Perceived health system facilitators and barriers to integrated management of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in Kenya: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

Understanding the facilitators and barriers to managing hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2D) will inform the design of a contextually appropriate integrated chronic care model in Kenya. We explored the perceived facilitators and barriers to the integrated management of hypertension and T2D in Kenya using the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care.

DESIGN

This was a qualitative study using data from a larger mixed-methods study on the health system response to chronic disease management in Kenya, conducted between July 2019 and February 2020. Data were collected through 44 key informant interviews (KIIs) and eight focus group discussions (FGDs).

SETTING

Multistage sampling procedures were used to select a random sample of 12 study counties in Kenya.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants for the KIIs comprised purposively selected healthcare providers, county health managers, policy experts and representatives from non-state organisations. The participants for the FGDs included patients with hypertension and T2D.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients' and providers' perspectives of the health system facilitators and barriers to the integrated management of hypertension and T2D in Kenya.

RESULTS

The clinical integration facilitators included patient peer support groups for hypertension and T2D. The major professional integration facilitators included task shifting, continuous medical education and integration of community resource persons. The national referral system, hospital insurance fund and health management information system emerged as the major facilitators for organisational and functional integration. The system integration facilitators included decentralisation of services and multisectoral partnerships. The major barriers comprised vertical healthcare services characterised by service unavailability, unresponsiveness and unaffordability. Others included a shortage of skilled personnel, a lack of interoperable e-health platforms and care integration policy implementation gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified barriers and facilitators that may be harnessed to improve the integrated management of hypertension and T2D. The facilitators should be strengthened, and barriers to care integration redressed.

Assessing the Readiness to Provide Integrated Management of Cardiovascular Diseases and Type 2 Diabetes in Kenya: Results from a National Survey

Introduction

Integrated chronic disease management is the desired core function of a responsive healthcare system. However, many challenges surround its implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa. The current study assessed the readiness of healthcare facilities to provide integrated management of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and type 2 diabetes in Kenya.

Methods

We used data from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 258 public and private health facilities conducted in Kenya between 2019 and 2020. Data were collected using a standardised facility assessment questionnaire and observation checklists modified from the World Health Organization Package of Essential Non-communicable Diseases. The primary outcome was the readiness to provide integrated care for CVDs and diabetes-defined as the mean availability of tracer items comprising trained staff and clinical guidelines, diagnostic equipment, essential medicines, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. A cut-off threshold of ≥70% was used to classify facilities as 'ready'. Gardner-Altman plots and modified Poisson regression were used to examine the facility characteristics associated with care integration readiness.

Results

Of the surveyed facilities, only a quarter (24.1%) were ready to provide integrated care for CVDs and type 2 diabetes. Care integration readiness was lower in public versus private facilities [aPR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9], and primary healthcare facilities were less likely to be ready compared to hospitals [aPR = 0.2; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.4]. Facilities located in Central Kenya [aPR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9], and the Rift Valley region [aPR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9], were less likely to be ready compared to the capital Nairobi.

Conclusions

There are gaps in the readiness of healthcare facilities particularly primary healthcare facilities in Kenya to provide integrated care services for CVDs and diabetes. Our findings inform the review of current supply-side interventions for integrated management of CVDs and type 2 diabetes, especially in lower-level public health facilities in Kenya.