Subgingival scaling and root planing during minimally invasive periodontal surgery: A randomized controlled split-mouth trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this randomized, controlled split-mouth study was to evaluate a videoscope as a visual adjunct to scaling and root planing when utilized in combination with minimally invasive surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-five pairs (89 interproximal surfaces) of periodontally hopeless teeth planned for extraction were scaled and root planed with minimal surgical access using surgical loupes (control) or adjunctive use of a videoscope (test). Teeth were extracted with minimal trauma, stained with methylene blue, and photographed with a digital microscope for analysis. The primary outcome of residual calculus was calculated as a percentage of the total interproximal area of interest. Secondary outcomes included treatment time, as well as residual calculus according to probing depth, tooth location, and treatment date. Data were analyzed using Student's paired t-tests, two-way analyses of variance, and Spearman's correlation tests.

RESULTS

Residual calculus area was 2.61% on control and 2.71% on test surfaces with no significant difference between groups. Subgroup analysis showed no difference in residual calculus between groups at moderate or deep sites. Treatment time per surface was significantly longer in the test group compared to the control group. Treatment order, tooth location, and operator experience did not significantly affect the primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Though the videoscope provided excellent visual access, it did not improve the efficacy of root planing for flat interproximal surfaces during minimally invasive periodontal surgery. Small amounts of calculus remain after instrumentation even with minimal surgical access and when root surfaces appear visually clean and tactilely smooth.

A qualitative study of factors resulting in care delays for adults with meningitis in Zambia

BACKGROUND

Meningitis causes significant mortality in regions with high comorbid HIV and TB. Improved outcomes are hindered by limited understanding of factors that delay adequate care.

METHODS

In-depth interviews of patients admitted to the University Teaching Hospital with suspected meningitis, their caregivers, doctors and nurses were conducted. Patient/caregiver interviews explored meningitis understanding, treatment prior to admission and experiences since admission. Provider interviews addressed current and prior experiences with meningitis patients and hospital barriers to care. A conceptual framework based on the Three Delays Model identified factors that delayed care.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patient/caregiver, eight doctor and eight nurse interviews occurred. Four delays were identified: in-home care; transportation to a health facility; clinic/first-level hospital care; and third-level hospital. Overcrowding and costly diagnostic testing delayed outpatient care; 23% of patients began with treatment inside the home due to prior negative experiences with biomedical care. Admission occurred after multiple clinic visits, where subsequent delays occurred during testing and treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Delays in care from home to hospital impair quality meningitis care in Zambia. Interventions to improve outcomes must address patient, community and health systems factors. Patient/caregiver education regarding signs of meningitis and indications for care-seeking are warranted to reduce treatment delays.