Central aspects when implementing an electronic monitoring system for assessing hand hygiene in clinical settings: A grounded theory study

Background

New technologies, such as electronic monitoring systems, have been developed to promote increased adherence to hand hygiene among healthcare workers. However, challenges when implementing these technologies in clinical settings have been identified.

Aim

The aim of this study was to explore healthcare workers' experiences when implementing an electronic monitoring system to assess hand hygiene in a clinical setting.

Method

Interviews with healthcare workers (registered nurses, nurse assistants and leaders) involved in the implementation process of an electronic monitoring system (n = 17) were conducted and data were analyzed according to the grounded theory methodology formulated by Strauss and Corbin.

Results

Healthcare workers' experiences were expressed in terms of leading and facilitating, participating and contributing, and knowing and confirming. These three aspects were merged together to form the core category of collaborating for progress. Leaders were positive and committed to the implementation of the electronic monitoring system, endeavouring to enable facilitation and support for their co-workers (registered nurses and nurse assistants). At the same time, co-workers were positive about the support they received and contributed by raising questions and demands for the product to be used in clinical settings. Moreover, leaders and co-workers were aware of the objective of implementing the electronic monitoring system.

Conclusion

We identified dynamic collective work between leaders and co-workers during the implementation of the electronic monitoring system. Leadership, participation and knowledge were central aspects of enhancing a collaborative process. We strongly recommend involving both ward leaders and users of new technologies to promote successful implementation.

To achieve the unachievable-Patients' experiences of opting for delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after trying rehabilitation alone as primary treatment: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

About 50% of patients who sustain an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are treated without ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). A significant proportion of these patients opt for late ACL-R. Patients' experience of changing treatment has not yet been investigated and presented in the scientific literature.

AIM

To explore patients' experiences before and after changing treatment from ACL rehabilitation alone to ACL-R.

METHOD

Fifteen patients were interviewed in semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with qualitative content analysis, based on the method described by Graneheim and Lundman. Patients were between 26 and 58 years old, and had tried rehabilitation for a minimum of 9 months prior to ACL-R.

RESULTS

Two themes, "Expecting what could not be achieved: the struggle to recover and not becoming stable", and "Internal completeness: expectations can be achieved", emerged from the analysis. Each theme was supported by three main categories and 5-6 subcategories. The first theme represents the journey before ACL-R, where patients experienced getting stronger, but perceived the knee as unstable. The second theme represents the journey after ACL-R, where patients expressed that they felt whole after their ACL-R, and where able to achieve their expections. Patients experienced a greater support from the healthcare system, and ultimately expressed a feeling of having achieved the unachievable after ACL-R.

SUMMARY

Patients who cross over from ACL rehabilitation to ACL-R experienced rehabilitation alone as insufficient to achieve the desired outcomes, which resulted in a need to opt for delayed ACL-R. Healthcare providers need to support patients, who primarily choose to undergo rehabilitation alone and later opt for ACL-R, throughout the whole rehabilitation process.

Patients' motivation to undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement. A phenomenological hermeneutic study

BACKGROUND

Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease, and its prevalence is increasing due to the ageing population. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the recommended method when treating frail, older patients. Knowledge of what motivates older patients to undergo TAVR is important, in order to meet patients' expectations.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to explore the meaning of older patients' motivation to undergo TAVR.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The design was a qualitative study, analysed using a phenomenological hermeneutic approach. In-depth, semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions were conducted. Participants were selected from a specialist cardiology clinic in Sweden. Eighteen patients, six women and twelve men, aged 66-92, were recruited.

RESULTS

The analysis showed that patients who had agreed to undergo TAVR were deeply affected by their body's failure. Before the TAVR procedure, the participants were limited in their daily activities and experienced that their life was on hold. They experienced that they were barely existing. They were aware of their life-threatening condition and were forced to confront death. Yet despite an advanced age, they still had considerable zest for life. It was very important to them to remain independent in everyday life, and fear of becoming dependent had a strong impact on their motivations for undergoing TAVR.

CONCLUSION

Older patients' motivations to undergo TAVR are strongly influenced by their fear of being dependent on others and their zest for life. Health care professionals need to support these patients in setting realistic and personalised goals.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Person-centered care actions could facilitate patients' involvement in the decision about TAVR and strenghten patients' beliefs in their own capabilities, before and after TAVR.