepromatous leprosy presenting with type II reaction before and type I reaction after treatment

Lepromatous leprosy is associated with a high bacillary load and poor cellular immune response. Early dermatologic manifestations include erythematous macules, papules, nodules, and plaques with a symmetrical distribution. Leprosy also shows two major reaction states including type I (reversal reaction) and type II (vasculitis). These reactions are usually seen in some patients who are undergoing treatment. Herein, we report an interesting patient with lepromatous leprosy who presented with skin lesions of type II reaction without receiving any anti-leprosy treatment and surprisingly showed a type I reaction eight months after the beginning of the treatment.

Ingenol mebutate for the management of cryotherapy-resistant anogenital warts

Ingenol mebutate (IM), as an active compound, is derived from the sap of the Euphorbia peplus, which is an FDA-approved plant for the treatment of actinic keratosis. Some reports have demonstrated that the IM gel 0.05% is safe and effective in the treatment of external anogenital warts (AGWs) but the efficacy of the drug on the recalcitrant AGWs is not clear. This article assesses the efficacy and safety of the IM gel 0.05% for cryotherapy -resistant AGWs. Totally, 15 cryotherapy-resistant patients with AGWs (including 8 men and 7 women) and a mean age of 34 years old (age range of 23-50 years old) were enrolled in this study. IM gel 0.05% was applied carefully on the AGWs every two weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The complete clearance rate and recurrence rate were assessed 1 week and 3 months after the last treatment, respectively. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of local skin reaction and the severity of pain was evaluated using the 10-point Visual Analogue Scale. Initially, the AGWs were cleared completely in 10 (66%) patients while 4 (40%) and all of (100%) the patients experienced a recurrence in the 3- and 12-months follow-ups, respectively. All the 15 patients experienced some degrees of pain and local adverse reactions. The mean score of the reported pain was equal to 5.87 ± 2.39. The use of IM gel 0.05% in the treatment of the difficult-to-treat cases of AGWs is associated with a high recurrence rate despite the initial rapid and effective clearance of the lesions. Also, the high level of local adverse reactions and severe pain are other prohibitive factors in the treatment of recalcitrant AGWs with the IM.