Four-year variation in pathogen distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of urosepsis: a single-center retrospective analysis

Background

Urosepsis is a common disease in urology, which is characterized by high treatment costs and high mortality. In the treatment of sepsis, anti-infection therapy is the most important means. However, the effect of empirical anti-infection therapy is often not ideal. Therefore, it is necessary to continuously monitor the prevalence of bacterial isolates in the blood culture of patients with urinary sepsis and their sensitivity to antibacterial drugs. This is of great significance to improve the efficacy of empirical antibiotic therapy for urosepsis.

Objective

To elucidate the landscape of prevailing bacterial profiles and their antimicrobial susceptibilities in urosepsis cases, and to furnish robust clinical evidence to underpin the timely initiation of empirical antibiotic treatment.

Methods

Collect the basic information and blood culture results of patients with urosepsis hospitalized from 2017 to 2020. Retrospective analysis of bacterial species and antimicrobial susceptibility in urosepsis and changes over 4 years.

Results

Gram-negative bacteria (178 isolates, 75.11%) constituted the main pathogens causing urosepsis, followed by Gram-positive bacteria (46 isolates, 19.41%) and fungus (13 isolates, 5.48%). The sensitivity of ertapenem, meropenem, amikacin, and imipenem to Gram-negative bacteria all exceeded 85%. The sensitivity rates of levofloxacin, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin are decreasing every year (p < 0.05). Tigecycline, vancomycin, and linezolid exhibited excellent sensitivity against Gram-positive bacteria. Among fungi, fluconazole demonstrated universal sensitivity, while itraconazole-resistant isolates have been found, and amphotericin B is still effective.

Conclusion

Analysis of blood culture results of patients more accurately reflected the etiology of urosepsis, mainly Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. If there are no definitive blood culture results, empiric treatment of urosepsis should not include fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Cefepime, cefoxitin, and ceftazidime are the most sensitive antibiotics to Gram-negative bacteria besides carbapenem antibiotics. In addition, the current situation regarding extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing bacteria and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bacteria resistance is extremely concerning with limited therapeutic options available. Strengthening antibiotic management practices and exploring novel antibacterial agents can help mitigate this issue.